|
...does he often speak in third person like this? Has he finally lost it? And by it, I mean his show of course 
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 00:41 |
|
|
Boon posted:It turns out international politics isn't like high school and the world is getting everything they want out of the US by doing the exact opposite of what you advocate. Eh, two world leaders have already out-hand-shake-punked him, so your hypothesis is essentially half right.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:37
|
|
|
Sessions is a monster part 9438quote:The government has agreed not to prosecute Citigroup’s Mexico-based subsidiary despite damning evidence it aided a cross-border money-laundering scheme for years, the Department of Justice announced Tuesday. The non-prosecution agreement is in sharp contrast with the hard line that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has already laid out for blue-collar criminals. Sell a tiny amount of crack? 30 years in the slammer. Launder a billion dollars in cartel drug money? Slap on the wrist.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:38
|
|
|
aware of dog posted:...does he often speak in third person like this? Has he finally lost it? I think he's saying that he's going on a long weekend that he does every year, but the media is gonna poo poo their pants because "MAYBE THIS MEANS HANNITY DOESNT HAVE A SHOW ANYMORE"
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:38
|
|
|
Sean Hannity has seen some poo poo, ya'll.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:39
|
|
|
Hannity won't drop the hilariously stupid and incredibly offensive DNC staffer murder conspiracy theory, and advertisers are starting to drop him like they did O'Reiley. He's trying to mock the people that are hoping Fox'll cancel his show, but he's a barely sentient baboon so it comes across as mindless drivel.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:40
|
|
|
Party Plane Jones posted:Sessions is a monster part 9438
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
Did Hannity have a stroke or something? Who writes like that?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
SgtScruffy posted:I think he's saying that he's going on a long weekend that he does every year, but the media is gonna poo poo their pants because "MAYBE THIS MEANS HANNITY DOESNT HAVE A SHOW ANYMORE" gently caress him anyway. FlamingLiberal posted:Did Hannity have a stroke or something? Who writes like that? Twitter script, dog.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
SgtScruffy posted:I think he's saying that he's going on a long weekend that he does every year, but the media is gonna poo poo their pants because "MAYBE THIS MEANS HANNITY DOESNT HAVE A SHOW ANYMORE" Correct. Just lots of prayers because he's starting to lose advertisers.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:43
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:Did Hannity have a stroke or something? Who writes like that?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:43
|
|
|
While driving home from work yesterday after the release of the CBO score, I decided to do something I never do and listen to conservative radio to hear reaction to the score. It turns out it was Hannity I was listening to. I was tuned in for half an hour and I did not hear him mention the CBO score once. The entire time I was listening was complaining about liberal fascism and their violations of the first amendment by boycotting his show. He took a couple callers who did nothing but compliment him on being tough and not backing down and defending America and freedom. It was completely void of substance and did not touch on a single current event actually occurring in politics.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:44
|
|
|
In addition to posting the text of an article, can we also start posting the URL? It'd be nice to have context of who is reporting and be able to save it into read later apps.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:46
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:It's pretty much impossible to detect that without extremely frequent polling of Montana. Assault should be disqualifying for someone running for congress.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:46
|
|
|
I had a dream that I met Rush Limbaugh last night. He walked up while I was talking to a group of friends, and I just smiled and shook his hand and said, "Rush". And then I ignored him until he walked away. It was weird and oddly satisfying.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:46
|
|
|
Can anyone confirm he actually takes annual vacations at this time? Was he out the two days before memorial day weekend in 16 and 15? Edit: quick cursory check shows he was NOT on vacation on May 28 and 29 of 2015, nor May 27 and 28th of 2016 John Wick of Dogs fucked around with this message at 14:50 on May 25, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:47
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jonathanchait/status/867735204638707712 https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/867732133632233473 https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/867382292322320384 https://twitter.com/donnermaps/status/867735046106488832 https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/867734611408900096 https://twitter.com/BrentBozell/status/867727265966301184 https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/867734607692779521 Party Plane Jones fucked around with this message at 14:50 on May 25, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:47
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:Did Hannity have a stroke or something? Who writes like that?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:47
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:I had a dream that I met Rush Limbaugh last night. He walked up while I was talking to a group of friends, and I just smiled and shook his hand and said, "Rush". And then I ignored him until he walked away. did you break his hand with a whiteknuckle kungfu grip? if not, missed dream opportunity
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:48
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Can anyone confirm he actually takes annual vacations at this time? Was he out the two days before memorial day weekend in 16 and 15? Bleeding heart ARE TROOPS dipshit like Hannity? I bet he takes 5 days to mourn the sacrifice of the fallen around Memorial Day every year. He then jerks off on the tomb of the unknown soldier to make patriotic baby ghosts to fight back the legion of aborted baby ghosts he failed to save from oblivion, who've come back FOR REVENGE.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:49
|
|
|
WeAreTheRomans posted:did you break his hand with a whiteknuckle kungfu grip? if not, missed dream opportunity You know, dreams, you rarely remember all of it. Ignoring him until he goes away is an allegory for our times, however.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:51
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:Bleeding heart ARE TROOPS dipshit like Hannity? Haha, I just checked and he did NOT take vacation last year or the year before
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:51
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Sometimes it isn't about homosexuality itself being inherently evil. A common Evangelical view is that sex is only for procreation. Recreational sex is inherently wrong. If you happen to have some good feels while doing it to make babies that's OK but it shouldn't be the main driving force. That extends into homosexuality being wrong because gay sex can't make babies. It is purely recreational in their eyes which makes it inherently lustful and thus sinful. These are the people who don't hate homosexuals but want to save them from that sin so they want to discourage homosexuality to save them from sin. They're also against masturbation as it's purely recreational as well as things like oral sex. If it isn't for procreating it's wrong. This is where the Quiverfull movement steps in; they argue that it's your God-given duty to marry young and have as many babies as possible. Of course that gets into weird logic like if a married couple knows that the woman can't get pregnant is it still OK for them to gently caress constantly? They tend to not have good answers for questions like that. It's kind of weird to me to see people theorizing about what Christians believe. First, most things they base ideologies on are single verses. Occasionally there are a couple other references to the same thing. Honestly, if you play video games it feels like the poo poo people do with dark souls and lore. You find a few sentences talking about something, compare it to the world around you and draw conclusions and develop ideologies. The problem comes when you realize that the Bible tells you it's infallible so anything in the world that might seem to challenge your ideologies is seen as the devil or just persecution. It's a neat little cult-like box if you buy into all of it, honestly. I guess for me it's hard to imagine not knowing these things. The most commonly/westboro-baptist-y used verse for being anti-gay is Leviticus 20:13 quote:If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. Or the one most older folks are probably used to hearing quote:If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. Not much of a difference there. Now, most people don't advocate the execution of gay people any more and that's attributed to the Old Testament being not entirely applicable to us as new Christians. It was meant mostly for god's people in that time. This is mostly because the Old Testament tells you to sacrifice animals as an offering for your sins but in the New Testament Jesus has arrived and died for your sins so offerings are no longer required. The Bible makes a lot more sense to me as a guide-book to life to keep people from doing awful poo poo to each other (in the time it was written) like we see a lot of today. Anyway I really didn't mean to turn this into a sermon but generally it's not that people take a random piece of how they feel the world should work. It's that they take random snippets of a book which is the key to eternal life and happiness, choose some prism in which every one of those is true and judge the world around them according to that standard. Maybe this is just the American version of it - as it sounds like some others in the world are a bit more progressive and open minded about it. But I can assure you that's the way a lot of the Bible Belt sees it.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Haha, I just checked and he did NOT take vacation last year or the year before His shows might have been pre-recorded. Back in my "unironically listen to talk radio days, during which Hannity was STILL insufferable" I remember those guys taking a lot of time off around major holidays. I could be wrong, though, I admit that I haven't payed attention to these wanks in fuckin' years.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 14:58
|
|
|
fishing with the fam posted:While driving home from work yesterday after the release of the CBO score, I decided to do something I never do and listen to conservative radio to hear reaction to the score. It turns out it was Hannity I was listening to. I was tuned in for half an hour and I did not hear him mention the CBO score once. The entire time I was listening was complaining about liberal fascism and their violations of the first amendment by boycotting his show. He took a couple callers who did nothing but compliment him on being tough and not backing down and defending America and freedom. The CBO score dropped like 30 minutes before his show ended. Not that he probably would have said much anyway until the RNC gave him notes on how to spin it, but there's a chance you get the show on delay.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:00
|
|
|
I've seen a lot of people online blaming the NYTimes for publishing the story. And I know it is a hot take but I just keep thinking "at least it was their NYTimes. If the Sun or Daily Mail had gotten hold of them they would have also published the name and home address of the poor sap that sold the backpack to the bomber".
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:02
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Assault should be disqualifying for someone running for congress. I don't disagree? Nobody's denying that way, way too many people will be perfectly fine with this. The question is how many won't be, and that's going to be a very difficult question to answer without frequent polling over the next week, which nobody is going to do because the election is tomorrow. edit: errr...today. The election is today. theflyingorc fucked around with this message at 15:05 on May 25, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:02
|
|
|
Money is speech, therefore by boycotting you're violating freedom of speech! Don't protest! Just send money.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:02
|
|
|
Party Plane Jones posted:Sessions is a monster part 9438 Job creators, Jack!
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:03
|
|
|
Mustached Demon posted:Maybe one will body slam him through a table. There's one who's relatively fit and a world-class judo practitioner, but he doesn't like damaging his possessions. 
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:05
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:The CBO score dropped like 30 minutes before his show ended. Not that he probably would have said much anyway until the RNC gave him notes on how to spin it, but there's a chance you get the show on delay. The CBO is too complicated to be put on the Two Minutes Hannity. You got to have visceral hard hitting news to talked about. Like body slamming.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:05
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:His shows might have been pre-recorded. Back in my "unironically listen to talk radio days, during which Hannity was STILL insufferable" I remember those guys taking a lot of time off around major holidays. Still doesn't gel with him having a substitute.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:08
|
|
|
http://i.imgur.com/PHOGsBY.gifv
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
God drat it, I had the popcorn all bought and everything: https://twitter.com/MeetThePress/status/867742604254949377 https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/867744438642065408 https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/867744418945798145 https://twitter.com/GarrettHaake/status/867571241523200000 Party Plane Jones fucked around with this message at 15:13 on May 25, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
Party Plane Jones posted:God drat it, I had the popcorn all bought and everything: It still cracks me up that they released a statement and THEN realized there was both audio AND witnesses.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:11
|
|
|
Party Plane Jones posted:God drat it, I had the popcorn all bought and everything: Looks like widdle snowfwake gweg isn't brave enough to face a reporter when there's security present and a camera running.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:12
|
|
|
You can use some sweeping generalizations to describe most republicans like wanting to hurt the poor, wanting to make the rich richer and being in lockstep on their agendas no matter how terrible. What are some generalizations you could use on democrats? besides that every now and then one of them can't keep their dick in their pants which directly leads to a complete idiot becoming president?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:15
|
|
|
We should bodyslam the clerk just to make sure.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
Ra Ra Rasputin posted:You can use some sweeping generalizations to describe most republicans like wanting to hurt the poor, wanting to make the rich richer and being in lockstep on their agendas no matter how terrible. Go to GBS, you'll find no end of hot takes.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 00:41 |
|
|
Ra Ra Rasputin posted:You can use some sweeping generalizations to describe most republicans like wanting to hurt the poor, wanting to make the rich richer and being in lockstep on their agendas no matter how terrible. "Socialism!" "They wanna kill your babies!" "They want Muslims taking over your towns!" They're bullshit, but hey, they still work.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 15:16
|
|