|
Gonzo McFee posted:The problem with the chants and the crowds is that it's being done by people who actively paying attention and getting involved. That's always true, though.
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 17:29 |
|
|
Pissflaps posted:I urge you to stop posting about me. I won't reply if you don't make nonsense and dishonest claims 
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:12
|
|
|
TheRat posted:https://twitter.com/Channel4News/status/870020852963614720 That was surprisingly brutal. The gently caress has happened in the last fe days that everyone's turning on the Tories? Has the national conscience shortage finally been addressed? Did Jiminy Cricket clone himself?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
winegums posted:That was surprisingly brutal. The gently caress has happened in the last fe days that everyone's turning on the Tories? Has the national conscience shortage finally been addressed? Did Jiminy Cricket clone himself? Close elections sell more papers. And they're still downplaying it a lot, mind you. They could easily be 100 times harder on May and the Tories.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/870040061001248768
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
winegums posted:That was surprisingly brutal. The gently caress has happened in the last fe days that everyone's turning on the Tories? Has the national conscience shortage finally been addressed? Did Jiminy Cricket clone himself? British public spiteful and petty, not overly choosy about their targets.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
This is odd https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/870040480179945473
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
David Davis needs to work out what Brexit will do to Dutch Courage imports before he next appears on TV.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Hoops posted:Why have the Tories had such a horrible campaign? I know Labour got a new team in but it's not like the Conservative party have no idea how to do what they need to do in a general election. Lyndon Crosby is not really as good as he's been hyped up to be. Much like Karl Rove people like to talk about how he's a Machiavellian genius but really he just really hammers on staying on message and this Dril tweet. https://twitter.com/dril/status/841892608788041732
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:17
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/870039936245927938 these 'don't knows' are why we should go doorknocking and phonebanking
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:17
|
|
|
Is that public expectation? It's the only way I can interpret that.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:17
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:I want labour to win. He says crossing his fingers
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
JeremoudCorbynejad posted:Is that public expectation? It's the only way I can interpret that.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
Gum posted:He says crossing his fingers It'd take more than crossed fingers.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
JeremoudCorbynejad posted:Is that public expectation? It's the only way I can interpret that. First reply to the tweet has the question (Yes)
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
Lord of the Llamas posted:I won't reply if you don't make nonsense and dishonest claims post as you wish, provided you've made a thorough inspection of page 306 of this thread
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
jBrereton posted:No it's what the public want. That seems improbable.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:It'd take more than crossed fingers. imagine a left wing leader who hadn't had mp's constantly denigrating him in the press for 2 years . The funny thing is if his current polling is correct then they definitely get the blame for loving it all up
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
Lord of the Llamas posted:I won't reply if you don't make nonsense and dishonest claims "I'm never wrong" "Here's where you're wrong" "Don't talk to me or my son ever again" 
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
Hoops posted:Why have the Tories had such a horrible campaign? I know Labour got a new team in but it's not like the Conservative party have no idea how to do what they need to do in a general election. Seriously though, it would be glorious if May fucks this up and loses the majority. Its like when people looked at Trump's election and pointed out that its like America looked at the Brexit result and thought "amateurs, *this* is how you gently caress up your own country", except its the Conservatives looking at Hilary thinking that they can go even worse.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:That seems improbable.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
Jose posted:imagine a left wing leader who hadn't had mp's constantly denigrating him in the press for 2 years . The funny thing is if his current polling is correct then they definitely get the blame for loving it all up Nah mate, Corbyn just got magically good the second election rules for broadcasting came into play. Nothing to do with his own party conspiring to get rid of him before he even won the first Labour leadership election.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
It's been removed, what did it say?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
JeremoudCorbynejad posted:Is that public expectation? It's the only way I can interpret that. it looks like they've just deleted that, so with that and what Gum said I assume someone accidentally labelled the numbers wrong in the tweet Party Boat posted:It's been removed, what did it say? possible outcomes from an election, about 67% "preferring" a Tory majority or words to that end, but it seems that poll may have actually just been expected outcome rather than what people want
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
jBrereton posted:explain the phrasing otherwise (although the tweet has been deleted?) I think it was a mis-tweet. You were right about the original wording, but perhaps that wasn't the actual question.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:23
|
|
|
Party Boat posted:This feels like desperation from the Sun, and I think it reflects worse on May than anyone else. It's a way of making her weak performance look better. "She would of smashed it if her dad weren't dead"
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:23
|
|
|
Angepain posted:post as you wish, provided you've made a thorough inspection of page 306 of this thread I'm fairly confident that reminding someone that they will be called to account on their claims (even if they did occur a whole six weeks ago) during a general election is well within those rules.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:23
|
|
|
Spangly A posted:disability cuts killed twice the amount of people the IRA did if you're going to engage in whataboutery at least stick to related stuff. like referencing the UVF or RUC crimes. a non sequitur just makes you look silly. and trying to reduce either of these to points scoring over death counts is embarrassing simplistic nonsense.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:24
|
|
|
Can't remember exact wording but it was "Regardless of your preference blah blah blah who's gonna win?"
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:24
|
|
|
jabby posted:Emily Thornberry gatecrashing Dominic Green's interview is well worth a watch. You can just tell she is loving loving the opportunity to really lay into the Tories in a way that would never have been allowed in Milliband's day. Love thornberry to bits
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:24
|
|
|
Jose posted:imagine a left wing leader who hadn't had mp's constantly denigrating him in the press for 2 years . The funny thing is if his current polling is correct then they definitely get the blame for loving it all up Only among those who would have blamed them regardless.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:24
|
|
|
Namtab posted:It's a way of making her weak performance look better. "She would of smashed it if her dad weren't dead" Makes me think "wow May would rather throw a grieving ally under the bus than debate Corbyn"
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:24
|
|
|
Cerv posted:if you're going to engage in whataboutery at least stick to related stuff. like referencing the UVF or RUC crimes. a non sequitur just makes you look silly. you know you're talking to someone who lost family to terrorist attacks during The Troubles, right?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
Gum posted:Can't remember exact wording but it was "Regardless of your preference blah blah blah who's gonna win?" No, it was 'Public Preference for Result', meaning which result would the public prefer. It was bizarre because it said over 60% would prefer a Tory majority and only 7% a Labour majority. A lot of the replies were asking if it really meant public prediction of the result, and it's since been deleted so it was probably wrongly worded. EDIT: Yup. https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/870043721508802560
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:26
|
|
|
Namtab posted:It's a way of making her weak performance look better. "She would of smashed it if her dad weren't dead" That's the intent but I haven't seen many respond that way
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:26
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Only among those who would have blamed them regardless. This is dumb as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:26
|
|
|
Gum posted:Can't remember exact wording but it was "Regardless of your preference blah blah blah who's gonna win?" quote:Regardless of what you would like to see happen at the general election, what do you think WILL be the result of a general election on 8th June?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:26
|
|
|
Gum posted:Can't remember exact wording but it was "Regardless of your preference blah blah blah who's gonna win?"
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:27
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Only among those who would have blamed them regardless. 
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 17:29 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/870043066945744897 Will the dam burst on the Tory's Brexit firewall or will they limp over the line having blown the biggest polling lead in UK political history?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 23:27
|
|