|
Wise Learned Man posted:By the way, been meaning to ask the thread:
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:02 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 17:19 |
|
posting from the past but lmaooooo someone get on the hooks and relay this to their fraud department; instant default
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:02 |
|
I have been away from this thread for a while, what is with Star Citizen and Amazon? If Amazon did anything with CIG, that's a pretty bad mark on Amazon's promotion team.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:03 |
|
I love when people claim Star Citizen is such a huge world. Just because there's two stations with a handful of hallways, a derelict station, and some satellites with 3 corridors, and thousands of kilometers of empty space between them, doesn't make a game huge. One station to another is a few hundred thousand kilometers, you quantum drive between them and get there in a few seconds. Great. So what? I could probably quantum drive between every location in SC in the same time it takes me to drive the highway loop around GTA5. The distance between things is all a facade. I could walk around in my house, then quantum drive over to my neighbor's house, then claim it was a huge distance and the world is so huge. If you take away the empty space between things, they literally only have a few dozen hallways. Is Super Mario Brothers a huge game because he jumped into a warp pipe?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:04 |
|
Wise Learned Man posted:By the way, been meaning to ask the thread: Sell the assets to goons to make the all-conquering Solar Plebian?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:06 |
|
Wise Learned Man posted:By the way, been meaning to ask the thread: lol that poo poo would be done. There is no evidence that CIG has any arrangement with Amazon other than using their free engine and paying for their cloud services.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:06 |
|
ZenMaster posted:I made videos claiming smoke and mirrors and fakery in the live streams and demos they put out like so many months ago.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:06 |
|
SO I was thumbing through an old computer magazine last night, and lo and behold I found an article about the Stimperor Chris Roberts himself! The whole thing's quite interesting, but there's one thing that I noticed. Remember how when Chris sat down to play his game a few years ago and it didn't look like he knew what the gently caress he was doing, down to snapping irritably about how he hated the chat interface? And people wondered why if the game was his baby he looked like a grandma trying to check her emails for the first time as he pawed and the controls? Whole article here. Apologies for quality, the scan needs refactoring: P.S.: Mark Hamill confirmed for cuck:
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:11 |
|
Wow, Illinois has some really big license plates
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:14 |
|
Foo Diddley posted:Wow, Illinois has some really big license plates iirc it was 'WC1', which is apropos as Chris' game is in the toilet.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:16 |
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:17 |
|
nawledgelambo posted:posting from the past but lmaooooo I posted the link a few pages back. Probably not best sent to fraud for this though, best to use their media inquiries email I think. Which I also did.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:24 |
|
If you're going to blow out like that, at least spell correctly.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:27 |
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:28 |
|
XK posted:If you're going to blow out like that, at least spell correctly.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2017 23:43 |
|
Mirificus posted:snip big idiot spamming message for you dumb mobile goons That image makes me lean toward some sort of vote bot, cause how else is his endless stream of posts going to get to 3 points? He must be on the Cool Kids list and not the Dirty Goon FUD'er one
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:05 |
|
"Star Citizen: Can u not" Just by the by, there's nothing untoward about that 'this is not a partnership' clause in the charge document. Two or more entities can be considered a legal partnership (in the business sense) in the UK if they satisfy some quite broad criteria, so that wording is included in most commercial documents to ensure that the parties don't accidentally enter into a partnership in their dealings. As for Ortwin saying he's happy to 'partner up' with Coutts, he's just using stupid corporate-speak and I don't think Coutts would really care about that tbh (nor would it be seen as evidence of a partnership). I mean, It's dumb in the same way that I could also claim I 'partnered up' with my local bank, but not in breach of their agreement or anything.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:10 |
|
I wonder how long the after glow will keep us all entertained.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:14 |
XK posted:If it collapses, there simply are no more refunds. There would be no resource to provide refunds even if they really desperately wanted to give refunds. At best, backers would get paid out pennies on the dollar with whatever is left after banks auctioned off desks, chairs, and computers for maybe 1/3 of their purchase value. The 3D models, audio, visual, artwork, I can only imagine would be worth only whatever a stock asset outfit would be willing to buy it for. Those guys sell huge asset packs for $20-$30. Why would anyone specifically want CIG's stuff except as random cruft to help fill out a generic asset library. It's almost valueless. Backers aren't getting poo poo. The people they secured additional additional financing from are going to be preferred creditors which means they get first dibs in the fire sale and backers get to fight over anything that happens to be left after they are done. Which will be zero lol There's no way CIGs assets are worth enough to even give out pennies on the dollar once creditors are done.
|
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:15 |
|
What if the reason 'Star Citizen' IP is "excluded collateral" is because they have already pawned it to a US institution?
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:23 |
Golli posted:What if the reason 'Star Citizen' IP is "excluded collateral" is because they have already pawned it to a US institution? this is the best reason and i choose to believe it is true
|
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:24 |
|
Sarsapariller posted:One fun thing that nobody in the community has really caught onto yet- I respectfully disagree here. I think this proves that the funding tracker is only backer/pledged money. Or the fantasy equivalent thereof (I still think it likely includes discounted packages to gray market resellers at full price). Which means we have no idea how much the NatWest and Coutts loans are for. It is neither a positive or negative sign for the idiot backers with skin still in the game.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:26 |
|
WarpDogs posted:
lol u fuckin noob
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:28 |
|
Golli posted:What if the reason 'Star Citizen' IP is "excluded collateral" is because they have already pawned it to a US institution? Could be. But... if it were then there would be public UCC-1 statements listing that collateral in the company's state of incorporation, which I believe is Delaware. Anyone want to pay the Delaware Secretary of State to find out?
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:31 |
|
The Titanic posted:Took the weekend off and sure thing, cig explodes. you are the jared kushner to cig's trump
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:34 |
|
MinorInconvenience posted:Could be. But... if it were then there would be public UCC-1 statements listing that collateral in the company's state of incorporation, which I believe is Delaware. Anyone want to pay the Delaware Secretary of State to find out? I'll save you the trouble: it's not.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:35 |
|
Golli posted:What if the reason 'Star Citizen' IP is "excluded collateral" is because they have already pawned it to a US institution? The Star Citizen IP is excluded collateral because it has a net worth of $0. More than that, the Star Citizen IP doesn't exist. Despite the constant issuing of "lore," JPEGS, and other bullshit streaming from Chris Roberts distended anus, there is no value whatsoever to the collection of assets that he considers the Star Citizen "IP" - they're nothing more than his generic imaginings, with no recognition factor outside of his mentally damaged fan base. Do you know what this is a picture of? It's a Tie Fighter. Everyone on the planet has known what this ship is since 1977. Pygmy tribes in unexplored jungles make Tie Fighter cookies on May the Fourth. It's an instantly recognizable icon from a beloved franchise. We know what color lasers it shoots, we know what the engine sounds like, we know how they fly. Do you know what this is a picture of? It's a Vanguard. Do you know how you know that? Because the loving name of the ship is on the goddamned picture along with the ship, because if it isn't, nobody would be able to tell it apart from any other ship they've seen in any other generic space movie or game. Nobody, aside from an incredibly insular and maladjusted community, gives the slightest poo poo whatsoever about what it is, what it's called, or what bizarre piece of shat-out D-level "lore" features its use. And nobody ever will. If anything, the Star Citizen IP has negative value - time will wind up being spent formatting the media on which it's all stored, and entry-level IT gets paid by the hour.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:36 |
|
Nuclearmonkee posted:Backers aren't getting poo poo. The people they secured additional additional financing from are going to be preferred creditors which means they get first dibs in the fire sale and backers get to fight over anything that happens to be left after they are done. You'd be surprised what people will bid on. I was shaking my head at some of the IP that was sold in the THQ bankruptcy auction. MinorInconvenience fucked around with this message at 00:40 on Jun 27, 2017 |
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:37 |
|
Scruffpuff posted:The Star Citizen IP is excluded collateral because it has a net worth of $0. drat son
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:38 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I'll save you the trouble: it's not. Thanks, Ortwin.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:39 |
|
Scruffpuff posted:The Star Citizen IP is excluded collateral because it has a net worth of $0. A Good Post
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:42 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I'll save you the trouble: it's not.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:42 |
Jst0rm posted:I wonder how long the after glow will keep us all entertained. I'm already bored. I hope CIG puts the "DEFINITELY NOT PAY TO WIN ASTROFUCKER 2500" on sale soon.
|
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:43 |
|
Ghostlight posted:As just a regular backer and not even an avocado you are privy to this information because moma isn't toast, he's ortwin
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:44 |
|
Ghostlight posted:As just a regular backer and not even an avocado you are privy to this information because Maybe MoMA is account sharing with his CIG overseers, naughty boy.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:44 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I'll save you the trouble: it's not. How do you know this right off the top of your head, completely unconnected outside observer?
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:48 |
|
Scruffpuff posted:Do you know what this is a picture of? lol, I literally wouldn't have been able to tell you what that was. I've never seen a Star Wars movie. I've watched the Plinkett reviews several times over, though.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 17:19 |
|
XK posted:lol, I literally wouldn't have been able to tell you what that was. I've never seen a Star Wars movie. I've watched the Plinkett reviews several times over, though. Here's a guy who has to drive for two hours to get to the nearest deep-jungle pygmy tribe
|
# ? Jun 27, 2017 00:52 |