|
Daztek posted:I like how MoMA doesn't answer those kind of questions anymore I still want to know what his most anticipated feature in 3.0 is
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 16:04 |
|
|
big nipples big life posted:I still want to know what his most anticipated feature in 3.0 is Seamless Space <--> Planetoid Landing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Seamless Space <--> Planetoid Landing. So, like KSP, but without even in the slightest shred of a hint of anything that could be remotely considered realistic or actual gameplay?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
Hav posted:Except those two buildings that the port authority put up. Luckily they were demolished around the start of the century. I can go through some lists, but to be honest, I'm not going to defend what Britain has become by pointing out where you're wrong, because you're just doing that 'everyone follows the rules' thing that looks ridiculous when poo poo falls over and explodes. You literally 9/11d US fire code. lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 20:59
|
|
|
Hav posted:Not MoMa, but just try and stop me having an opinion. No you do not. And the standard has nothing to do with "attempting to do something", and that has no relevance. Unjust Enrichment is a simple cause of action that says you made a profit off something that you shouldn't. In this case, it could be something as simple as an inflated pay check, bonus etc. Anything that shows the made more money than is standard, instead of putting into the project, will qualify. See Lily drone fiasco. That's why this particular cause of action almost always appears in lawsuits which involve monetary damages, fraud etc. Unjust Enrichment Cause Of Action - California quote:1. Receipt of a benefit at the expense of another; and D_Smart fucked around with this message at 21:13 on Jun 29, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:What a completely loaded post Derek; please put more effort into this next time. Piercing cases are not ALWAYS successful. In fact, they have less than a 50% success rate when tried. And, the bar for providing unjust enrichment is incredibly high. Source: Cornell, Berkeley, and many other empirical studies performed in the last two decades. Doesn't matter because it'll never get there - there's no need for legal action since they're not doing anything illegal. Chris Roberts should sell a spaceship for lawyers.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Seamless Space <--> Planetoid Landing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:No you do not. I especially like the part where an armchair-lawyer is telling a real lawyer facts about law. If only there was someone who would tweet about what we should do with armchair lawyers...
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I especially like the part where an armchair-lawyer is telling a real lawyer facts about law. Cast Iron TOS. List your ships this poo poo is boring.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:that's actually now coming in 4.0 but 4.0 isn't coming 
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:06
|
|
Welcome to the
|
MoMA do you think 4 hours is too long for a submarine movie?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:What a completely loaded post Derek; please put more effort into this next time. Piercing cases are not ALWAYS successful. In fact, they have less than a 50% success rate when tried. And, the bar for providing unjust enrichment is incredibly high. Source: Cornell, Berkeley, and many other empirical studies performed in the last two decades. Doesn't matter because it'll never get there - there's no need for legal action since they're not doing anything illegal. I don't recall anyone saying they were doing anything illegal as per this loan. Do you know something that we don't? Also, 50% huh? Please cite your sources. Thanks! ps http://markjkohler.com/piercing-the-corporate-veil-and-protecting-yourself/
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I don't recall anyone saying they were doing anything illegal as per this loan. Do you know something that we don't? I did. Read my responses again - this time s l o w l y.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I especially like the part where an armchair-lawyer is telling a real lawyer facts about law. Is that why you keep doing it?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
Didn't MOMA say that if they didn't show 3.0 by mid-summer he would be worried?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
Eldragon posted:Didn't MOMA say that if they didn't show 3.0 by mid-summer he would be worried? I said June/July. AFAIK, it's still on schedule. edit: wasn't the first day of summer like a week ago?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
XK posted:Christianpost again? I know that's where I go to get all my Star Citizen news. At least they know the readership will believe any old shite...
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:11
|
|
|
MoMA, where's 3.0? Tomorrow night? tick tock tick tock
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
is it mid-year yet
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I said June/July. AFAIK, it's still on schedule. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Totally still on schedule.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
 "circulmventing" 
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I said June/July. AFAIK, it's still on schedule. Pretty sure you said PTU Testing VERY SOON EXPECT RELEASE IN JUNE. Welp 
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
QUOTE THE poo poo OUTTA MY POST, I STICK TO MY GUNS :smugfucker: *6 Months Later* PRETTY SURE I DIDN'T SAY THOSE EXACT WORDS :furiousbackpedalling:
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Lawyer (by day).
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:16
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:going by the list of responses i'm going with thread telephone game I just woke up and I'm on my phone, so I'm not going looking for it, but I remember it and it was in one of those videos he does with his fat rear end wife. And she sounded just as unbelieving of this claim as anyone with half a brain would. E: Blue Cross Blue Balls posted:Ben said he played through the SQ42 on 1 of those bensday with batgirl or whatever it's name is on Youtube. ^^^^ The Rabbi T. White fucked around with this message at 21:23 on Jun 29, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I especially like the part where an armchair-lawyer is telling a real lawyer facts about law. I really like the part where some anon dude* on the Internet is claiming to be a "real lawyer", without even a hint of alarm that such a self-own would illicit  * the same dude who was once touting a "platinum coated ToS" put out by a company actively running a scam
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." #neverforget
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I really like the part where some anon dude* on the Internet is claiming to be a "real lawyer", without even a hint of alarm that such a self-own would illicit I never said I was lawyer, nor am I Toast. I believe Hav once revealed he was an attorney, and my comment was directed to your reply of his response. You have reading comprehension issues.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I said June/July. AFAIK, it's still on schedule. Except that it's actually not on schedule? After the delays, the current release date "window" is now July 27th. Right. So should we start worrying now, or wait until July 28th?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Except that it's actually not on schedule? After the delays, the current release date "window" is now July 27th. Right. It'll be in evocati's hands early July.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
AP posted:List your ships this poo poo is boring. peter gabriel posted:It's hard to put into words just how consistently poo poo the game is, you really have to experience it. Things like doors are just on another level of broken, because they are things that are supposed to do something. Like ladders, anything that is meant to be something you interact with is broken. The inevitable consequences of CryEngine.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Beet Wagon posted:
LOL!! Those butt-hurt pricks. Who is circumventing a ban? They do realize that OSC was unbanned by Reddit admins, right? And that shortly after that, the /r/StarCitizen mods decided to ban him from their sub-Red anyway?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:It'll be in evocati's hands early July. Why do you think this is true when basically every date they've ever given they've missed?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
Maw posted:Why do you think this is true when basically every date they've ever given they've missed? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Qz_b1di3i8
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:24
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:It'll be in evocati's hands early July. Can we quote the poo poo out of this if we want?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:24
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I never said I was lawyer, nor am I Toast. I believe Hav once revealed he was an attorney, and my comment was directed to your reply of his response. ManofManyAliases posted:Lawyer (by day).
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:25
|
|
|
This is a good answer and I guess I'm on team moma now
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:25
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I said June/July. AFAIK, it's still on schedule.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 16:04 |
|
|
 I want to be a space lawyer = I am a lawyer in real life in the mind of Dr. Dr. Derek Smart.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 21:26
|
|