Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Baloogan
Dec 5, 2004
Fun Shoe
i have some austaralian storeies that sound like stdh.txt so im not gonna share em

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Squizzle
Apr 24, 2008




does australia have marriage equality yet

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.
oval office is misogynistic when directed at women, but not gendered when it's directed at men/animals/inanimate objects

Squizzle
Apr 24, 2008




its creepy fuckin eugenic how britain sent its crimers to the other side of the world and one group became a peaceful corbyn-loving people and the other turned into bigot island

deadgoon
Dec 4, 2014

by FactsAreUseless

exmarx posted:

oval office is misogynistic when directed at women, but not gendered when it's directed at men/animals/inanimate objects

yeah like how its ok to call someone a fag as long as they arent actually gay

got any sevens
Feb 9, 2013

by Cyrano4747
Is calling a woman a "dick" good or bad

deadgoon
Dec 4, 2014

by FactsAreUseless

got any sevens posted:

Is calling a woman a "dick" good or bad

yeah

Fauxbot
Jan 20, 2009

I need more wine.

Squizzle posted:

does australia have marriage equality yet

lol nope

Tokamak
Dec 22, 2004

Byolante posted:

This is hilariously wrong and I must assume you either aren't Australian, or in the off chance you are, only socialise with inner city types.

Fag and human being are only ever used in a derogatory manner, oval office is neutral in Australian usage and requires context to determine if it was derogatory or not.

I'am. It's funny how you immediately differentiate the use of the word between social groups. It's almost as if it's got some baggage and isn't used by the more educated, professional types for a reason. You'd have to be in a fairly rough place, a tradesmen, or around teenagers a lot to ever hear the word in public. You hear gently caress, or poo poo, or bullshit far more often than oval office.

deadgoon
Dec 4, 2014

by FactsAreUseless

Tokamak posted:

the more educated, professional types

lol gently caress those cunts

deadgoon
Dec 4, 2014

by FactsAreUseless
its ok for me to say that because im in a brit thread not an american thread

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

Tokamak posted:

I'am. It's funny how you immediately differentiate the use of the word between social groups. It's almost as if it's got some baggage and isn't used by the more educated, professional types for a reason. You'd have to be in a fairly rough place, a tradesmen, or around teenagers a lot to ever hear the word in public. You hear gently caress, or poo poo, or bullshit far more often than oval office.
So in other words, tut-tutting about 'oval office' is a way for upper class people to disparage lower class people

Tokamak
Dec 22, 2004

rudatron posted:

So in other words, tut-tutting about 'oval office' is a way for upper class people to disparage lower class people

They don't disparage them because they never interact with them.

I live in a traditionally immigrant/working class area, so maybe the problem is I don't live around enough white people.

Tokamak has issued a correction as of 08:09 on Jul 14, 2017

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

rudatron posted:

So in other words, tut-tutting about 'oval office' is a way for upper class people to disparage lower class people

nah

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.

deadgoon posted:

yeah like how its ok to call someone a fag as long as they arent actually gay

no, it's different than that

hakimashou
Jul 15, 2002
Upset Trowel

rudatron posted:

So in other words, tut-tutting about 'oval office' is a way for upper class people to disparage lower class people

Maybe "upper class" people just know better than to use gendered slurs?

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747

Tokamak posted:

I'am. It's funny how you immediately differentiate the use of the word between social groups. It's almost as if it's got some baggage and isn't used by the more educated, professional types for a reason. You'd have to be in a fairly rough place, a tradesmen, or around teenagers a lot to ever hear the word in public. You hear gently caress, or poo poo, or bullshit far more often than oval office.

Ah yes, the old if only you were educated you would understand that you aren't a good person. Please tell me more about how being wealthy and conforming to wealthy people norms makes you a better person.

jBrereton
May 30, 2013
Grimey Drawer
oval office 👏 Is 👏 Not 👏 A 👏 Gendered 👏 Insult 👏 Here 👏 In 👏 The 👏 Same 👏 Way 👏 As 👏 Its 👏 Kutwijf-Esque 👏 American 👏 Meaning 👏 But 👏 It 👏 Is 👏 Still 👏 About 👏 The 👏 Worst 👏 Word 👏 You 👏 Can 👏 Use 👏 So 👏 People 👏 Tend 👏 To 👏 Avoid 👏 It

e: Except 👏 If 👏 They 👏 Are 👏 Trying 👏 To 👏 Shock 👏 Or 👏 Show 👏 What 👏 Cool 👏 Transgressive 👏 And 👏 Forthright 👏 Opinion-Havers 👏 They 👏 Are

jBrereton has issued a correction as of 09:56 on Jul 14, 2017

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.
it's a term of endearment amongst friends

jBrereton
May 30, 2013
Grimey Drawer
Nearly anything can be a term of endearment among friends in a pub based context.

Tokamak
Dec 22, 2004

Byolante posted:

Ah yes, the old if only you were educated you would understand that you aren't a good person. Please tell me more about how being wealthy and conforming to wealthy people norms makes you a better person.

Yes, that's kind of how education works.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
education imparts knowledge, not 'goodness', and it's extremely dangerous and arrogant to presume that more educated = better than, if only because education is a second-order signifier for class and privilege

it's this exact blindness towards class predisposition that turns 'meritocracy' into what is essentially a plutocratic oligarchy

Vitamin P
Nov 19, 2013

Truth is game rigging is more difficult than it looks pls stay ded

hakimashou posted:

Maybe "upper class" people just know better than to use gendered slurs?

People in the public eye or who have the risk of reputational damage probably do think more about how certain words look especially bad to use yes. Also getting more educated about misogyny has meant I personally won't call a woman a oval office and would hesitate even at twat because there's a whole nasty baggage to those words that has nothing to do with the generic insult I'd be using them for. Upper class people have more opportunities for education and I assume my experience isn't unique so yeah, upper class people are probably less likely to use gendered slurs.

That doesn't make them 'better' people though, just more knowledgeable and sometimes media savvy. A bricklayer calling Lily Allen a gobby oval office doesn't hate women more than the polite tory MP cutting the childcare allowance does.

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747

Tokamak posted:

Yes, that's kind of how education works.

Explain why ivy leagues and oxbridge turn out an overwhelming majority of nimby neolibs then because the world as it lies kinda argues against your proposition. Its almost as if words in and of themselves have no animus and that rich, well educated neolibs know exactly how to talk woke while destroying the welfare state as is happening in Germany, the UK, the US, France and Australia to name a few.

Tokamak
Dec 22, 2004

rudatron posted:

education imparts knowledge, not 'goodness', and it's extremely dangerous and arrogant to presume that more educated = better than, if only because education is a second-order signifier for class and privilege

it's this exact blindness towards class predisposition that turns 'meritocracy' into what is essentially a plutocratic oligarchy

I agree with you. The OP was framing my argument as a moral failing of the lower classes, and I was pretty flippant in my reply. The word has a lot of baggage and if you are the sort of person who is interested in how you use language, you'd probably come to the conclusion that it isn't worth using.

Tokamak
Dec 22, 2004

Byolante posted:

Explain why ivy leagues and oxbridge turn out an overwhelming majority of nimby neolibs then because the world as it lies kinda argues against your proposition. Its almost as if words in and of themselves have no animus and that rich, well educated neolibs know exactly how to talk woke while destroying the welfare state as is happening in Germany, the UK, the US, France and Australia to name a few.

Maybe the class thing is a by product of it being a lovely word, and the ruling class has far more to gain in not using it then the average person. That doesn't reflexively make it subversive or politically powerful, it's just a lovely word. That it may or may not be an insult depending on how you use it, and that you should be careful using it to positively describe women, means that it's just not a useful word. Words fall in and out of favour all the time. In my experience I've seen the word oval office being used increasingly less.

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

rudatron posted:

So in other words, tut-tutting about 'oval office' is a way for upper class people to disparage lower class people

you could say the same thing about 'human being' in the US, a take that would also be very, very bad

hakimashou
Jul 15, 2002
Upset Trowel

Byolante posted:

Ah yes, the old if only you were educated you would understand that you aren't a good person. Please tell me more about how being wealthy and conforming to wealthy people norms makes you a better person.

In this case by not using gendered slurs?

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Vitamin P posted:

People in the public eye or who have the risk of reputational damage probably do think more about how certain words look especially bad to use yes. Also getting more educated about misogyny has meant I personally won't call a woman a oval office and would hesitate even at twat because there's a whole nasty baggage to those words that has nothing to do with the generic insult I'd be using them for. Upper class people have more opportunities for education and I assume my experience isn't unique so yeah, upper class people are probably less likely to use gendered slurs.

That doesn't make them 'better' people though, just more knowledgeable and sometimes media savvy. A bricklayer calling Lily Allen a gobby oval office doesn't hate women more than the polite tory MP cutting the childcare allowance does.

this is correct

you know that statistic that people are less racist the more educated they are? turns out it's not cause they're actually less racist, they're just better at hiding their racism

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008

Our war against free speech cannot end until we silence this bronze beast!


jBrereton posted:

oval office 👏 Is 👏 Not 👏 A 👏 Gendered 👏 Insult 👏 Here 👏 In 👏 The 👏 Same 👏 Way 👏 As 👏 Its 👏 Kutwijf-Esque 👏 American 👏 Meaning 👏 But 👏 It 👏 Is 👏 Still 👏 About 👏 The 👏 Worst 👏 Word 👏 You 👏 Can 👏 Use 👏 So 👏 People 👏 Tend 👏 To 👏 Avoid 👏 It

e: Except 👏 If 👏 They 👏 Are 👏 Trying 👏 To 👏 Shock 👏 Or 👏 Show 👏 What 👏 Cool 👏 Transgressive 👏 And 👏 Forthright 👏 Opinion-Havers 👏 They 👏 Are

or if you live in the north, you silly oval office :)

Whorelord
May 1, 2013

Jump into the well...

all you cunts need to shut the gently caress up and stop loving oppressing our cunting culture and our right to call a loving oval office a oval office

you stupid twats

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose
people defending their use of oval office remind me of all those Aussies who said that their blackface minstrel shows couldn't be racist because they weren't American and therefore they were unrelated to slavery

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008

Our war against free speech cannot end until we silence this bronze beast!


up noorf oval office is just a racier/informal way of saying person, saying "don't put that there where anycunt could tread on it!" is like saying "i need to piss" instead of "i need to use the toilet"

Baloogan
Dec 5, 2004
Fun Shoe
just start calling eachother 'cuck'

its the same sort of sound

Whorelord
May 1, 2013

Jump into the well...

Vincent Van Goatse posted:

people defending their use of oval office remind me of all those Aussies who said that their blackface minstrel shows couldn't be racist because they weren't American and therefore they were unrelated to slavery

gently caress off you weak cultural imperialist oval office

Whorelord has issued a correction as of 15:20 on Jul 14, 2017

TomViolence
Feb 19, 2013

PLEASE ASK ABOUT MY 80,000 WORD WALLACE AND GROMIT SLASH FICTION. PLEASE.

bloody septics prescribing a language they didn't even invent, the cunts

Whorelord
May 1, 2013

Jump into the well...

https://youtu.be/3GAbStTKFIw

TomViolence
Feb 19, 2013

PLEASE ASK ABOUT MY 80,000 WORD WALLACE AND GROMIT SLASH FICTION. PLEASE.

Words like oval office and arse and whatnot didn't used to be offensive, what used to get you (sometimes literally) excoriated was blasphemy. You could say oval office all you want as long as you didn't take the lord's name in vain, but in our secular age blasphemy's been superseded by reminding folk they have vital, material bodies full of piss, poo poo and blood, which kind of reflects our unease with our tenuous and fragile existence in a newly godless universe. So really what this policing of vulgarity tells us is that we're obsessed with morbidity and disgusted by our own profane materiality, it's a very gnostic take on things when you think about it so the divine has been sort of discursively resurrected as a malevolent demiurge that we fear angering through saying bad words so really when you think about it, South park was right all along.

Squizzle
Apr 24, 2008




jBrereton posted:

oval office 👏 Is 👏 Not 👏 A 👏 Gendered 👏 Insult 👏 Here 👏 In 👏 The 👏 Same 👏 Way 👏 As 👏 Its 👏 Kutwijf-Esque 👏 American 👏 Meaning 👏 But 👏 It 👏 Is 👏 Still 👏 About 👏 The 👏 Worst 👏 Word 👏 You 👏 Can 👏 Use 👏 So 👏 People 👏 Tend 👏 To 👏 Avoid 👏 It

e: Except 👏 If 👏 They 👏 Are 👏 Trying 👏 To 👏 Shock 👏 Or 👏 Show 👏 What 👏 Cool 👏 Transgressive 👏 And 👏 Forthright 👏 Opinion-Havers 👏 They 👏 Are


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liYkRarIDfo

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dreylad
Jun 19, 2001
i read a good book a while ago about the shift from blasphemy to obscenity in 19th century england that was very much rooted in middle-class christian beliefs and disciplining/controlling the political and social expressions of the working class

it's more interesting than it sounds, i swear

http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo3635442.html

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply