Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Baka-nin
Jan 25, 2015

Mercury_Storm posted:

I've been talking with an acquaintance who lives in NY who believes that there is a cabal of taxi drivers who are secretly enforcing Sharia Law upon members of the Muslim community. One of them apparently threatened him because at one point he stated interest in studying Islam, so I guess he's under the cabal's purview now. He's gone as far as to make a police report about being threatened.

I can't find this being discussed on any of the usual conspiracy sources so I'm wondering where he got this from, or if this is all him here.

I can actually see this one being true (well somewhat truthful, if the taxi driving is coincidental). Muslim communities have increasing problems with hardline fraternities trying to pressure the majority to follow them. And taxi driving is usually a good entry level job for a migrant and requires a lot of informal networking so its not that surprising that a lot of conservative guys ended up in it, and then exploited it as platform with a captive audience.

The British Bengali community has been plagued with allegations that its under control by community leaders whose power rests not on genuine support but on connections in Bengal and a network of small businesses in the area giving them a stranglehold on everything that goes on in their neighbourhoods.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

moller
Jan 10, 2007

Swan stole my music and framed me!

GreyjoyBastard posted:

Oh yeah, I love plotting how to sabotage road designs for fun and profit. :v:

You roadists conspire to rob us of the trains and streetcars that are our birthright.

Seriously though, I don't think it's controversial to state that car culture has had deleterious effects driven more by the desires of industry and finance than the needs and wellbeing of the population.

The Chairman
Jun 30, 2003

But you forget, mon ami, that there is evil everywhere under the sun

FecLives posted:

This has been argued endlessly. The buildings were designed to withstand two 707 impacts. Building 7 collapses on its own?

My dad used to get drunk and over stoke the fireplace. I remember watching the grate get red orange and slowly sag under the weight of the oak logs. Later on in welding class I learned where steel moves. Steel resists movement well above 1800 degrees. It moves very slowly when it deforms. There is only one steel framed building collapse. The building was fully involved and didn't have the anti draft measures to prevent significant oxygen flow to fire which burned for 24 hours, the top 10 floors collapsed on one side, there are pics, etc.

The wood stove doesn't collapse.

There are two ways that a structural member can fail:
  • rupture/yielding, where the material shatters or tears or crushes
  • instability, where the member suddenly buckles or changes shape and can no longer hold any load, despite the material remaining whole

For columns, buckling (type 2) happens at a much lower applied load than compression yielding (type 1), and the effect is exacerbated the more slender the column gets. You can increase a column's resistance to buckling by bracing it sideways with horizontal beams; the longest distance between horizontal supports is the column's "unsupported length". The buckling equation is critical load = pi^2 * material strength * geometry factor / unsupported length^2, so doubling a column's unsupported length reduces the critical load by 75%.

Building 7 was built over a Con Edison substation, which severely limited the footprint of the interior columns in the tower, so they compensated by having relatively large columns carry larger floor areas. One column in particular, Column 79, carried a significant amount of the floor loads on the northwest corner of the building.

When the fire started, it caused the horizontal floor trusses on the affected floors to distort and loosen from their connections to the columns. Eventually, one truss pulled away from Column 79 altogether and collapsed into the floors below it, knocking those lower floors free of the column as well.

Column 79, now only a fraction as strong as before because of its much longer unsupported length, immediately buckled, dragging all the other floor trusses still connected to it downwards, which then caused a cascading series of failures that eventually brought down the rest of the interior columns. Finally, the exterior facade fell in on itself without anything holding it up any more.

The Chairman fucked around with this message at 19:36 on May 11, 2017

GutBomb
Jun 15, 2005

Dude?

The Chairman posted:

There are two ways that a structural member can fail:
  • rupture/yielding, where the material shatters or tears or crushes
  • instability, where the member suddenly buckles or changes shape and can no longer hold any load, despite the material remaining whole

For columns, buckling (type 2) happens at a much lower applied load than compression yielding (type 1), and the effect is exacerbated the more slender the column gets. You can increase a column's resistance to buckling by bracing it sideways with horizontal beams; the longest distance between horizontal supports is the column's "unsupported length". The buckling equation is critical load = pi^2 * material strength * geometry factor / unsupported length^2, so doubling a column's unsupported length reduces the critical load by 75%.

Building 7 was built over a Con Edison substation, which severely limited the footprint of the interior columns in the tower, so they compensated by having relatively large columns carry larger floor areas. One column in particular, Column 79, carried a significant amount of the floor loads on the northwest corner of the building.

When the fire started, it caused the horizontal floor trusses on the affected floors to distort and loosen from their connections to the columns. Eventually, one truss pulled away from Column 79 altogether and collapsed into the floors below it, knocking those lower floors free of the column as well.

Column 79, now only a fraction as strong as before because of its much longer unsupported length, immediately buckled, dragging all the other floor trusses still connected to it downwards, which then caused a cascading series of failures that eventually brought down the rest of the interior columns. Finally, the exterior facade fell in on itself without anything holding it up any more.

Your "science" doesn't mean anything because my dad's wood stove didn't collapse even though the log supports were plenty hot. Checkmate, poindexter.

Keeshhound
Jan 14, 2010

Mad Duck Swagger

GutBomb posted:

Your "science" doesn't mean anything because my dad's wood stove didn't collapse even though the log supports were plenty hot. Checkmate, poindexter.

Also, iron and steel behave comparably, and all steel is chemically identical. There certainly aren't a broad range of metallurgical techniques used to produce alloys with different properties for different uses.

It's so simple, you guys, ugh. :rolleyes:

Big Mackson
Sep 26, 2009
people finally have the truth about vaccines on facebook because of this https://www.infowars.com/study-infants-with-dtp-vaccine-5-to-10-times-more-susceptible-to-dying/

blarblarbarg

QuarkJets
Sep 8, 2008

I'm not clicking on a infowars link and shame on you for posting one instead of doing literally anything else

Big Mackson
Sep 26, 2009

QuarkJets posted:

I'm not clicking on a infowars link and shame on you for posting one instead of doing literally anything else

i feel bad.

Tias
May 25, 2008

Pictured: the patron saint of internet political arguments (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund
Sooo.. the researchers couldn't be sure how old their test subjects were, and concluded that the vaccine was the factor increasing death from infections, not the fact that kids were treated in rural bumfuck Guinea-bisseau?

Not surprised the researcher is Danish :denmark:

HackensackBackpack
Aug 20, 2007

Who needs a house out in Hackensack? Is that all you get for your money?

Michael Jackson posted:

people finally have the truth about vaccines on facebook because of this https://www.infowars.com/study-infants-with-dtp-vaccine-5-to-10-times-more-susceptible-to-dying/

blarblarbarg

More susceptible to dying? We're all going to die someday, Alex.

You know what DPT vaccinated babies won't die of? loving diphtheria.

Big Mackson
Sep 26, 2009

Leofish posted:

More susceptible to dying? We're all going to die someday, Alex.

You know what DPT vaccinated babies won't die of? loving diphtheria.

ablooo blooo blooooo :qq:

-alex jones

El Puerco
Feb 18, 2017
I liked the videos on angular ejecta. They show very clearly that debris was carrying angular momentum. Explosive demolition is the only way to account for the angular trajectory of those debris. You explanation of building 7 is laughable the chairman. None were ever in danger of collapse.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

FecLives posted:

I liked the videos on angular ejecta. They show very clearly that debris was carrying angular momentum. Explosive demolition is the only way to account for the angular trajectory of those debris. You explanation of building 7 is laughable the chairman. None were ever in danger of collapse.

angular momentum can easily be caused by the crushing movement of the buildings

were you born with brain damage or did something traumatic happen to you? regardless, you have my sympathy as you struggle your way through life

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

FecLives posted:

I liked the videos on angular ejecta. They show very clearly that debris was carrying angular momentum. Explosive demolition is the only way to account for the angular trajectory of those debris. You explanation of building 7 is laughable the chairman. None were ever in danger of collapse.

rick veicht is that you

for those of you who aren't so deep in comics that you've read Maximortal, rick veicht is a writer/artist who did a lot of work with alan moore on swamp thing in the 80s and then kinda went off and did his own indie thing and did a whole bunch of weird books

one of those was The Big Lie, a book about a time traveler going back to try to warn people about 9/11 armed with The Real Truth, the last page is a dude staring at the explosives right before he dies when they go off, it owns hard

also this is the cover

1stGear
Jan 16, 2010

Here's to the new us.

FecLives posted:

You explanation of building 7 is laughable the chairman. None were ever in danger of collapse.

A dude posts a reasonable thorough overview listing multiple reasons why Building 7 collapsed and your response is NUH UH IDIOT. Gosh guys why does no one believe truthers.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

1stGear posted:

A dude posts a reasonable thorough overview listing multiple reasons why Building 7 collapsed and your response is NUH UH IDIOT. Gosh guys why does no one believe truthers.

substance abuse and poor life decisions, generally. the only truthers i ever knew irl were a pair of mentally ill stoners who got married out of high school. the wife was on "disability" and the husband kept getting fired and rehired from the only job he ever had at a seedy porn store. last time i met up with them they clearly hated each other and spent the whole time arguing about petty poo poo, but neither one was capable of leaving the other. i hope they rot together, they deserve each other

El Puerco
Feb 18, 2017
Typical baboons. The idea that there are multiple ways a steel frame building can collapse is dumb. There is only one way, demolition.

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord

FecLives posted:

Typical baboons. The idea that there are multiple ways a steel frame building can collapse is dumb. There is only one way, demolition.
You lose points for failure to use "sheeple."

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

FecLives posted:

Typical baboons. The idea that there are multiple ways a steel frame building can collapse is dumb. There is only one way, demolition.

i'm the guy who doesn't think an airplane exploding inside of a building counts as demolition. only purestrain explosives for me, number one tom clancy expert

El Puerco
Feb 18, 2017
The airplane did not explode, it was pulverized, the fuel igniting in a visible ball of fire that lasted a short time. The insuing fire was starved of oxygen, black smoke billowing, few fuel sources, was never hot enough to weaken the metal significantly. The color of the fire denotes its temperature.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

FecLives posted:

The airplane did not explode, it was pulverized, the fuel igniting in a visible ball of fire that lasted a short time. The insuing fire was starved of oxygen, black smoke billowing, few fuel sources, was never hot enough to weaken the metal significantly. The color of the fire denotes its temperature.

*ensuing, not insuing

El Puerco
Feb 18, 2017
Each tower was made to withstand 2 707 impacts.

El Puerco
Feb 18, 2017
My spell check wasn't working

El Puerco
Feb 18, 2017
I like the sculpture that looks like a fly head

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

FecLives posted:

My spell check wasn't working

too bad there's not a check for embarassing yourself with bad arguments rooted in deep, prideful ignorance. reddit would disappear overnight

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

FecLives posted:

Each tower was made to withstand 2 707 impacts.

Yea? How did they know and/or test that?

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

WampaLord posted:

Yea? How did they know and/or test that?

uh i thnik engnieres kno hwo to desing a bulidnig whcih acn witstand ovre two thousnd fiev hundrde impcats :rooleyes:

QuarkJets
Sep 8, 2008

FecLives posted:

Typical baboons. The idea that there are multiple ways a steel frame building can collapse is dumb. There is only one way, demolition.

Actually have you considered that the military used space lasers mounted on the moon?

FecLives posted:

Each tower was made to withstand 2 707 impacts.

According to the lead structural engineer of the WTC, each tower was designed to withstand 1 impact from a 707 with the assumption that it A) couldn't see the tower due to foggy conditions and B) was looking for a landing strip (the only circumstance in which you'd have an excuse to fly that low near the WTC). In other words, the towers were designed to withstand low-speed impacts from planes with relatively little fuel, as opposed to the fully-fueled high-speed collisions that the towers actually experience. And in fact the towers did survive the initial collisions and remained standing for quite awhile. What the design did not consider was a blazing jet fuel inferno, since it was assumed that an impact would come from a low-fuel aircraft.

It's clear that you actually don't know anything so I apologize in advance for the thread continuing to laugh at you

QuarkJets fucked around with this message at 06:32 on May 17, 2017

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007
Probation
Can't post for 2 hours!
There aren't truthers on SA you're being trolled.

QuarkJets
Sep 8, 2008

Baronjutter posted:

There aren't truthers on SA you're being trolled.

I don't care

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Baronjutter posted:

There aren't truthers on SA you're being trolled.

it's hard to say for sure, /pol is making a comeback

El Puerco
Feb 18, 2017
Jet fuel won't burn hot enough without a significant oxygen source. I'm going to light my whale oil lamp.

El Puerco fucked around with this message at 06:50 on May 17, 2017

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

FecLives posted:

Jet fuel won't burn hot enough without a significant oxygen source. I'm going to light my whale oil lamp.

wtc7 was filled with your posts

QuarkJets
Sep 8, 2008

FecLives posted:

Jet fuel won't burn hot enough without a significant oxygen source. I'm going to light my whale oil lamp.

And huge holes in the sides of buildings are known for their inability to provide oxygen to building fires

SatansOnion
Dec 12, 2011

boner confessor posted:

wtc7 was filled with your posts

Bat poo poo can be refined into an explosive agent, so this checks out as a true science fact! As celebrated scientist Roman Reigns once said, "Believe that."

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

I'm seeing this Hillary Clinton and the DNC assassinated Seth Rich conspiracy theory popping up again and it's amazing.

The DNC is able to (a) plan and execute assassinations with no evidence trail pointing back to them and without anyone involved leaking it, yet (b) can't keep an email password secure.

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

VitalSigns posted:

I'm seeing this Hillary Clinton and the DNC assassinated Seth Rich conspiracy theory popping up again and it's amazing.

The DNC is able to (a) plan and execute assassinations with no evidence trail pointing back to them and without anyone involved leaking it, yet (b) can't keep an email password secure.

Someone in another thread pointed out that if Rich really did it it would be more valuable for the DNC to have him arrested otherwise they'd just... produce this.

Lightning Lord fucked around with this message at 08:52 on May 17, 2017

The Chairman
Jun 30, 2003

But you forget, mon ami, that there is evil everywhere under the sun

FecLives posted:

You explanation of building 7 is laughable the chairman. None were ever in danger of collapse.

The explanation was more for people who might have been actually curious about the collapse mechanism, not for goofballs

1stGear
Jan 16, 2010

Here's to the new us.

VitalSigns posted:

I'm seeing this Hillary Clinton and the DNC assassinated Seth Rich conspiracy theory popping up again and it's amazing.

The DNC is able to (a) plan and execute assassinations with no evidence trail pointing back to them and without anyone involved leaking it, yet (b) can't keep an email password secure.

:umberto:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

trickybiscuits
Jan 13, 2008

yospos

VitalSigns posted:

I'm seeing this Hillary Clinton and the DNC assassinated Seth Rich conspiracy theory popping up again and it's amazing.

The DNC is able to (a) plan and execute assassinations with no evidence trail pointing back to them and without anyone involved leaking it, yet (b) can't keep an email password secure.
It's a highly successful conspiracy that targets only people whose deaths in no way prevent something bad from happening to the Clintons.

  • Locked thread