|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 07:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 22:19 |
|
|
Nichael posted:
What about Tiffany?☹️
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 07:46
|
|
President Eric Trump
|
oohhboy posted:What about Tiffany?☹️ Who?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 07:50
|
|
|
assuming that the Democratic wave of 2018 that people keep talking about actually happens, what are the chances that liberal politicians, media and talking heads will immediately squander it by clinging to the useless concepts of decorum, bipartisanship and political capital
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 07:56
|
|
|
Undoubtedly referring to the 80's pop singer Tiffany. I can't think of another one anywhere near as noteworthy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 07:57
|
|
|
Majorian posted:Undoubtedly referring to the 80's pop singer Tiffany. I can't think of another one anywhere near as noteworthy. There's that jewelry store with those little blue boxes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:03
|
|
|
Mustached Demon posted:There's that jewelry store with those little blue boxes. Oh yeah, my wife keeps mentioning that place. I'm not sure why, I think she wants something from there. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:04
|
|
|
Majorian posted:Oh yeah, my wife keeps mentioning that place. I'm not sure why, I think she wants something from there. She wants one of those little blue boxes duh. Ladies find them cute. My brother was told that and got his wife a blue box from Tiffany's. An empty one.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:05
|
|
|
Chris Cilizza on CNN after democrats retake the house in 2018: Well now that the minor issues are solved lets spend the two years before the next election on constantly screaming that the democrats are corrupt and bad and don't deserve your vote
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:09
|
|
|
Mustached Demon posted:She wants one of those little blue boxes duh. Ladies find them cute. I'm sure that went over well. Did he try to justify it by saying something along the lines of, "This box is a PROMISE! A promise for all the beautiful things we'll get each other over the years! It's totally not evidence of me forgetting our anniversary! Baby where you going?!  "
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:12
|
|
|
Majorian posted:I'm sure that went over well. Did he try to justify it by saying something along the lines of, "This box is a PROMISE! A promise for all the beautiful things we'll get each other over the years! It's totally not evidence of me forgetting our anniversary! Baby where you going?! No he owned up to it. He said he thought it was the box they wanted and honestly found it weird woman really wanted the box.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:13
|
|
|
I hope she found that endearing. Did anybody post this, btw? "Trump White House grants waivers of ethics rules." Aiding Conway, Bannon, and four ex-lobbyists. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:15
|
|
|
RottenK posted:assuming that the Democratic wave of 2018 that people keep talking about actually happens, what are the chances that liberal politicians, media and talking heads will immediately squander it by clinging to the useless concepts of decorum, bipartisanship and political capital Even in a best case scenario, all a Democratic wave in 2018 does is slow down the damage until 2020. They're not coming anywhere close to enough for veto overrides even if by absolute miracle they manage to just barely squeak into a neutral or +1 Senate (this is super unlikely, but predicting politics 1.5 years from now might as well use tea leaves for all the good it does in this climate). Getting a majority in the House seems unlikely but possible if the Russia stuff really stays in the news that long, and that would be huge for setting up investigation committees and making sure lovely laws stop being written. Of course, anything shy of 51 Senate seats means they can still appoint terrible judges, and even with 51 seats, there's still executive orders and the lovely cabinet picks.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:15
|
|
|
HPanda posted:Even in a best case scenario, all a Democratic wave in 2018 does is slow down the damage until 2020. They're not coming anywhere close to enough for veto overrides even if by absolute miracle they manage to just barely squeak into a neutral or +1 Senate (this is super unlikely, but predicting politics 1.5 years from now might as well use tea leaves for all the good it does in this climate). Getting a majority in the House seems unlikely but possible if the Russia stuff really stays in the news that long, and that would be huge for setting up investigation committees and making sure lovely laws stop being written. Of course, anything shy of 51 Senate seats means they can still appoint terrible judges, and even with 51 seats, there's still executive orders and the lovely cabinet picks. I know what the wave is supposed to achieve, you don't need to tell me. I was asking about the probablility of the wave happening and then producing no results at all because of sabotage by cretins who would want to "stay civil"/"go high"/"have the moral high ground"/"preserve political capital" etc etc etc, instead of getting their knives out and obstructing the conservatives in every way possible while also riling the base up in preparation for 2020.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:42
|
|
|
There's plenty of little Joe Liebermans in wait, and the media is still swarming with useless morons who are very worried about decorum and want to give trump a chance every time he manages to no act demented for a second.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:44
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-rg5nvtXNw
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:46
|
|
Timeless Appeal posted:Noah didn't retire and he didn't complain about climate change. A few pages ago but the "God will take care of climate change" line doesn't even work even if you are religious. God didn't manifest Noah's ark, nor he'd teleported the animals on it. He told Noah, and Noah did his best to fix the issue. So we have an example of a literal "God acts through men to address Climate Problems" in the fuckin Bible.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 08:52
|
|
|
That Italian Guy posted:A few pages ago but the "God will take care of climate change" line doesn't even work even if you are religious. As well as several examples of people flat-out ignoring oncoming catastrophes, and WELP, guess how that turned out!
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 09:03
|
|
|
Looks like those predictions of the arts at least being good during Trump were entirely accurate!
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 09:04
|
|
|
RottenK posted:I know what the wave is supposed to achieve, you don't need to tell me. I was asking about the probablility of the wave happening and then producing no results at all because of sabotage by cretins who would want to "stay civil"/"go high"/"have the moral high ground"/"preserve political capital" etc etc etc, instead of getting their knives out and obstructing the conservatives in every way possible while also riling the base up in preparation for 2020. Fair enough. Then not very high. On one hand, they can come together well enough when they smell blood. On the other hand, the left has, at least for the past few months, shown that they're pissed, probably enough to start attacking any Democrat turncoat if something came down to just one or two votes. So far, they've only had hall passes on things that would pass anyway. If a Democratic wave hits in 2018, that shows a motivated voter base that might not turn up for them in 2020 if they betrayed the base. A motivated base is gonna outweigh the small possibility of a few right-wing moderates.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 09:04
|
|
|
Wow he has good taste
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 09:15
|
|
|
HPanda posted:If a Democratic wave hits in 2018, that shows a motivated voter base that might not turn up for them in 2020 if they betrayed the base.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 09:41
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JohnAvlon/status/870111344384782336 Ha ha ha marvelous
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 09:58
|
|
|
El Burbo posted:Wow he has good taste I can see how you'd get confused and say something like this but actually no his taste is very bad because he watches animes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 10:08
|
|
|
Jealous Cow posted:https://twitter.com/JohnAvlon/status/870111344384782336 He's draining the swamp!
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 10:09
|
|
|
This kid knows his anime.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 10:18
|
|
|
Camel Camus posted:I can see how you'd get confused and say something like this but actually no his taste is very bad because he watches animes. I think you'll find, sir,
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 10:39
|
|
|
The kids are alright.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 10:46
|
|
|
drilldo squirt posted:This kid knows his anime. Anime sucks though.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 10:54
|
|
|
the fact that the son of Donald J. Trump is, by all appearances, a JoJo fan is completely loving hilarious to me
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 10:57
|
|
|
like good loving lord "Barron Trump is a weeaboo" was just about near the bottom of the list of things I expected to be actually true
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 10:58
|
|
|
Be careful before the anime-right gets a hold of him.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 10:58
|
|
|
LORD OF BOOTY posted:the fact that the son of Donald J. Trump is, by all appearances, a JoJo fan is completely loving hilarious to me uhh you see the blue tick anywhere?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 11:09
|
|
|
jojo fans unite
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 11:10
|
|
|
Kurtofan posted:jojo fans unite I just started watching Diamond is Unbreakable, only started watching JoJo early this year. Good anime.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 11:12
|
|
|
Someone send this kid some Evangelion.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 11:46
|
|
|
Frogfingers posted:Someone send this kid some Space Runaway Ideon.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 11:49
|
|
|
Jealous Cow posted:https://twitter.com/JohnAvlon/status/870111344384782336
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 11:52
|
|
|
Having just been shown the squirrel scene from Jojo after thinking it was another kid's cartoon for years I can say that this kid has hilariously good taste.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 12:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 22:19 |
|
|
Ignoring anime for
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 12:20
|
|
