|
A Wrinkle in Time teaser trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4U3TeY2wtM
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 05:27 |
|
|
i don't think that'll be good
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 19:16
|
|
|
Worked on that one for a bit on the post side. Really interesting to see it start to come together visually!
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 21:38
|
|
|
Not a proper trailer, but a bunch of new behind the scenes stuff for The Last Jedi. I mean I always try to temper expectations but I can't help but get hype. Also our company has already rented out an entire theater for opening day. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye6GCY_vqYk
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 22:34
|
|
|
It's Star Wars, it's absolutely OK to be hype. The crushing disappointment that we felt with each prequel is part of the whole experience.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 23:45
|
|
|
muscles like this! posted:A Wrinkle in Time teaser trailer This was always one of my favorite books as a kid. This trailer looks very....okay. I hope the 2d flatland scene will be cool.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
kanonvandekempen posted:William H. Macy has worked with some of the great directors in his acting career: Steven Spielberg, Paul Thomas Anderson and the Coen brothers. Finally he is taking those lessons and producing art of his own. I laughed too hard at the ending joke with the one-eyed balloon operator.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 14:18
|
|
|
drat, you guys are off your game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZOaI_Fn5o4
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
So, so hype.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 15:45
|
|
|
I need that loving soundtrack.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 16:13
|
|
|
Excited that future California finally wipes out the minorities
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 16:19
|
|
|
Kiimo, why is there a trailer for the trailer we're already watching at the head of the trailer and can you please make them stop? Like, does the tracking show that 15% of the audience closes the window if the first thing they see is a trailer band? (those are people who aren't going to see the movie anyways)
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
Dillbag posted:Kiimo, why is there a trailer for the trailer we're already watching at the head of the trailer and can you please make them stop? Like, does the tracking show that 15% of the audience closes the window if the first thing they see is a trailer band? (those are people who aren't going to see the movie anyways) He's explained this like 20 times. It's because when the trailer shows up as an ad for a YouTube video, you have to watch the first five seconds before you can skip it. So they show big moments from the trailer to keep people interested in watching the whole thing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 16:46
|
|
|
Well, that made me considerably less excited. Seems like they're going for a savior of the world angle now rather than the more personal story of the original and that dialogue is total poo poo. Well, at least it'll be pretty and have good music... much like Tron Legacy. Also, they're seriously going the "Deckard is a replicant" route aren't they? He's a replicant that has somehow lived past his expiration date and Jared Leto wants him to find out why. Deakul fucked around with this message at 17:35 on Jul 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
Deakul posted:Well, that made me considerably less excited. Yeah dude I dunno about this movie But what continues to bug me is Harrison Ford in his goddamn Wrangler jeans and Hanes t-shirt outfit he got at a kohls the day shooting started It feels.... anachronistic
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 17:35
|
|
|
Yeah, that too. He looks like he just rolled out of bed and threw on a shirt and jeans then walked onto the set.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
It is weird to have watched Blade Runner the Final Cut and think Deckard is not a replicant.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 17:46
|
|
|
DivisionPost posted:drat, you guys are off your game
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 17:56
|
|
|
DivisionPost posted:drat, you guys are off your game  All I wanted was a quiet navelgazy sci-fi film that explored what being human meant with an eerie ambient soundtrack.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
Wendell posted:It is weird to have watched Blade Runner the Final Cut and think Deckard is not a replicant. I look at the unicorn as not him but his realization that there's more to replicants, that they're beautiful and impossible but there they are all the same. It's his eyes opening to them being more than just machine, to them being alive, and the origami a message of, "I know you've gone native. Out of respect, you can have a head start." Search for a reason, there it will be.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
I'll probably be happier if the movie doesn't dance around it. The ambiguity of the original will still hold up regardless of "canon" and being coy feels like it'd be limiting
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
Wendell posted:It is weird to have watched Blade Runner the Final Cut and think Deckard is not a replicant. I think the movie just sort of doesn't make sense if he's a replicant. Why the poo poo would you make a replicant for the purpose of tracking down and killing other replicants, and then make him pretty lovely at it? He gets his rear end kicked every time he's in a straight-up fight with one of the replicants. e: like, I realize this is treading dangerously close to tactical realism, but the replicants we're shown are strong as gently caress and Deckard has regular human strength. The movie would be breaking its own internal logic a little if the latter was supposed to be a replicant.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
Wendell posted:It is weird to have watched Blade Runner the Final Cut and think Deckard is not a replicant. The problem is that Deckard as a replicant undermines the themes and structure of the story. But it was a fan theory in the 80's that Ridley Scott decided "Yeah! Let's jam that in there!" and with every time he went back to change the film, he shoved more of it in there.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
The question of whether or not Deckard is a Replicant is more interesting in its ambiguity than in definitively coming down on one side or the other.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
exquisite tea posted:The question of whether or not Deckard is a Replicant is more interesting in its ambiguity than in definitively coming down on one side or the other. Yeah.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 19:50
|
|
|
exquisite tea posted:The question of whether or not Deckard is a Replicant is more interesting in its ambiguity than in definitively coming down on one side or the other. I just hope they get to the bottom of where they get those cool Blade Runner guns. I want a scene where we meet the guy that developed them and they explain how and why they made them. That would be swell.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 19:56
|
|
|
exquisite tea posted:The question of whether or not Deckard is a Replicant is more interesting in its ambiguity than in definitively coming down on one side or the other. Agreed, but if a sequel is going to include Ford it feels like it'll have to either shed some of that or get precious about it. Villeneuve is cool though so I hope he threads the needle
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 20:05
|
|
|
Syncopated posted:I laughed too hard at the ending joke with the one-eyed balloon operator. Usually comedy trailers bounce right off me but "you took a loving 'kill-shot' at me?!" is golden.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 20:13
|
|
|
lelandjs posted:
You already have that. It's called Blade Runner.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 20:30
|
|
|
BonoMan posted:You already have that. It's called Blade Runner. I mean, yeah but I wanted more.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 20:39
|
|
|
Ex Machina? Under the Skin?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:Ex Machina? Under the Skin? Ex Machina is about what it means to be a robot and Under the Skin is what it means to be a flesh-eating alien
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
No way I'm watching that trailer, but I don't know why someone would need a Blade Runner sequel to be the same as the original, that's weird.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 22:48
|
|
|
DivisionPost posted:drat, you guys are off your game lol the comments (i know i know) consisting of sad losers saying the male lead is too ugly.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
I hate this world and we deserve death for the internet giving voice to the disgusting filth of the masses.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 00:54
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:lol the comments (i know i know) consisting of sad losers saying the male lead is too ugly. ...what?
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 06:43
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:lol the comments (i know i know) consisting of sad losers saying the male lead is too ugly. Ryan Gosling ugly? first i've heard of it
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 06:46
|
|
|
Wandle Cax posted:Ryan Gosling ugly? first i've heard of it The Ugly Gosling Yes, internet, I made it up. Pay me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 06:49
|
|
|
Like, I could see someone thinking he's "too ugly" in a very clinical, lop-sided face kind of way. But in practice I don't know anyone who wouldn't consider him handsome.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 06:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 05:27 |
|
|
The Ugly Gosling  somehow, still good looking
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 06:55
|
|