|
That's why I keep getting copies of LotR that I don't want.
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 11:14 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 11:09
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 12:05
|
|
|
I'd sit on that. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 13:23
|
|
|
Turpitude II posted:I'd sit on that. Could probably spin too
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Wait till the HR community hears about this... Steve sits back in his chair proudly as he thinks to himself "Ted thought he was funny when he photocopied his rear end..." with a devilish grin on his face. In walks Amy from HR. "Steve, come with me please".
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 16:51
|
|
|
 From here. Palpek has a new favorite as of 19:09 on Jun 14, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
Palpek posted:
Posting anything Giger related is easy mode.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 20:13
|
|
|
Lurking Haro posted:Posting anything Giger related is easy mode. Yeah. Even if it's not actually a penis, it's a penis.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 20:39
|
|
|
Ow. The first joints in his fingers!
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2017 08:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2017 10:36
|
|
|
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pegboy
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2017 15:21
|
|
|
Magnus Praeda posted:Yeah. Even if it's not actually a penis, it's a penis. The man was the living embodiment of the "If It's Longer Than It's Wide" Song. Godspeed, Hans Rudi.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2017 10:15
|
|
|
Magnus Praeda posted:Yeah. Even if it's not actually a penis, it's a penis.
|
|
#
?
Jun 16, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
John Big Booty posted:Sometimes it's a vagina. If it's taller than it's wide
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2017 00:09
|
|
|
Snowy posted:If it's taller than it's wide It's not your mother.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
I thought posting homegrown was a ban-worthy offense.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:It's not your mother. At some point I've gotta map out the precise nature of the quantum flux state of unbangable, banged-by-everybody and I banged her that yo mama exists in
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2017 07:54
|
|
|
Well, I tried to get to the bottom of this. Apparently, the term was first coined in the 70's in Playboy. Even then, it wasn't in regard to anything other than to refer to Gay Gigolos who were up to be 'Pegged', rather than ones who would sit on one. This apparently mutated into describing boys in Brothels in India who would be forced to sit on them, and then to the British Navy. And even though there is historical accounts of Sodomy in the Navy, it was never a rampant thing where you would have a designated man for it. The act was a capital crime, and punishments were cruelly severe ranging from hundreds of lashings to executions. So two consenting men would have to be very hush hush about their affair, or else they would likely have their lives ruined in the best of cases. If you want to read about what I just said in many more words, you can read about it in this (presumably) respectable paper here: http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/columns/straight-dope/article/13036233/buggery-and-the-british-navy Otherwise, have these dogs that look like penises.  
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2017 08:15
|
|
|
How do you safely Google that?
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2017 12:58
|
|
|
SomeJazzyRat posted:Well, I tried to get to the bottom of this. Apparently, the term was first coined in the 70's in Playboy. Even then, it wasn't in regard to anything other than to refer to Gay Gigolos who were up to be 'Pegged', rather than ones who would sit on one. This apparently mutated into describing boys in Brothels in India who would be forced to sit on them, and then to the British Navy. And even though there is historical accounts of Sodomy in the Navy, it was never a rampant thing where you would have a designated man for it. The act was a capital crime, and punishments were cruelly severe ranging from hundreds of lashings to executions. So two consenting men would have to be very hush hush about their affair, or else they would likely have their lives ruined in the best of cases. If you want to read about what I just said in many more words, you can read about it in this (presumably) respectable paper here: http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/columns/straight-dope/article/13036233/buggery-and-the-british-navy Besides, if you're going to take a person along whose sole duty is to have sex with the crew, wouldn't it be preferable to just bring a woman instead?
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
Cat Hatter posted:Besides, if you're going to take a person along whose sole duty is to have sex with the crew, wouldn't it be preferable to just bring a woman instead? Women aren't allowed on boats, it's bad luck.
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2017 19:32
|
|
|
Cat Hatter posted:Besides, if you're going to take a person along whose sole duty is to have sex with the crew, wouldn't it be preferable to just bring a woman instead? Woah woah waoh slow down tiger. Obviously you don't "get" sailors. There's a reason there's a phrase "walk like a sailor" mkay?
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2017 19:56
|
|
|
Karate Bastard posted:Woah woah waoh slow down tiger. Obviously you don't "get" sailors. I mean from a purely logistical standpoint. Assuming that the process of readying a butthole for sex is so time consuming and/or arduous that it would be preferable to provide food/lodging for someone who is only useful for sex than allow the untrained buttholes of the enlisted men to perform this service (I'm not so sure of that, but I'll bow to the extensive knowledge of the Royal Navy with regards to male-male anal sex), then I posit that a woman might be preferable because at least once the men are satiated that even if she isn't an able seaman that she could at least perform other useful duties like "swabbing the deck" or "not giving the crew dick-splinters with a butthole that spends much of its time on a (presumably) wooden peg". I know a woman wouldn't be the crew's first choice, but once they've been at sea long enough they'd be willing to gently caress the boat, and then we're back to dick-splinters.
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Cat Hatter posted:I mean from a purely logistical standpoint. Assuming that the process of readying a butthole for sex is so time consuming and/or arduous that it would be preferable to provide food/lodging for someone who is only useful for sex than allow the untrained buttholes of the enlisted men to perform this service (I'm not so sure of that, but I'll bow to the extensive knowledge of the Royal Navy with regards to male-male anal sex), then I posit that a woman might be preferable because at least once the men are satiated that even if she isn't an able seaman that she could at least perform other useful duties like "swabbing the deck" or "not giving the crew dick-splinters with a butthole that spends much of its time on a (presumably) wooden peg". Shiver me Tinders!
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
Women were deemed too silly for space.
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Shiver me Tinders!  
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 01:53
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/IBTimesUK/status/876064389937471488
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 02:45
|
|
|
Deep Australian abyss... Tiggum's mom?
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 02:50
|
|
|
Ribbed for her pleasure.
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 02:54
|
|
|
BrianBoitano posted:How do you safely Google that? Incognito Window, and wording it in such a way that our NSA overloads couldn't possibly judge us. Like "Oh dear lord did Pegboys really exist that sounds awful -porn".
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 02:56
|
|
|
consider: most humans have mouths (except for those who have the word "homo" instead)
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
InediblePenguin posted:consider: most humans have mouths (except for those who have the word "homo" instead) TIL that 4chan users don't have mouths. But in that case into what orifice do they shovel their Doritos and Mountain Dew?
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 03:49
|
|
|
Cat Hatter posted:Besides, if you're going to take a person along whose sole duty is to have sex with the crew, wouldn't it be preferable to just bring a woman instead? Women and seamen don't mix
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
Damnit I came here to post that
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 07:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 07:16
|
|
|
Could I get an arrow? I still can't find it, honey.
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 14:22
|
|
|
I'm not going to google "clit arrow." YOU CAN'T MAKE ME!
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 15:57
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:I'm not going to google "clit arrow." It'd make a good alt account name for you though
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 18:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 11:14 |
|
|
SomeJazzyRat posted:NSA overloads 
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 18:51
|
|
