|
I thought it was "snitchin' is bitchin'"
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 15:06 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 15:01 |
|
The sanctioned action is to snitch.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 17:20 |
|
PMush Perfect posted:Wait, really?
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 18:09 |
|
People like that literally keep the forum afloat. Reach liquidity through crazy.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 18:34 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:I'm sure she will be back, just look for the new poster talking about birds and cat dicks and threatening the president in D&D. im sure the secret service take avs's circus acrobats and horse themed """threat""" incredibly seriously you joyless shmuck
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 19:19 |
|
Sorry, but what is you beef with me? I seriously have no idea.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 21:04 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:I'm sure she will be back, just look for the new poster talking about birds and cat dicks and threatening the president in D&D. Threatening to unbirth him. You need to be specific.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 21:16 |
|
I still can't get over that threatening to unbirth the president is the reason. I think that's really indicative of Avshalom's absurdity.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 21:29 |
I just realized the pale ones never said "aye" during the pact, just "..." Can they not talk?
|
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 21:50 |
|
One has the face and mouthparts of a monstrous fly, and the other has no apparent mouth at all, so I'm guessing no, not in the conventional sense. The pale bartender didn't talk either.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2017 21:59 |
|
Malpais Legate posted:I still can't get over that threatening to unbirth the president is the reason. I think that's really indicative of Avshalom's absurdity. That wasn't the reason. She was sincerely arguing that someone ought to shoot Trump, which is bannable even if you are Australian.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 02:58 |
Dead Reckoning posted:One has the face and mouthparts of a monstrous fly, and the other has no apparent mouth at all, so I'm guessing no, not in the conventional sense. The pale bartender didn't talk either. I guess for some reason I never correlated "the ability to speak" with "has a mouth" E: did book head ever talk?
|
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 03:09 |
|
VanSandman posted:That wasn't the reason. She was sincerely arguing that someone ought to shoot Trump, which is bannable even if you are Australian. Oh. Well that makes more sense but is decidedly less funny.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 03:11 |
|
VanSandman posted:That wasn't the reason. She was sincerely arguing that someone ought to shoot Trump, which is bannable even if you are Australian. Her permaban links to a post where she said, and I quote, "I will consume the president with my mighty womb and absorb his strength over a nine month reverse-gestation."
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 03:31 |
|
Who What Now posted:Her permaban links to a post where she said, and I quote, "I will consume the president with my mighty womb and absorb his strength over a nine month reverse-gestation." No one ever said she wasn't funny.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 03:32 |
|
Who What Now posted:Her permaban links to a post where she said, and I quote, "I will consume the president with my mighty womb and absorb his strength over a nine month reverse-gestation." It's called a POWER CLAMP.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 03:42 |
|
Look, folks, I know you love your white knighting, but in the hopes of shortening this derail, I bring you the following link: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3797481&userid=184584&perpage=40&pagenumber=4#post472462226 Click on it and scroll gradually down the page.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 03:53 |
|
Reach POTUS through violence
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 04:18 |
|
Can we please end the Avs derail? Thank you.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 04:45 |
|
Someone should shoot trump though. Like is that even a controversial statement? (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 06:12 |
|
While it's fine for Trump to advocate for stochastic terrorism, if you advocate for stochastic terrorism against the president don't be surprised if the Secret Service knock on your door and tell you to knock it off. I would delete that post.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 06:41 |
|
At this point you might as well leave it up and see if you get to meet a secret service agent.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 07:14 |
|
The problem's not whether you meet a Secret Service agent, it's whether Lowtax has to deal with yet-a-Goddamn-nother visit from the men with earwigs, and IIRC he would really rather not. It won't be up to you whether that post stays.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 20:43 |
|
darthbob88 posted:The problem's not whether you meet a Secret Service agent, it's whether Lowtax has to deal with yet-a-Goddamn-nother visit from the men with earwigs, and IIRC he would really rather not. It won't be up to you whether that post stays. im certain the secret service felt that the idea of avs swallowing up donald trump with her mighty uterus was a credible threat and have sent agents to investigate thoroughly
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 21:26 |
|
stone cold posted:im certain the secret service felt that the idea of avs swallowing up donald trump with her mighty uterus was a credible threat and have sent agents to investigate thoroughly One time forums poster Twisty made a post about killing presidential candidate McCain, and later edited the post to gaotse. The FBI then visited Twisty with the printed out goatse post, as well as a post quoting Twisty's original comment with the reply "You're gay" and had twisty explain goatse to them. It's not exactly a logical bunch
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 22:45 |
|
I feel like "Don't make the Secret Service contact Lowtax" is going to need to be an official forum rule soon. Trump presidency is probably going to make it come up more.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2017 23:04 |
|
El Burbo posted:One time forums poster Twisty made a post about killing presidential candidate McCain, and later edited the post to gaotse. The FBI then visited Twisty with the printed out goatse post, as well as a post quoting Twisty's original comment with the reply "You're gay" and had twisty explain goatse to them. It's not exactly a logical bunch so much more effective at getting the point across than just showing up with the death threat
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 02:51 |
|
Pavlov posted:I feel like "Don't make the Secret Service contact Lowtax" is going to need to be an official forum rule soon. Trump presidency is probably going to make it come up more. I think you mean "Don't make the Secret Service contact Lowtax, again"
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 02:52 |
|
Something else to talk about!
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 03:07 |
|
Man, I hate Mimicks
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 03:17 |
|
Well, now we know what happened to that family of chair thieves.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 03:21 |
|
a kitten posted:Just take all those free
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 03:31 |
|
Master thieves don't go in and randomly start picking up poo poo.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 03:35 |
|
it's like these nerds have never played dark souls
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 03:36 |
|
Reene posted:it's like these nerds have never played dark souls it's like these nerds have never even played mario 64
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 03:57 |
|
Or read Dungeon Meshi.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 04:28 |
|
Mile'ionaha posted:While it's fine for Trump to advocate for stochastic terrorism, if you advocate for stochastic terrorism against the president don't be surprised if the Secret Service knock on your door and tell you to knock it off. I would delete that post. holy moley
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 05:10 |
|
Motherfucker posted:holy moley I shouldn't assume anything, so please be certain to read my first sentence of that post with an incredibly acerbic and snarky tone. Like, obviously, it shouldn't be okay to advocate for stochastic terrorism, but I'm pretty sure that's exactly what his second amendment people comment was, regarding Hillary. And apparently everyone was fine with that.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 05:13 |
|
I enjoy how Charon is never not doing a gopniki squat.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 05:42 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 15:01 |
|
Oxxidation posted:I enjoy how Charon is never not doing a gopniki squat. terrible form, the heels need to be touching the ground
|
# ? Jul 10, 2017 05:51 |