|
I really don't get people who say "Why have you made it impossible for me to vote for you when I clearly want completely the opposite of what you want." If you don't think that people with money should help out those without it then you aren't Labour. It's not Labour's job to salve your conscience about being a oval office by abandoning that principle so that you vote for them.
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 22:04 |
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:How was he supposed to answer "Why have you made it impossible for me to vote Labour?", exactly 'because you're a wanker and we care more about workers'
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:40
|
|
|
It sounds like a lot of the criticisms from actual small businesses could be alleviated with banding, with a separate small profits rate to the main rate. That would help out the 'couple of joiners/plumbers/electricians form a limited company to limit their liability on large contracts' lot without helping the 'why can't I hire someone for an hour a week on a pittance?' lot. What are the main reasons against banding corporation tax? I suppose it could create additional loopholes for larger companies to exploit, and there are arguments that most small businesses like that should be aiming to minimize their profits by paying themselves salaries rather than dividend related trickery anyway.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:40
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Then labour is hosed.  seriously, we don't care now kindly go the gently caress away (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:41
|
|
|
Aspirational voters as in "aspirations of being a decent human being but just can't manage it"
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:If you don't think that people with money should help out those without it then you aren't Labour. It's not Labour's job to salve your conscience about being a oval office by abandoning that principle so that you vote for them. No you see he used to think that (when he didn't have any money)
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:44
|
|
|
jabby posted:The bloke was interviewed afterwards and claimed Corbyn didn't answer the question. "We've made it impossible for you to vote labour because we actually want the country to be better" was his answer. The fact he doesn't says more about him.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:45
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:It sounds like a lot of the criticisms from actual small businesses could be alleviated with banding, with a separate small profits rate to the main rate. That would help out the 'couple of joiners/plumbers/electricians form a limited company to limit their liability on large contracts' lot without helping the 'why can't I hire someone for an hour a week on a pittance?' lot.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:47
|
|
|
Small Business Man was 100%, 100% Tory. It's nothing to do with who his parents voted for. Anyone who doesn't see how every word he said was dripping with Toryness doesn't understand Tory voters. Vicars wives in Guildford and asset managers in Canary Wharf are only a subset, it's guys like that that are the reason they win elections.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:What are the main reasons against banding corporation tax?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:I really don't get people who say "Why have you made it impossible for me to vote for you when I clearly want completely the opposite of what you want." In the states these are (were?) known as Reagan Democrats. People who claim to have been Democrats all their life but have voted Republican for the past thirty years. The reason generally being FYGM.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
I prefer the term Covert Underhanded Non-disclosing Tory.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:51
|
|
|
Corbyn was too polite to call the man a selfish waste of space. Don't know where he gets the patience.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
ShaneMacGowansTeeth posted:
You cared enough to reply? E: and to find and upload a picture with your reply
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
TheRat posted:Here's Corbyn vs Small Business Man for those who missed it: He's rather good at this
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
Namtab posted:You cared enough to reply? only when it's exceptionally loving dumb by his standards
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
jBrereton posted:If Labour's policy is not to gently caress up small business with more legislation (a good idea, this last government has added a huge admin burden) then doing stuff like banding corp tax is not a flier. There may in practice be additional admin, but it wouldn't be for the small limited company.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:00
|
|
|
ShaneMacGowansTeeth posted:only when it's exceptionally loving dumb by his standards Just tell him to gently caress off. He'll send you a pm and you reply saying gently caress off. Worked for me.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:00
|
|
|
Namtab posted:Just tell him to gently caress off. He'll send you a pm and you reply saying gently caress off. Worked for me. In what way did it 'work'?
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:01
|
|
|
Namtab posted:Just tell him to gently caress off. He'll send you a pm and you reply saying gently caress off. Worked for me. he's just sent a PM claiming "I'm obsessed with him". Nope, just calling him out on his shitposting
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:03
|
|
ShaneMacGowansTeeth posted:he's just sent a PM claiming "I'm obsessed with him". Nope, just calling him out on his shitposting
|
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:04
|
|
|
Benjamin Arthur posted:looool hey, my posting is terrible, but two years straight of "CORBYN BAD, LABOUR hosed" and you just have to occasionally scream at the sheer banality of it all
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:07
|
|
|
Text
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:Would there be a large admin burden for the business themselves? They already have to do their annual accounts and declare their profits if they're limited, so surely it would just be a case of HMRC saying all profits under £x are taxed at y% and all over at z% and issuing the tax slip based on that.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:09
|
|
|
TomViolence posted:Text the ignore function does nothing to help this in TYOOL 2017
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:10
|
|
ShaneMacGowansTeeth posted:hey, my posting is terrible, but two years straight of "CORBYN BAD, LABOUR hosed" and you just have to occasionally scream at the sheer banality of it all He's a boring narcissist who feeds in this thread, not surprised when he's not posting here he's looking for more attention in PMs.
|
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
Benjamin Arthur posted:He's a boring narcissist who feeds in this thread, not surprised when he's not posting here he's looking for more attention in PMs. but he doesn't break any rules, can't forget that
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
TheRat posted:Here's Corbyn vs Small Business Man for those who missed it: Brilliant response, but I also would have accepted Corbyn running up those stairs and smashing this man's head in as a valid answer to the question
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
ShaneMacGowansTeeth posted:hey, my posting is terrible, but two years straight of "CORBYN BAD, LABOUR hosed" and you just have to occasionally scream at the sheer banality of it all if any combination of letters could entice 'flaps into not being quite so obnoxious then he would have settled down a long time ago he is our curse, our punishment, forever and eternal. dehumanise yourself and face to pissflaps.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
One thing that comes to me from this 'debate' is that Corbyn is more likely to benefit from sending a spokesperson to the seven-way debate and May is more likely to be harmed. May because it goes against her strong image to be seen to be avoiding a fight, Corbyn because his personal history is a much bigger issue for him than his policies and they can't attack his history as well if he isn't there. If he gets someone like Thornberry who can keep the topic on policy and keep mocking May for not showing up, Labout might come out quite well.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:14
|
|
|
Angepain posted:if any combination of letters could entice 'flaps into not being quite so obnoxious then he would have settled down a long time ago P*******s is actually Theresa May and I claim my five pounds
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
As funny as Pissflap's stroppy PMs must be, lets all laugh at the media turning on Jeremy Paxman instead. Martin Kettle says "Politicians deserve better", which I'm not sure is true, though he also says the public deserve better & I'd agree with that. John Harris says he has Frankie Howerd (sic) expressions & makes for crap TV. Some writer from The Economist wants him "put out to pasture". Former Sun shithead Stig Abell thinks he's become a caricature of himself. As someone who has always found Paxman tedious, I do enjoy that people have turned on him & John Humphries particular style. It's really miserable that the best received line from May is the one about no deal being better than a bad deal despite it being complete bollocks. But I suppose if you're the idiot who thought Brexit was a good idea then more bad ideas can also be good ideas if you wish hard enough.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:17
|
|
|
Benjamin Arthur posted:He's a boring narcissist who feeds in this thread, not surprised when he's not posting here he's looking for more attention in PMs. Pissflaps is basically the kind of voter that you need to motivate to vote to get Labour into power. We will lose if it can't be done. Simple as that.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:18
|
|
|
Hexyflexy posted:Pissflaps is basically the kind of voter that you need to motivate to vote to get Labour into power. We will lose if it can't be done. Simple as that. Yes, the internet pedant is a key demo for Labour, without whom victory is impossible. 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
forkboy84 posted:As funny as Pissflap's stroppy PMs must be, lets all laugh at the media turning on Jeremy Paxman instead. The media are turning on Paxman because he tore apart their darling Mrs May and jeopardised Leveson 2 being struck down.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
Hexyflexy posted:Pissflaps is basically the kind of voter that you need to motivate to vote to get Labour into power. We will lose if it can't be done. Simple as that. I've always voted and I've always voted labour. But you're right: voters like me win elections for labour.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
Edit: double post
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
Hell has officially frozen over https://twitter.com/campbellclaret/status/869280381786312704
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:I've always voted and I've always voted labour. Good job you're voting Labour then.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 22:04 |
|
|
Pissflaps posted:In what way did it 'work'? You stopped sending me pms
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2017 00:25
|
|