|
Comstar posted:And THERE IT IS. THE RUSSIAN CONNECTION. The man the President wants to be the FBI head's law firm is a consultant for Rosneft. All roads lead to Russia.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:08 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 07:23 |
|
Wray seems like a GOP Party hack. Again, no Democrat should be complicit in this nomination.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:10 |
|
SO, Russia planted a fake news story that got Qatar in a pickle.Trump encouraged it. 2 days later, Russia asks for their loan of 1/5 of the state oil company back from Qatar. IS THIS WHY RUSSIA PLANTED THE STORY??? And Trump was their agent who did it! Russia gets their loan back at a substantial discount, billions presumably. And the guy whom works at the Legal outfit that works for said state oil company is going to be the next Head of the FBI.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:12 |
|
How many people are connected to Rosnef exactly?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:16 |
|
What Charlie said, don't start panicking before we have any evidence of anything. Wait and see what's going on before you start getting chubbies over WW3.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:17 |
|
mcmagic posted:Wray seems like a GOP Party hack. Again, no Democrat should be complicit in this nomination. He's got reasonable bona fides for the position and in any other circumstance should sail through, but the fact he's spent the last decade using his in-depth knowledge of the DoJ and FBI to defend ultra rich criminal assholes should raise more than a few eyebrows.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:18 |
|
I'm still baffled by the Goon who was worried that a terrorist attack in Iran was going to allow Trump to shut down the Russian investigation.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:19 |
|
Technical Analysis posted:What Charlie said, don't start panicking before we have any evidence of anything. Wait and see what's going on before you start getting chubbies over WW3. WWIII should be the least of our concerns. Vladimir Putin essentially controls the world right now.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:21 |
|
St. Dogbert posted:WWIII should be the least of our concerns. Vladimir Putin essentially controls the world right now. "essentially", as in, not
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:22 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:I'm still baffled by the Goon who was worried that a terrorist attack in Iran was going to allow Trump to shut down the Russian investigation. To be fair, when the tiny, obese hands of government don't know how the system works they can and will do dumbshit to obstruct and cajole everyone into complying. Whether or not this effort succeeds is another matter.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:23 |
|
Nothing is going to stop the investigation. At best all this is just going to suck the already thin media oxygen from it for a while. Donald drops more bombs than a B-52 everyday than a carpet bombing run.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:23 |
|
mango sentinel posted:He's got reasonable bona fides for the position and in any other circumstance should sail through, but the fact he's spent the last decade using his in-depth knowledge of the DoJ and FBI to defend ultra rich criminal assholes should raise more than a few eyebrows. He's a GW Bush and Christie party hack. This is NOT the non political person we were told by GOP senators they would vote for. NTM his obligatory Russian ties.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:25 |
|
Technical Analysis posted:What Charlie said, don't start panicking before we have any evidence of anything. Wait and see what's going on before you start getting chubbies over WW3. The Middle East is a powder keg. Anything could be the "Archduke Ferdinand" event. Something that might be minor if it took place in, say South America, could be the straw that breaks the camel's back in the Middle East.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:26 |
BarbarianElephant posted:The Middle East is a powder keg. Anything could be the "Archduke Ferdinand" event. Something that might be minor if it took place in, say South America, could be the straw that breaks the camel's back in the Middle East. Care to fit any more cliches into that sentence?
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:28 |
|
South Korea temporally halts THAAD because of environmental reasons as they do an impact report. You would think they would do that before they started installation. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40183448 BarbarianElephant posted:The Middle East is a powder keg. Anything could be the "Archduke Ferdinand" event. Something that might be minor if it took place in, say South America, could be the straw that breaks the camel's back in the Middle East. Trump is throwing plenty of fire around for no reason and we are likely pass "Archduke Ferdinand"already. This is moving very quickly so we will know very soon.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:29 |
|
BarbarianElephant posted:The Middle East is a powder keg. Anything could be the "Archduke Ferdinand" event. Something that might be minor if it took place in, say South America, could be the straw that breaks the camel's back in the Middle East. Agreed, but there's no point in panicking over every event before we even have any details.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:29 |
|
BarbarianElephant posted:The Middle East is a powder keg. Anything could be the "Archduke Ferdinand" event. Something that might be minor if it took place in, say South America, could be the straw that breaks the camel's back in the Middle East. would you say that the next 6 months will be critical, mr. friedman
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:29 |
Comstar posted:And THERE IT IS. THE RUSSIAN CONNECTION. The man the President wants to be the FBI head's law firm is a consultant for Rosneft. So check it out. QHG Holdings was incorporated by Glencore and Qatar, then on December 30 2016 two things happened: Glencore terminated its appointment as a member, and Qatar Holding LLC was appointed in their place. This is all in the Cayman Islands. QHG Shares Pte. Ltd. is registered with Singapore's government. The company was formerly known as Catalpo until Glencore left, now it is the shareholder of QHG Holdings. That shareholder company is under the management of Intertrust. Intertrust's major shareholder is Blackstone Group, i.e. Stephen Schwarzman. (See the flowchart in the middle of this image.) Schwarzman has billions in Russian dark money flowing into McConnell's super-PAC, and Trump appointed Schwarzman as chairman of the strategic and policy forum. And that's not all. mdemone posted:As before, new additions appear in bold; as-yet-unverified information now appears in italics.
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:30 |
|
The big sign will be if KSA changes it's Military posture. You can't hide that.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:32 |
|
It should be noted within those New Jersey primary results that: a) Murphy received less than 50% of his party's vote (about 48%), while b) Johnson and Wisniewski (two more progressive candidates) received about 22% of the vote each. A couple of takeaways: a) New Jersey is ready and willing to become a progressive bastion, and Murphy (assuming he wins) would have a Democratic state legislature to work with, but b) He's going to have problems getting progressive folks on board with him, because they hate his Goldman Sachs history and the fact that he's dumped $18 million into this election. Would it be enough to cost him the election? Eh, probably not. It's just going to be a weird race to keep track of.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:32 |
|
CyberPingu posted:Care to fit any more cliches into that sentence? I could just say "The Middle East wants war, and the smallest thing could be the pretext, as it was in Europe just prior to WW1." Happy now?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:32 |
|
oohhboy posted:South Korea temporally halts THAAD because of environmental reasons as they do an impact report. You would think they would do that before they started installation. That's not the real reason.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:33 |
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:Last night was NJ primary to see who from each party will run for Chris Christy's replacement and numbers are very interesting. I don't think the Republicans have a chance in hell in the general but not sure 2009 is a good baseline year for the Democratic primary, as we did have a Democratic incumbent as well. How do 2013 numbers compare?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:33 |
|
mcmagic posted:He's a GW Bush and Christie party hack. Where are you getting this?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:34 |
|
derra posted:I don't think the Republicans have a chance in hell in the general but not sure 2009 is a good baseline year for the Democratic primary, as we did have a Democratic incumbent as well. How do 2013 numbers compare? The GOP is going to get blown out. Christie's name is mud here. The problem is that Murphy is a Goldman Sachs hack who drowned the election in money, which is a repeat of Corzine, aka the greasy gently caress who paved the way for Christie in the first place. loving machine politics, man.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:34 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:I'm still baffled by the Goon who was worried that a terrorist attack in Iran was going to allow Trump to shut down the Russian investigation. I keep pointing out that these "nothing matters" people aren't suffering from pessimism but in fact intellectual laziness, yet people don't believe me.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:36 |
|
Toaster Beef posted:It should be noted within those New Jersey primary results that: People didn't really pay attention to the race and the turnout was low. The thing you have to remember about NJ politics is that the county party heads get to pick who is on the Dem line on the ballot and they pretty much anointed Murphy months ago. I voted for Wisniewski and I literally had to stare at the ballot for 5 mins to find his name. Murphy is going to win the general. He's up 25 points in the polls already and he's running against someone with Christie's stink all over her. He also has a decent platform and has been saying the right things. I guess it's possible that he ends up being a good governor but I'm not getting my hopes up.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:37 |
|
Xombie posted:I keep pointing out that these "nothing matters" people aren't suffering from pessimism but in fact intellectual laziness, yet people don't believe me. I think it's less laziness and more being traumatized, because let's face it, last year was traumatic.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:41 |
|
mdemone posted:So check it out. QHG Holdings was incorporated by Glencore and Qatar, then on December 30 2016 two things happened: Glencore terminated its appointment as a member, and Qatar Holding LLC was appointed in their place. This is all in the Cayman Islands. How much money is 19% of Rosneft worth? Because Russia and Trump look to be trying to start a war (by putting pressure on Qatar) to get it back, cheap. That's the motive. Russia sold it to Qatar and wanted to get it back, and Trump was the man who can make it happen.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:45 |
|
Night10194 posted:I think it's less laziness and more being traumatized, because let's face it, last year was traumatic. The nothing matters comments feel a lot like clinical depression.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:45 |
|
Zapf Dingbat posted:The nothing matters comments feel a lot like clinical depression. Por que no los dos?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:46 |
Comstar posted:How much money is 19% of Rosneft worth? Because Russia and Trump look to be trying to start a war (by putting pressure on Qatar) to get it back, cheap. That's the motive. Russia sold it to Qatar and wanted to get it back, and Trump was the man who can make it happen. Rosneft is around ~$60B, so we are talking ten billion or so.
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:47 |
|
Zapf Dingbat posted:The nothing matters comments feel a lot like clinical depression. Ever heard of "depressive realism"?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:47 |
|
Comstar posted:How much money is 19% of Rosneft worth? 15 billion dollars
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:47 |
|
Oxxidation posted:The GOP is going to get blown out. Christie's name is mud here. I live in Bergen and am well aware of how terrible the Democratic machine is. I just didn't think it would be too useful comparing Democratic primary turnout this year against a year when we had a (terrible) incumbent on the ballot.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:48 |
|
Spaced God posted:https://twitter.com/ReutersTech/status/872183197362212865 Soooooo, this seems like a bad case for two reasons. One being the potential implications down the line, and the other being just a poor focus. #1: I don't think this is really a constitutional question. Lots of people have brought up records keeping laws in relation to tweets being deleted, and sure it's something that should be upheld, but it's not a constitutional situation and I don't think the SC will hear it because of that. #2: If it does go to the SC I don't think the result, if they rule that blocking people is against the first amendment, will be limited to the Office of the President or elected officials in general. Which could mean that blocking people in online forums is unconstitutional. Basically it would state that: Yes, the first amendment guarantees you an audience wherever you want one. Or at least a venue. Which could be good or bad in the long run, but with the current state of internet discourse and RU backed harassment rings I think it'd be a step back.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:48 |
|
[quote="mcmagic" post=""473128630"]but I'm not getting my hopes up. [/quote] trump thread: I'm not getting my hopes up
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:51 |
|
oohhboy posted:South Korea temporally halts THAAD because of environmental reasons as they do an impact report. You would think they would do that before they started installation. This is because we sent over the other 4 after the election without telling the elected Prez to try to make 'facts on the ground,' as I think those people put it. And so he was understandably upset.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:54 |
|
https://twitter.com/sfchronicle/status/872322609123389443
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:59 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 07:23 |
|
https://twitter.com/publicroad/status/872451722815451136 gently caress you US Weekly. Why are they printing this regime propaganda?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 14:59 |