Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
What regions belong in the Pacific Northwest?
Alaska, US
British Columbia, CA
Washington, US
Oregon, US
Idaho, US
Montana, US
Wyoming, US
California, US (MODS PLEASE BAN ANYONE VOTING FOR THIS OPTION TIA)
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Reene
Aug 26, 2005

:justpost:

Senor P. posted:

People with mental illness are every where. Irregardless of their political or religious beliefs.
Unfortunately, you cannot save everyone.

less conflation of violent racists with mentally ill people would be awesome, tia

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DevNull
Apr 4, 2007

And sometimes is seen a strange spot in the sky
A human being that was given to fly

anthonypants posted:

If you've discovered a method of bringing about a socialist state in this country without a violent uprising I'd like to hear it.

Historically, most of the violence is against revolutionaries. It is the counter revolutionaries that will turn to fascist gangs and military repression. Your statement isn't exactly saying the revolutionaries will be the violent party, but I think it should be clear which side must resort to violence. It is the ruling class which will, and is already using violence to keep themselves in power. That is the role of the state, with their police and military forces.

Reene posted:

less conflation of violent racists with mentally ill people would be awesome, tia

Yeah, this. People with mental illness are more likely to be the target of violence. Fascists are created by a capitalist society, and taught to be violent.

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!

DevNull posted:

Historically, most of the violence is against revolutionaries. It is the counter revolutionaries that will turn to fascist gangs and military repression. Your statement isn't exactly saying the revolutionaries will be the violent party, but I think it should be clear which side must resort to violence. It is the ruling class which will, and is already using violence to keep themselves in power. That is the role of the state, with their police and military forces.

Communist revolutionaries have a very strong history of using only peaceful methods, and definitely would never resort to genocide


Really how the poo poo can you look at... any successful communist revolution ever, and decide it was only violence by the ruling class? Historical communists don't have the greatest record w.r.t peaceful revolutions.

Reene
Aug 26, 2005

:justpost:

revolutions in general aren't peaceful given that people in power tend to want to preserve their power at any cost

the point is that there is not presently an absence of violence. the violence is merely extremely one-sided.

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


The Soviets were only very briefly a worker's state. Funny how over a half dozen imperial powers invading the fledgling soviets did such a good job of demolishing the revolutionaries that successfully cast off the chains of bourgeois control. The bureaucracy was all that remained, and the bureaucracy was never again a vehicle of the workers, becoming nothing but a new chain upon their necks under Stalin.

In addition, clearly this Democracy thing will never work out. You see what happened after the French Revolution? Tsk, tsk, you should never try to abandon monarchy, all you'll get is a Reign of Terror. To say nothing of the genocidal slave state that became of that whole "American experiment". It's obvious we should never try to fight for a better future or to try to abolish existing institutions of oppression and exploitation, since clearly the material conditions that generate the trends of history are static and uniform and it's not as though there is actually a complex and dynamic dialectic that determines the course of human events.

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


Back on topic, there are anti-Muslim demonstrations taking place in Portland this weekend, and in Seattle next weekend. I know comrades in Portland have been building a big coalition protest against that, and locally in Seattle CAIR and MAPS, two Muslim rights organizations, have begun to organize a loose coalition for the coming action. I was happy to see some representatives of the more militant left factions present and willing to consider their perspective, because it seems like the CAIR and MAPS representatives want this to be as peaceful as possible, and seeing as how they are representatives of the groups who are being targeted by these racist actions, I think it's only right that their ideas about how to organize a counterprotest should take precedence.

Teabag Dome Scandal
Mar 19, 2002


James Garfield posted:

Communist revolutionaries have a very strong history of using only peaceful methods, and definitely would never resort to genocide


Really how the poo poo can you look at... any successful communist revolution ever, and decide it was only violence by the ruling class? Historical communists don't have the greatest record w.r.t peaceful revolutions.

lol

DevNull
Apr 4, 2007

And sometimes is seen a strange spot in the sky
A human being that was given to fly

Some labor groups seem to be mobilizing as well.

https://twitter.com/coreypein/status/869719332397305858

coyo7e
Aug 23, 2007

by zen death robot
Just make sure you bring a knife to your next protest. They seem much more effective than concealed firearms, tbh

Error 404
Jul 17, 2009


MAGE CURES PLOT
Peaceful protest is an oxymoron.

If its a protest, it threatens the interests of those in power, who will always resort to violence to protect those interests.

Then again, making lots of noise and ultimately doing nothing is a hallmark of liberals who play at changing things.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

Error 404 posted:

Peaceful protest is an oxymoron.

If its a protest, it threatens the interests of those in power, who will always resort to violence to protect those interests.

Then again, making lots of noise and ultimately doing nothing is a hallmark of liberals who play at changing things.
I think the best example of a peaceful protest in recent memory would be the DAPL water protectors. Despite being unarmed they faced overwhelming violence, and it's very likely that if they employed violence in any capacity they would have been wiped out, the media would have helpfully explained to everyone that they got what was coming to them, and the pipeline would have been built anyway.

And the best example of a non-peaceful protest would be the Malheur wildlife refuge occupation.

HashtagGirlboss
Jan 4, 2005

So there's been one thing that's been bothering me about the coverage following the events of last Friday, and I think I've figured it out. Less than a year ago, a black teenager was run down by a white supremacist in a pickup truck in one of the less affluent suburbs of Portland. There was some media coverage and some discussion, but it mostly got ignored - it happened in a bad part of town and the victim was No Angeltm.

Incidentally, it was this post (which I haven't really seen any discussion of or national media attention on) that jogged that recollection:

Doorknob Slobber posted:

More racist poo poo in the PNW yesterday.

I've seen lots of celebration of the lives of the men on the MAX and I've seen lots of coverage about how they were heroes. The main narrative I've picked up on is basically "Brave white men give their lives to mentally ill!!! (that part seems to be very important to mention) racist in defense of non-white teenagers." Maybe this is looking too hard, but it almost feels like the main narrative is essentially "Brave white men give thier lives to mentally ill!!! racist thereby absolving Portland of racial animosity forever." The "Trimet Heroes" talk and the loving coverage almost seems like it's a reflection of the victims being from the same tribe as the majority of this very white city. I'm honestly unsure that the coverage would be so dramatic and overwhelming if the victims had been the two women, or people of color.

DevNull
Apr 4, 2007

And sometimes is seen a strange spot in the sky
A human being that was given to fly

I think it is important to keep in mind that the the Longshoremen kicked off the first general strike in the US with their refusal to load arms headed for the White Army in Russia. The IWW was also pretty drat militant and involved at the time. While that was a very long time ago, we should be happy to see a possible resurgence of their involvement. Mobilizing a group to head to Portland isn't overthrowing the violent police state, but it is a step up from most things that have been happening on the labor front.

CongoJack
Nov 5, 2009

Ask Why, Asshole
If it were two women there would almost certainly be more coverage, especially if they were white ladies.

HashtagGirlboss
Jan 4, 2005

CongoJack posted:

If it were two women there would almost certainly be more coverage, especially if they were white ladies.

But they very decidedly were not white women? Otherwise, I'm not sure how this counters my point?

CongoJack
Nov 5, 2009

Ask Why, Asshole

xrunner posted:

But they very decidedly were not white women? Otherwise, I'm not sure how this counters my point?

Sorry I meant if the dudes who got knifed defending the girls were women instead there would be more coverage.

Edit: whoops sorry misread your post, Yea if the girls had been knifed we probably wouldn't have heard nearly as much about it.

ElCondemn
Aug 7, 2005


anthonypants posted:

I think the best example of a peaceful protest in recent memory would be the DAPL water protectors. Despite being unarmed they faced overwhelming violence, and it's very likely that if they employed violence in any capacity they would have been wiped out, the media would have helpfully explained to everyone that they got what was coming to them, and the pipeline would have been built anyway.

And the best example of a non-peaceful protest would be the Malheur wildlife refuge occupation.

I'm not sure what your point is, but the DAPL was built, there was even an executive order to expedite it. The non-peaceful "protestors" at the wildlife refuge won since they were tried and acquitted of all federal charges.

So what we can learn from this? If you're white and want to be violent you can do so and win, but if you're brown and you're non-violent you lose. Which I guess is being reflected in this thread, trying to justify our current way of life as if it can't be changed without the death of countless people or the rise of an even worse regime.

I just don't understand why we can't have a functioning society, did other socialist democracies have to have a violent revolution to get where they're at? What's the history in places like Sweden and Norway? I'm sure they weren't always like that, why can't we move in that direction? Why are some of you so adamant about preserving the status quo? I guess life is probably pretty good for you, so much that you're willing to just accept that hundreds of people are being killed by police each year and that families are going hungry and into debt because they can't afford access to healthcare and other basic services.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

ElCondemn posted:

I'm not sure what your point is, but the DAPL was built, there was even an executive order to expedite it. The non-peaceful "protestors" at the wildlife refuge won since they were tried and acquitted of all federal charges.

So what we can learn from this? If you're white and want to be violent you can do so and win, but if you're brown and you're non-violent you lose. Which I guess is being reflected in this thread, trying to justify our current way of life as if it can't be changed without the death of countless people or the rise of an even worse regime.

I just don't understand why we can't have a functioning society, did other socialist democracies have to have a violent revolution to get where they're at? What's the history in places like Sweden and Norway? I'm sure they weren't always like that, why can't we move in that direction? Why are some of you so adamant about preserving the status quo? I guess life is probably pretty good for you, so much that you're willing to just accept that hundreds of people are being killed by police each year and that families are going hungry and into debt because they can't afford access to healthcare and other basic services.
I believe that there is a difference between protest and revolution.

ElCondemn
Aug 7, 2005


anthonypants posted:

I believe that there is a difference between protest and revolution.

I'm just saying protesting clearly isn't enough, we need to accept that we may need a revolution and be willing to move in that direction if necessary. But I'm certain if people were actually willing to make a change it would happen, without a revolution even. What is being asked for isn't anything unrealistic or absurd. I'm just lamenting the fact that so many people (even those in this thread) are talking about this poo poo like it's crazy to even bring it up.

GodFish
Oct 10, 2012

We're your first, last, and only line of defense. We live in secret. We exist in shadow.

And we dress in black.

ElCondemn posted:

So what we can learn from this? If you're white and want to be violent you can do so and win, but if you're brown and you're non-violent you lose. Which I guess is being reflected in this thread, trying to justify our current way of life as if it can't be changed without the death of countless people or the rise of an even worse regime.

I just don't understand why we can't have a functioning society, did other socialist democracies have to have a violent revolution to get where they're at? What's the history in places like Sweden and Norway? I'm sure they weren't always like that, why can't we move in that direction? Why are some of you so adamant about preserving the status quo? I guess life is probably pretty good for you, so much that you're willing to just accept that hundreds of people are being killed by police each year and that families are going hungry and into debt because they can't afford access to healthcare and other basic services.

Letter from Birmingham Jail By Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., 16 April 1963

"First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."

Peachfart
Jan 21, 2017

Oh, is this the part of the thread where we purity test everyone and leftism further shrinks into irrelevance? Neat.

Personally I believe that you can have an argument about methodology without immediately accusing everyone of being class traitors and such, but given the extremely effective history of leftist protests I'm sure you all know best.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




I got felt out by multiple ilwu members after the election for my political leanings. While there are there is the occasional nutter, https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3708238&pagenumber=113&perpage=40#post472857215

The overwhelming majority of them I encounter are old school democrats with no love for Trump or Trump supportors. Someone put a Trump sticker on a stevedores car to gently caress with him. They didn't treat it well.

They don't gently caress around. They take seriously the history of thier past strikes. At least in Seattle and Tacoma they are competent and organized. It be a big deal if they were involved.

ElCondemn
Aug 7, 2005


Peachfart posted:

Oh, is this the part of the thread where we purity test everyone and leftism further shrinks into irrelevance? Neat.

Personally I believe that you can have an argument about methodology without immediately accusing everyone of being class traitors and such, but given the extremely effective history of leftist protests I'm sure you all know best.

Feel free to argue about methodology, right now all you seem to be doing is making sarcastic remarks and dismissing any talk that you find too extreme. Sorry if it feels like a "purity test" to you, but feel free to gently caress off unless you are actually interested in talking about the state of our society.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

Peachfart posted:

Oh, is this the part of the thread where we purity test everyone and leftism further shrinks into irrelevance? Neat.

Personally I believe that you can have an argument about methodology without immediately accusing everyone of being class traitors and such, but given the extremely effective history of leftist protests I'm sure you all know best.
Do you have an actual "argument about methodology" to present or is it just more wailing about how posting on the internet is ineffective

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum
In lighter news, does anyone remember Mary Kay Letourneau

Peachfart
Jan 21, 2017

anthonypants posted:

Do you have an actual "argument about methodology" to present or is it just more wailing about how posting on the internet is ineffective

Sure. If you want full communism now, consider not immediately attacking the regular left as these people usually agree 90% with you.
And you will need all the allies you can get, considering this country elected Donald Trump as president. And maybe, just maybe, we can move this country leftwards.
And for those of you who think that all we need to do is revolt and magically leftist policies will appear, it is far more likely that the better funded and more powerful far right will simply dispense with any pretense of democracy and just take over.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

Peachfart posted:

Sure. If you want full communism now, consider not immediately attacking the regular left as these people usually agree 90% with you.
And you will need all the allies you can get, considering this country elected Donald Trump as president. And maybe, just maybe, we can move this country leftwards.
And for those of you who think that all we need to do is revolt and magically leftist policies will appear, it is far more likely that the better funded and more powerful far right will simply dispense with any pretense of democracy and just take over.
What is the "regular left", is that Hillary Clinton or the DSA or old people who are on welfare and medicare and love being on welfare and medicare and who enthusiastically vote for people who want to to abolish welfare and medicare

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


I always say if someone is not interested in policies or practices that will cause the redistribution of wealth, they are not on the left.

At best these are people who can be persuaded, at worst, they are obstacles whose sympathies ultimately lie with the ruling class.

If a person goes on an internet forum to poo poo talk the left, odds are they are not the former type of liberal. Or, at least, they're not the kind of person who soothing, cajoling words should be wasted on.

ElCondemn
Aug 7, 2005


Peachfart posted:

Sure. If you want full communism now, consider not immediately attacking the regular left as these people usually agree 90% with you.
And you will need all the allies you can get, considering this country elected Donald Trump as president. And maybe, just maybe, we can move this country leftwards.
And for those of you who think that all we need to do is revolt and magically leftist policies will appear, it is far more likely that the better funded and more powerful far right will simply dispense with any pretense of democracy and just take over.

Who attacked you? Who is attacking the left at all? What about a socialist platform is so unreasonable to the "regular left"? Are you sure you don't mean the "right" when you say "regular left"? I'm not really sure how you expect liberal/progressive socialist programs will magic into existence if people like you keep shooting them down as unrealistic.

What is your proposed solution if any attempt to move left will just be quashed by the "powerful far right"? To me it just seems like you're saying there is no solution and any movement towards a solution is pointless.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

ElCondemn posted:

Who attacked you? Who is attacking the left at all? What about a socialist platform is so unreasonable to the "regular left"? Are you sure you don't mean the "right" when you say "regular left"? I'm not really sure how you expect liberal/progressive socialist programs will magic into existence if people like you keep shooting them down as unrealistic.

What is your proposed solution if any attempt to move left will just be quashed by the "powerful far right"? To me it just seems like you're saying there is no solution and any movement towards a solution is pointless.
I think you're forgetting that the major reason Hillary Clinton won the 2016 election was because she was wise and strong enough to realize she'd gone as far left as she needed, and instead reached out to the right and successfully persuaded moderate Republicans to vote for her. It was a brilliant tactical move, and if she didn't have the creativity and the forethought to go through with it, we might be sitting under a President Trump right now. Is that what you want? A President Trump?

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

ElCondemn posted:

Who attacked you? Who is attacking the left at all? What about a socialist platform is so unreasonable to the "regular left"? Are you sure you don't mean the "right" when you say "regular left"? I'm not really sure how you expect liberal/progressive socialist programs will magic into existence if people like you keep shooting them down as unrealistic.

What is your proposed solution if any attempt to move left will just be quashed by the "powerful far right"? To me it just seems like you're saying there is no solution and any movement towards a solution is pointless.

Come on, the last few pages have been nothing more than a giant, circular firing squad. We have people seriously talking about full blown revolution while making GBS threads on those who are actually in the government actively working to make things better.

Why are folks so concerned about trying to score rhetorical points and verbally burn people who likely agree on 99% of poo poo to begin with? What does that loving accomplish?

Reene
Aug 26, 2005

:justpost:

who was making GBS threads on people in government working to make things better I must have missed that

also,

https://twitter.com/dirquez/status/870000914928619520

unfortunate but unsurprising

I wish I wasn't working that day so I could attend the counter-rally. if you're going please be safe. I have a pretty bad feeling about it.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum
In spite of Friday's murders, the nazis will get their rally this weekend https://twitter.com/dirquez/status/870001828984897536

ElCondemn
Aug 7, 2005


Solkanar512 posted:

Come on, the last few pages have been nothing more than a giant, circular firing squad. We have people seriously talking about full blown revolution while making GBS threads on those who are actually in the government actively working to make things better.

Why are folks so concerned about trying to score rhetorical points and verbally burn people who likely agree on 99% of poo poo to begin with? What does that loving accomplish?

Maybe you're reading something I'm not? I'm not sure what "firing squad" you're talking about. Be explicit, cite examples, I honestly am not sure who you think is being attacked.

Who's asking for points? What is disagreeable about what is being said?

anthonypants posted:

In spite of Friday's murders, the nazis will get their rally this weekend

Meanwhile they cancel BLM protests because scary black people might be there...

Error 404
Jul 17, 2009


MAGE CURES PLOT
Liberals have historically always, and likely will always, ally with fascists against leftism.

And no amount of handwringing about purity or circular firing squads will change that fact.

Materially the space between you whatabouters and the people cheering on murderous pieces of poo poo is pretty thin, and shrinking every day

Y'all wanna stop being treated like an obstacle? Then stop being an obstacle.

Reene
Aug 26, 2005

:justpost:

there absolutely is a contingent of (largely very young) leftists that do the ~purity~ bullshit (see leftbook) but lol if you think this thread is any of that

ElCondemn
Aug 7, 2005


Error 404 posted:

Y'all wanna stop being treated like an obstacle? Then stop being an obstacle.

I recently saw this oatmeal comic that explains in a simple way why these people feel like they're being attacked. They're being faced with information that's contrary to their belief so they interpret it as an attack and lash out.

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/believe

I'm assuming these people are just having trouble coming to terms with the fact that their point of view is flawed and they need to start getting on board with the reality of what's happening.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

ElCondemn posted:

Maybe you're reading something I'm not? I'm not sure what "firing squad" you're talking about. Be explicit, cite examples, I honestly am not sure who you think is being attacked.

In the last several pages there were folks who believed that anyone who wanted decent wages to be maintained for police were a traitor to the cause, RuanGacho in particular was poo poo on for trying to talk about community policing where he works. Then we had others who screamed about meltdowns when I pointed out the Sawant was an imperfect actor and advocated that unionized blue color labor needs to revolt against their employers and armed guards and unionized white color labor should be left to the wolves. We get it, lots of you think Everett is a complete shithole filled with rednecks and 4x4 trucks but maybe if you got to know a few of these folks you'd realize it's a lot more diverse than it first appears and you could gain a whole lot of needed support.

I mean come on, we're all leftists here. Not everyone is going to be living in downtown Seattle or Portland, but that doesn't mean they don't hold leftist views.

Error 404
Jul 17, 2009


MAGE CURES PLOT

Solkanar512 posted:

I mean come on, we're all leftists here.

That's where you're wrong kiddo.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

Error 404 posted:

That's where you're wrong kiddo.


I'm totally down with punching Nazis, so where are we disagreeing again?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply