|
Pissflaps posted:It's very enjoyable actually. The patisserie chefs aren't posh. No you're right they aren't. I feel bad straight away. It seems good, actual people who have worked up to this rather than bought a farmhouse and got a bit into it.
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 12:34 |
|
|
Tortuga posted:This isn't loving bake off Why would you trust a word a Lib Dem leader says?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
peanut- posted:I thought Amber Rudd actually did decently well there. The ganging up on her was counter-productive. It let her play the serious grown-up delivering what the people want on Brexit, immigration and foreign policy in the face of all the shouty lefties. They are going to absolutely hammer the Coalition of Chaos poo poo now. They were going to hammer this poo poo anyway, anything the tories have said that hasn't been a soundbite has been a well deserved disaster for them.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
Overall thoughts, small parties did the best. Lucas and Wood absolutely bossed it. Labour had a few hiccups, especially corbyn almost falling off a ledge when asked if the police cuts not happening would've stopped Manchester. Overall, jam man did well though, and the tories came off looking like asses, and since nobody gaffed seriously may not showing is still the biggest issue.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
Friendly reminder that James Schneider has done an absolutely incredible job with Corbyn's campaign after he took over
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
NotJustANumber99 posted:No you're right they aren't. I feel bad straight away. It seems good, actual people who have worked up to this rather than bought a farmhouse and got a bit into it. Deport the French/Welsh patissiers and let the Are Boys team win 
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:11
|
|
|
My basic takehome from the debate was that it was worse for the Conservatives than it was good for Labour. Corbyn wasn't stellar, just competent. May however looks worse than ever
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:11
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/politicshome/status/869927375462699008
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:11
|
|
|
What's the odds on a Tory majority but May losing her seat? That might be the funniest outcome of this dark timeline.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
The main thing is Corbyn won points just for being there. Theresa May pushed a grieving daughter in front of the camera so she could hide. Corbyn didn't gently caress up notably, so that's all he needed to look more strong and stable than the woman who makes orphaned children fill her podium because she's a coward.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
Verizian posted:What's the odds on a Tory majority but May losing her seat? That might be the funniest outcome of this dark timeline. seems likely if she loses seats on an election she called
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
This is massive if true. EU got jam man's back?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:Oooh liking the phrase "spiv economy". Isn't that what The Mayfair Set covered?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
Verizian posted:What's the odds on a Tory majority but May losing her seat? That might be the funniest outcome of this dark timeline. She has a 54% majority, you've got no hope
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
I feel like all the people bickering with each other kind of plays in to the Coalition of Chaos line - The Tories looked pretty bad, but I can see people holding their nose and voting for them to avoid another coalition.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
Venuz Patrol posted:seems likely if she loses seats on an election she called She's got a majority of 29,000 in Maidenhead. Even if she gets forced out as leader she's still going to be an MP.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
Verizian posted:What's the odds on a Tory majority but May losing her seat? That might be the funniest outcome of this dark timeline. As in her constitency? Absolutely none, she has something like the 3rd largest majority in the country and Maidenhead is full of cunts.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
mfcrocker posted:She has a 54% majority, you've got no hope Holy moly, almost 30k.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
May looks terrible. Amber Rudd actually did okay considering - she spoke like a human being (albeit a Tory). I thought Caroline Lucas and Angus Roberston were the most impressive. Corbyn was fine but the Brexit stuff was awkward, there's no way to get round that if he doesn't want to alienate one or the other half of the voters though.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
Lmao, the guy who said 'bollocks' to May has a piece in The Guardian: I called Theresa May’s NHS lies ‘bollocks’ on live TV. Now I’m voting Labour quote:I was undecided but the prime minister’s refusal to give a straight answer at the leaders’ hustings infuriated me. Corbyn has convinced me he deserves a chance
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:17
|
|
|
Verizian posted:What's the odds on a Tory majority but May losing her seat? That might be the funniest outcome of this dark timeline. If this happens I might die of laughter on election night.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
We're still going to lose, boys. Don't forget.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
Captain No-mates posted:We're still going to lose, boys. Don't forget. Dunno, our boys' recipe looks well researched, interesting and potentially very tasty.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
Regarde Aduck posted:What is wrong with an united Ireland? Nothing theoretically, but I can see how it could be a problem for someone looking to lead the UK. There's no public support in the UK for chopping off one of the four countries in the UK. Keeping your countries' territorial integrity is one of the most fundamental duties of a leader. Edit: Oops, sorry, pages late. Prince John fucked around with this message at 21:26 on May 31, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
I don't want a United Ireland. Thanks.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
I'll be interested to see what effect this has on popular opinion, if anything, because I don't think it did anything positive for Corbyn. May skipping the debate is certainly embarrassing, but I'd be surprised if it negatively affected anybody's voting intention. Pleasantly surprised, mind.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
It was definitely more bad for tories than good for labour imo, but we might all be a bit biased.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
Are there any meaningful statistics on the effect of televised debates by 'X Y z A b(not b) C' a week out from a surprise election? I think we are on thin ice here, prediction wise.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:24
|
|
|
Mu. posted:I'll be interested to see what effect this has on popular opinion, if anything, because I don't think it did anything positive for Corbyn. May skipping the debate is certainly embarrassing, but I'd be surprised if it negatively affected anybody's voting intention. Her entire deal is being stronger than corbyn, and, in particular, stronger than corbyn because she's going to march into brussels and be a "bloody difficult woman". The big takeaway is that she actually prefers to run and hide when faced with someone who might be mean to her, pushing grieving daughters in the firing line instead if need be.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:25
|
|
|
Captain No-mates posted:We're still going to lose, boys. Don't forget.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
Miftan posted:It was definitely more bad for tories than good for labour imo, but we might all be a bit biased. I think if Corbyn bombed, it would make it look like a good idea for May but him holding up means the big questions remains Of course I'm sure most headlines tomorrow will be Coalition of Chaos or Money Tree or Yellow Money to Buy Trains.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
Verizian posted:What's the odds on a Tory majority but May losing her seat? That might be the funniest outcome of this dark timeline. Her majority was nearly 30k in 2015, there's utterly no way she loses her seat.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:27
|
|
|
How does monopoly work
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:28
|
|
|
Corbs did alright and May looks terrible, so in that sense I suspect that his gamble paid off.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:28
|
|
|
Mugsbaloney posted:How does monopoly work You ask the banker for momney and he gives it to you, and then you give it to muslamic scroungers to live in mansions, obviously!
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
Party Boat posted:She's got a majority of 29,000 in Maidenhead. Even if she gets forced out as leader she's still going to be an MP. Maidenhead has an extraordinarily lovely town centre for a commuter town in the south east. All those Tory voters clearly aren't spending their dosh there.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
Mugsbaloney posted:How does monopoly work The money is different colours according to value but you can use any of it to buy the gasworks, stations, etc as long as you meet the value. And, having bought them, straight away you start loving people through owning it, whereas before everyone could land there and be fine.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Oberleutnant posted:You ask the banker for momney and he gives it to you, and then you give it to muslamic scroungers to live in mansions, obviously! Bankers trickling down money... isn't this Tory policy?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Raeg posted:I think if Corbyn bombed, it would make it look like a good idea for May but him holding up means the big questions remains Every newspaper always declares a debate a win for their preferred candidate, even if Rudd had utterly crashed and burned the Telegraph and the Mail would have spun it as a resounding victory for common sense against the forces of communism and terrorist sympathisers. They can't, however, spin "Theresa May didn't turn up" in any way but a laughably transparent one - even the Telegraph took a shot at her for it.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 12:34 |
|
|
peanut- posted:As in her constitency? Absolutely none, she has something like the 3rd largest majority in the country and Maidenhead is full of cunts. glad to see this is still true despite having left the area 6 years ago
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 21:32
|
|
