|
Also the last one is "shot suppression." I write this in case anyone else was like me and spent 20 minute wondering what "shots up" referred to.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 17:25 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 11:50 |
|
gently caress John Scott. Is there anyway to watch the E:60 in Canada without resorting to ?
|
# ? May 28, 2017 17:39 |
|
Only good outdoor game is in - 20 weather. You're up, Winnipeg.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 18:22 |
|
JoelJoel posted:Only good outdoor game is in - 20 weather. You're up, Winnipeg. They're too scared to put one in January. That's why the one last year was in October and it was 9 degrees celcius.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 18:33 |
|
The teams don't get any extra money from those outdoor games. What the Penguins got in exchange for the Stadium Series home game, for example, was a makeup cost for losing a PPG Arena home game. The money on top of that, the NHL kept.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 18:36 |
|
eXXon posted:
You mean Kadri v Ovi right Gio posted:winter classic was an already stale gimmick that was murdered by league over-saturation. once the novelty of having an outdoor game wore off it was just one of eighty-two boring regular season games. On the other hand I went to one and it was fun I wouldn't go to one across the Detroit border again tho because whooo boy that drive back was a fantastic disaster Thufir posted:Have the all stars compete in Crashed Ice https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FC635rC_1Us I'd support this
|
# ? May 28, 2017 18:47 |
|
Jamwad Hilder posted:It should be 1 point for an OT/SO win nothing for losing in my opinion Better yet, ditch the shootout and allow ties, except both teams get 0 points for a tie
|
# ? May 28, 2017 19:30 |
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:Where does Arizona end up if they do move? They dangle it in front of Quebec and then Bettman screws them over and gives it to Seattle.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 19:32 |
|
hyper from Pixie Sticks posted:They dangle it in front of Quebec and then Bettman screws them over and gives it to Seattle. I guess Kansas City has completely given up eh?
|
# ? May 28, 2017 19:34 |
|
Xtanstic posted:I guess Kansas City has completely given up eh? I honestly don't know. The key element here is screwing Quebec, which happens so often I'm surprised Article 1 of the NHL constitution isn't 'lol gently caress u quebec'
|
# ? May 28, 2017 19:43 |
|
Xtanstic posted:I guess Kansas City has completely given up eh? I think the big issue with Kansas City is that the arena they'd use is owned by the same group that owns the Kings, and the league really wants to avoid the conflict of interest. Plus, I don't know that KC has anyone motivated to bring hockey to the town in the same way Seattle, Quebec, and Las Vegas do.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 20:02 |
|
Montreal took on John Scott in exchange of Quebec not getting a team is a good theory
|
# ? May 28, 2017 20:35 |
|
Teemu Pokemon posted:They should move the winter classic/ASG so they coincide and do the whole week outdoors and that's it I've been saying this for a couple years now. They need to cash in on the spectacle.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 21:45 |
|
i am the bird posted:I've been saying this for a couple years now. They need to cash in on the spectacle. They could even risk doing it in a city with a football stadium and no professional hockey team like Green Bay, or Seattle, or Denver.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 21:48 |
|
i am the bird posted:They need to cash in on the spectacle. It's this logic that has led them to increase the number of outdoor games in a season
|
# ? May 28, 2017 21:49 |
|
Powershift posted:They could even risk doing it in a city with a football stadium and no professional hockey team like Green Bay, or Seattle, or Denver.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 22:05 |
|
Lost Season posted:I think the big issue with Kansas City is that the arena they'd use is owned by the same group that owns the Kings, and the league really wants to avoid the conflict of interest. Plus, I don't know that KC has anyone motivated to bring hockey to the town in the same way Seattle, Quebec, and Las Vegas do. I seem to recall reading an article not long ago that the KC arena was making money hand over fist with just concerts, the odd college basketball game/tournament, and other small time stuff and that it was proof maybe arenas like that don't need an anchor tenant any more.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 22:14 |
|
Eric the Mauve posted:Better yet, ditch the shootout and allow ties, except both teams get 0 points for a tie Then you have some games worth less than others, which is still pretty bad. Way to make just going back to W/L look good. Gio posted:there's only so much you can do to make the regular season interesting. personally i think it'd be cool if the season were significantly shorter, but obviously that'll never happen because teams need to make money. i think it'd be cool though to have a 24 game season, one game a week. Emulating the NFL is dumb poo poo for idiots. A EDIT: This is also conducive to abandoning conferences and divisions and just having the best 16* teams in the playoffs. *You'd even be able to throw out arguments against a 12- or even 8-team playoff tournament that are made from fairness, since equitable schedule, but the owners will never give up the extra revenue or the free labor. dont be mean to me fucked around with this message at 22:57 on May 28, 2017 |
# ? May 28, 2017 22:49 |
|
Ties are for soccer.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 22:59 |
|
dont be mean to me posted:A BUT MAH RIVALRIES
|
# ? May 28, 2017 23:02 |
|
Everyone knows that rivalries are forged during the playoffs. I submit that all teams should therefore qualify for the playoffs.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 23:03 |
|
You all have terrible ideas and should be ashamed of yourselves.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 23:04 |
|
If you think the NHL is going to give up 25+% of their revenue by shortening the season you're an idiot
|
# ? May 28, 2017 23:12 |
|
dont be mean to me posted:Then you have some games worth less than others, which is still pretty bad. If only there was a way to have all games worth the same amount of points. If only all games could be 3 point games. Man, it's too difficult to figure out how there could be a way that was possible. Because surely, if the NHL can't figure it out, somebody like me, a common fan, cannot figure it out.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 23:38 |
|
The (dumb) argument is that 3 point games would invalidate all the old point records, as if the loser point doesn't already do that.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 23:39 |
|
dont be mean to me posted:Then you have some games worth less than others, which is still pretty bad. Yes that's the entire point. Teams who don't try to win are bad and should feel bad. If hockey coaches are going to absolutely refuse to play in any way but ultra conservatively then let's goddamn force them to play for a win or else.
|
# ? May 28, 2017 23:56 |
|
Suspicious posted:The (dumb) argument is that 3 point games would invalidate all the old point records, as if the loser point doesn't already do that. Any Habs records that can be invalidated should be.
|
# ? May 29, 2017 00:00 |
|
You can easily reword that record to "most regulation/OT wins in a single season."
|
# ? May 29, 2017 00:07 |
|
honestly make it so the only team stat is "wins" and the top 8 wins per conference make the playoffs and thats it . If the game goes to 60 minutes and no team wins the game just ends
|
# ? May 29, 2017 00:14 |
|
ElwoodCuse posted:I seem to recall reading an article not long ago that the KC arena was making money hand over fist with just concerts, the odd college basketball game/tournament, and other small time stuff and that it was proof maybe arenas like that don't need an anchor tenant any more. The same thing happened with the KeyArena after the Sonics left iirc.
|
# ? May 29, 2017 00:17 |
|
Suspicious posted:The (dumb) argument is that 3 point games would invalidate all the old point records, as if the loser point doesn't already do that. It can't just be this. We had regular season OT added, loser points added, shootouts added, the regular season has gone from (in the expansion era) 74-76-78-80-84-82 games, none of that is consistent or fair.
|
# ? May 29, 2017 00:25 |
|
ElwoodCuse posted:It can't just be this It isn't. The reason there aren't three point regulation wins is because the current system makes playoff races seem tighter than they actually are. The NHL is a gate driven league, and interest and ticket sales drop markedly when people don't feel like their team can win anything. Changing to a three point win would eliminate a bunch of teams by January, and that would kill gate revenue for them. The owners aren't going to implement a change that negatively affects their pocket book because it makes logical sense or the fans want it. Hockey is a business first and foremost. No decision has ever or will ever be made in the name of "the spirit of the game."
|
# ? May 29, 2017 00:31 |
|
Except the Subban trade.
|
# ? May 29, 2017 00:36 |
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:Where does Arizona end up if they do move? Quebec is a red hot chance, but the NHL would exponentially rather hold Arizona in Arizona until Seattle, Portland, Kansas or somewhere like that opens up.
|
# ? May 29, 2017 00:36 |
|
Xtanstic posted:It's this logic that has led them to increase the number of outdoor games in a season It's kind of the opposite, though. It can't be a spectacle if it happens a million times a year.
|
# ? May 29, 2017 01:26 |
|
It should be wins-losses-shootout wins Shootout and OT losses are worth nothing extra
|
# ? May 29, 2017 06:50 |
|
Suspicious posted:You can easily reword that record to "most regulation/OT wins in a single season." Or point percentage which is the only metric that actually makes any sense for that record
|
# ? May 29, 2017 15:34 |
|
dont be mean to me posted:
|
# ? May 29, 2017 18:49 |
|
Both of this book's authors have now been fired for being jackasses on social media.
|
# ? May 29, 2017 18:50 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 11:50 |
|
Thufir posted:
Why did they think it necessary to write a book about one season of Patrick Roy's coaching? e: For those not in the know, this is why Frei got ditched: ThinkTank fucked around with this message at 18:54 on May 29, 2017 |
# ? May 29, 2017 18:52 |