|
Its actually interesting to me that people are meta analyzing the Jastiger posts. But hard counter is mostly right. I dont think we should actually kill people, and I dont have an answer. But god drat these regressive people are pretty garbage and i wish there was a way to stop them from loving up the country/humanity. The policies these people vote for do actually hurt and kill people so seriously gently caress them.
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 12:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:25 |
|
|
Anyone wanna make the argument that if the south had won the civil war, the north would be better off?
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 14:10
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Anyone wanna make the argument that if the south had won the civil war, the north would be better off? The United States probably would not exist today so: possibly 
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 14:12
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Anyone wanna make the argument that if the south had won the civil war, the north would be better off? Hank Williams Jr would.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 15:49
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Anyone wanna make the argument that if the south had won the civil war, the north would be better off? No. But the south would have been better off.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 16:27
|
|
|
South is a 3rd world country without the North subsidizing their stupid asses.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 16:30
|
|
|
I think the slaves might have been worse off.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
Shangri-Law School posted:I think the slaves might have been worse off. I don't know, think of all the racism that came from them being freed. If they were still property maybe they wouldn't have to feel the sting of getting rejected for a job application just because they were black. Makes you think... edit: I better put this here because SA loves to take things seriously, but I'm being exceedingly sarcastic and facetious here.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
akma posted:No. But the south would have been better off. Boll weevil would have wrecked them (if they'd lasted that long at all).
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
Really the problem is civilization. Never should have invented it in the first place. We should have just stayed in the trees, guys. If you need me I'll be giving up language and technology, eating bananas, hooting at animals, and dying of dysentery at 37.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Really the problem is civilization. Never should have invented it in the first place. We should have just stayed in the trees, guys. If you need me I'll be giving up language and technology, eating bananas, hooting at animals, and dying of dysentery at 37. You'll at least need fire to cook those bananas. 
3D Megadoodoo has a new favorite as of 19:23 on May 16, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Really the problem is civilization. Never should have invented it in the first place. We should have just stayed in the trees, guys. If you need me I'll be giving up language and technology, eating bananas, hooting at animals, and dying of dysentery at 37. Civilization is great but someone should have had some foresight and controlled reproduction worldwide several billion people ago. I probably posted about it itt a long time ago but to reiterate my related unpopular opinion: the georgia guidestones seem pretty spot on for an ideal society. I don't know how getting down to 500 million people will work in practice but it's the right idea, even acknowledging that I would probably be among those who get removed from the population.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 19:21
|
|
|
We need to colonize space, like, stat.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:We should have just stayed in the trees, guys. If you need me I'll be giving up language and technology, eating bananas, hooting at animals, and dying of dysentery at 37.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 05:49
|
|
|
yeah I eat rear end posted:Civilization is great but someone should have had some foresight and controlled reproduction worldwide several billion people ago. It'll inevitably be the 500 million most wealthy people on the planet, which would create a system in which their wealth has significantly less power, leading them to cannibalize each other and repeat humanity's mistakes. It'd be pretty funny for a while there, tho.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 07:21
|
|
|
Killed By Death posted:Even the trees were a bad move! If you ask me, no one should ever have left the oceans. Multiple cells just complicate things. Let's just all be amoebas again.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 07:24
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Multiple cells just complicate things. Let's just all be amoebas again. Agreed.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 07:26
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Agreed. I want my ghost to have a beer hat.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 07:36
|
|
|
Everyone, middle-class and lower, should be allowed to eat one rich person to even things out.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 11:17
|
|
|
If corporations are people, they should be allowed to run for public office including the presidency.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 11:25
|
|
|
We Know Catheters posted:Everyone, middle-class and lower, should be allowed to eat one rich person to even things out.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 11:56
|
|
|
Right, that's why kobe beef is so tender.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 12:04
|
|
|
yeah I eat rear end posted:If corporations are people, they should be allowed to run for public office including the presidency. I look forward to the days of President Amazon (sponsored by Tostidos)
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 12:30
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:I look forward to the days of President Amazon (sponsored by Tostidos) The United States presidential election of 2052 will be a hard-fought contest between AFL-CIO (D) and Bain Capital (R).
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 12:40
|
|
|
yeah I eat rear end posted:If corporations are people, they should be allowed to run for public office including the presidency. But they're not people. That's not what corporate personhood means. A person, in the usual sense, is a natural person, ie. a human being. Corporate personhood is a legal convenience allowing corporations (ie. groups of people) to act as a single entity. "Corporations are people" is a largely meaningless slogan designed to imply that corporations either have too many or too few rights, depending on who's using it.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
Well make them people then. President Google or Chase or whatever probably couldn't do much worse than what we've got now.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 15:39
|
|
|
Collateral Damage posted:On the contrary, I think we should kill and eat the poor. They're more likely to have done manual labour so their meat is going to be more tender. Just meat and bones doesn't mean good eating. Mu Zeta posted:Right, that's why kobe beef is so tender. Kobe beef is tender because they are pampered and eat a special diet (plus alcohol), like rich people.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 18:12
|
|
|
Please refer to my election results by county map
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
We Know Catheters posted:Kobe beef is tender because they are pampered and eat a special diet (plus alcohol), like rich people. That's the joke, Collateral Damage doesn't understand what makes meat good. The best meat is meat that does little to no work, like the filet.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 01:25
|
|
|
Hdcp 2.2 is the dumbest poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
WampaLord posted:That's the joke, Collateral Damage doesn't understand what makes meat good. The best meat is meat that does little to no work, like the filet. Eat the unemployed!
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
hard counter posted:the jastigerest of posts imho is where you take a stubborn hardline stance on something you're not guaranteed to be fully educated on or have completely thought through yet while providing a quasi-unironic extreme solution for it, nonetheless this makes him an unpopular opinion superstar because he's really just giving voice to various common frustrations, usually about regressives and the like, that some people are likely to feel similarly frustrated over - he's also likely to hash things out in good faith if you ask Oh there's nothing halfway About the Jastiger way to treat you When he treats you Which he may not do at all
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 09:33
|
|
|
yeah I eat rear end posted:Well make them people then. President Google or Chase or whatever probably couldn't do much worse than what we've got now. President Wal-Mart would be just as bad as Trump.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 10:39
|
|
|
bean_shadow posted:President Wal-Mart would be just as bad as Trump. That is why president Target has my support.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 10:46
|
|
|
yeah I eat rear end posted:That is why president Target has my support. Too bad it's President K-Mart's turn. 
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 12:57
|
|
|
I'm sick of our two party system; President Comcast and President Bank of America are both terrible choices
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
Oh god, President Disney has declared a dictatorship.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
Das Boo posted:Oh god, President Disney has declared a dictatorship. We could do worse than a cartoon mouse as our lord and master.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Those videos of parents destroying their kids electronics to "Teach them a lesson" are hosed up and awful and I 100% guarantee every single parent who makes them is also horrifically physically and emotionally abusive. Congrats parents! You've taught your kids the valuable lesson of absolute fear of you! Hopefully they don't grow up and shove you into a broken retirement home! OldTennisCourt has a new favorite as of 19:56 on May 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 19:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:25 |
|
|
Is it the smashing, the videos, the deprivation or all three that you find abusive? Like, if the parent were to calmly confiscate and sell the device is that pretty much just as bad in your mind, or? I think the first two bits are obviously hosed but see nothing wrong with being all "Okay, guess who doesn't have an iphone/whatever anymore?" e: I ask because I know more than a few (generally younger) people that see very little difference between the two/feel that taking away, say, internet access is abusive.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 20:54
|
|
