|
Race Realists posted:https://twitter.com/ClarkHat/status/868629558714675200 no, I am not going to buy someone's racist book to be ironic.
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:39 |
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Glad to know rev is focusing on the important things in life. quote:
this is what loving happens when you don't mentally progress pass 'Smarmy 17-Year-old Internet Libertarian' EDIT: quote:AnonymousMay 26, 2017 at 7:18 AM  yes you DEFINITELY DONT want money because you're living in abject poverty like the rest of us
BornAPoorBlkChild has a new favorite as of 02:26 on May 28, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 02:15
|
|
Individualists will continue to be persecuted for not being kind enough. The independent citizen will always be punished for not being nice enough
|
Doc Hawkins posted:I was not expecting a tweet about gushing 15-year-olds to have a context that made it even more of a self-own, but "xxtreme white christian video game culture war" has done the impossible. Nothing gets #teens hornier for christianity then that weird kid that lives in the middle of nowhere bragging about throwing knives. Also lol at "learning about Christianity on the streets". I don't think that Clark Danger has ever been on the streets in his life. Too high a risk of seeing a liberal, I'd guess.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 05:15
|
|
|
What was his deal again? Is he the ancap papist?
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 05:24
|
|
|
Is there anything more pathetic then writing twitter fanfiction about how you'd be one of the "cool christian rebels" in high school and gently caress all the girls because they'd be impressed that played with knives like a creep, all because a video game has christian fundamentalist enemies?
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 08:17
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:no, I am not going to buy someone's racist book to be ironic. There Was An Extinction-Level Event In 2012: And We All Now Live In A Simulation (Kindle Edition) so look out for Clark joining the team at SSC
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 10:27
|
|
|
divabot posted:There Was An Extinction-Level Event In 2012: And We All Now Live In A Simulation (Kindle Edition) holy poo poo that title "Chapter One: You Are Going To Read 27 Pages About The Protagonist's Mom Waking Him Up For Breakfast On This The Day He Is Coming Of Age"
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 11:13
|
|
|
Clark has apparently never spoken with anyone who has been outdoors. It is woods, targets in the woods. Targets in the wood is some weird British gentry nonsense.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 12:00
|
|
|
Relevant Tangent posted:Clark has apparently never spoken with anyone who has been outdoors. It is woods, targets in the woods. Targets in the wood is some weird British gentry nonsense. It makes it sound as if he learned about the outdoors from "Sir, You Are Being Hunted". vv Nice. Munin has a new favorite as of 16:45 on May 28, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 16:33
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:Is there anything more pathetic then writing twitter fanfiction about how you'd be one of the "cool christian rebels" in high school and gently caress all the girls because they'd be impressed that played with knives like a creep, all because a video game has christian fundamentalist enemies? While you were studying civil rights I was learning Christianity on the Streets
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 16:34
|
|
|
Race Realists posted:this is what loving happens when you don't mentally progress pass 'Smarmy 17-Year-old Internet Libertarian' Also gotta love the not subtle racism at the end there about Atlanta
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 17:23
|
|
|
divabot posted:There Was An Extinction-Level Event In 2012: And We All Now Live In A Simulation (Kindle Edition) I'm pretty sure that was last week's episode of Doctor Who? 
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
What the hell does Clark have against witches?! Is it the 12th century at his house?
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:20
|
|
|
I want to get off Mr Bones Wild Ride.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
Oh man ,,, truly a new intulectual powerhouse. I had to tweet lol at that because holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
I know a poo poo ton of women into all kinds of BDSM dynamics and I don't know a single one who sincerely thinks women would be better off without the vote. Like there are a couple who fantasize about like, total patriarchal dominance but none of them actually think that would be a good idea to make real
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:Nothing gets #teens hornier for christianity then that weird kid that lives in the middle of nowhere bragging about throwing knives. Clark is fantasizing about a world where the time he went to school wearing a gas mask it totally made all the cheerleaders want him.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 20:47
|
|
|
I feel like even if throwing knives was attractive, attempting to throw knives and cutting your hands up instead would not be.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
Neon Noodle posted:What the hell does Clark have against witches?! Is it the 12th century at his house? I'd thank you not to insult the 12th century by comparison to this fuckwit.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
Josef bugman posted:I'd thank you not to insult the 12th century by comparison to this fuckwit. What's the 12th century done for me lately, huh?
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:What's the 12th century done for me lately, huh? Stopped it being 1917.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:I feel like even if throwing knives was attractive, attempting to throw knives and cutting your hands up instead would not be. It's deeply revealing of how little the dude understands the mechanics of knife throwing, yeah.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 21:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/NuclearTakes/status/869251331734859776
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 22:54
|
|
|
And I'm proud to be an American, where two is less than three And I won't forget that no one died jet fuel can't melt beams
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
Carlgon is utterly baffled by the concept of dominoes. Claims all domino videos are fake, impossible.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 02:11
|
|
|
No one tell him that more than 3 buildings were destroyed when two huge towers in the middle of a dense city fell down
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 02:33
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Optifix/status/869210983000141824
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 02:33
|
|
|
I love the part where he asks why NORAD didn't identify the threat, as if they would suddenly realize that the commercial traffic looked kinda unusual that day and instantly scramble fighters loaded with missiles and cannon shells within a few minutes.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 03:12
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/BigBowlOfChili/status/869265736920956928
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 10:25
|
|
|
I've binged the poo poo out of Contrapoints's videos (so good), and at one point some response to his non-binary genders vid came up in the sidebar and I decided you know what, gently caress it. Intellectual rigour means exposing yourself to different opinions and all that. This is the relevant part of the video, watch for a couple minutes if for some reason you want to know what I'm blabbing about, but the summary is that this dude is pulling up a study to demonstrate that science, even if research on non-binary genders is lacking, considers gender to be binary. And he manages to so obviously completely contradict his actual point I feel like I'm missing something. The study he picked to support this point displays sex and gender as a loving spectrum. He even says "[there are gradients] of masculine and feminine, it's still a loving binary." But isn't that exactly what a binary system isn't? Am I missing some sort of technical definition? From what I can google and like, knowledge of what the word means, surely a binary system is one in which only two states exist. Like temperature isn't binary, because it's not just hot and cold or 0 or 100, and you wouldn't say pain is binary because something either hurts or doesn't. Regardless, if genders can exist on a spectrum between male and female, why can't that mean there are mid points that are neither definitely male or female, perhaps an expression of gender that does not neatly fall into either category, a 'non-binary' gender, if you will. And then he goes on to use tallness as an analogy and it's just aaah, you picked something that is defined solely in relative terms when you're supposedly talking about this fixed, natural system and also there's a million ways to describe height beyond 'he tall' or 'he short'. Summary: I am convinced I just saw someone make a video completely refuting their own point. I can't make sense of it, feel like I'm going crazy for missing something glaringly obvious.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 14:04
|
|
|
Gitro posted:I've binged the poo poo out of Contrapoints's videos (so good), and at one point some response to his non-binary genders vid came up in the sidebar and I decided you know what, gently caress it. Intellectual rigour means exposing yourself to different opinions and all that. This is the relevant part of the video, watch for a couple minutes if for some reason you want to know what I'm blabbing about, but the summary is that this dude is pulling up a study to demonstrate that science, even if research on non-binary genders is lacking, considers gender to be binary. And he manages to so obviously completely contradict his actual point I feel like I'm missing something. Sounds like he doesn't know what gender nonbinary means and is actually thinking about third gender without realizing it, while also also being kinda dumb
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 14:15
|
|
|
Gitro posted:I've binged the poo poo out of Contrapoints's videos (so good), and at one point some response to his non-binary genders vid came up in the sidebar and I decided you know what, gently caress it. Intellectual rigour means exposing yourself to different opinions and all that. This is the relevant part of the video, watch for a couple minutes if for some reason you want to know what I'm blabbing about, but the summary is that this dude is pulling up a study to demonstrate that science, even if research on non-binary genders is lacking, considers gender to be binary. And he manages to so obviously completely contradict his actual point I feel like I'm missing something. He appears to be conflating the idea of binary with the idea of category.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 14:18
|
|
|
Surprisingly, someone who feels uncomfortable about people violating gender norms has not spent a lot of time considering gender and its definitions. Dude wants an easy way to shut down the discussion/behavior because it gives him bad feelings, so he just looks for the first thing that resembles an authority that agrees with him and throws it in. People who are freaking out are very bad at being rational, it turns out.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 14:35
|
|
|
Yeah that all makes sense I guess, it's just he dickwags about having a philosophy PhD at the start and it's hard to believe that someone who ostensibly knows how to construct an argument doesn't realise what he's saying contradicts the point he's making as he's saying it. It's just  I didn't expect any amazing insights but I didn't expect that. He also says that for 10k+ years only two genders have served us fine, which is objectively false but hey, if reality was what he thought it was on that last point he'd be somewhat correct to assert it.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:I love the part where he asks why NORAD didn't identify the threat, as if they would suddenly realize that the commercial traffic looked kinda unusual that day and instantly scramble fighters loaded with missiles and cannon shells within a few minutes. Yeah, I love the idea that NORAD somehow has the flight plan for every single plane taking off and landing in the US. And that a plane being in the general area of at least three major airports is super unusual. When I lived in the city I used to sit on the patio at a bar and watch 747's come in low over brooklyn, it happens all the time every single day.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 15:15
|
|
|
Gitro posted:Yeah that all makes sense I guess, it's just he dickwags about having a philosophy PhD at the start and it's hard to believe that someone who ostensibly knows how to construct an argument doesn't realise what he's saying contradicts the point he's making as he's saying it. It's just "As a philosophy PhD let me tell you about how the appeal to tradition is actually cool and good when I do it"
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 15:17
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:"As a philosophy PhD let me tell you about how the appeal to tradition is actually cool and good when I do it" I've got a bachelor's in Philosophy and the bizarre conservatism of the discipline was a huge factor in my not going any further with it.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 15:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:39 |
|
|
The most charitable I can be is that he's talking about gender as an analytical framework, and NOT really the social construct and enforcement side of things where everyone goes in one bucket or the other. He's attacking the idea that we need more words and terminology for non-binary things, instead of just using the words we've got.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 15:24
|
|
