|
Office Pig posted:dnd gone full-on delusion lol whats going on in the big suck
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:29 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:39 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:lol drat he protected his tweets eh I think it's unlikely top through anyway. still fun to speculate who'd come on top between the blue dogs and the progressives
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:29 |
|
i would very much to own a ballcap with this logo
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:31 |
|
lol protected his account, what did it say?
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:32 |
|
deadgoon posted:whats going on in the big suck just go there and click a few threads and read the posts, you'll regret it
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:33 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:lol protected his account, what did it say? GalacticAcid posted:lol drat he protected his tweets
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:34 |
|
imagine a pragmatic boot, incrementally stomping on the face of humanity forever
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:35 |
|
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:35 |
|
Office Pig posted:dnd gone full-on delusion lol Whats happenin
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:44 |
|
Agean90 posted:every dem primary is going to have one guy whose past is vague except for them working for the CIA, all will have no discernable platform, they will have one of 3 faces, all of them will call hilldawg their hero. the boys from cedar falls
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:47 |
|
https://twitter.com/sarahljaffe/status/877972708826505216 primary every last one of these motherfuckers
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:53 |
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:https://twitter.com/sarahljaffe/status/877972708826505216 maybe they have directly jacked into Big Data and the algorithms are telling them they will win THIS TIME for sure
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:55 |
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:https://twitter.com/sarahljaffe/status/877972708826505216 Can I agree with you and the Dem leadership? Republicans wont change until they see what they're actually getting for it.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:56 |
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:https://twitter.com/sarahljaffe/status/877972708826505216 poo poo like this is why I refuse to cut the dems any slack regardless of how much influence they actually have.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 22:57 |
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:https://twitter.com/sarahljaffe/status/877972708826505216 NAH NAH NAH NAHHHH NAH NAHHH NAHH NAH HEY HEY HEY GOOOODBYEEEE
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:00 |
|
GODDAMMIT gently caress THESE ASSHOLES
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:00 |
|
is that statement based on literally anything at all, because from her timeline it looks like shes just angry about the Hoyer comment
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:02 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:is that statement based on literally anything at all, because from her timeline it looks like shes just angry about the Hoyer comment has that ever stopped the suck zone
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:03 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:is that statement based on literally anything at all, because from her timeline it looks like shes just angry about the Hoyer comment do we have any reason to give the democrats the benefit of the doubt that it's false?
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:03 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:is that statement based on literally anything at all, because from her timeline it looks like shes just angry about the Hoyer comment when, for chrissakes, has democratic leadership ever failed to disappoint in the previous ten years?
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:04 |
This thread makes me understand the "gently caress libs" vote tbh
|
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:05 |
|
certain dems itt make me understand the "gently caress libs" vote tbh
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:06 |
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:https://twitter.com/sarahljaffe/status/877972708826505216 her music owns https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HJ9NUC9M0U
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:07 |
|
Agean90 posted:do we have any reason to give the democrats the benefit of the doubt that it's false? well not giving yourself a rage stroke over twitter speculation is prolly a good one
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:07 |
|
Homeless Friend posted:Whats happenin 'Of course ossof lost its no big deal' 'we were so close, we'll get 'em next time' 'gently caress you commie losers we'll lose harder because of you'
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:07 |
|
this thread makes me udnerstand less of reality every day
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:08 |
|
basically what everyone expected would happen
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:09 |
Gene Hackman Fan posted:certain dems itt make me understand the "gently caress libs" vote tbh The natural result is 💯% vote for GOP in 2018
|
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:09 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:well not giving yourself a rage stroke over twitter speculation is prolly a good one Gene Hackman Fan posted:i'm posting itt to say that i, as the chair of a local party will continue to poo poo on national leadership in its current incarnation (and the state leaderships who support them) until they either unfuck themselves or gently caress off, with the latter being the far more preferable option to me.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:10 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:well not giving yourself a rage stroke over twitter speculation is prolly a good one my friend rage is my adderal. from it comes the fuel for political action
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:10 |
|
seriously, for the complete lack of any sort of discernible message, democrats are loving up royally at it.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:11 |
|
Submarine Sandpaper posted:The natural result is 💯% vote for GOP in 2018 if we keep doing what neolibs insist will win elections, sure.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:11 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:is that statement based on literally anything at all, because from her timeline it looks like shes just angry about the Hoyer comment https://twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/877965285340438528
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:12 |
|
Homeless Friend posted:Whats happenin Went into a mostly random thread: quote:It's really very simply. Republicans fall in line. Democrats dont. This is because we have a monopoly on critical thinking skills. Unfortunately, it also means that we've convinced a whole wing of the party not to vote for 'wall street' candidates, conveniently forgetting that that's literally all candidates because it turns out wall street, whether they should be or not, actually is important. quote:bernie is simultaneously so unpopular that a candidate in his image would have lost but so popular that he is making it so centrist dems lose every election? quote:sorry for the stealth edit: but yes. It turns out you can be both. If, say, the tea parties hadn't voted trump, he would have lost. Every vote matters, and every person who stays home because the democrats aren't idiologically pure is partly responsible for the mess we're in now. lol
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:17 |
|
"the only reasonable change is that we kill bernie sanders"
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:18 |
|
[cosmic brain] we lose because we're so smart!!
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:19 |
|
https://twitter.com/elivalley/status/878005640819605509
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:20 |
|
https://twitter.com/facepaulmrevere/status/878013992790142977 https://twitter.com/girlziplocked/status/878003731660451840
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:21 |
|
I think the big problem with most D&D posters is that they weren't bullied enough as kids
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:21 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:39 |
|
Willa Rogers posted:Yah. Good read. I'm just getting around to reading Capitalist Realism and it's been great so far.
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 23:22 |