Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Intrinsic Field Marshal
Sep 6, 2014

by SA Support Robot

business hammocks posted:

Contrapoints is having a one-on-one conversation with Laci Green about genderqueer identities and expression on Thursday at some yet to be determined time, if anyone's curious. It's probably going to be on Laci's channel.

It's part of a series including Blaire White and some TERF who tells people to kill themselves when they call her a TERF.

Why cant people just be polite and respect what gender pronouns people want to be called even if they believe gender is based on biology and not what a person believes what they are?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SHY NUDIST GRRL
Feb 15, 2011

Communism will help more white people than anyone else. Any equal measures unfairly provide less to minority populations just because there's less of them. Democracy is truly the tyranny of the mob.

Telling people to kill themselves is a classic terf move

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

business hammocks posted:

It's part of a series including Blaire White and some TERF who tells people to kill themselves when they call her a TERF.
Cathy Brennan is debating Laci Green?

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

No, another one. I've never heard of her before but she dropped into Contra's twitter to tell a teenager to commit suicide. A cis teenager, even!

BigRed0427
Mar 23, 2007

There's no one I'd rather be than me.

business hammocks posted:

Contrapoints is having a one-on-one conversation with Laci Green about genderqueer identities and expression on Thursday at some yet to be determined time, if anyone's curious. It's probably going to be on Laci's channel.

It's part of a series including Blaire White and some TERF who tells people to kill themselves when they call her a TERF.

I'll watch the replay of this when it goes up, but I do tend to advoid these things. They never end well for either side.

Didn't Contra do a stream with White at one point that didn't go well?

rkajdi
Sep 11, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Guavanaut posted:

Yeah, it doesn't work on Dork Enlightenment types who hear stories about how garbage Feudalism was and think "ah, better times."

But then those people can't complain about the disposable male. The whole point of many of those structures was "It is an honor and a privilege (heh) to be a disposable pawn in the eyes of my Lord."

I think there's a pretty big divide for these guys between being a peasant who gets to screw his wife without her consent (i.e. the image of Feudalism they have) and a society where they are more equal but actually have to put their shingle out there to get laid. And of course they choose the latter, since apparently having sex is the most important thing in the world that they aren't willing to put any effort into doing.

It's also hyper-entertaining that they are also completely in the thrall of the cults of absolute beauty and virginity. Everything I've seen with the man-o-sphere almost makes sex the pathetic thing they have to have-- it's almost treated as a thing you have to do, but only grudgingly. I half think these guys only really want sex as a way to validate their worth.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Yes. His conversations with Roamingmillennial and some weird quasi-mra catholic went better. The justification is that Laci has an audience that would benefit from hearing an informed voice on the subject and there's nobody else in the series repping a pro-trans or more-than-two perspective.

NikkolasKing
Apr 3, 2010



business hammocks posted:

Yes. His conversations with Roamingmillennial and some weird quasi-mra catholic went better. The justification is that Laci has an audience that would benefit from hearing an informed voice on the subject and there's nobody else in the series repping a pro-trans or more-than-two perspective.

The Distributst (the Catholic) has done chats with a lot of people and I get the impression he at least knows some history amd politics and he will also let even Godless Communists speak. MR meanwhile is just a doormat and White is aggrssively uninformed.

All that being said, while the "debate" with Blaitr was poo poo show, I saw people say he convinced them and showed them how ignorant Blair was. So some good came of it.

fallenturtle
Feb 28, 2003
paintedblue.net

Voyager I posted:

The problem is that withholding your support in this system means you get the greater of two evils instead.

It's not a great system, but until we make a better one you aren't helping yourself by being too cool for the rules.

Not voting is only a protest vote if you tell people you didn't vote, otherwise no one knows (note to self: make money by selling "I didn't vote stickers" next general election). On the other hand voting for the loser narrows the margin of wining which actually has optics (mandates, blah blah blah, etc).

SHY NUDIST GRRL
Feb 15, 2011

Communism will help more white people than anyone else. Any equal measures unfairly provide less to minority populations just because there's less of them. Democracy is truly the tyranny of the mob.

The only loving without consent in feudalism these guys will be related to is when the king consummates the marriage as is tradition

SHY NUDIST GRRL
Feb 15, 2011

Communism will help more white people than anyone else. Any equal measures unfairly provide less to minority populations just because there's less of them. Democracy is truly the tyranny of the mob.

fallenturtle posted:

Not voting is only a protest vote if you tell people you didn't vote, otherwise no one knows (note to self: make money by selling "I didn't vote stickers" next general election). On the other hand voting for the loser narrows the margin of wining which actually has optics (mandates, blah blah blah, etc).

It also makes the loser work to keep your vote. America politicians like to write off "non voters"

BigRed0427
Mar 23, 2007

There's no one I'd rather be than me.

business hammocks posted:

Yes. His conversations with Roamingmillennial and some weird quasi-mra catholic went better. The justification is that Laci has an audience that would benefit from hearing an informed voice on the subject and there's nobody else in the series repping a pro-trans or more-than-two perspective.

I hope so.

I do agree with Contra that you need to be willing to defend your ideas against people who disagree with you in a civil tone.

But that idea hits a wall when you are dealing with people like White and Sargon. They do not give a gently caress about what ever you have to say because their world view is the correct one, how dare you say otherwise. Or worse is guys like Bearing and sides who post on Kiwifarms who find the idea of trans people and not conforming to beauty standards of porn, real or hentai to be funny. After a point, a lot of trans people just go into immediate "gently caress you" mode when people ask them questions.

PoizenJam
Dec 2, 2006

Damn!!!
It's PoizenJam!!!

business hammocks posted:

Do you think she's dog-whistling while giving herself plausible deniability?

Her? Yes. Because she loving knows better.

Hence my apprehension about giving her the benefit of the doubt.

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:

Why cant people just be polite and respect what gender pronouns people want to be called even if they believe gender is based on biology and not what a person believes what they are?

The problems are twofold (with the first point being the most important):

1. Simply expressing that opinion (in a context like this) is pretty hurtful/insulting. A good example is someone who believes something like "black people are naturally less intelligent than white people". Even if they think they're acting polite to them in person, expressing that sort of view is inherently insulting to the group in question.

2. The belief in question that you mentioned is actually a fringe belief, but is often portrayed (like you seem to be portraying it here) as a more mainstream "common sense" idea. Research doesn't really support the idea that gender is just based on biology (in the sense of whether someone is biologically male/female).

fallenturtle
Feb 28, 2003
paintedblue.net

This video is a lot better when you assume he's drinking hot chocolate.

Edit: Well, until he's ruins it at the 8 min mark.

fallenturtle
Feb 28, 2003
paintedblue.net

JVNO posted:

Then let's talk Laci Green and her disingenuous refusal to acknowledge her new demographic of supporters will abandon her as soon as they realize she's still a 'feminist'.

Like, the interest in her among the alt-right/antifeminists seems to begin and end with, 'we can convert her fully!' She's a darling now, because in their mind she makes them look like the reasonable ones for engaging in discussion... But give it a few more months and a few more times asserting 'gender and sex are different' and 'the wage gap is real!'. I don't think they'll be sticking around once the novelty wears off, unless she goes full Honey Badger or something.

Or maybe she will stick around as 'one of the good ones' to 'prove' antis aren't above debate or something.

It'll probably end when her relationship with Ray Gun ends.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Verisimilidude posted:

Wait, so is Hbomb a Good Guy? I've been assuming most if not all video game YT personalities are horrible, and I see his name thrown around a lot.

He has some very lengthy (and correct) opinions about dark souls but he's a solidly good egg on the politics front.

Lemniscate Blue
Apr 21, 2006

Here we go again.

fallenturtle posted:

This video is a lot better when you assume he's drinking hot chocolate.

Edit: Well, until he's ruins it at the 8 min mark.

I can't figure out what he thinks happened in 1965.

*SLUUUUURP*

BigRed0427
Mar 23, 2007

There's no one I'd rather be than me.

Lemniscate Blue posted:

I can't figure out what he thinks happened in 1965.

*SLUUUUURP*

Start of the veitnam war? The voting rights act?

BigRed0427 fucked around with this message at 18:00 on Jul 10, 2017

Lemniscate Blue
Apr 21, 2006

Here we go again.

BigRed0427 posted:

Start of the veitnam war?

Or the Voting Rights Act? Or Johnson's Great Society? MLK's Selma march? The Watts Riots?

Dylan went electric?

There's just no telling.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
I'd bet money on the VRA or Hart-Celler.

fallenturtle
Feb 28, 2003
paintedblue.net

BigRed0427 posted:

I hope so.

I do agree with Contra that you need to be willing to defend your ideas against people who disagree with you in a civil tone.

But that idea hits a wall when you are dealing with people like White and Sargon. They do not give a gently caress about what ever you have to say because their world view is the correct one, how dare you say otherwise. Or worse is guys like Bearing and sides who post on Kiwifarms who find the idea of trans people and not conforming to beauty standards of porn, real or hentai to be funny. After a point, a lot of trans people just go into immediate "gently caress you" mode when people ask them questions.

Unless White is bullshitting, it seems like she has changed her views when it comes to questioning other trans people's legitimacy after watching that recent Riley video. Her biggest hang up it seems is over whether or not minors should be allowed to take puberty blockers and also the general belief that being trans = suffering and thus it must be eradicated.

fallenturtle
Feb 28, 2003
paintedblue.net

Lemniscate Blue posted:

I can't figure out what he thinks happened in 1965.

*SLUUUUURP*

Oh good, I'm not the only one. I thought maybe I just didn't pay enough attention to the video, but I don't want to rewatch it. I assumed something civil rights related.

CrazyLittle
Sep 11, 2001





Clapping Larry

business hammocks posted:

This will always be my favorite political statement on and by the gamer mentality vis a vis politics:

https://techraptor.net/content/gamergate-media-gave-away-america

Stay edgelord, my friends

https://twitter.com/TheOctale/status/884075679972720641

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

When she was talking to Contra her big claim was that if there were pills that could eliminate her sense of dysphoria and make her happy with a male body, she would take them. That no such pills exist or indeed seem possible at all gave her no trouble, and she argued consistently as if the question regarding trans issues was one of either transitioning or taking an imaginary science-fictional pill that does not exist and never could exist.

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

NikkolasKing posted:

Got some more #fakenews for you guys
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2017/07/10/here-are-5-video-game-youtubers-you-really-need-to-watch/#4e566df7b309

Hbomb is on his way up in the world. I quite like Sterling, too.

Stuff like this makes me happy since it reaffirms the online community of racists and misogynists are still just a joke in the real world while actual intellectuals have a chance to do some real good.

This is something that's been on my mind the past few days, mainly thinking about why there are so many people doing "rational" videos like Sargon and why there don't seem to be as many people making videos rebutting them and putting forward more leftist views. Hbomberguy and Shaun and Jen are great, but they're definitely in a minority when it comes to videos directly talking about these ideas.

The thing that made me realize what's going on was a random vlogbrothers video when I realized that the channels and groups and communities that celebrate more leftist ideas are just... doing that. They're not spending time directly refuting Carlgon because they're using their time attempting to just make the world a better place directly. It made me feel a lot better about it when I realized that Carlgon and his ilk pretty much just sit in a corner pulling off sick nasty burns on people who mostly just don't give a poo poo that they even exist. The only relevance they have is in being so evil in harassment of a specific few people they've decided are Satan, and if Anita's harassment had never happened no one would know who Carlgon even is.

mojo1701a
Oct 9, 2008

Oh, yeah. Loud and clear. Emphasis on LOUD!
~ David Lee Roth

LITERALLY MY FETISH posted:

This is something that's been on my mind the past few days, mainly thinking about why there are so many people doing "rational" videos like Sargon and why there don't seem to be as many people making videos rebutting them and putting forward more leftist views. Hbomberguy and Shaun and Jen are great, but they're definitely in a minority when it comes to videos directly talking about these ideas.

The thing that made me realize what's going on was a random vlogbrothers video when I realized that the channels and groups and communities that celebrate more leftist ideas are just... doing that. They're not spending time directly refuting Carlgon because they're using their time attempting to just make the world a better place directly. It made me feel a lot better about it when I realized that Carlgon and his ilk pretty much just sit in a corner pulling off sick nasty burns on people who mostly just don't give a poo poo that they even exist. The only relevance they have is in being so evil in harassment of a specific few people they've decided are Satan, and if Anita's harassment had never happened no one would know who Carlgon even is.

You'll also notice that a lot of "rationalist" videos are the definition of :effort:. They really don't have to do much other than rant about something and just let that sweet sweet alt-right cash roll in.

It's also why they fight so drat hard to stay relevant because once you've made a name for yourself being an Internet scumbag, it's hard to find a real job afterward.

Dongicus
Jun 12, 2015

NikkolasKing posted:

Got some more #fakenews for you guys
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2017/07/10/here-are-5-video-game-youtubers-you-really-need-to-watch/#4e566df7b309

Hbomb is on his way up in the world. I quite like Sterling, too.

Stuff like this makes me happy since it reaffirms the online community of racists and misogynists are still just a joke in the real world while actual intellectuals have a chance to do some real good.

no
ok
ok
yes
who?

Seraphic Neoman
Jul 19, 2011


I also want to crosspost this amazing post about Sargon's petition. It's from reddit, but the dude deserved his gold:

quote:

Internet ideologues and their sycophants will never get a "conversation" with academics. Confronted with their nonsense, the only thing an academic can do is point out how they are wrong, and stop talking with them when it becomes evident that they have no intention of listening. A debate presupposes two at least remotely similarly sophisticated and defensible positions. There can be no debate between a geologist and the guy asserting igneous rocks are bullshit. The latter can listen and learn, or they can stop wasting our time, but it's absurd to even contemplate that there can be a legitimate "debate" between us. Your views are not tennable and even if we reconstruct them in order to make them tennable (that is, if we do your work) they will remain fairly unnuanced. That's just all there is to this. No amount of shouting and stomping your feet down will make us take you seriously because you are simply incapable of advancing any argument worth taking seriously, and that's fully and exhaustively on you, on your intellectual laziness. You could read a book, but you choose not to. You could ask for recommendations in any of the academic subreddits, you could ask for help understanding the material, there, too. But you choose not to. That's all well and good, but you can not, in turn, expect us to think highly of you.
I mean just take a step back and look at what you're talking about. You (plural) have had no contact with any textbook or relevant educational material of some minimum quality, let alone having approached any primary sources, you literally know nothing at all about these fields beyond what you could gather from horribly biased youtube videos made by completely unqualified entertainers that themselves know nothing about these fields. You don't even know what they are called. You certainly can't even begin to imagine what the academic debates are about. You think you will what? You'll go up to an educator and have them answer to your half-formed fantasies about what the field they specialize in is supposed to be about? The potatoes have committed mutiny and they're trying to beat up the greengrocer.
What you very audaciously call indoctrination is nothing more than education in a field that is completely alien to you. In fact your clique doesn't even rise to the heights of disagreeing that any particular theory is right or wrong. You revolt against the very idea of coming to an understanding about what the theory is stating, about what is claimed in the first place. Sargon doesn't "level material criticisms against these courses". Sargon, and people like Sargon, make trivially false claims about what is being claimed, and then throw tantrums when people try to correct them. Now this is precisely perpetuating misinformation.
What you are doing is exactly equivalent to what young earth creationists are doing. You stomp your feet and demand a debate that can not be had, supposing that the noise you make coupled with your self-assuredness somehow translates into a tennable position that people who know what they are talking about -and are not, very much unlike you, peddling fantasies- are obliged to humour. But they are not and they won't. The ''universities'' will continue ignoring you, just like they are still ignoring YECs.

and from the same thread

quote:

quote:

Academia has spun out blatantly wrong and harmful thinigs about race, gender, and religion in the past

Academics are not infallible and yet, you will not be the one to point out any of their faults, because you have not gone to the trouble of actually studying any of these things, which is exactly my point. You can not criticise a discipline about the content (and not even just the content, you can't even name it) of which you are altogether oblivious.

quote:

I'm not saying Sargon is wholly correct

I'm not saying Sargon is wholly incorrect, either. In fact I'm not saying Sargon is at all incorrect, in the same sense that "water boils at 24 spins per second" is not wrong, because it is not even wrong. Do you get this? I would be less inclined to be hostile if he was actually wrong, because that would mean he would at least be on topic, having some vague idea what he's talking about, which would indicate he would have made some attempt to educate himself on the topic of his interest and that's laudable. Then I could try to explain why he's wrong, and we could engage in a discussion, but he, and people like him, don't rise to the olympian heights of being wrong. They argue against fantasies, and they are doing so deliberately (because they can not but know what they haven't studied, and yet this doesn't deter them from pretending otherwise).
Why doesn't he pick up a textbook? Why don't you? Ritzer's introduction to sociological theory is as good as any (Certainly better than nothing). In the age of internet piracy you can even get them for free, but you choose not to. And that's not even what's really reprehensible. I choose not to read about civil engineering, but I also shut up about it. You feel that you, willing ignoramous (and this is a matter of fact) that you are, will correct the people who have been studying a subject for decades on what it's even about. You can not justify this pittiful display and you don't even try. You just know that something you have never laid eyes on is wrong for "reasons" (really just mediocre excuses not to doubt your priors) you pull out of the deepest crevices of your digestive system, and you can not but do so, because you have no interest in even comprehending the arguments you wish to argue against. THIS is what the condescension is for. I look down on you because you are willingly staying ignorant.

quote:

I think you might have actually been trying to persuade that I am wrong (and maybe I am), or that Sargon is wrong. But in total, your comment worked against that

It's not my job to persuade you about anything. It's your duty and your responsibility to actually study something if you are interested in it. If you don't you're injuring yourself and if you wish to parade your consequent ignorance you're demeaning yourself. Know that I loathe this pathetic idea that you are entitled to hold on to nonsense until someone goes out of their way to persuade you otherwise. That it is ok for you to not know what you are talking about until a knight in shining armor arrives to force you out of your self-imposed (and violently clinged onto) ignorance. You should want to bring yourself out of it on your own, and not trying to do so when you can represents your own moral failing.
Fundamentally, you are a person in possession of reason. You can recognise when you haven't really looked into something, and you can take action to learn about the things you care about. This is all in your grasp, and this is why you are responsible for choosing not to reach out to it, and this is why I look down on you.

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

LITERALLY MY FETISH posted:

This is something that's been on my mind the past few days, mainly thinking about why there are so many people doing "rational" videos like Sargon and why there don't seem to be as many people making videos rebutting them and putting forward more leftist views. Hbomberguy and Shaun and Jen are great, but they're definitely in a minority when it comes to videos directly talking about these ideas.

The thing that made me realize what's going on was a random vlogbrothers video when I realized that the channels and groups and communities that celebrate more leftist ideas are just... doing that. They're not spending time directly refuting Carlgon because they're using their time attempting to just make the world a better place directly. It made me feel a lot better about it when I realized that Carlgon and his ilk pretty much just sit in a corner pulling off sick nasty burns on people who mostly just don't give a poo poo that they even exist. The only relevance they have is in being so evil in harassment of a specific few people they've decided are Satan, and if Anita's harassment had never happened no one would know who Carlgon even is.

I think it's mostly that left-leaning people and social justice proponents tend to get their politically-oriented media through different mediums than Youtube. Also, if someone is just "against the alt-right", the mainstream media basically has that covered (while the alt-right doesn't have much presence in newspapers or television).

Intrinsic Field Marshal
Sep 6, 2014

by SA Support Robot

Ytlaya posted:

I think it's mostly that left-leaning people and social justice proponents tend to get their politically-oriented media through different mediums than Youtube. Also, if someone is just "against the alt-right", the mainstream media basically has that covered (while the alt-right doesn't have much presence in newspapers or television).

Yes lets all trust the mainstream media....

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


joseph anderson is the only good video game youtube apart from harry bomberguy. he's not a funny guy and doesn't aim to be but man is he right like 99 percent of the time.

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:

Yes lets all trust the mainstream media....

What, when did I say anything about the mainstream media being good? I was just making the point that alt-righters have no choice but to resort to places like Youtube to enjoy an echo chamber.

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:

Yes lets all trust the mainstream media....

have you ever posted and not been insufferable?

Harrow
Jun 30, 2012

Verisimilidude posted:

Wait, so is Hbomb a Good Guy? I've been assuming most if not all video game YT personalities are horrible, and I see his name thrown around a lot.

I tend not to agree with his takes on video games (except that we agree that Bloodborne is a masterpiece), but yeah, he's pretty good and honestly more of his videos are about making fun of the alt-right/MRAs than video games anyway.

Mark Brown is also a good video game YouTuber who mostly does in-depth videos on game design.

Hihohe
Oct 4, 2008

Fuck you and the sun you live under


SSNeoman posted:

I also want to crosspost this amazing post about Sargon's petition. It's from reddit, but the dude deserved his gold:




Goddamn that was some hard dunking.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:

Yes lets all trust the mainstream media....

Did you actually read the post or just see the word "mainstream" and your brain went into poo poo posting autopilot?

Intrinsic Field Marshal
Sep 6, 2014

by SA Support Robot

Who What Now posted:

Did you actually read the post or just see the word "mainstream" and your brain went into poo poo posting autopilot?

shitposting auto pilot

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

Ytlaya posted:

I think it's mostly that left-leaning people and social justice proponents tend to get their politically-oriented media through different mediums than Youtube. Also, if someone is just "against the alt-right", the mainstream media basically has that covered (while the alt-right doesn't have much presence in newspapers or television).

Also, I'm not sure if it's this or if it's about someone sitting down to think about what kind of youtube channel they want to make, and instead of even thinking of carlgon, they decide they want their youtube channel to actually make the world a better place in some fashion, either by educating people or helping to create events for people to come together and accomplish things, and the thought never crosses their mind to just make videos yelling at dumb people, but Carlgon and the septic rationals all decided they needed to make videos screaming about how people are WRONG and that this was a good use of their time.

Take something like the vlogbrothers, although their channel kind of just happened out of experimentation, but outside of the occasional one off rant about people saying science is wrong, most of what they produce is either education or attempting to put together communities and use that community to make the world a better place with things like project for awesome. It's not that leftist idea videos aren't being made, it's that none of them who are doing it even acknowledge that carlgon exists because it'd be a waste of time. Anita Sarkeesian didn't start off with "These assholes are WRONG about EVERYTHING." She started off with "wow, there's not a lot of easily accessible ideas about this one specific area, feminism and video games and comics, and I'm going to make a video series about this specific thing" and not "those specific people" because the point isn't to call other people out, it's to educate and hopefully someone who genuinely just doesn't know about this stuff or has never thought of it can have an "Oh, I get it now" moment.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SHY NUDIST GRRL
Feb 15, 2011

Communism will help more white people than anyone else. Any equal measures unfairly provide less to minority populations just because there's less of them. Democracy is truly the tyranny of the mob.

Also the people who do make these take down videos didn't get started like that. Shaun and Henry explosiveman stream videogames

  • Locked thread