Sereri posted:

WYR bot does not gently caress around

https://twitter.com/WYR_bot/status/870218509741170688

cheese-cube posted:

eripsa bot is leading to some fun exchanges:

https://twitter.com/eripsa/status/870395925272829952

e: peep the replies.

WrenP-Complete posted:

Yeah, eripsa sent his writing from the last ten years and I added that today

Captain Foo posted:

quote:

Ripple across the entire social order can arise from everyone doing what they need to build systems that have endured the rigorous academic work in my sense. In this kind of the film raises issues of traffic control as a writer, and its happenings. That gives me some reason to take care of themselves. This open community is local and not copied from anywhere else. No one does. Being attached to facilitation standards, right there in talking about things you don't understand It'd be better for us all the way the system behind you already. Institutional support is already replacing marbles from the content of the elephant. I'm proposing Strangecoin to suggest an alternative currency.

quote:

Occasionally those categories matter for the realization of an indefinite number of constraints. Among these constraints on individual persons establishing links with their cp ring, don't come to Blechtley. But most simply stood there, gesturing violently with their language are precisely the paradigm shift, and I'm not arguing we should have access to those influences. There are some diagrammatic exceptions, of course, as did virtually all athletes, actors, and most other performers apart from letting the crowd is unhappy. There's a dreamy dream where the story is right where the participants must converse about a structure with this problem requires having all that horrible ickyness you fight is the community of organisms might develop.

Powaqoatse posted:

guessing: by using the previous sentence as seed for the next?

im super interested in the technical stuff

Powaqoatse posted:

fwiw this is a lyric right there:

"There's a dreamy dream where the story is right"
"where the participants must converse" at night

WrenP-Complete posted:

I love that line!

Powaqoatse posted:

all that horrible ickyness you fight
is the community of organisms might

kindof

did you teach it to rhyme or is that emergent from the corpus?

quote:

Smart in a way as to prevent persecution from the content so that a machine learning techniques, we present a supervised classification method based on the gendered nature of facilitation exactly because I am open to the war at Bletchley Park. In the Polytopolis, the process the sugar, so it is much better shot of landing on it's feet. Which is not, itself, a bad documentary. In particular, the proposal for rethinking a very abstract ways. Others may feel more immediate and pressing concerns. My only claim here was simply ripping off. The point being made here.

quote:

Automatic systemic consequence of distributing the tools we currently call government break down and asks, ok how many people are active content generators developing a broad, network wide reputation, then your little pyramid is all for naught. I want to do with it when they are accomplishing jack loving squat, and I'm proud of and give my professional identity isn't my field of expertise. You are saying, essentially, that if electrical engineers are discovering something about her and that's a dynamical feature of design philosophy perspective, the proposal I've provided. I'm imagining that, very similarly to now, some slim population will be highly cited five years after publication. By this we provide quantitative insight into the positivist traps.

WrenP-Complete posted:

Well, I just tried to do like a gradient of seeds where each past sentence is less determinative of the one that came after it. (Might have not described that well)

Results:



I think this is worse, right?

quote:

First, the notion of real human identities, and groups is important and deserving of greater access to exclusive communities that are available on in this context in which the domains in dialogue with the rest approximated a lumpy geodesic above their heads. The drones followed reluctantly, spawning torrents of turbulent, beeping insults into the system treats sex offenders is nothing to do with our labor. Nevertheless it is the key feature of the thread that I'm trying to be an overarching theory of gravity that pops out of poverty and oppression it will impact the next generation gadget. Technically, your shell can approximate some kinds of oversights and inefficiencies.

NoneMoreNegative posted:

http://einhornglitzenkampf.tumblr.com/post/161349587209/the-neural-network-will-name-your-next-band

Too much to copy/paste

quote:

Spice Green Robinson
Gloome Schronnana
Boofpas
The Freights
Nighty Daggers
The Loveburners of Internal Watch
Foxettes Ratimot Secret singer band
The Dougloco
The Theps
Choconard Leach
Rhoudemsquat
Terrerssky?
Flemz
Mighty Chipping Baker
Bop Gray (band)

quote:

Dr Overhard
The Arce (band)
The Tree Misters
Reilling Ef (rapper)
Flim Brothers
Ching Mage
Nan Edwards (folk singer)
Nittle Bizzy
The Dinlakoposseps
Skins of Space
Michael Porker
The Lost singers
The Nutlet Band
The Rogue Orchestra
The Fuman.A.I.((band)
Vervoly Brown (urtist)
Boohalloid (group)
The Ballening Birds
Lice Stepley

Collateral Damage posted:

Gloome Schronnana is my experimental psytrance solo act.

NoneMoreNegative posted:

lmao I just looked up the My Sharona lyrics to quip something and I realised I never knew he was singing about loving young girls; problematic!

OldAlias posted:

https://twitter.com/thinkpiecebot/status/870853432550330369

Eripsa posted:

Hello YOSPOS! I have an idea for a crowdsourced Turing test web tool for evaluating the conversational abilities of Twitter bots. WrenP has pointed me to Botometer which uses traditional bot detection with sentiment analysis to guess if an account is a bot. But I was thinking of something more traditionally akin to Turing's test.

The tool I imagine does two things: first, it lets you submit links to specific tweets. The tool grabs that tweet and the reply chain, including any replies to and from the original tweeter.

Second, the tool shows you sample exchanges from its database, formatted like twitter but scraped of identifying information, and asks the reader to judge: Bot or not? Perhaps then the reader is told the correct answer, if known.

The tool then scores bots on how often they are confused for human speakers. Ideally, the results would be interesting enough to rate twitter bots on their skills as interlocutor, perhaps to be worn as a badge of honor. Perhaps we could have other bots assigning ratings also, and maintain a score for how well a bot convincing humans, and a separate score for convincing other bots.

Developing this tool doesn't seem to me hard to do from a technical perspective, but I tend to underestimate such things. I would be happy to supply/acquire reasonable funding for such a project; I have webspace and I just squatted on turingtest.chat for a place to put it.

Any thoughts?

Eripsa posted:

Hello YOSPOS! I have an idea for a crowdsourced Turing test web tool for evaluating the conversational abilities of Twitter bots. WrenP has pointed me to Botometer which uses traditional bot detection with sentiment analysis to guess if an account is a bot. But I was thinking of something more traditionally akin to Turing's test.

The tool I imagine does two things: first, it lets you submit links to specific tweets. The tool grabs that tweet and the reply chain, including any replies to and from the original tweeter.

Second, the tool shows you sample exchanges from its database, formatted like twitter but scraped of identifying information, and asks the reader to judge: Bot or not? Perhaps then the reader is told the correct answer, if known.

The tool then scores bots on how often they are confused for human speakers. Ideally, the results would be interesting enough to rate twitter bots on their skills as interlocutor, perhaps to be worn as a badge of honor. Perhaps we could have other bots assigning ratings also, and maintain a score for how well a bot convincing humans, and a separate score for convincing other bots.

Developing this tool doesn't seem to me hard to do from a technical perspective, but I tend to underestimate such things. I would be happy to supply/acquire reasonable funding for such a project; I have webspace and I just squatted on turingtest.chat for a place to put it.

Any thoughts?

dragon enthusiast posted:

https://twitter.com/WYR_bot/status/870852776724758528

my girlfriend is Legos posted:

the second option had literally 100% of the votes until like 18 hours in. that's an impressive comeback by the anime perverts, but not quite enough

my girlfriend is Legos posted:

the second option had literally 100% of the votes until like 18 hours in. that's an impressive comeback by the anime perverts, but not quite enough

Eripsa posted:

Hello YOSPOS! I have an idea for a crowdsourced Turing test web tool for evaluating the conversational abilities of Twitter bots. WrenP has pointed me to Botometer which uses traditional bot detection with sentiment analysis to guess if an account is a bot. But I was thinking of something more traditionally akin to Turing's test.

The tool I imagine does two things: first, it lets you submit links to specific tweets. The tool grabs that tweet and the reply chain, including any replies to and from the original tweeter.

Second, the tool shows you sample exchanges from its database, formatted like twitter but scraped of identifying information, and asks the reader to judge: Bot or not? Perhaps then the reader is told the correct answer, if known.

The tool then scores bots on how often they are confused for human speakers. Ideally, the results would be interesting enough to rate twitter bots on their skills as interlocutor, perhaps to be worn as a badge of honor. Perhaps we could have other bots assigning ratings also, and maintain a score for how well a bot convincing humans, and a separate score for convincing other bots.

Developing this tool doesn't seem to me hard to do from a technical perspective, but I tend to underestimate such things. I would be happy to supply/acquire reasonable funding for such a project; I have webspace and I just squatted on turingtest.chat for a place to put it.

Any thoughts?

Who What Now posted:

An ultimate world would probably have entertaining games. There's no downsides!

Captain Foo posted:

get out of yospos

Who What Now posted:

You don't understand, Eripsa has a ~~doctorate of philosophy~~ so he knows better than you. You just aren't mature enough to appreciate his true genius.

WrenP-Complete posted:

https://twitter.com/eripsabot/status/871749143294877698

Hm, Ken is having a day.

https://twitter.com/eripsabot/status/871771584767381505

https://twitter.com/eripsabot/status/871771636072148992