|
The greens are changing from within to more blatantly use the environment and whatever to peddle top tier, bespoke market solutions.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 01:34 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:57 |
|
Bogan King posted:Greens aren't forming govt so you should probably just vote LNP. Some representation is better than none, except when they gently caress up and waste what they do have like now.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 01:47 |
|
Nobody in this thread was agreeing with Pauline, maybe you would have benefited from some extra instruction in your reading classes?
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 01:50 |
|
So anyone got the details? Only thing i can find is NSW Greens are aligned with the teachers union so took hardline stance because its the loving NSW Greens and they should be expelled.Solemn Sloth posted:Because the communist party of Australia ain't getting elected anytime soon Just remember the NSW Greens are the communist branch and god help anyone supporting that.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 01:53 |
|
Solemn Sloth posted:Because the communist party of Australia ain't getting elected anytime soon
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 01:54 |
|
Communism is good my friend.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:02 |
|
Tokamak posted:Communism is good my friend. posted from my iPhone
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:17 |
|
JBP posted:posted from my iPhone Change from within fam
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:19 |
|
JBP posted:posted from my iPhone Made in Communist China
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:21 |
|
Thought I might as well post this since I got some incredible support in here last year. Once again I'm taking my life into my hands and risking insanity by doing Dry July this year. For the month of July I'll be alcohol-free, which considering the number of football games I'll be watching and State of Origin series NSW will be losing will be a very painful experience. I also have a number of birthday parties and work trips so not having a drink will likely lead to me living out some sort of existential nightmare (or just getting stuck listening to the most boring person in the universe since I won't have an easy out to escape). One way or another, this should be a wonderful experience for everyone who isn't me - why wouldn't you want to be a part? Any help you could provide would be extremely welcome; all funds go to help people with cancer in a variety of ways (like therapies, comfort items, hospital furnishings and more). For more information on how the funds are used, please see https://www.dryjuly.com/tagged_posts. The link is at https://www.dryjuly.com/users/peter-thorburn-2 and thanks in advance to anyone (and then curses in advance shortly thereafter)! Now back to your regularly scheduled Greens/PHON posting!
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:21 |
|
there's no requirement that the instruments we use to liquidate the kulaks have to be freshly forged by co-ops jfc do you even read the comintern directives?
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:23 |
|
posted from my bespoke green financial solutions
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:25 |
|
Pauline Hanson is right
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:32 |
|
https://twitter.com/brutofficiel/status/877589807182077952
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:34 |
Cartoon posted:http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-21/pauline-hanson-under-fire-repulsive-bigoted-comments-autism/8640328 This just in, Cartoon falls into the 44% of people who can't read. Tragic. Point to where I agreed with her. Quote the part of my post. edit: Wait, I found it for you, Cartoon. quote:But the answer isn't removing them from the system, particularly when I'm pretty sure the 'special schools' have been gutted for years. Where are these kids going to go? The schools which all the other kids mock? Segregated classes to the same effect? wait hang on that's the wrong part, that's the part where i disagree with hanson. poo poo. Milkfred E. Moore fucked around with this message at 02:44 on Jun 22, 2017 |
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:41 |
|
I think this is supposed to be comedy? It's actually quite hard to tell if it is or isn't though, so it's either a poo poo opinion piece or a worse piece of comedy.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:43 |
|
Zenithe posted:I think this is supposed to be comedy? It's actually quite hard to tell if it is or isn't though, so it's either a poo poo opinion piece or a worse piece of comedy. The writer is a satirist but thats pretty lovely satire
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:44 |
|
WHEN HE HIMSELF IS MADE FROM CARBON! Actually though, what the gently caress should the greens do with gonski 2.0. Should they support it? It's less funding than Gonski 1, but seems like it's simpler and better targeted as well as fairer than Gonski 1. Gonski 1 is almost certainly dead so do they allow funding to be cut and get a better distribution or block it and try to keep the higher funding. Criticise the greens all you like for *splits* but gently caress guys, some issues don't have easy answers and you're criticising the party for actually having principles rather than being all "I believe *checks notes*". We rightly lambasted labor for not being loving sure whether or not they should support drug testing welfare recipients when the answer should be loving obvious, and then we're kicking the greens for not being able to easily find an answer to a complicated problem.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:45 |
Lid posted:The writer is a satirist but thats pretty lovely satire On this, we agree.
|
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:46 |
|
Milky Moor posted:This just in, Cartoon falls into the 44% of people who can't read. Tragic. Milky Moor posted:You say a lot of poo poo, Cartoon, but this might just take the cake.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:46 |
|
Cartoon posted:gently caress you Milky Moor you smegma filled collostomy bag reject. Hahaha wow.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:52 |
|
here's my argument gonski 2 uses a better model than current school funding, cool. it provides more funding than what is currently legislated. it provides less funding than labor has promised they would provide. labor's promise is immaterial because they are not in power, and can increase funding when they're elected. the crossbenchers have gotten some significant concessions from the government, chief among them an independent body to supervise schools funding. seems like a fairly reasonable package to support. the labor chuds will cry about lnp-greens collusion but the greens aren't the ones who line up to support torturing refugees and increasing the power of the police and intelligence agencies so they can go gently caress themselves
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:53 |
Cartoon posted:You said I was full of poo poo for disagreeing with her.... So. Man who says secondary school exams are easy tries to rail against the educational standards of someone who says that's the wrong perspective to take. Oh, Cartoon. One day you'll stop making GBS threads in holes and join the 21st Century. I'm glad that you found the one kid in your class who had trouble reading, but there's way more than one kid with that issue in any modern classroom. Let's take your point apart. "Let's be brutally frank: The HSC isn't all that loving hard" The HSC -- and other secondary exams, by extension -- is easy. "If you are bright and apply yourself you'll do well" You'll do well, if you are bright and apply yourself. Therefore, the kids who don't pass the easy exam aren't bright or apply themselves. They are, in a sense, choosing to fail. This is a bootstraps-level argument. "despite the attention of any number of teachers." A strange point, given that the HSC isn't hard. If it isn't hard, why do we even need teachers? Your point -- that the HSC is both easy but also reliant on students being bright and knowing to apply themselves -- is incoherent.
|
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:55 |
"Pfft, learning the alphabet isn't hard. If you were smart and weren't so lazy, you'd just know it. Nothing personal, kid." - Cartoon, to a kindergarten class.
|
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:57 |
|
Lid posted:So anyone got the details? Only thing i can find is NSW Greens are aligned with the teachers union so took hardline stance because its the loving NSW Greens and they should be expelled. Justin Field is that you
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 02:59 |
|
Milky what the gently caress are you even arguing for here
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:00 |
|
Recoome posted:Milky what the gently caress are you even arguing for here good posts
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:00 |
|
JBP posted:posted from my iPhone [nothing gets past this guy]
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:01 |
|
hooman posted:WHEN HE HIMSELF IS MADE FROM CARBON! They put up a list of requirements for supporting it, got the government to agree, then hosed around taking so long to resolve dumb splits that the government went and negotiated with Pauline Hanson instead. I'm sure it won't be too long before someone from NSW comes in to fly the flag about how actually we are right and furthermore at the Sydney university young trotskist club I
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:01 |
|
BBJoey posted:here's my argument That's pretty much my take on it, although I haven't paid it a great deal of attention. What's the union's objection to it? Just less funding than Labor promised? Certain members who won't do as well under a needs based model?
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:02 |
Recoome posted:Milky what the gently caress are you even arguing for here This isn't an argument. That implies a sense of equality between opponents. Just because a literal neanderthal is making GBS threads in my yard doesn't make the fact that I'm telling him that we invented sanitation years ago an argument.
|
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:02 |
|
For someone banging on about other poster's reading ability, it's weird that you seem to think that taking chunks of sentences out of the context of the whole is an argument or something?
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:03 |
|
Milky Moor posted:Man who says secondary school exams<snip> Also keep digging the ad homenin holes, they never fail to win arguments.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:22 |
|
Solemn Sloth posted:They put up a list of requirements for supporting it, got the government to agree, then hosed around taking so long to resolve dumb splits that the government went and negotiated with Pauline Hanson instead. Too late Aesculus posted:Justin Field is that you
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:23 |
|
Here's a summary for those of you unable to keep up: - Hanson was talking about how bright kids ("Most of the time the teacher spends so much time on them they forget about the child who wants to go ahead in leaps and bounds in their education, but are held back by those.") were being held back by teachers being distracted by disabled students. - Cartoon said that bright students who apply themselves don't need teachers that much because the HSC is easy for them if they just apply themselves so Hanson's comment is full of poo poo. - Milky Moor thinks Cartoon is saying most kids (not just bright kids in particular) don't need teachers and should all just pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Gets pissy. - Cartoon thinks Milky Moor is saying Pauline Hanson is right. Gets pissy.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:24 |
|
Futuresight posted:Here's a summary for those of you unable to keep up: So what you're saying is they're both wrong?
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:28 |
Futuresight posted:Here's a summary for those of you unable to keep up: Thank you, thread archivist.
|
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:29 |
|
Cartoons link says that assistant teachers exist in most classrooms for the disadvantaged meaning that the main teacher isn't distracted in the first place.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:31 |
|
Lid posted:The writer is a satirist but thats pretty lovely satire I thought it was on par with this thread. Sorry!
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:32 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:57 |
|
Anidav posted:Cartoons link says that assistant teachers exist in most classrooms for the disadvantaged meaning that the main teacher isn't distracted in the first place. the smog is affecting your thinking
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 03:33 |