|
new thread same old suck
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 03:47 |
|
https://youtu.be/5V6GHnxEJjg
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:13 |
|
Pelosi, Obama, Hillary All have the stink of n-word-ism clinging to them and as such more humiliating defeats are certain until you purge the party of their influence
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:13 |
|
my concern with replacing Pelosi is that given the current makeup of the house caucus we'll end up with some boring nebbish with adequate hair and much less ability to whip
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:14 |
|
[strong bad voice] Steny Hoyer
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:14 |
|
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/338714-exclusive-blue-dog-democrats-meet-with-top-trump-aides-on-tax-reform blue dogs are the lesser evil, but only by a speck
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:14 |
|
Agean90 posted:Pelosi is the establisment personified and legislators are waaay more important than the chair. if the center wants to shoot themselves in the foot then fine by me, let's hope a progressive can snatch the seat They can't, and probably shouldn't just now. They can't snatch the DNC chair either but it's a lot more embarrassing for the story to be about him. What has Pelosi done that gets everybody upset again? To me she comes off as what Clinton claimed to be, someone who would love to be more progressive but is pragmatic about it.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:16 |
|
Reminder that many of the things you probably hate about america are bill clinton's fault
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:17 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:my concern with replacing Pelosi is that given the current makeup of the house caucus we'll end up with some boring nebbish with adequate hair and much less ability to whip The whip should focus on whipping, the chair should focus on not pissing off the Democratic base every 2 weeks
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:17 |
|
FuriousxGeorge posted:They can't, and probably shouldn't just now. They can't snatch the DNC chair either but it's a lot more embarrassing for the story to be about him. Pelosi is chronically overcautious and, while not actively irredeemable, just behind the times in a lot of ways on account of being old. shes no Feinstein, and i tend to credit her with having the awareness necessary to be pushed on issues, but shes just got a lot of baggage and is slow on the uptake in conclusion Nancy Pelosi can be compared and contrasted
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:19 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:in conclusion ... can be compared and contrasted gently caress I should have used this construction on one of my finals essays now I'll never get the chance
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:21 |
|
FuriousxGeorge posted:They can't, and probably shouldn't just now. They can't snatch the DNC chair either but it's a lot more embarrassing for the story to be about him. Declaring abortion to be a negotiable position and declaring that single payer will never be a dem platform is the big thing. also the """"pragmatic""""" excuse don't work when your party loses 1000 seats over the course of 10 years. She's a tepid centrists whos beholden to the same corporate powers that are telling the DCCC not to invest in left candidates and ive seen no evidence that what she does can't be done by anyone else
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:21 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:Pelosi is chronically overcautious and, while not actively irredeemable, just behind the times in a lot of ways on account of being old. shes no Feinstein, and i tend to credit her with having the awareness necessary to be pushed on issues, but shes just got a lot of baggage and is slow on the uptake is her fighting against singlepayer in her state while claiming she's for trying it on a state by state basis an example of having the awareness necessary to be pushed on the issues, or just two-faced conniving like hillary clinton?
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:21 |
|
https://twitter.com/Papapishu/status/877318152564158467
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:22 |
sucks to succ
|
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:23 |
|
Vox Nihili posted:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-yankovich/my-experience-taking-my-d_b_12462036.html Guillotine, immediately.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:23 |
|
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/a-tale-of-two-races-quist-ossoff_us_594a0fc6e4b0710bea889a98quote:Ossoff also received criticism for not attacking the policies of President Trump more, and not mentioning the highly controversial American Health Care Act (AHCA) in his campaign ads. Yet, Ossoff came out against the AHCA on his website and sparred with Handel over the bill during debates. Let's not mention the bill that was unpopular as gently caress among EVERYBODY and make sure to go to my website! 50 million dollars!
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:23 |
|
UHD posted:new thread same old suck
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:25 |
|
Condiv posted:is her fighting against singlepayer in her state while claiming she's for trying it on a state by state basis an example of having the awareness necessary to be pushed on the issues, or just two-faced conniving like hillary clinton? Condiv i dont think this is a question you actually are seeking an answer to
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:25 |
|
Aurubin posted:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/a-tale-of-two-races-quist-ossoff_us_594a0fc6e4b0710bea889a98 if giving people homework doesn't work for socialists, it sure as poo poo isn't going to work for democrats
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:25 |
|
Condiv posted:is her fighting against singlepayer in her state while claiming she's for trying it on a state by state basis an example of having the awareness necessary to be pushed on the issues, or just two-faced conniving like hillary clinton? it's definitely the latter the democratic party apparatus definitively does not want candidates that support single payer to win democratic primaries
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:25 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:Condiv i dont think this is a question you actually are seeking an answer to
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:26 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:Condiv i dont think this is a question you actually are seeking an answer to not really, but i'd still like it if you answered two-faced conniving
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:27 |
|
we had a chance for a new start with a suck zone free of snotty grousing and you schlemiels threw it all away. tch, typical brenard brothers
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:28 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:we had a chance for a new start with a suck zone free of snotty grousing in what universe
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:29 |
|
Al! posted:in what universe well i mean surely there must be one
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:30 |
|
mormonpartyboat posted:cant wait for the reveal of ironstache's perfect policy page, except for the line about changing the age of consent to 15 you and your purity tests
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:31 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:we had a chance for a new start with a suck zone free of snotty grousing and you schlemiels threw it all away. tch, typical brenard brothers i tried my best to lead us toward unity by presenting a candidate that everyone can hate, together...
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:31 |
|
it would be cool if the millions ossoff wasted being a lifeless loser were instead spent on freezing him in carbonite to be put in karen handel's office
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:32 |
|
he could have at least had a full bar lol
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:34 |
|
Condiv posted:not really, but i'd still like it if you answered two-faced conniving Pls dont 1 star vote trump thread and please dont be so sucky namaste v
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:34 |
|
other things he could've done was spent his megamillions commissioning an episode of rwby staring him and the animes vs the evil haren kandel
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:35 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:well i mean surely there must be one The Trump thread in that timeline must be something else
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:36 |
|
Democrats are bad, Socialists are good, Marxists are the best.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:36 |
|
Joementum posted:https://twitter.com/DebraMessing/status/874781466517016578 the link doesnt work lol
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:37 |
|
money only seems to win elections against socialists
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:38 |
|
NNick posted:Democrats are bad, Socialists are good, Marxists are the best. democrats are bad socialists are good marxists are useless, anarchy!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:38 |
Al! posted:democrats are bad socialists are good marxists are useless, anarchy!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:41 |
|
NNick posted:Democrats are bad, Socialists are good, Marxists are the best. exploding brain final form: ancap is the only moral choice
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:42 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 03:47 |
|
actually only Maoists are good, a point which i hope you will come to appreciate after your struggle session
|
# ? Jun 21, 2017 23:43 |