|
What a weird word spine is
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 02:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 12:55 |
|
|
Shear Modulus posted:im kind of confused why so many people are surprised that hillary would hire someone who doesn't care about any issues except militarism generally they make a better effort not to expose their ~private position~ on the issues
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
Lemming posted:Smh at the people who tried to donate to get out of it instead of accepting their fate smh at people who are hyperattached to their ~forums identity~ and don't just laugh and start anew
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 02:43
|
|
|
babypolis posted:i dont understand how we didnt have evrey single hillaryman throw themselves on their knees, recounce hillary, and embrace full communism. how do you not change your worldview after being destroyed so horribly lmao Mrit did. He was decent enough to repent when the axe was coming down, at least
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 02:47
|
|
|
I donated, and I would have got away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling posters. Would have escaped a double toxx scott free. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 02:47
|
|
|
Not a Step posted:Lowtax wanted it to be exactly like a toxx ban in that the account was actually banned, like what would happen if you lost a toxx. Because, you know, you had lost a toxx. Lowtax only got involved after Exmarx intervened (without bothering* to talk to logik or I ahead of time), but otherwise you've more or less got it right. *Exmarx, that is. Captain_Maclaine has issued a correction as of 02:53 on Jun 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 02:48
|
|
|
she hates beer look at her, shes not having a good time how can you trust someone so day crew like her Homeless Friend posted:What a weird word spine is sch-pine
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 02:52
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:she hates beer that wide open glare while shes drinking says "ok hill, you got this, just take your medicine and theyll think youre cool"
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
how do you do, fellow beer-likers?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:00
|
|
|
hillary is definitely a gin kinda gal
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:01
|
|
|
Shear Modulus posted:how do you do, fellow beer-likers? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:02
|
|
|
Al! posted:that wide open glare while shes drinking says "ok hill, you got this, just take your medicine and theyll think youre cool" I don't think it's even necessarily that she doesn't like to have a beer, it's that she freezes up and turns way mechanical and fake whenever she has to interact with people she doesn't know or are outside her comfort zone (ie: corporate boardrooms and closed-doors fundraisers).
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:02
|
|
|
this picture was good for a nice chuckle again
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:04
|
|
|
Al! posted:you have a weird obsession with safe spaces so im gonna chalk it up to that but like the first time i was ever aware of exmarx in cspam was when he did his weird powerplay Yes. Because the people who toxxed for Hillary only ever posted in CSPAM, and never in D&D, so its really weird that a D&D guy would be concerned about CSPAM posters.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:07
|
|
|
Taintrunner posted:many people in this thread I'm guessing have been conventional liberals in the past before transitioning into smash the state tankies due to the nightmarishly reality around them becoming clear i thought tankie meant you were pro-state
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:07
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:i thought tankie meant you were pro-state no that means you're a zegermans post apologist
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
ex post facho posted:no that means you're a zegermans post apologist umm who doesn't like zegremans posts?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
From what I've heard, Exmarx was no Hillary fan so his move was not some attempt at preserving posters. I had personally "presented" two options, one was to permaban/ban as usual and the other was to forgive the permas into normal bans like how we did with the Trump toxxes. I thought that the list of toxxers was simply too large and I thought that it would be more managable if the list was culled in some way. ExMarx said he would deal with it, and that was the end of that. I have no comments on what he did other than he did what he thought was best and I wished that he had consulted us about it beforehand. My personal take is that while you can argue about the integrity of the toxx or whatever, the main reasoning behind it came from SSers / offsite morons who just wanted to throw a molotov into what they viewed as a snowflake echochamber etc. They don't really care about toxxes or how it must be respected, they just wanted things to burn. Nobody whined when we violated the integrity of the toxx by giving Trump toxxers a way out. edit: i apologize preemptively to maclaine/shengji if i missed something you guys mentioned during the whole thing, we can't reference the thread and i only remember what i posted, kinda
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:she hates beer 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:45
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:From what I've heard, Exmarx was no Hillary fan so his move was not some attempt at preserving posters. I had personally "presented" two options, one was to permaban/ban as usual and the other was to forgive the permas into normal bans like how we did with the Trump toxxes. I thought that the list of toxxers was simply too large and I thought that it would be more managable if the list was culled in some way. ExMarx said he would deal with it, and that was the end of that. i remember lolling at the people all like 'the sanctity of the toxx' when everyone was fine w/getting banned anywya, most of us just wanted to raise money for charity instead of lowtax. of course that was before i knew lowtax was a broke semi manic dude and the forums are gonna die basically any day now, i could see why he would want the income
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:47
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:From what I've heard, Exmarx was no Hillary fan so his move was not some attempt at preserving posters. I had personally "presented" two options, one was to permaban/ban as usual and the other was to forgive the permas into normal bans like how we did with the Trump toxxes. I thought that the list of toxxers was simply too large and I thought that it would be more managable if the list was culled in some way. ExMarx said he would deal with it, and that was the end of that. it was reasonable for exmarx to try to raise money for charity as an alternative to save time for mods, and it was also reasonable for lowtax to override that decision. this is my controversial opinion.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:50
|
|
|
lowtax has been struggling ever since his mangosteen storefront imploded
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:58
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:it was reasonable for exmarx to try to raise money for charity as an alternative to save time for mods, and it was also reasonable for lowtax to override that decision. this is my controversial opinion. There's a conspiracy going on somewhere, I'm sure of it. We just need to find it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:00
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:From what I've heard, Exmarx was no Hillary fan so his move was not some attempt at preserving posters. I had personally "presented" two options, one was to permaban/ban as usual and the other was to forgive the permas into normal bans like how we did with the Trump toxxes. Wait, why were people who toxxed for a Trump win banned? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:05
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:Wait, why were people who toxxed for a Trump win banned? the popular-vote clause, no doubt. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:Wait, why were people who toxxed for a Trump win banned? They were told they were going to be upgraded to a perma unless they renounced Trump, then they would only eat a regular probation. Trump's loss was seen as inevitable and they wanted to perma anyone who would support Trump. And then the Hillary people were offered amnesty to 'reduce the workload' despite it actually being a massive amount of work to verify the donations. I'm sure politics played absolutely no role
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:09
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:Wait, why were people who toxxed for a Trump win banned? they weren't, they got an offer to exchange their toxxes for a donation to some charity when the pussy tape dropped IIRC and everyone was sure he was gonna lose
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:09
|
|
|
Man
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:10
|
|
|
Not a Step posted:They were told they were going to be upgraded to a perma unless they renounced Trump, then they would only eat a regular probation. Trump's loss was seen as inevitable and they wanted to perma anyone who would support Trump. what wacky hijinks! comedy website, am I right??!??
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
the obvious lesson is that posting in any toxx thread is stupid, but stupid people are going to keep doing it so 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:shengji who???????????????
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
Not a Step posted:They were told they were going to be upgraded to a perma unless they renounced Trump, then they would only eat a regular probation. Trump's loss was seen as inevitable and they wanted to perma anyone who would support Trump. oh my god
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
Not a Step posted:They were told they were going to be upgraded to a perma unless they renounced Trump, then they would only eat a regular probation. Trump's loss was seen as inevitable and they wanted to perma anyone who would support Trump. you can drone on about conspiracies all you want but lol this implies that exmarx is a Hillary supporter
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
Joementum posted:the obvious lesson is that posting in any toxx thread is stupid, but stupid people are going to keep doing it so I just used to post to dnd when I wanted arbitrary rules + bans.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
we're approaching "baloogan is a Hillary supporter" status here
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
Hillary does like drinking though, just not beer in particular. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
as someone who once had access to the modqueue, i can tell you it's all loving chaos lol dont try to devine any strategic planning or long term motivation even a little bit
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 12:55 |
|
|
Al! posted:as someone who once had access to the modqueue, i can tell you it's all loving chaos lol dont try to devine any strategic planning or long term motivation even a little bit I can confirm this
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:19
|
|