|
quote:Inside ‘The Mummy’s’ Troubles: Tom Cruise Had Excessive Control http://variety.com/2017/film/news/the-mummy-meltdown-tom-cruise-1202465742/ Welp.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 05:30 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 23:50 |
|
Cruise should probably have made McQuarrie take over the director's chair too.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 05:37 |
|
Casimir Radon posted:Wesley Snipes defeats the aliens by refusing to pay his taxes. https://twitter.com/wesleysnipes/status/781228661101895680
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 05:37 |
|
Wesley Snipes is one hundred percent unironically a national treasure.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 05:51 |
|
He calls himself the Daywalker.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 05:59 |
|
I'm hoping The Mummy doesn't tank the Dark Universe franchise. A dumbfun action-horror movie to look forward to on a regular basis could be fun. Or at least interesting. Wesley seems to forget, or thinks everone else did, that he intentionally cheated on his taxes and tried to use Sovcit bullshit when he got caught. davidspackage posted:He calls himself the Daywalker. Casimir Radon fucked around with this message at 06:06 on Jun 19, 2017 |
# ? Jun 19, 2017 06:03 |
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:http://variety.com/2017/film/news/the-mummy-meltdown-tom-cruise-1202465742/ they might as well give this article the headline "Universal Throws Tom Cruise Under Bus Because Everyone Is One Bad Movie Away From Hating Him Anyways" edit: Tom Cruise did not hire Kurtzman to direct, nor did he decide to turn a standard-issue Universal Horror Reboot into the loving Dark Universe. Tom Cruise is a big loving movie star who does this sort of thing with basically every movie he is in, and that is known right when you hire him, and Universal is pissed that unlike with something like Edge of Tomorrow or Jack Reacher it backfired on them. gently caress Universal. DC Murderverse fucked around with this message at 06:13 on Jun 19, 2017 |
# ? Jun 19, 2017 06:10 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:they might as well give this article the headline "Universal Throws Tom Cruise Under Bus Because Everyone Is One Bad Movie Away From Hating Him Anyways" I'm pretty sure everyone can figure out who screwed the pooch here for themselves
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 06:19 |
|
Everyone in the general public is going to forget about how lame The Mummy was in a few months when that movie starring Cruise as a drug smuggler in the 80's comes out and everyone remembers that Tom Cruise is a stellar loving actor in addition to being a world-class movie star.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 06:23 |
|
I'd like to nominate Blade to join the Dark Universe.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 06:23 |
|
Leavemywife posted:I'd like to nominate Blade to join the Dark Universe. Well the MCU doesn't seem to want him so I guess he's free.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 06:28 |
|
Leavemywife posted:I'd like to nominate Blade to join the Dark Universe. just cast wesley snipes as van helsing, retcon him into being half-vampire, give him a leather jacket and sunglasses and dare Marvel to stop them.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 06:28 |
|
Yeah, I find it hard to believe that Cruise decided to become a dictator on The Mummy when he's always been really collaborative. That story's definitely some kind of spin.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 06:40 |
|
The weird part is, it's already at just shy of 300 million worldwide. It's not going to be super profitable, but it's not going to lose money either.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 06:58 |
|
They probably should have realized something was wrong when they had to rework their Mummy design after X-Men Apocalypse. The idea of the Mummy being a betrayed princess or whatever could have been good, but whenever I think of this film I just feel like watching FraserMummy instead.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 07:20 |
|
Snowman_McK posted:The weird part is, it's already at just shy of 300 million worldwide. It's not going to be super profitable, but it's not going to lose money either. It's doing really badly on the domestic front and markets like Australia, Germany, Mexico and the UK where big budgets action films usually do really well so it looks like it'll be making most of its money in China. It'll probably limp home to a profit after the bean counters finish tallying everything up. But it might be the reviews that hurt it the most, Universal must have been pretty embarrassed by all that and that article blaming Cruise for all their problems sounds like some early damage control. They'd already announced a release date for Bride of Frankenstein (Valentine's Day 2019, LOL) so it'll be interesting to see if they start quietly moving that around or even giving it the dreaded TBA release date or whether they stick to their guns and push ahead.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 07:27 |
|
plus like even if u take it as 100% true the article's excuse for Universal is that, "Universal knew that if it wanted “The Mummy” to compete against the likes of “Wonder Woman” and “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2” it needed every ounce of Cruise’s waning star power" . Which is like...they could also make a movie that doesn't require Punished Tom Cruise 2 be given all the power to be successful, they could release it on...a different day mayhaps???
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 07:30 |
|
Hat Thoughts posted:plus like even if u take it as 100% true the article's excuse for Universal is that, "Universal knew that if it wanted “The Mummy” to compete against the likes of “Wonder Woman” and “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2” it needed every ounce of Cruise’s waning star power" . Releasing it then was a bad attempt at a power play working off of the assumption that Wonder Woman wasn't going to perform very well. If this movie had come out in, say, April (in that dead period between Fast 8 and Guardians 2, it might have made the same amount opening weekend, and probably wouldn't have been quite so disappointing. Instead it's just another June blockbuster in a month with Wonder Woman, a new Transformers, Cars 3 and at the very end, Despicable Me 3 which is going to make more money than god.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 07:45 |
|
I think the main thing that gets me is the idea that Universal's hands were tied & they had to cast Tom Cruise to make the movie successful when we see, clearly, the movie wasn't successful
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 08:02 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:they might as well give this article the headline "Universal Throws Tom Cruise Under Bus Because Everyone Is One Bad Movie Away From Hating Him Anyways" Yeah, the whole Dark Universe poo poo is a Kurtzman/Orci project and universe-building was by far the worst part of the movie. Mission: Impossible is in iron grasp of Cruise and those movies are incredibly entertaining, Jack Reacher is his big-series project, they are competently made as well. The only thing I would believe as a result of Cruise messing things is the intentional pushing-off of the female villain in many ways. Aging dudes do feel threatened by someone overshadowing them on the screen, as evidenced by Johnny Depp refusing to have a female antagonist in the last Pirates movie
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 08:49 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:Despicable Me 3 which is going to make more money than god. Brother you are right about that. Those little fuckin minions are an historical treasure.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 09:01 |
|
fatherboxx posted:Yeah, the whole Dark Universe poo poo is a Kurtzman/Orci project and universe-building was by far the worst part of the movie. The only reason I had hopes for The Mummy was because I thought "oh, Cruise is going to Mission: Impossible this mofo". Too bad.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 21:10 |
|
FilthyImp posted:They probably should have realized something was wrong when they had to rework their Mummy design after X-Men Apocalypse. FraserMummy is like the perfect summer popcorn flick thankfully.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 21:16 |
|
I'd prefer FrasierMummy.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 22:28 |
|
davidspackage posted:He calls himself the Daywalker. I love it.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 22:30 |
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:I love it. If you use Twitter at all Snipes is legit funny as hell, super positive and definitely worth following. I'm so fascinated by this Mummy movie now, from what people are saying maybe they should have released it without audio after all.
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 22:44 |
|
Wesley Snipes also lays some pretty brutal burns on people who try to mess with him. https://twitter.com/wesleysnipes/status/826554911215144960
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 23:26 |
|
https://twitter.com/wesleysnipes/status/826538689144582144 (Wesley Snipes was in three comic book movies and Marvel owns Blade again so all of these posts are important and on topic).
|
# ? Jun 19, 2017 23:50 |
|
https://twitter.com/wesleysnipes/status/876864082329993218 https://twitter.com/wesleysnipes/status/876865156894138368 What a card
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 00:34 |
|
Wesley Snipes' game is so good he has to politely inform half the population that he is not available due to sexual preference.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 00:39 |
|
Snipes was replaced by a rapper who goes by the name Sticky Fingaz.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 00:50 |
|
Casimir Radon posted:Snipes was replaced by a rapper who goes by the name Sticky Fingaz. He actually did ok. He's like...the MorningWalker. A thankless job, having to cover for an extremely charismatic actor in an iconic role.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 17:11 |
|
Tom cruise is a stellar loving actor hahaha
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 17:37 |
|
I just want to know who thought it was a good idea (if it wasn't Cruise himself) to cast him as a character that is clearly written to be 30ish. It's distracting at this point.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 17:39 |
|
In some ways the 1999 Mummy gave Universal the wrong idea. In that instance the filmmakers were able to draw on the parallels to Indiana Jones and the like to make a big dumb action adventure blockbuster thing, and they had a great cast and the right attitude and it worked. I think because of that Universal thought "Well, okay, we can get big tentpole movies out of ALL the classic monsters!", hence various attempts at turning Frankenstein and Dracula into action movies. And there's something weird about the aesthetic of the recent attempts too- they all look cheaper than they probably were, because they're not quite gothic and not quite flashy action, so they just look muddy.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 19:01 |
|
Maxwell Lord posted:And there's something weird about the aesthetic of the recent attempts too- they all look cheaper than they probably were, because they're not quite gothic and not quite flashy action, so they just look muddy. I think its a (continuing) side effect of a bunch of these movies wanting to be the Dark Knight without knowing how that movie worked.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 19:16 |
|
Yes they skipped 4 -
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 19:21 |
|
The twist is the shark has six heads
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 19:26 |
|
Godzilla 2 began filming yesterday and we have the official synopsisquote:WARNER BROS. PICTURES' AND LEGENDARY PICTURES' MONSTERVERSE KICKS INTO GEAR AS THE NEXT GODZILLA FEATURE GETS UNDERWAY https://www.warnerbros.com/studio/news/warner-bros-pictures-and-legendary-pictures-monsterverse-kicks-gear-next-godzilla
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 19:38 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 23:50 |
|
Maxwell Lord posted:In some ways the 1999 Mummy gave Universal the wrong idea. In that instance the filmmakers were able to draw on the parallels to Indiana Jones and the like to make a big dumb action adventure blockbuster thing, and they had a great cast and the right attitude and it worked. I think because of that Universal thought "Well, okay, we can get big tentpole movies out of ALL the classic monsters!", hence various attempts at turning Frankenstein and Dracula into action movies. Van Helsing utterly sucked but it made $300,000,000.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2017 19:52 |