Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
loquacius
Oct 21, 2008

paranoid randroid posted:

Schumer cant whip for poo poo lmao cmon you old sleaze even Pelosi kept her herd of cats in line on this

Chucky Shoom has been ok on trying to contain the Dem civil war but not great at his actual job managing the Dem senate yeah

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Serf
May 5, 2011


ThndrShk2k posted:

Sometimes it's literally better than getting involved and then destabilizing another area for 2 generations

its been one enormous fuckup after enormous fuckup since the loving first world war. end american imperialism and military adventurism and leave the rest of the world alone militarily

paranoid randroid
Mar 4, 2007

loquacius posted:

Chucky Shoom has been ok on trying to contain the Dem civil war but not great at his actual job managing the Dem senate yeah

"uh hi Senator Schumer? yeah its Senator Scumbag. look i need a hall pass on the AHCA vote, on account of my constituency being a bunch of nihilistic boomers who just want someone to smother them in their sleep."

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!

paranoid randroid posted:

Schumer cant whip for poo poo lmao cmon you old sleaze even Pelosi kept her herd of cats in line on this

how else would she eat the cats huh? just open her gullet and let the cats march single file right into her

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

Agnosticnixie posted:

Tragically even if the US dropped all support I suspect May, Trudeau and Macron would still quite happily sell them the gear.

But without superlative amounts of western support, Saudi Arabia would basically not even be able to defeat the starving militias of the poorest arab state.

It's not just the arms. The US is doing mid-air refueling for the Saudi Air Force, which only the US has the capability of doing for them. Without that they wouldn't be able to do double-tap strikes on weddings and hospitals.

Concerned Citizen posted:

or putin, for that matter.

Russia is not going to supply the KSA.

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006


Pharma, hospitals, and insurers all try to exert pressure on each other and none have enough indivudual leverage to do anything and it leads to a ton of petty price squabbles that in the end the consumer pays for.

Example: Pharma rep goes to hospital and says "hey try this new technique" and hospital says "no" and pharma goes "gee it'd be shame if your drug supply disappeared"

at least that's my understanding, it might be wrong. Point is the profit motive alone isn't the only reason, another reason is the lack of a large negotiating entity in the form of strict regulations that allow for hundreds of private insurers to compete evenly (like in Germany) or a single payer system that can tell all these companies what it's gonna pay or they can pound sand.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
A fun read.

https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/874627601779884032

got any sevens
Feb 9, 2013

by Cyrano4747

Joementum posted:

It's not just the arms. The US is doing mid-air refueling for the Saudi Air Force, which only the US has the capability of doing for them. Without that they wouldn't be able to do double-tap strikes on weddings and hospitals.



This is why I don't get western people helping set up schools and stuff over there, even if you aren't taken hostage by one of the militias while you're there, our own government will bomb it within a few years. It's been a pattern for 15 years now.

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006


But like

he didn't win

and Macron murdered everyone

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.

loquacius posted:

My interpretation of that stat was that it was based on the spending of Americans in general, not the American government specifically

so the answer to the question is "because they are profit-incentivized to make us pay more"

But the American government pays more than other countries correct?

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme
gently caress it just create a healthcare price control board and be done with it

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


zegermans posted:

But like

he didn't win

and Macron murdered everyone

contrarianism is a disease

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

ex post facho posted:

because we have a for profit healthcare system with massive administrative overhead, thats why

healthcare is something like $9t, of which something like $500b is due to private insurance

We'd still be paying 5% (16.5% vs. current 17%, when OECD average is around 11-12%) more in GDP than other OECD countries if all we did was change our payer model.

(calculated another way: United Healthgroup has like 13% market share and made $67b profit, which works out to a rough estimate of insurance industry-wide profit of $515b)

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

Concerned Citizen posted:

gently caress it just create a healthcare price control board and be done with it

We already have one, we just need to extend its authority.

ThndrShk2k
Nov 3, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Bread Liar

zegermans posted:

But like

he didn't win

and Macron murdered everyone

May didn't win either.

Corbyn won people's hearts, despite all odds.
He may be onto something.

ThndrShk2k
Nov 3, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Bread Liar

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

healthcare is something like $9t, of which something like $500b is due to private insurance

We'd still be paying 5% (16.5% vs. current 17%, when OECD average is around 11-12%) more in GDP than other OECD countries if all we did was change our payer model.

(calculated another way: United Healthgroup has like 13% market share and made $67b profit, which works out to a rough estimate of insurance industry-wide profit of $515b)
Of course assuming market prices stay the same, which they won't.

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/874646655232028672

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!

zegermans posted:

But like

he didn't win

and Macron murdered everyone

neolibs are always harping on about incrementalism

im seeing it now and they dont like it so it makes you think that maybe they were just procrastinating on the whole incrementalism thing :thunk:

should be advocating for inert-ism, the opposite of acceleration-ism

Agean90
Jun 28, 2008


wonder what the irrelevent left is up to

https://twitter.com/fightfor15/status/874457556080631808

well then :getin:

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015
The comments glorifying Macron and Trudeau are great because they remind me how shallow centrists really are.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


https://twitter.com/thehill/status/874649575298134016

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

healthcare is something like $9t, of which something like $500b is due to private insurance

We'd still be paying 5% (16.5% vs. current 17%, when OECD average is around 11-12%) more in GDP than other OECD countries if all we did was change our payer model.

(calculated another way: United Healthgroup has like 13% market share and made $67b profit, which works out to a rough estimate of insurance industry-wide profit of $515b)

the big thing in how single payer will drive down costs is provider consolidation, I'd imagine.

like how many MRI providers does any given city actually need vs. how many do they have

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

quote:

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who has tried in recent weeks to tamp down the talk of impeachment, backed Capuano on Tuesday, the source said. She argued that the Democrats should focus on bread-and-butter issues like the economy while allowing the various investigations into the Russia-Trump saga to play out on their own terms.

another bad dem

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

Lastgirl posted:

neolibs are always harping on about incrementalism

im seeing it now and they dont like it so it makes you think that maybe they were just procrastinating on the whole incrementalism thing :thunk:

should be advocating for inert-ism, the opposite of acceleration-ism

My point is I'm not sure the groundswell of leftist support is as big as ya'll think based off a guy who picked up more seats than expected to a person who spent the last few weeks talking about taking Alzheimer's patients homes away from them and hinting at Muslim internment camps when her 20k police officer cuts seemed to backfire.

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)
look, we're capitalists

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

Concerned Citizen posted:

another bad dem

That reads way more like a "way to phrase this to throw a bone to the left" than "this is pragmatic". Pelosi is a good opposition leader but man she kinda sucks as majority leader in terms of squandering opportunity.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


zegermans posted:

My point is I'm not sure the groundswell of leftist support is as big as ya'll think based off a guy who picked up more seats than expected to a person who spent the last few weeks talking about taking Alzheimer's patients homes away from them and hinting at Muslim internment camps when her 20k police officer cuts seemed to backfire.

https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/873674408224862210

ex post facho
Oct 25, 2007

quote:

Voters for decades were conned into thinking they were noisome minorities whose best path to influence is to make peace with the mightier "center," which inevitably turns out to support military interventionism, fewer taxes for the rich, corporate deregulation and a ban on unrealistic "giveaway" proposals like free higher education. Those are the realistic, moderate, popular ideas, we're told.

But it's a Wizard of Oz trick, just like American politics in general. There is no numerically massive center behind the curtain. What there is instead is a tiny island of wealthy donors, surrounded by a protective ring of for-sale major-party politicians (read: employees) whose job it is to castigate too-demanding voters and preach realism.

Those pols do so with the aid of a bund of dependably alarmist sycophants in the commercial media, most of whom, whether they know it or not, technically inhabit the low end of the 1 percent and tend to be amazed that people out there are pissed off about stuff.

[...]

Such people of course have many very good reasons to embrace the status quo. The problem is, they're not terribly numerous as a group, which unfortunately for them still matters in a democracy. It's one of the unpleasant paradoxes of exclusive wealth. If you live in a democracy, you're continually forced to manufacture the appearance of broad support for the regressive policies underpinning your awesome lifestyle.

If those of us in the media spent less time lecturing about the wisdom of the status quo, and more time treating disaffected voters like the overwhelming majority they are, we might at least stop face-planting on our election predictions. We're not the center anymore, and we have to stop acting like we ever were.


taibbi accurately describes the posting in C-SPAM ca. October 2015-June 2017

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

the big thing in how single payer will drive down costs is provider consolidation, I'd imagine.

like how many MRI providers does any given city actually need vs. how many do they have

well the fact that hospitals/pharma now negotiate with a single insurer that they have to make a deal with will be pretty significant as well, hence why medicare/medicaid can get big cost savings

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod



this is a dumb take

we're blaming dems for rolling over. hth

ex post facho
Oct 25, 2007
joementum pls read, much scare

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_age_of_anger_20170611

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

Agean90 posted:

wonder what the irrelevent left is up to

https://twitter.com/fightfor15/status/874457556080631808

well then :getin:

drat the police were doing old school COINTELPRO on them? That's lovely.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

ThndrShk2k posted:

Of course assuming market prices stay the same, which they won't.

you're then calling for a near-$3t haircut to the healthcare (care, not insurance) industry

and like it's one thing when you've been calling for eliminating the insurance industry, which everyone (or at least everyone who matters to implementing a single payer plan) agrees are parasites

the political discussion that's going on around single payer is nowhere near the the "we need to politically go after the AMA" stage we'd need to get there, I don't think

paranoid randroid
Mar 4, 2007
the Hill pretty much only exists to troll me personally with their insanely lovely ledes

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006


This is why the right wins, they only need 14 words instead of 3000.

Serf
May 5, 2011


yeah impeaching trump wouldn't solve the problem, but if it gets em shook, i say keep blowing smoke

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

paranoid randroid posted:

the Hill pretty much only exists to troll me personally with their insanely lovely ledes

honestly at some point i can't even get mad at them, they're just incredibly talented at it and that deserves recognition

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011

Macron won due to abysmal turnout for parliamentary elections. The only people excited for that election voted for him. The PS pulled an Obama/Clinton and the "French party of socialism" ran to the center and actively told it's base to gently caress off. Where did that get them? Hollande leaves with approval ratings in the single digits, Hamon was 4th in the first round of the presidential elections, and almost wholly annihilated in parliament.

People know. But apathy is as much of a choice as voting.

ex post facho
Oct 25, 2007

zegermans posted:

This is why the right wins, they only need 14 words instead of 3000.

man the second reign of terror is gonna be fukkin' killer

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010




many reasons, including but not limited to=
1. medicare and medicaid are legally barred from neogitating over the cost of drugs, which means the drug companies go "yeah this epipen will be a zillion dollars" and medicare has to say "ok"
2. the insurance industry is a completely unnecessary parasitic rent extractor
3. (this is a big one) patents for drugs last a longer time than any other country without price controls. this prevents US companies from making generics, and it was just shown recently that nobody is interesed in letting people import price-controlled canadian drugs
4. general monopolization and cartelization of drug and medical device and software companjes

  • Locked thread