|
🔥+E 🌲 🌓 1⃣
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 02:42 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 10:21 |
|
Hillary "Nrrta'thhaax" Clinton would never have won and to deny this fact shows massive delusions on par with trump
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 02:46 |
|
I remember on these very forums on primary day, once Hillary took the nom, saying trump will win and Bernie was their only chance
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 02:47 |
|
Blue Train posted:I remember on these very forums on primary day, once Hillary took the nom, saying trump will win and Bernie was their only chance anyone with half a brain at least went "uh, guys.............."
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 02:50 |
|
VikingSkull posted:anyone with half a brain at least went "uh, guys.............." SUCH A HOT TAKE mods plz ban tia
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 03:03 |
|
Blue Train posted:I remember on these very forums on primary day, once Hillary took the nom, saying trump will win and Bernie was their only chance i like how all the people that were all in on the yass queen mi abuela poo poo haven't come near a thread about hillary all year but they still rub their butts all over every other political thread in cspam i also like how people are engaging the retarded monkey that was so aggressively retarded that they got kicked out of cspam i also like the name cspam goons amuse me dance, you fat bitch ha ha ha
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 04:04 |
|
Mordor She Wrote posted:Bernie would never win, nothing would have stopped Trump's victory and we'll have to live with that forever. I think it would have been possible for Hillary to beat Trump if she wasn't so transparently terrible about literally everything. Are you suggesting there is simply no way she could have avoided being a warmonger who laughs about how the US murders its enemies?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 04:21 |
|
I know you guys are the "silent majority" and whatnot but salty bernie supporters are just a minor part of demographic.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 04:35 |
|
Hillary probably could have won (not be popular or even good mind you) had she just owned up to being an old corrupt bitch like thatcher. Most dems would have still hated her, but you probably would have had more shrug their shoulders and go alright I'll vote for her.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 04:35 |
|
Bholder posted:I know you guys are the "silent majority" and whatnot but salty bernie supporters are just a minor part of demographic. yeah salty hillary supporters are a way bigger demographic
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 04:37 |
|
VikingSkull posted:yeah salty hillary supporters are a way bigger demographic Of course it is, you call everyone a Hillary supporter who dares to disagree with you.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 04:40 |
|
Bholder posted:Of course it is, you call everyone a Hillary supporter who dares to disagree with you. lmao the disconnect is powerful
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 04:41 |
|
Remember back when Comey was an ideological Republican who intentionally influenced the election to get his man Trump elected? That was a funny narrative even back then but obviously way more so now.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 04:50 |
|
Cnut the Great posted:Remember back when Comey was an ideological Republican who intentionally influenced the election to get his man Trump elected? That was a funny narrative even back then but obviously way more so now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Wgb9-Tc6I8
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 04:57 |
|
Comey's a weak company man, not a GOP partisan. That was pretty clear in November. He did the email thing because his office in NYC was out of control and couldn't be trusted not to leak. Also, saying Bernie would have won is kind of a vacuous statement--Joe Biden would have won too, does that mean neoliberalism is the new hotness after all?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 05:57 |
|
So wait I haven't clicked on this thread, is this a 150 page thread for talking about hillary clinton??
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:01 |
|
porfiria posted:Comey's a weak company man, not a GOP partisan. That was pretty clear in November. He did the email thing because his office in NYC was out of control and couldn't be trusted not to leak. sayin that runnin hillary was a damned fool mistake is not vacuous when she refuses to go away
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:07 |
|
Jeffrey of YOSPOS posted:So wait I haven't clicked on this thread, is this a 150 page thread for talking about hillary clinton?? depending on who you ask its the containment thread for alt-right proud kekistani trump supporters. you know, all of these people talking about bernie
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:08 |
|
pair this with the clip of colbert sternly talking down to his studio audience like a 3rd grade teacher, like a fine wine and cheese
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:09 |
|
ArgumentatumE.C.T. posted:sayin that runnin hillary was a damned fool mistake is not vacuous when she refuses to go away I know Hillary 2020 is a funny meme, but there is a 0% chance she actually runs.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:15 |
|
VikingSkull posted:yeah salty hillary supporters are a way bigger demographic They are hardly what you'd call "silent" though
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:17 |
|
porfiria posted:I know Hillary 2020 is a funny meme, but there is a 0% chance she actually runs. Have you been paying attention to the news lately? They sure seem to be setting up the possibility
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:18 |
|
Jeffrey of YOSPOS posted:So wait I haven't clicked on this thread, is this a 150 page thread for talking about hillary clinton?? Yes. It's actually one of the most on-topic threads on the forums, because somehow we keep finding out more new things about her and they're always worse
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:21 |
|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:Have you been paying attention to the news lately? They sure seem to be setting up the possibility they're trying to alley oop chelsea for 2020 using basically the exact same platform as last time except with a fresh faced youthful clinton. the thing is though that chelsea 2020 is still clinton 2020 and they're still going to lose to trump because running that same campaign against an incumbent is almost as dumb as hillary running again
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:22 |
|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:Have you been paying attention to the news lately? They sure seem to be setting up the possibility Watching the news is an excellent way to misunderstand the world.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:40 |
|
nigga crab pollock posted:they're trying to alley oop chelsea for 2020 using basically the exact same platform as last time except with a fresh faced youthful clinton. the thing is though that chelsea 2020 is still clinton 2020 and they're still going to lose to trump because running that same campaign against an incumbent is almost as dumb as hillary running again
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:43 |
|
phasmid posted:Chelsea has a stupid little hamster face and should not be on TV. hillary is questionably senile and probably doesn't have control over her bowel movements or the fine motor control of her lower extremities but that didn't stop them from trying
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:46 |
|
nigga crab pollock posted:hillary is questionably senile and probably doesn't have control over her bowel movements or the fine motor control of her lower extremities but that didn't stop them from trying Jesus. That's just cruel of them...
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:49 |
|
It would be clever for the Democrats/media to keep floating Hillary as a 2020 contender without her actually running.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 06:53 |
|
Jeffrey of YOSPOS posted:So wait I haven't clicked on this thread, is this a 150 page thread for talking about hillary clinton?? This is the secret Bernie Bro hangout thread where we talk about our main man Bernie and how he would have won. Also about how Hillary Clinton had slaves. Sophy Wackles fucked around with this message at 08:43 on Jun 10, 2017 |
# ? Jun 10, 2017 07:42 |
|
Pawn 17 posted:This is the secret Bernie Bro hangout thread where we talk about our main man Bernie and how he would have won. Also about how Hillary Clinton was a slave owner. And people say that the Democratic party has changed since the civil war just lol
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 07:46 |
|
porfiria posted:Also, saying Bernie would have won is kind of a vacuous statement--Joe Biden would have won too, does that mean neoliberalism is the new hotness after all? hmmm yes interesting take (btw bernie woulda won)
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 07:59 |
|
Lol now Bernie's got the evangelicals mad at him because he doesn't believe in their bullshit religion. Hail Satan. Feel the Bern.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 08:07 |
|
Trump dominated the evangelical vote in a landslide, to tune of around 85% so in a nutshell they all voted for modern-day Herod lol
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 08:27 |
|
phasmid posted:Lol now Bernie's got the evangelicals mad at him because he doesn't believe in their bullshit religion. Isn't it because Bernie suggested a Christian was unfit for public office based on his believing that Christianity is the only path to salvation--which is, you know, a central tenet of the Christian religion? As a Bernie supporter and atheist I have to say that was pretty stupid of him, and at the very least he should have chosen his battle better there.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 08:29 |
|
not really https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsCMP07nPwc gently caress this guy. hail bernie hail satan
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 08:35 |
|
Homestar Runner posted:not really I'm not watching that whole video. In this country, you're allowed to believe whatever you want to believe about where other people who don't subscribe to your religion go to in the afterlife. The afterlife isn't something that has any effect on real world affairs (because it doesn't exist). Christians are allowed to believe Christianity is the only path to salvation, Muslims are allowed to believe Islam is the only path to salvation, Jews are allowed to not to give a poo poo about any of this salvation garbage, etc. Unless he said something else about Muslims I'm really not seeing the issue.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 08:53 |
|
^^ What Homestar said. Also:Cnut the Great posted:Christianity is the only path to salvation--which is, you know, a central tenet of the Christian religion? He believes people who aren't Christian are dross, unsalvageable. Someone who believes that and is dumb enough to admit it is surely unfit to govern a diverse populace. Thus, he got the old shutdown.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 08:54 |
|
phasmid posted:^^ What Homestar said. Also: He said this: quote:“As a Christian, I believe that all individuals are made in the image of God and are worthy of dignity and respect, regardless of their religious beliefs,” Vought said. “I believe that as a Christian, that’s how I should treat all individuals—” It doesn't matter if some Christians disagree that their religion is the only path to salvation. Believing that your religion is the only path to salvation is not some sort of fringe religious belief, and saying someone should be disqualified from public office for believing it is unconstitutional and un-American. The guy (IMO) credibly stated that he believes all people should be treated equally in this life regardless of their religious beliefs, and that's all that should matter when it comes to determining if he's fit to govern a diverse populace. Stating that he believes that people who aren't Christian are "dross" seems both unfair and bordering on an intentional mischaracterization of his stated beliefs taken as a whole. You can disagree with him theologically (as I do) without advocating that he be barred from serving in public office by virtue of his harmless beliefs about a fictional afterlife.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2017 09:03 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 10:21 |
|
Except that the quote was lifted from an article the man wrote defending his alma mater for firing a teacher. The teacher in question was exercising their constitutionally protected freedom of speech, but that seemed not to accord with the articles of faith at said school. If the man is willing to blackball someone out of a job for saying that Christians and Muslims pray to the same God, what reason do I have to believe he will keep an objective view of things in office? So which is it? Do we side with the constitution and reinstate the teacher or do we let someone who lets the Bible advise his work in to a secular position? e. By the way dross, noun - something regarded as worthless; rubbish. If someone "stands condemned" it means they're off to hell. It's not a misrepresentation. He said it himself, he was just too chickenshit to repeat it because he knew that was the object of Sanders' line of questioning. phasmid fucked around with this message at 09:12 on Jun 10, 2017 |
# ? Jun 10, 2017 09:08 |