Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Covok
May 27, 2013

Yet where is that woman now? Tell me, in what heave does she reside? None of them. Because no God bothered to listen or care. If that is what you think it means to be a God, then you and all your teachings are welcome to do as that poor women did. And vanish from these realms forever.

Aves Maria! posted:

are you ever not making GBS threads your pants over the worst possible future outcome?

Dude, that's literally their plan. Like 100% no one here would disagree that's why they set things to take effect in 2020. They expect to lose the house and senate and Presidency by then and plan to use the fallout of this bill to get back into office. They did it with the original ACA, for that matter.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Boon
Jun 21, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Alter Ego posted:

Now the followup question at every presser should be "If there are no tapes, why did Trump imply that there were?"

No video or audio exists of any confirmations or denials of the existence of tapes and I can neither confirm nor deny any reporters even asked this question as the presser may or may not have existed.

ThisIsWhyTrumpWon
Jun 22, 2017

by Smythe

Fart City posted:

Dens really need to get into the branding game, here. By the time Obamacare got this far (relatively speaking, I know the two situations don't align exactly), "death panels" had already entered the public lexicon. Was it absurd? Sure. Misleading? Yup. Did it stick? Absolutely. This bill is going to straight-up kill people. It's time to start banging the cups on the jail bars.

"The Bill From Hell"

"SB 50205 otherwise known as the "Kill Your Grandma" Bill"

"Let Americans Die in the Streets Act"

Just start naming it that every single time you refer to it.

Branding people.

"Sir I rise in opposition to the the Let Americans Die in the Streets Act."

Aves Maria!
Jul 26, 2008

Maybe I'll drown

Spiritus Nox posted:

I mean, you don't take back bills. You pass new ones. New ones need to be signed by the president. Even if Trump is impeached, it's unlikely we'll get anyone who would undo the closest things the GOP's likely to get to signature legislation before 2020.

actually, the Take Backsies Act of 1902 tells us

Covok posted:

They expect to lose the house and senate and Presidency by then and plan to use the fallout of this bill to get back into office. They did it with the original ACA, for that matter.

what? no. that's not at all what happened with the ACA

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Aves Maria! posted:

idk, but I don't think dank memes are what the Dems need in this instance.


The push pin is that's it's loving horrific. People have demonstrated that they are violently opposed to it, over and over again, without needing to gear up a sloganeering campaign. Calling it Trumpcare and pointing out how it's going to gently caress you, me, and your neighbor's dog seems to be effective enough.

The problem is it's so loving bad that anything you say which describes it accurately gets met with either "it can't really be that bad you must be a partisan" equivocation, or " technically it's not genocide" semantic quibbling.

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe
https://twitter.com/aravosis/status/877925724031770624
https://twitter.com/desiderioDC/status/877914158787842048


:siren:
https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/877915333566144513
https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/877916939426951168
:siren:

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

Is this even true? EvilWeasel needs to chime in.

fixing stuff requires legislation, which means in 2018-2020 you need trump's signature, but you can potentially get that in other ways: put in small riders in the budget to postpone stuff/ameliorate it/etc and dare him to shut down the government over it (the Republicans did that to some aspects of Obamacare, small sabotages that managed to make it into law). you're not getting a veto-proof majority, of course.

how much damage is done in the interim before 2020 all depends on the details, you could theoretically reverse this immediately on January 20, 2020 if you abolish the filibuster but it may take time to actually implement actions to reverse the damage, which again depends on the details

aware of dog
Nov 14, 2016

Jesus Christ.

Aves Maria!
Jul 26, 2008

Maybe I'll drown

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

The problem is it's so loving bad that anything you say which describes it accurately gets met with either "it can't really be that bad you must be a partisan" equivocation, or " technically it's not genocide" semantic quibbling.

well yeah, but that's just the entire reason the Republican party exists at this point. A whole lot of "they couldn't be that evil!"

Tart Kitty
Dec 17, 2016

Oh, well, that's all water under the bridge, as I always say. Water under the bridge!

BarbarianElephant posted:

Why are Democrats so bad at snappy phrasing, when it's not exactly unknown that most of Hollywood's creative people and the media are Democrats? They should be the best at this.

This is what I'm talking about. People keep saying "oh well, it's a terrible loving bill and that should be good enough," but that's the same base logic that got Trump elected in the first place. American politics has evolved to a place of hyper-branding not unlike what you would see on reality television (which, again, Trump). And people have been shown to respond to it. The new bill is called the "Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017." It's deliberately vague and clunky, and if you asked Joe Q. Public in your office what it was, there's a good chance they wouldn't be able to give you an answer. We all clucked our tongues at "Make America Great Again," but it worked. It was refined reactionary stupidity that hit with laser-focused accuracy. Dems really need to recalibrate how they present information to the public. Because as annoying as it is, memed politics is becoming more and more of a battlefield in the world today.

Tart Kitty fucked around with this message at 17:53 on Jun 22, 2017

Ravenfood
Nov 4, 2011

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

The problem is it's so loving bad that anything you say which describes it accurately gets met with either "it can't really be that bad you must be a partisan" equivocation, or " technically it's not genocide" semantic quibbling.
Right. Its worse than (iirc) Ryan's tax plans which people just refused to believe were that vile, and people remember that "death panels" weren't a think so if you start screaming about "telling grandma die in the street" they'll think you're just doing the same thing the GOP did over the ACA.

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007


Jesus christ is that an image. :smith:

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

This is extremely good news:

https://twitter.com/pdmcleod/status/877930939460050944

Since those haven't been pre-blessed, there's a reasonable chance they're stricken which may provoke a conservative revolt.

Petr
Oct 3, 2000
Remember when everyone here thought repealing the ACA would be a political impossibility after it had been in effect for a couple years?

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

Ravenfood posted:

Right. Its worse than (iirc) Ryan's tax plans which people just refused to believe were that vile, and people remember that "death panels" weren't a think so if you start screaming about "telling grandma die in the street" they'll think you're just doing the same thing the GOP did over the ACA.

But then Grandma dies in the street and maybe they will exercise that neglected grey matter and remember it at the polls.

peengers
Jun 6, 2003

toot toot
Really, at this point punching fascists should extend to police as well

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

Petr posted:

Remember when everyone here thought repealing the ACA would be a political impossibility after it had been in effect for a couple years?

That's nothing! I'm so old I remember when an idiot like Trump could never get elected!

Xae
Jan 19, 2005


This poo poo is terrifying because I'll loving guarantee you most of these databases are not setup to tell if they have been changed. Low level auditing and transaction logging are the first things that get turned off when you have a budget crunch.

Spiritus Nox
Sep 2, 2011

BarbarianElephant posted:

But then Grandma dies in the street and maybe they will exercise that neglected grey matter and remember it at the polls.

"Not my fuckin' grandma."

Aves Maria!
Jul 26, 2008

Maybe I'll drown

Petr posted:

Remember when everyone here thought repealing the ACA would be a political impossibility after it had been in effect for a couple years?

I don't mean to rain on your parade but it's a) not repealed yet and b) if it does get repealed, it's likely to cost the Rs more than the ACA did the Dems, just going by how much people hate hate hate the AHCA/whatever they decide to call it.

Ravenfood
Nov 4, 2011

BarbarianElephant posted:

But then Grandma dies in the street and maybe they will exercise that neglected grey matter and remember it at the polls.
Maybe, but too late for grandma and a whole fuckton of people. :smith:

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe

ImpAtom posted:

Jesus christ is that an image. :smith:

https://twitter.com/Shareblue/status/877932067039981568
https://twitter.com/MKhan47/status/877913261479350273
https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/877922940867813376

edit:
the idiot has spoken
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/877932956458795008

Deified Data
Nov 3, 2015


Fun Shoe

Covok posted:

Dude, that's literally their plan. Like 100% no one here would disagree that's why they set things to take effect in 2020. They expect to lose the house and senate and Presidency by then and plan to use the fallout of this bill to get back into office. They did it with the original ACA, for that matter.

McConnell doesn't plan on losing any of those things.

Kylra
Dec 1, 2006

Not a cute boy, just a boring girl.
Republicans filibustering any improvements from AHCA level assuming they get AHCA passed and Dems don't get a filibuster proof majority while the worst(?) of the changes don't come into effect until a possible democratic takeover in 2020 leaving a Dem congress with the mess and possible popular blame for all the worst parts sounds like the most reasonably predictable thing ever to me. Unless there's some procedural magic that can be done, or AHCA can be likewise undone with the reconciliation process, which I do not know.

Petr
Oct 3, 2000

Aves Maria! posted:

I don't mean to rain on your parade but it's a) not repealed yet and b) if it does get repealed, it's likely to cost the Rs more than the ACA did the Dems, just going by how much people hate hate hate the AHCA/whatever they decide to call it.

I'm not having any parade, believe me. And I know it's not repealed yet and may not be, but it's obviously not a political impossibility.

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/877932907137966080

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/877932956458795008

So he admits he lied about there being tapes.

Xae
Jan 19, 2005


Its a dodge.

"I did not make any recordings".

Is different from "No recordings were ever made".

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe
https://twitter.com/mattmfm/status/877932005593300993

TheScott2K
Oct 26, 2003

I'm just saying, there's a nonzero chance Trump has a really toad penis.
Setting things up for AHCA to detonate just as Democrats get power back seems like a great way to make single-payer unstoppable.

happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug

BarbarianElephant posted:

But then Grandma dies in the street and maybe they will exercise that neglected grey matter and remember it at the polls.

It's going to be funny watching the average life expectancy of the US drop to mid 60s soon.

fsif
Jul 18, 2003

I think this might be the singular instance of "Trump's trying to distract us!" that I agree with.

Elotana
Dec 12, 2003

and i'm putting it all on the goddamn expense account

twice burned ice posted:

My Gary Johnson voting mother (:wtc:) is now convinced that singe player is the best option because she's convinced that the government is obligated to pay poor citizens healthcare costs regardless, so we might as well do it as efficiently as possible.
Your mother and I would get along famously!

Flip Yr Wig
Feb 21, 2007

Oh please do go on
Fun Shoe

Xae posted:

Its a dodge.

"I did not make any recordings".

Is different from "No recordings were ever made".

Not that it's really important right now, but I believe that any phone White House phone conversations are recorded as standard policy.

Aves Maria!
Jul 26, 2008

Maybe I'll drown

Kylra posted:

Republicans filibustering any improvements from AHCA level assuming they get AHCA passed and Dems don't get a filibuster proof majority while the worst(?) of the changes don't come into effect until a possible democratic takeover in 2020 leaving a Dem congress with the mess and possible popular blame for all the worst parts sounds like the most reasonably predictable thing ever to me. Unless there's some procedural magic that can be done, or AHCA can be likewise undone with the reconciliation process, which I do not know.

That's a pretty big gamble, and it's quite likely that people would remember that "hey, Republicans tried really hard to push through a healthcare bill 3 years ago and now everything is loving awful". Unless, of course, we just assume the worst possible scenario will come to pass in every conceivable situation.

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



Flip Yr Wig posted:

Not that it's really important right now, but I believe that any phone White House phone conversations are recorded as standard policy.

Yeah Comey said he was asked to call the White House switchboard at least once. Not sure if others were from cell phones.

TARDISman
Oct 28, 2011




Welp I feel physically ill.

EndTimesProfit
Jul 1, 2004

Don't worry son, it's just the Smilin' Mighty Jesus!

Flip Yr Wig posted:

Not that it's really important right now, but I believe that any phone White House phone conversations are recorded as standard policy.

I thought the one meeting where Trump stated Comey cleared him of any investigation was in the Oval Office.

HappyHippo
Nov 19, 2003
Do you have an Air Miles Card?

evilweasel posted:

fixing stuff requires legislation, which means in 2018-2020 you need trump's signature, but you can potentially get that in other ways: put in small riders in the budget to postpone stuff/ameliorate it/etc and dare him to shut down the government over it (the Republicans did that to some aspects of Obamacare, small sabotages that managed to make it into law). you're not getting a veto-proof majority, of course.

how much damage is done in the interim before 2020 all depends on the details, you could theoretically reverse this immediately on January 20, 2020 if you abolish the filibuster but it may take time to actually implement actions to reverse the damage, which again depends on the details

If the Dems gain control in 2018 they need to just name everything "Trump is the best and most handsome man alive act of 2019" and there will be no vetos.

HappyHippo fucked around with this message at 18:04 on Jun 22, 2017

EndTimesProfit
Jul 1, 2004

Don't worry son, it's just the Smilin' Mighty Jesus!

TARDISman posted:

Welp I feel physically ill.

McConnell will probably be able to skip his Viagra after seeing that.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Spiritus Nox
Sep 2, 2011

fsif posted:

I think this might be the singular instance of "Trump's trying to distract us!" that I agree with.

...why? Going "yeah you got me I lied" does more to close the debate on that issue than reopen it, especially when a major bill just dropped, and especially when most people seemed to have been running with that expectation for a while anyway. "I have tapes and I'm not going to share them" or something along those lines would make a way bigger splash.

  • Locked thread