Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Risky Bisquick
Jan 18, 2008

PLEASE LET ME WRITE YOUR VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT SO I CAN FURTHER DEMONSTRATE THE CALAMITY THAT IS OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM.



Buglord

cowofwar posted:

China is dicking around with its currency again.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ow-twitter-asia

Chinese large cities cracking down on speculative mania causing prices to explode in lovely third tier cities.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ow-twitter-asia

Australia's bubble has peaked with Chinese having lost interest.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-25/chinese-investors-pull-out-of-melbourne-apartment-market/8557182

I'm curious to see what this does to the valuations in their super heated market. The dollar figures in some cities are even worse than vancouver.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos

Risky Bisquick posted:

I'm curious to see what this does to the valuations in their super heated market. The dollar figures in some cities are even worse than vancouver.
Things not looking good in general for Australia with world iron supplies being at a peak, and domestic Chinese production at all-time high.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-ironore-stockpiles-idUSKBN1720UO

DariusLikewise
Oct 4, 2008

You wore that on Halloween?
What policy would the Trudeau government go with to keep propping up homeowners if the market starts crashing and they need to limp it on life support until election time? Mortgage interest deductions? Subsidized Mortgage Payments? Negative Interest Rates???

EvilJoven
Mar 18, 2005

NOBODY,IN THE HISTORY OF EVER, HAS ASKED OR CARED WHAT CANADA THINKS. YOU ARE NOT A COUNTRY. YOUR MONEY HAS THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND ON IT. IF YOU DIG AROUND IN YOUR BACKYARD, NATIVE SKELETONS WOULD EXPLODE OUT OF YOUR LAWN LIKE THE END OF POLTERGEIST. CANADA IS SO POLITE, EH?
Fun Shoe
It'll be a simple form.

quote:

Do you have a mortgage? [Y] [N]

Please select one and provide your banking information for either a direct deposit subsidy or direct withdrawal, based on your answer.

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos
https://twitter.com/InvestTranscend/status/867803024483332096



lol

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos

DariusLikewise posted:

What policy would the Trudeau government go with to keep propping up homeowners if the market starts crashing and they need to limp it on life support until election time? Mortgage interest deductions? Subsidized Mortgage Payments? Negative Interest Rates???
It will be called "Residential Easing" and we'll have twenty quarters of it.

Risky Bisquick
Jan 18, 2008

PLEASE LET ME WRITE YOUR VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT SO I CAN FURTHER DEMONSTRATE THE CALAMITY THAT IS OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM.



Buglord

DariusLikewise posted:

What policy would the Trudeau government go with to keep propping up homeowners if the market starts crashing and they need to limp it on life support until election time? Mortgage interest deductions? Subsidized Mortgage Payments? Negative Interest Rates???

They are already using the CMHC and the BoC to prop up the bubble. The BoC rate is disconnected with fundamentals and serves to reduce the impact of borrowing to the hilt by homeowners (and Ontario :laugh:).

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨


The chart would indicate that things are getting better, if FIRE was 84% if the last 7 years, but obviously a smaller proportion now. No?

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

Subjunctive posted:

What are "other industries"?

A question the Canadian economy has been grappling with for the last 15 years.

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

Baronjutter posted:

A question the Canadian economy has been grappling with for the last 15 years.

I edited my post, but the tweet number doesn't seem to match the chart.

mashed
Jul 27, 2004

Update to condo board hijacking from the other week - http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/condo-owners-resign-toronto-1.4131732

Forensic accountants and lawyers. Sounds delightful.

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos
oh my loving god

http://business.financialpost.com/fp-comment/dear-mr-morneau-its-time-to-step-in-and-save-home-capital

quote:

Funds that we manage own shares in Home Capital Group Inc., the majority of which were purchased after the major sell-off last month. We are writing to ask Finance Minister Bill Morneau to act to save the company, which we believe is the victim of aggressive U.S. investment bears who are drawing unwarranted comparisons with the 2008 U.S. housing crisis.

#chop

Finance Minister Bill Morneau should, as his predecessor did in 2008-2010, provide stronger leadership to calm the waters in the Canadian finance sector. He should encourage Canada’s big banks to do what they recently did for another alternative Canadian mortgage company (Equitable Bank), provide a lending backstop that halts a run on deposits and gives Home time to move forward. Perhaps a short-term lending facility by the Bank of Canada accompanied by a Ministerial statement to Home depositors and mortgage holders about the guarantees provided by the CDIC would help.

Home has an impressive track record in the Canadian housing market serving a niche of hard-working first-generation Canadians. Shareholders, borrowers and depositors don’t deserve to be taken down by a combination of a disclosure dispute with a provincial regulator and U.S. short-sellers. Asset quality is not an issue in Canada, nor is the strength of the larger banking sector, but a failure by the Canadian government to act on the Home Capital funding issue could lead to The Big Short 2 — Canadian edition.

Privatize the profits, socialize the losses. Jesus Christ.

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

Ahahahahaa

Risky Bisquick
Jan 18, 2008

PLEASE LET ME WRITE YOUR VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT SO I CAN FURTHER DEMONSTRATE THE CALAMITY THAT IS OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM.



Buglord
They had better leave that mismanaged dumpster fire company to circle the drain. Why the gently caress would the government of Canada give a poo poo about a us citizen hedge fund manager who is qqing about their rapeloan company performance inverting from raping clients to investors. Get the gently caress out

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost
Wish I'd thought of writing to the finance minister to help make a stock go up after I purchased it.

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

I like that parting shot at the end too- if we go down, we'll drag the country with us and it'll be on you!

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

The Butcher posted:

Wish I'd thought of writing to the finance minister to help make a stock go up after I purchased it.

Yeah, I feel like a chump.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Didn't the National Post have an op-ed earlier in May demanding a "market based solution" for Home Capital and telling Morneau to stay out of it?

Powershift
Nov 23, 2009


Mr. Apollo posted:

Didn't the National Post have an op-ed earlier in May demanding a "market based solution" for Home Capital and telling Morneau to stay out of it?

Probably the same guys trying to hurt the price to buy up stock.

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

mashed_penguin posted:

Update to condo board hijacking from the other week - http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/condo-owners-resign-toronto-1.4131732

Forensic accountants and lawyers. Sounds delightful.

I've always found buying condos to be a strange concept.

Let's combine the misery of apartment life with the insanity of HOAs.

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost

etalian posted:

I've always found buying condos to be a strange concept.

Let's combine the misery of apartment life with the insanity of HOAs.

Even better is buying presales. Will the condo be built on time? Will it be anything like the demo unit? What sorts of defects will the building show in a few years? Will your neighbours be jerks? Will the strata be insane/useless/overly busybodies/taken over by a bunch of dudes who want to rob the funds and funnel all services to their own companies?

WHO KNOWS! Roll the dice and find out!

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

The Butcher posted:

Even better is buying presales. Will the condo be built on time? Will it be anything like the demo unit? What sorts of defects will the building show in a few years? Will your neighbours be jerks? Will the strata be insane/useless/overly busybodies/taken over by a bunch of dudes who want to rob the funds and funnel all services to their own companies?

WHO KNOWS! Roll the dice and find out!

Please trigger warning that poo poo.

flashman
Dec 16, 2003

etalian posted:

I've always found buying condos to be a strange concept.

Let's combine the misery of apartment life with the insanity of HOAs.

There can be poorly run condos, and poorly run rental properties, or they can be run by people that have some clue what they're doing. The fact that some condos and some rentals are poorly run shouldn't really be a deciding factor. If you're renting, you should see what others are saying about the management company, and if you're buying, you should probably fork over the money for a background check on the condo (to make sure the finances are in order, and to see what, if anything, residents have been complaining about).

Every annoyance I have with my condo board and management company would probably be even worse if I were in a rental-only building, and I'd have less control over fixing the things I don't like. The only special assessment we had was fairly minor (I think my portion was $1700 or something) and it was to put in a new pump system to keep the basement from flooding. It sucked at the time, but then the following year the huge flood happened in Calgary, and we had 0 water infiltration despite being less than a block from the river, so it was completely worth it.

Cold on a Cob
Feb 6, 2006

i've seen so much, i'm going blind
and i'm brain dead virtually

College Slice
If a rental only building is badly run, you can leave at the end of your lease. If you sell a condo you just bought, you'll have to eat a loss if you want out. Depending on how lovely things are going and what sort of special assessments get levied, it might be a huge loss.

flashman
Dec 16, 2003

Cold on a Cob posted:

If a rental only building is badly run, you can leave at the end of your lease. If you sell a condo you just bought, you'll have to eat a loss if you want out. Depending on how lovely things are going and what sort of special assessments get levied, it might be a huge loss.

Owning where you live has a number of advantages beyond an ephemeral sense of pride. To list a few:

1) You cannot be kicked out on your landlord's whim.
2) You can redecorate and renovate as you please.
3) You don't have to consider the possibility of a rent increase occurring every year.
4) You can do what you want in your own dwelling, including "owning pets" and "smoking."
5) You have greater privacy rights.

I don't give a gently caress about some random sense of "pride," I like the freedom and convenience that ownership offers me. I know I've paid a premium for it, but not extremely so, and I'll probably get all of my money back when I sell, even if I don't make money on it.

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

flashman posted:

Owning where you live has a number of advantages beyond an ephemeral sense of pride. To list a few:

2) You can redecorate and renovate as you please.
3) You don't have to consider the possibility of a rent increase occurring every year.
4) You can do what you want in your own dwelling, including "owning pets" and "smoking."


My understanding is that many condo buildings effectively forbid smoking because it needs to be undetectable, and also that you can be quite restricted in terms of permitted renovations. You also have to worry about increasing condo fees and special assessments. Unless you own it outright, you're exposed to interest rate fluctuation. Property taxes, maintenance, etc.

Owning a home doesn't necessarily give you complete autonomy or constant finances.

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

flashman posted:

Owning where you live has a number of advantages beyond an ephemeral sense of pride. To list a few:

1) You cannot be kicked out on your landlord's whim.
2) You can redecorate and renovate as you please.
3) You don't have to consider the possibility of a rent increase occurring every year.
4) You can do what you want in your own dwelling, including "owning pets" and "smoking."
5) You have greater privacy rights.

I don't give a gently caress about some random sense of "pride," I like the freedom and convenience that ownership offers me. I know I've paid a premium for it, but not extremely so, and I'll probably get all of my money back when I sell, even if I don't make money on it.

We should and could solve most of these with much greater renter's rights and protections like first world countries generally have.

flashman
Dec 16, 2003

Subjunctive posted:

My understanding is that many condo buildings effectively forbid smoking because it needs to be undetectable, and also that you can be quite restricted in terms of permitted renovations. You also have to worry about increasing condo fees and special assessments. Unless you own it outright, you're exposed to interest rate fluctuation. Property taxes, maintenance, etc.

Owning a home doesn't necessarily give you complete autonomy or constant finances.

Honestly, the rental market in Calgary right now is so hosed that, even if a housing bubble exists, it may well be easier to ride that out than the current rent bubble. As long as you take into the account that the value of your property isn't guaranteed to increase, and you will have to pay for maintenance on it, I think there's a reasonable argument to be made for buying vs. renting in the current market in this city. Outside of a few specific areas, the market isn't massively overheated.

Could you lose some money, depending on what happens? Yes. That's the inherent risk in home ownership. Given rents in Calgary right now, though, I'd probably take a loss of property value rather than throwing money into the incinerator as renting would represent at this point. If the property market is inflated here, it's absolutely nothing compared to how inflated the rental market is at this moment. Price-to-rent ratio is still very low compared to other cities, especially so since the flood.

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost

flashman posted:

Could you lose some money, depending on what happens? Yes. That's the inherent risk in home ownership.

Please report to room 101 in the morning for mandatory reeducation.

the talent deficit
Dec 20, 2003

self-deprecation is a very british trait, and problems can arise when the british attempt to do so with a foreign culture





flashman posted:

Owning where you live has a number of advantages beyond an ephemeral sense of pride. To list a few:

1) You cannot be kicked out on your landlord's whim.
2) You can redecorate and renovate as you please.
3) You don't have to consider the possibility of a rent increase occurring every year.
4) You can do what you want in your own dwelling, including "owning pets" and "smoking."
5) You have greater privacy rights.

I don't give a gently caress about some random sense of "pride," I like the freedom and convenience that ownership offers me. I know I've paid a premium for it, but not extremely so, and I'll probably get all of my money back when I sell, even if I don't make money on it.

i rent, but the condo board in my building bans #2 and #4, #3 is an insignificant risk as compared to special assessments and strata fee increases and #5 is covered pretty well by rental laws. i'll give you #1 tho

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008

quote:

Toronto Homeowners Are Suddenly in a Rush to Sell

Toronto’s hot housing market has entered a new phase: jittery.

After a double whammy of government intervention and the near-collapse of Home Capital Group Inc., sellers are rushing to list their homes to avoid missing out on the recent price gains. The new dynamic has buyers rethinking purchases and sellers asking why they aren’t attracting the bidding wars their neighbors saw just a few weeks ago in Canada’s largest city.

“We are seeing people who paid those crazy prices over the last few months walking away from their deposits,” said Carissa Turnbull, a Royal LePage broker in the Toronto suburb of Oakville, who didn’t get a single visitor to an open house on the weekend. “They don’t want to close anymore.”

Home Capital may be achieving what so many policy measures failed to do: cool down a housing market that soared as much as 33 percent in March from a year earlier. The run on deposits at the Toronto-based mortgage lender has sparked concerns about contagion, and comes on top of a new Ontario tax on foreign buyers and federal government moves last year that make it harder to get a mortgage.

“Definitely a perception change occurred from Home Capital,” said Shubha Dasgupta, owner of Toronto-based mortgage brokerage Capital Lending Centre. “It’s had a certain impact, but how to quantify that impact is yet to be determined.”


Early data from the Toronto Real Estate Board confirms the shift in sentiment. Listings soared 47 percent in the first two weeks of the month from the same period a year earlier, while unit sales dropped 16 percent. Full-month data will be released in early June.

A couple months ago amid robust demand, it was common for sellers to price their homes on the low side to spur bidding wars. Such tactics won’t work now, according to Century 21 Millennium Inc. brokerage owner Joanne Evans.

“The frenzy is over -- it’s over,” said Evans, who focuses on Toronto suburbs such as Brampton. “Sanity is returning to the marketplace.”

Recent competition for homes had some prospective buyers so desperate they were buying properties “sight unseen,” said Shawn Zigelstein, a Toronto-area agent with Royal LePage Your Community Realty. Others made offers without an inspection.


In February, home-inspection firm Carson Dunlop saw a 34 percent drop in volume. Business has improved since then, with the first two weeks of this month putting the Toronto-based company on track to be unchanged from May 2016, according to founder Alan Carson.

“The market does seem to be shifting,” he said.


The average selling price in the Toronto area was C$890,284 ($658,000) through May 14, up 17 percent from a year earlier, yet down 3.3 percent from the full month of April. The annual price gain is down from 25 percent in April and 33 percent in March. Toronto has seen yearly price growth every month since May 2009. The last time the city saw gains of less than 10 percent was in December 2015.

Brokers say some owners are taking their homes off the market because they were seeking the same high offers that were spreading across the region as recently as six weeks ago.

“In less than one week we went from having 40 or 50 people coming to an open house to now, when you are lucky to get five people,” said Case Feenstra, an agent at Royal LePage Real Estate Services Loretta Phinney in Mississauga, Ontario. “Everyone went into hibernation.”

Toronto real estate lawyer Mark Weisleder said some clients want out of transactions.

“I’ve had situations where buyers are trying to try to find another buyer to take over their deal,” he said. “They are nervous whether they bought right at the top and prices may come down.”
Confidence Wanes

Brokers say the 15 percent foreign buyers’ tax announced by Ontario on April 20 and the ongoing struggles at Home Capital are sapping confidence. That’s more than offset concerns about tighter rent controls that developers have said will limit housing supply and keep prices high.

Weekly polling data show real estate price expectations have come down, in a sign that Canadians are anticipating housing markets in Toronto and Vancouver will finally cool. The share of people saying home prices will rise in the next six months fell for a second week to 46 percent, according to data compiled by Nanos Research Group for Bloomberg News. That’s down from a record 50.1 percent two weeks ago.


The fate of Home Capital, known as a “b-lender” because it caters to new immigrants and other homebuyers who can’t get a traditional bank loan, remains in question. A run on deposits and stock plunge began late last month after regulators accused the company of misleading investors about potentially fraudulent mortgage applications.

“Home Capital is affecting things because people who can’t get mortgages from the banks rely on them and other b-lenders,” said Lorand Sebestyen, an agent with iPro Realty Ltd. in Toronto. “If you can’t get the mortgage then you obviously can’t buy anything and it’s going to affect the market, especially for the higher-priced properties.”

The firm went into survival mode as concern about Toronto’s housing market was escalating, with Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz warning the gains were unsustainable. Worries about a market bubble morphed into nervousness about whether Canada might be on the brink of a financial meltdown. Rising household debt and runaway housing prices led to credit rating downgrades for the country’s six biggest banks this month by Moody’s Investors Service.

“It’s fear,” Century 21’s Evans said. “It’s another contributing factor to the fear of ‘what’s going to happen?”’

Home Capital’s competitors have seen a surge in demand as more brokers steer clients away from the struggling lender, Dasgupta said. Those lenders in turn are experiencing slower response times due to a backlog of borrowers.

“Home Capital is a bigger deal than the government announcement,” Weisleder said. “It’s had a bigger impact on the market.”
Rental Time

Still, not all sellers are feeling pinched.

Michael Hartmann put his north Toronto home up for sale on May 17, and it sold on May 22, the first day he began taking offers. The 53-year-old professor at McMaster University’s DeGroote School of Business in Hamilton, Ontario, decided not to take his agent’s advice to price the house on the low side in an attempt to stir up a bidding war.

He nudged the price up to be more in line with other homes in the neighborhood and sold it for C$1.65 million, C$10,000 above asking price. Hartmann said he and his wife will take their time before choosing their next move.

“We are in the fortunate position as empty-nesters that we don’t have to rush back into the market,” he said. “We have the advantage of seeing whether we go back in and buy in Toronto or somewhere else in Canada or go abroad.”

In the meantime, they plan to rent.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-24/toronto-bidding-wars-turn-to-homebuyers-remorse-as-market-slows

triplexpac
Mar 24, 2007

Suck it
Two tears in a bucket
And then another thing
I'm not the one they'll try their luck with
Hit hard like brass knuckles
See your face through the turnbuckle dude
I got no love for you
I'm watching this trashy HGTV show where people win the lottery then get the host to help them buy a house. It's hilarious, they have like 3 mil and they're buying $250k houses in the Midwest.

But sure, buying 1mil houses on a 70k salary makes sense.

Cold on a Cob
Feb 6, 2006

i've seen so much, i'm going blind
and i'm brain dead virtually

College Slice

flashman posted:

Owning where you live has a number of advantages beyond an ephemeral sense of pride. To list a few:

I know most of your points were addressed already but I have a few things to add so I'm going to respond to them all anyway.

First, I didn't say anything about pride. I said renting gives you greater mobility. You didn't even address that point. I also don't give a poo poo about pride of ownership, as evidenced by my buying then selling two properties in three years.

flashman posted:

1) You cannot be kicked out on your landlord's whim.
Not necessarily true if you live in a place that respects renter rights i.e. Ontario. In practice a lot of shady poo poo happens but hopefully these recent legislative changes will help. I agree that Calgary is a lot worse though.

You should know that a strata does have the legal right to evict you from your unit under some circumstances though. It can and does happen.

flashman posted:

2) You can redecorate and renovate as you please.
True, though you can get away with minor stuff if you're careful and get permission. I've had friends put up shelves, paint, and even install a different shower head - all with permission though.

In the strata in the last building where I owned there were a lot of restrictions on the types of renovations you could do - for example, I wasn't allowed to install a clothes washer or dryer, if I installed hardwood it had to have a specific underlay, all of the contractors I used had to be licensed and approved by the board (the former I agreed with, the latter could lead to kick-back situations), I wasn't allowed to touch the balcony or windows, if I did anything that involved electrical work the electrical in my ENTIRE UNIT had to be redone with a new panel installation and inspected (it was an older building), etc etc. My current building (where I rent) you're not allowed to install a gas stove, even though there is a gas furnace and water heater.

flashman posted:

3) You don't have to consider the possibility of a rent increase occurring every year.
Assuming you mean an "unreasonable" one, not true in Ontario (anymore). My rent just went up a whopping $25 per month this year for example. You're not wrong about Alberta though, I had my rent almost double there one year. They lost us as a tenant though over it, and we moved to a much nicer place closer to work for roughly what they increased our rent to.

I also know of some condos that dropped in value by 60k (in Burlington in 2016 when everything else was climbing!) due to special assessments that added $900 per month for three years so don't act like it's not a huge risk haha.

Renting also allows you to put all your down-payment money into investments, which will definitely offset the rental increases, especially in a market like Ontario where the spread between owning a condo and renting one is so huge.

You're also responsible for the costs of repairs inside your unit. My light fixture just went out on the weekend and my landlord is coming by tonight to take a look to see if it can be repaired or if she'll have to replace it. Not my problem. :)

flashman posted:

4) You can do what you want in your own dwelling, including "owning pets" and "smoking."
LMAO. Not in a strata building. We spent months looking for a condo where we could bring our mutt. We ended up selling that unit and going back to renting. With rental only buildings and houses in Ontario they can't prevent you from bringing your dog or cat as well, but in a building with a strata the strata supersedes that law. You can agree to all kinds of poo poo when you sign on with a strata (whether you buy or rent in one) that is outright illegal in a rental-only building, and the protections for renters in Ontario are only getting stronger.

Stratas also have the power to levy fines against you if you break their rules. In fact, if you own a unit that you rent out and your TENANT breaks the rules, YOU get the fine and good luck collecting it from your tenant (usually you can evict them on this basis though).

flashman posted:

5) You have greater privacy rights.
Depends on the strata. In my building they can enter the unit to check for things such as sources of excessive noise i.e. we had the condo manager enter the unit above us several times to get them to put felt pads on the feet of their furniture. They also entered the units to inspect the sprinkler system in a prior condo I lived in. In a rental building they have limited legal rights to enter your unit and the buildings I have lived in (Alberta and Ontario) were all pretty good about following the law on this.

So overall you're wrong for Ontario, half-right for Alberta, but if you live in Alberta why not just buy a house and forget stratas entirely? Then more of what you believe is actually true. If moved back to Calgary I'd buy a nice little bungalow, I've seen them listed for as little as 300k there recently. I'm sure I'll buy again eventually, just probably not in the GTA and definitely not a condo.

EvilJoven
Mar 18, 2005

NOBODY,IN THE HISTORY OF EVER, HAS ASKED OR CARED WHAT CANADA THINKS. YOU ARE NOT A COUNTRY. YOUR MONEY HAS THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND ON IT. IF YOU DIG AROUND IN YOUR BACKYARD, NATIVE SKELETONS WOULD EXPLODE OUT OF YOUR LAWN LIKE THE END OF POLTERGEIST. CANADA IS SO POLITE, EH?
Fun Shoe
So what you're saying is living in the same building as other people is horrible because most people are terrible and are both too worried about the superficial things their neighbors do with their property while being inconsiderate about what they do with their own.

Sounds about right.

Cold on a Cob
Feb 6, 2006

i've seen so much, i'm going blind
and i'm brain dead virtually

College Slice

EvilJoven posted:

So what you're saying is living in the same building as other people is horrible because most people are terrible and are both too worried about the superficial things their neighbors do with their property while being inconsiderate about what they do with their own.

Sounds about right.

Good fences Draconian strata rules with punishingly high financial penalties for infractions make good neighbours.

flashman
Dec 16, 2003

Cold on a Cob posted:

Good fences Draconian strata rules with punishingly high financial penalties for infractions make good neighbours.

You know, considering this thread always goes on about how owning is such bullshit, the more I hear about renting the more I think I'd gladly pay a hefty premium to avoid it. I'm lucky that, when I was renting, my landlord fixed everything within 24 hours (corporate landlords are the best!) but if that weren't an option... gently caress that, pay the money and buy if at all possible

EvilJoven
Mar 18, 2005

NOBODY,IN THE HISTORY OF EVER, HAS ASKED OR CARED WHAT CANADA THINKS. YOU ARE NOT A COUNTRY. YOUR MONEY HAS THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND ON IT. IF YOU DIG AROUND IN YOUR BACKYARD, NATIVE SKELETONS WOULD EXPLODE OUT OF YOUR LAWN LIKE THE END OF POLTERGEIST. CANADA IS SO POLITE, EH?
Fun Shoe
Renting loving sucks in a lot of ways. Aside from one time where we got two good neighbors back to back we've on average swapped good neighbors for poo poo neighbors that party and play music at all hours of the night / run the HVAC which they control in their unit for some reason at weird temps / stink up the house with weed but "It totally doesn't smell dude I use a vaporizer!" about every 1.5 years.

We've also had landlords do stuff like come over when there's water literally pouring through cracks in the foundation making everything in the basement super damp and humid your landlord may go :shrug: "all basements leak here run this Eatons brand dehumidifier 24/7 at your expense"

Now that we own and don't share walls with anyone we have yet to be kept up all night by some rear end in a top hat and when something breaks we can fix it ASAP, or change it because we don't like it. We also haven't gotten angry letters about doing stuff like wanting to hang our laundry outside on a clothesline, or install and run a dishwasher, or build things using power tools.

EDIT: I'd be willing to give this up and live in better density housing if it were properly built and maintained, there was a guarantee of not having to deal with assholes on the other side of the wall, we weren't constantly being hounded by MY PROPERTY VALUES idiots regarding things like clothes lines and there were proper shared use spaces for projects / camping equipment drying / bicycle maintenance etc but these places and our stuff would have to be kept safe and treated with respect which means these things don't exist because people are loving terrible.

EvilJoven fucked around with this message at 15:09 on May 29, 2017

Cold on a Cob
Feb 6, 2006

i've seen so much, i'm going blind
and i'm brain dead virtually

College Slice

flashman posted:

You know, considering this thread always goes on about how owning is such bullshit, the more I hear about renting the more I think I'd gladly pay a hefty premium to avoid it. I'm lucky that, when I was renting, my landlord fixed everything within 24 hours (corporate landlords are the best!) but if that weren't an option... gently caress that, pay the money and buy if at all possible

Although I've only been reading this thread this year, from what I've seen this thread goes on about how owning is bullshit in the Ontario and Vancouver market and how making yourself house rich and cash poor is a lovely way to live. In particular, buying into this market now would be nuts when the spread between renting and buying is so significant.

Renting can be lovely, this is true. And in non-insane markets, owning a house can be a good hedge against rental increases if you can tolerate a possible interest rate increase. I would happily do so again if I didn't live in the GTA.

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


flashman posted:

Owning where you live has a number of advantages beyond an ephemeral sense of pride. To list a few:

1) You cannot be kicked out on your landlord's whim.
2) You can redecorate and renovate as you please.
3) You don't have to consider the possibility of a rent increase occurring every year.
4) You can do what you want in your own dwelling, including "owning pets" and "smoking."
5) You have greater privacy rights.

2. Not for condos. The one I used to rent had rules down to "You can't have non-white curtains because the facade must be a uniform". gently caress that.
4. While it's illegal (or at least unenforceable) to have a no pets clause in a rental lease (at least in Ontario), condo buildings CAN restrict pets/the types of pets allowed in their buildings.

Honestly the other problem is with only condos being built, and making up an increasing percentage of the rental market, renting those is literally the worst of both worlds.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos
So the factors that measure home prices and rent prices in CPI calculations are basically unchanged in number from 2005 in Vancouver and Toronto. In fact based on CPI breakdown home prices and rental costs are the major components bringing down CPI which makes no sense. Is this an example of regulatory capture and lobbying by real estate industry?

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-bank-of-canada-is-worried-about-home-prices-2017-5

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply