|
Elyv posted:The time they asked that one dude who posts in this thread to manually delete his unneeded decks one by one because they were taking up too much storage It should be noted that these were automatically saved draft decks and they numbered in the thousands.
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 22:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 07:21 |
|
|
I like the ones where saffi eriksdottir and strionic resonator just don't work. You can activate their abilities but they both just don't do anything.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 22:24
|
|
|
ThePeavstenator posted:It should be noted that these were automatically saved draft decks and they numbered in the thousands. Entire megabytes of data, how could modo ever hope to handle it?
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
uPen posted:Entire megabytes of data, how could modo ever hope to handle it? it must have been in the gigs, each card in each deck is unique and has it's own instance of the art image and rules text I bet lol either way once it started causing problems the obvious answer is the email your customer and tell them to do hours of busy work for you because they use your product too much
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
The fact that Spawnsire of Ulamog's ability cost (2) to activate through multiple recurrences of RoE flashback drafting and was never actually fixed. No, really, I can find someone reporting this bug as far back as 2015, and Saffron Olive posted about this bug on Twitter earlier this year. Gatherer still lists the cost of Ulamog's ability as (2)0: _____, so I'm confident it's still bugged.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 22:48
|
|
|
The time Deadshot could target the same creature twice. Okay, that's small potatoes, but you guys got most of the good ones already.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 22:51
|
|
|
They still haven't fixed Reanimate + Containment Priest, which I consider more egregious because that's an actual Legacy relevant interaction and seemingly shouldn't be too tough to get working.Elyv posted:- the time when Jaddi Lifestrider crashed the game despite working for years Did it crash the game? I thought it asked you to tap 99 things, including all the cards in your opponent's sideboard, and if there weren't enough cards you timed out. Death Bot posted:The time when gleemox, a card notable for saying "this card is banned" on it, was legal in multiple formats Hey they fixed that one after one jackass played it against a streamer while a WotC employee was watching.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
cheetah7071 posted:That time where if snapcaster flashed back a zenith card, it would shuffle into your library but still show up in the exile zone, and your opponent would know when you drew it because it would disappear from exile I remember having this effect me and my opponents. The reveal when it was drawn was a nice buggy touch.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:Did it crash the game? I thought it asked you to tap 99 things, including all the cards in your opponent's sideboard, and if there weren't enough cards you timed out. That was Tangle Wire if you didn't have enough permanents to tap to it. Hellsau posted:Hey they fixed that one after one jackass played it against a streamer while a WotC employee was watching. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 23:09
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:Did it crash the game? I thought it asked you to tap 99 things, including all the cards in your opponent's sideboard, and if there weren't enough cards you timed out. Oh yes you're right, my mistake. --- That time they announced flashback standard and then it turned out that multiple cards in those decks didn't work.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
PhyrexianLibrarian posted:1) xmage.de seems to be a little bit more reliable than woogerworks, but not by much. Thanks this is perfect.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 23:23
|
|
|
Elyv posted:Oh yes you're right, my mistake. Fortunately they wisely pulled the affected throwback gauntlet when the bugs became apparent, even though the bugs effected cards that were widely known and reported as bugged for more than a year before the gauntlet went up.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 23:39
|
|
|
ShaneB posted:Thanks this is perfect. FWIW, I've had more luck with activity levels on xmage.de over woogerworks. That said, both are reasonably active.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
Mezzanon posted:God I hope that modern event deck story is true It's not quite what I remembered: http://www.starcitygames.com/article/24935_Playing-An-Event-Deck-At-An-SCG-Open.html
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 01:37
|
|
|
That period of time where 'discard card at random' did not in fact discard anything at random. That time when Tempting Wurm let your opponent put creatures into play from your hand.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 01:46
|
|
|
ZeroCount posted:That period of time where 'discard card at random' did not in fact discard anything at random.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 01:49
|
|
|
suicidesteve posted:This is the first one I haven't heard of yet. This was way back when MODO 2.0 rolled out, and Guerrilla Tactics was in your deck it would trigger whenever it drat well pleased, even if it wasn't in your hand.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 01:58
|
|
|
That time i got hundreds of tickets from selling cards from a phantom cube that actually wasn't phantom
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
Bugsy posted:That time that Mirrodin Blinding Beam worked, but MM Blinding Beam didn't this has always been my favorite cuz it means of all the programmers at least one doesn't know how to copy/paste
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:That time i got hundreds of tickets from selling cards from a phantom cube that actually wasn't phantom Lmao this is great
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 02:14
|
|
|
Ein Sexmonster posted:Everything about Panglacial Wurm. They literally just gave up trying to make it work. How does that card work IRL, anyway? Do you literally resolve it in the middle of resolving whatever effect is causing you to search your library?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 02:24
|
|
|
AlternateNu posted:How does that card work IRL, anyway? Do you literally resolve it in the middle of resolving whatever effect is causing you to search your library? You cast it while the other spell/ability is still resolving. It will go directly above it on the stack. The spell/ability resolves. Players get priority. Then panglacial wurm resolves.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
I just collected company'd into a reflector mage in response to a Liliana of the Veil uptick and made my opponent discard an Olivia Voldaren he had just played. I think I need to go take a shower.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
Since it hasn't really come up yet, TDSL has been interesting. It feels like the old timers have been getting wrecked which might be attributable to 1) They just don't draft AKH too much 2) The new world order fairly ruined draft strategies that aimed to leave your opponents only with cards that replace colors on permanents or w/e Probably a large part the former, but it feels like the latter has some kind of effect. Not a huge deal, but kinda funny given all the talk of how team drafting so thoroughly changes the strategy of drafting etc.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
uninverted posted:I just collected company'd into a reflector mage in response to a Liliana of the Veil uptick and made my opponent discard an Olivia Voldaren he had just played. I think I need to go take a shower. Bouncing someone's Liliana with Cryptic in response to the uptick when they're hellbent is pretty nice too.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 04:54
|
|
|
Rides Naked posted:Since it hasn't really come up yet, TDSL has been interesting. It feels like the old timers have been getting wrecked which might be attributable to Also, AKH draft is some hard stuff. It feels much more skill intensive and especially demanding regarding decision making while drafting.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 05:01
|
|
|
meanolmrcloud posted:Also, AKH draft is some hard stuff. It feels much more skill intensive and especially demanding regarding decision making while drafting. I've been doing pretty well with it in leagues. It got a lot better when I started valuing cheap interaction (including efficient exert creatures) above everything except sure-win bombs.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
meanolmrcloud posted:Also, AKH draft is some hard stuff. It feels much more skill intensive and especially demanding regarding decision making while drafting. clamiam45 posted:I've been doing pretty well with it in leagues. It got a lot better when I started valuing cheap interaction (including efficient exert creatures) above everything except sure-win bombs. Agreed
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 05:28
|
|
|
Rides Naked posted:Agreed Haha nice. That deck rules too, but I've never gotten FOUR drakes! Did you have the spells to make it easy?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
ThePeavstenator posted:No, the initial matrix is the matchup favorability for each deck. Looks like you inspired Frank Karsten: https://www.channelfireball.com/articles/its-a-small-sample-analysis-but-the-standard-equilibrium-metagame-apparently-contains-0-marvel/
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 06:26
|
|
) and spit out what the best decks are, as well as what metagame will look like over time. The model can also accept "hedge" values to account for player preferences (i.e. there's an obvious best deck but a much cheaper deck is really popular anyway).
|
Gonna see how Jund gods works in standard this week. Spent $35 finishing the deck yesterday so I have practice with another deck once rotation hits..
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 09:10
|
|
|
Elyv posted:We should commemorate this by listing some of our favorite bugs Goblin token blocks Serum Visions
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 09:12
|
|
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:Looks like you inspired Frank Karsten: https://www.channelfireball.com/articles/its-a-small-sample-analysis-but-the-standard-equilibrium-metagame-apparently-contains-0-marvel/ That's... interesting? Marvel is actually a BAD deck choice?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 10:52
|
|
|
Slightly, in the specific "ideal" meta that's composed of BG, UR and zombies. If people insist on playing decks that lose to Marvel (say, too large a percentage of the field is zombies), it probably becomes a good pick. I'd be curious to see Peavstenator run Karsten's numbers.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 11:07
|
|
|
Rides Naked posted:Since it hasn't really come up yet, TDSL has been interesting. It feels like the old timers have been getting wrecked which might be attributable to Whenever I hear Marshall commentating a match i think wow this guy has no idea how to play limited at all. And then I watched him play and yeah, he has no idea how to play limited at all.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 14:58
|
|
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:Looks like you inspired Frank Karsten: https://www.channelfireball.com/articles/its-a-small-sample-analysis-but-the-standard-equilibrium-metagame-apparently-contains-0-marvel/ Siivola posted:Slightly, in the specific "ideal" meta that's composed of BG, UR and zombies. If people insist on playing decks that lose to Marvel (say, too large a percentage of the field is zombies), it probably becomes a good pick. The title of the article says it all, "It’s a Small-Sample Analysis". The math all works out, but look at the BG numbers. The deck's matchup percentages are all above 50 except for Zombies, and Zombies gets rolled by every other deck. Basically I don't buy BG having those matchups, and I think the problem stems from looking at the day 2 results of 7-2 players in 2 GPs. That's not a very large of a sample size, and you can't really justify the assumption that both players in each matchup are equally skilled, which this model relies on. ThePeavstenator fucked around with this message at 15:11 on Jun 7, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 15:05
|
|
|
Firebatgyro posted:Whenever I hear Marshall commentating a match i think wow this guy has no idea how to play limited at all. And then I watched him play and yeah, he has no idea how to play limited at all. Doesn't Marshall hang out in the 1900 club range pretty regularly?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 15:34
|
|
|
Remember for magic players there's no in between. If something isn't the best then it's garbage.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 15:55
|
|
|
ShaneB posted:Doesn't Marshall hang out in the 1900 club range pretty regularly? Yea. The guy is a limited God.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 15:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 07:21 |
|
|
Firebatgyro posted:Whenever I hear Marshall commentating a match i think wow this guy has no idea how to play limited at all. And then I watched him play and yeah, he has no idea how to play limited at all. Lmao yeah okay
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2017 16:11
|
|
