|
yeah I feel like it would be fairly easy to kill a horse with glitter
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:48 |
|
|
Reverand maynard posted:yeah I feel like it would be fairly easy to kill a horse with glitter It would probably have a heart attack if you just threw the glitter in the air. Or slip on the glitter and break all its legs.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
Catberry posted:How are the HAW weapons on a Phoenix? I know they are easy to smartbomb but do they apply damage well to Cruisers without target painters? Depending on the cruiser's sig radius, with web + painter and faction ammo, you are applying ~40-60% of your dps which isn't bad. Edit: This is from a solo perspective. Having alts/friends to add is going to make it easier. Only takes 2 webs and 3 painters total to apply 95%+ dps to a vexor. FranktheBank fucked around with this message at 22:32 on Jun 29, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
FranktheBank posted:Only takes 2 webs and 3 painters total to apply 95%+ dps to a vexor. That seems like pretty insane requirements when these are supposed to be anti subcap weapons in their own right.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 05:37
|
|
|
Catberry posted:That seems like pretty insane requirements when these are supposed to be anti subcap weapons in their own right. Torps are poo poo on anything not a bomber.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 07:16
|
|
|
Catberry posted:That seems like pretty insane requirements when these are supposed to be anti subcap weapons in their own right. For comparison, with a web and painter, a naglfar with faction ammo deals less than 30% dps if the vexor is closer than 9km. At 12km its 50% dps. The pinnacle is 18km (heated fed web) where the nag is dealing 75% dps. Adding a 2nd web brings all the numbers up about 20%. And paper, having a vexor sit at 16-18km is great dps. It just falls off HUGE if you lose web.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 07:48
|
|
|
Catberry posted:I gently caress horses. Easy there Mr. Pence.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 08:02
|
|
|
lucifirius posted:Torps are poo poo on anything not a bomber.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 08:32
|
|
|
FranktheBank posted:For comparison, with a web and painter, a naglfar with faction ammo deals less than 30% dps if the vexor is closer than 9km. At 12km its 50% dps. The pinnacle is 18km (heated fed web) where the nag is dealing 75% dps. What about two HAW Revs dropped 30 km apart firing scorch on the same target?
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 12:18
|
|
|
Reverand maynard posted:torps are probably the coolest weapon system in eve. Slow, can't apply for poo poo, but huge damage if they actually connect on the right target. They're loving useless right up until some poor fucker is painted and vindicator webbed and then he gets erased from eve by a phoenix Solution to the 'torp problem' on Phoenixes: give them web strength and web range, in the form of a grappler bonus.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
guristas drone phoenix 
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 18:56
|
|
|
Catberry posted:What about two HAW Revs dropped 30 km apart firing scorch on the same target? Assuming they are firing at a Vexor as well. At 30km, no webs will be on it. So we can say they both have a painter. At 30km they are each dealing ~40% dps. If they each have 2 painters (4 total on target) they are dealing ~60% dps. Most Revs fit 2 TCs w/ tracking script that I see, so with just those, they are dealing less than ~28% dps. But, if the both have 2 TCs and a painter, they are dealing 70% dps.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 19:45
|
|
|
FranktheBank posted:Assuming they are firing at a Vexor as well. At 30km, no webs will be on it. So we can say they both have a painter. At 30km they are each dealing ~40% dps. If they each have 2 painters (4 total on target) they are dealing ~60% dps. And if the 2 revs are 60 apart they'll alpha the vexor while the Phoenix wishes it had any range at all.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
Booley posted:And if the 2 revs are 60 apart they'll alpha the vexor while the Phoenix wishes it had any range at all. Unfit vexors sure. 2 revs are gonna alpha for like 8k each at 60km. So i will leave in structure.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 20:05
|
|
|
FranktheBank posted:Unfit vexors sure. 2 revs are gonna alpha for like 8k each at 60km. So i will leave in structure. With scorch I think it might be higher. Regardless, it's higher than the 0 that a haw phoenix does because ccp can't figure out how to balance missiles.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 20:11
|
|
|
I'm thinking about what Dreads to focus on. I've been asking around a lot and I think I'll be focusing on the Rev because I want to play with the HAW weapons and I like that the tank is immune to cap warfare. Also XL Scorch 
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
Booley posted:And if the 2 revs are 60 apart they'll alpha the vexor while the Phoenix wishes it had any range at all. sup retarded rote kapelle dude
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 20:49
|
|
|
Someone take all this isk off my hands and give me btc/eth
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 03:30
|
|
|
goodness posted:Someone take all this isk off my hands and give me btc/eth contact angelique duchemin ingame
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
Viva Miriya posted:contact Ok
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 03:32
|
|
|
Its easier to sell isk than buttcoins idk why you would want buttcoins
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 03:50
|
|
|
drugs
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 07:34
|
|
|
orange juche posted:Its easier to sell isk than buttcoins idk why you would want buttcoins has Law and Order done a darknet drugdealers episode yet?
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 08:18
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8qgehH3kEQ
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 12:11
|
|
|
orange juche posted:Its easier to sell isk than buttcoins idk why you would want buttcoins you can buy stuff with buttcoins
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 14:17
|
|
|
1001 Arabian dicks posted:you can buy stuff with buttcoins All of it drugs, weapons or bulk copies of Atlas shrugged.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 15:11
|
|
|
Do missile damage application mods get forgotten? I see a lot of making GBS threads on Caldari Supremacy yet every HAW fit for other races uses tracking mods. I've never used a HAW dread at all but I can say that any ship/weapon system that needs a tracking mod gets one and I find a lot of people seem to forget that they exist now for missiles. Phoenix already has a disgusting tank and the alpha DPS is great so are people considering adding a low/mid tracking mod for missiles, then seeing how "lovely" it is? Also the DPS application no matter what the range is definitely overlooked when you're in an immobile ship. It's real biggest deterrent for use is the distance to target travel time for weapon damage.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 15:36
|
|
|
Catberry posted:All of it drugs, weapons or bulk copies of Atlas shrugged. yeah and for $5 i can gently caress your mom
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 17:14
|
|
|
1001 Arabian dicks posted:yeah and for $5 i can gently caress your mom Don't forget the change then.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
Catberry posted:Don't forget the change then. You mean the second tip?
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2017 01:09
|
|
|
I think the biggest mistake ccp does is to try to fix the game for small groups. The endgame is and should be to join a big alliance and be a part of the epic battles or stay in high/lowsec. I was hoping we get it back with the upcoming moonmining Like the way First scan down a moon after mining the ore a new moon must be scanned down Second the new moonmining arry must first build and defend and can than work like ccp planed it. And last we must work together to mine in a big fleet and defend this big fleet for all the others they found our moonmining arry and come to kill the miner and or steal the ore/mine it for selfe. But I know it will never happend in that way. And maybe you have good points, I don't see atm, why my idea is bad. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 03:12
|
|
|
source your quotes
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 03:15
|
|
|
No soure, its just my wish for the upcoming moonmining. Sorry for misunderstanding.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 03:35
|
|
|
The whole moon mining thing is a serious gently caress up. It's an integral part of alliance income. Also, it gets some fights. I don't understand why they're so steadfast in loving things up...
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 03:41
|
|
|
Valar Morghulis posted:The whole moon mining thing is a serious gently caress up. It's an integral part of alliance income. Also, it gets some fights. the new moon mining is cool + good, we're excited for it
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 03:45
|
|
|
Valar Morghulis posted:The whole moon mining thing is a serious gently caress up. It's an integral part of alliance income. Also, it gets some fights. It's great because all our strongest enemies depend on moon mining to live while at the same time being too cool to mine manually.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 03:56
|
|
|
Yeah, as with any change to the game that rewards cooperation and large-scale organization, it's effectively a buff for us.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 03:58
|
|
|
Valar Morghulis posted:The whole moon mining thing is a serious gently caress up. It's an integral part of alliance income. Also, it gets some fights. Alliances are gonna have to either require taxes or force corps to run their own SRP programs. But either way, the moon goo is gonna have to be collected by somebody.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 07:21
|
|
|
eh, its likely people will turn to renters again
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 08:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:48 |
|
|
XenJ posted:Like the way If moons are minable by Rorquals gently caress all will happen under an alliance's supercap umbrella. If they require barges it'll just lead to a Claw extravaganza.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2017 08:59
|
|