|
BRISTOL PALINS BABY posted:someone post screenshots of t_d and how they are rationalizing this It's amazing http://imgur.com/a/sBHE7
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 04:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 06:23 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/887156984256094208 Good Lord could a worse bill exist?
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 04:50
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JaxAlemany/status/887144137459421185
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 04:55
|
|
|
lol efb
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 04:55
|
|
|
Lote posted:And when you run out of bullets, you throw the gun. The GOP's attempt at throwing the gun, in clip form: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZxNbAwY_rk&t=158s
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 04:57
|
|
|
HappyHippo posted:https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/887156984256094208 that sounds like a challenge
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 04:57
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:Yeah they don't have the votes to repeal so I dunno why they want to do this. This way, Mitch will be able to truthfully tell his master "Hey, I did exactly what you demanded, but those other senators didn't listen to you." Meanwhile every Republican gets to play yet another round of Legislative chicken, everyone pledging to vote "Yes" so Trump will remember their obedience, with the last few holdouts stuck voting against it to save the entire party, taking on the President's inevitable wrath and retaliation for daring to do so. It will almost certainly end with a result just like today, with nearly everyone showing Don that they do as he commands, except a few sacrificial "No" votes... unless somehow everyone is too afraid to be the one who resists, in which case they pass this bill that I doubt more than a few of them actually want. Robot Hobo fucked around with this message at 05:03 on Jul 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 04:59
|
|
|
HappyHippo posted:https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/887156984256094208 So how does this work? Reconciliation bills are required to be debt neutral over 10 years...?
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:00
|
|
|
Rigel posted:oh, I guess there is a version of "full repeal" that is not full repeal but reconciliation-approved Thats almost impressive
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:01
|
|
|
skylined! posted:we are at a non zero chance that the gop, controlling all three branches, somehow manages to be the most ineffective legislative body in history Dr. Angela Ziegler posted:What is the point of the Senate Rigel posted:The #NeverTrumpers continue to dunk on their hated foe coyo7e posted:*NRA commercials endorsing political killings BIG HEADLINE posted:Never forget that Trump has the power to just stop funding the ACA subsidies. His calls for Congress to do it is proof that there is a limit to his stupidity.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:01
|
|
|
Something I've been wondering about for a while: the reason Republicans are having difficulty coming up with a repeal and replace bill is because they need to come up with something that will be deficit neutral for over 10 years, right? (because of the Byrd Rule) But why wouldn't they just pass this poo poo right now and worry about it later like the Bush tax cuts? I'd figure having some repeal and tax cuts is better than nothing. Is this just a case of Republicans being so greedy it actually ends up being counterproductive?
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:02
|
|
|
As an Arizonian, im really worried about the type of person who could possibly replace Flake. And McCain. This state is deep red hell hole and I see way too many Confederate flags. We might actually miss McCain if he gets replaced by some psycho magahat.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
HappyHippo posted:https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/887156984256094208 Use Medicaid savings to toss old people into the trash.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:04
|
|
|
Charliegrs posted:As an Arizonian, im really worried about the type of person who could possibly replace Flake. And McCain. This state is deep red hell hole and I see way too many Confederate flags. We might actually miss McCain if he gets replaced by some psycho magahat. I'm tired of this argument. He's an old man, he's going to die soon anyway, he will be replaced by someone worse no matter when he dies. Why panic about it? It's going to happen, it's just a matter of when, and since no one can know that, why bother discussing it going  "But what about his replacement?"Let's cross that bridge when we come to it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:06
|
|
|
Push El Burrito posted:Use Medicaid savings to toss old people into the trash. jobs!
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:06
|
|
|
I'm glad my grandma died before they could get around to taking her Medicare away
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:07
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:Something I've been wondering about for a while: the reason Republicans are having difficulty coming up with a repeal and replace bill is because they need to come up with something that will be deficit neutral for over 10 years, right? (because of the Byrd Rule) Keeping the bill deficit neutral isn't the problem so much as creating something that both moderates and conservatives are willing to sign off on. The thing to keep in mind is that the GOP really isn't acting in good faith when it comes to "fixing" healthcare. Nothing they're doing is really about healthcare at all.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:09
|
|
|
HappyHippo posted:https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/887156984256094208 But wait, there's more https://twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/880768006988673024
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:14
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:Something I've been wondering about for a while: the reason Republicans are having difficulty coming up with a repeal and replace bill is because they need to come up with something that will be deficit neutral for over 10 years, right? (because of the Byrd Rule) There are more than 2 Republicans who demand the worst possible option for doing so. At the same time there are more than 2 Republicans whose states are happy with a lot of the things the ACA did. Since the loss of more than 2 votes means that the bill will not pass, this causes an issue. Especially when madmen like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul stalk the halls and must be pandered to in some manner if the bill is to have a chance to pass.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:14
|
|
|
HappyHippo posted:But wait, there's more Not that I think they have any chance of getting a repeal through, but the argument is going to be that the CBO report is meaningless because the repeal won't go into effect immediately and Republicans will come up with a really great plan before anyone loses their insurance.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:15
|
|
|
I don't care how or by who, but I absolutely need this to get brought up at the next White House press conference, because I've got some major questions about a fuckdoll.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:Something I've been wondering about for a while: the reason Republicans are having difficulty coming up with a repeal and replace bill is because they need to come up with something that will be deficit neutral for over 10 years, right? (because of the Byrd Rule) The fundamental problem is that there is no reasonable solution to healthcare more conservative than Obamacare.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
BRISTOL PALINS BABY posted:someone post screenshots of t_d and how they are rationalizing this cuck cuck cuck triggered libtards MAGA
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
Paradoxish posted:Not that I think they have any chance of getting a repeal through, but the argument is going to be that the CBO report is meaningless because the repeal won't go into effect immediately and Republicans will come up with a really great plan before anyone loses their insurance. "You had seven years to come up with a really great plan, why wasn't it what you came out with from the start?" (Not that any sort of logic or reason matters to people making that argument)
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
Does anybody in this thread understand how it passes reconciliation? It seems to violate everything I understand about it!Paradoxish posted:Not that I think they have any chance of getting a repeal through, but the argument is going to be that the CBO report is meaningless because the repeal won't go into effect immediately and Republicans will come up with a really great plan before anyone loses their insurance. Companies will pull out of the individual market way before that happens, though. Do they really think nothing will happen until the midterms?
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:19
|
|
|
Paradoxish posted:Not that I think they have any chance of getting a repeal through, but the argument is going to be that the CBO report is meaningless because the repeal won't go into effect immediately and Republicans will come up with a really great plan before anyone loses their insurance. I think their plan is "vote for repeal to say you did to the rabid base in 2018, but we'll wind up losing the house or senate and the dems can bail us out before grandma dies." Then they can campaign in 2020 railing against whatever plan the dems passed to keep their constituents alive.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:20
|
|
|
RottenK posted:cuck cuck cuck triggered libtards MAGA 4d chess
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:20
|
|
|
Good thing I got me a lifetime supply of Alex Jones' Dad-Bod Turbo Health rear end Kickers for when my healthcare gets repealed to the Victorian era.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:20
|
|
|
Push El Burrito posted:Use Medicaid savings to toss old people into the trash. Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:Breitbart comments HappyHippo posted:But wait, there's more Sufficiently Republican legislation is indistinguishable from hostile foreign power's campaign of sabotage to dismantle a functioning state. RottenK posted:cuck cuck cuck triggered libtards MAGA
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
Charliegrs posted:As an Arizonian, im really worried about the type of person who could possibly replace Flake. And McCain. This state is deep red hell hole and I see way too many Confederate flags. We might actually miss McCain if he gets replaced by some psycho magahat. Please. Arizona isn't that bad. So many people have moved there from other states, it is constantly changing and becoming more purple by the year. Registered Republicans only hold about a 4% edge over registered Democrats. I say this as a ten year transplant.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:26
|
|
|
mynnna posted:"You had seven years to come up with a really great plan, why wasn't it what you came out with from the start?"
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:27
|
|
|
Wasn't one of the reasons that repeal and replace later would not work was because insurance companies would GTFO of certain markets? Like the whole 2 years later wouldn't stop anything really.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:29
|
|
|
Not that you can expect consistency with prior statements from these motherfuckers, but still https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/887161554944180224
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:30
|
|
|
HappyHippo posted:But wait, there's more Hahahahaha that's loving incredible imagine managing, on purpose, to write a bill that essentially outright prohibits health insurance for 3/4 of the loving country
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:Someone made an excellent point earlier... They can't cut medicare in an election year. Nobody is that stupid. For the love of god, stop saying that! Sneakster posted:Are all the powerful people really this demented, incompetent, treacherous, disconnected from society as a whole, sociopathic, inhuman, potentially demonic ghouls? Or did I answer my own question? Yes, because as we proved earlier, the left is really insistent that anyone who isn't demented, incompetent, treachorous, disconnected from society as a whole, sociopathic, inhuman, and potentially demonically ghoulish be forced out of office for any transgressions against this ideal perfect government, while the right is very insistent on electing anyone who is those things. But remember, only a cuck and a right wing shithead would ever dare question them. Charliegrs posted:As an Arizonian, im really worried about the type of person who could possibly replace Flake. And McCain. This state is deep red hell hole and I see way too many Confederate flags. We might actually miss McCain if he gets replaced by some psycho magahat. Oh no, we might lose our venerated ally from across the aisle who one time voted on one thing relating to methane that ended up being a moot point, and gently caress all else of import. But he would no longer have concerns. Concerns that allow people to say "look, not all Republicans are bad". You can argue its improper to lust after the death of an old man who has a family who love him and would miss him, and while I don't begrudge people their right to hate him in spite of that, I agree with it. However, don't try and sell this lame rear end "the next guy will be a lot less likely to turn against the party than McCain" narrative. White house has released a picture of the translator that was hired for this call. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
BiggerBoat posted:Hey, fellow Floridian person. I recently lost my job too and right now have no healthcare insurance at all. Weird thing was, even when I had it, I basically had no TIME to visit the doctor anyway. I have mental health and addiction issues (as well as some physical ones) but don't know a lot of treatment facilities that offer weekend and evening hours that could cater to my schedule. My job was real funny about me missing 2 hours during a day to go seek mental counseling and now that I have the time, I can't afford the visits and they won't renew meds without seeing me. I know I'm 20 pages behind on this thread (moves fast, etc, etc)... but this is loving horrific. Aren't there any MedGoons in FL to give these people a hand?
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
HappyHippo posted:https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/887156984256094208 Well there are still some people with insurance. I'm sure they could just outlaw all medical treatment.  that this is Plan CI also wanna know how that 2015 bill causes more people to lose insurance than a full repeal does. That might be the winner of dumbest bill.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:40
|
|
|
Mister Adequate posted:Hahahahaha that's loving incredible imagine managing, on purpose, to write a bill that essentially outright prohibits health insurance for 3/4 of the loving country https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VrvhUU7Kok
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
Thaddius the Large posted:I don't care how or by who, but I absolutely need this to get brought up at the next White House press conference, because I've got some major questions about a fuckdoll. Okay, let's put the hold on Russia for a second, because I have some pressing questions that need an answer: 1)Who made the statement about the doll? 2)How did the dolls' orientation come to be known? and 3)What were they even discussing that would lead to the topic of sex dolls being brought up?
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 06:23 |
|
|
Hastings posted:Okay, let's put the hold on Russia for a second, because I have some pressing questions that need an answer: Bannon was lamenting his status as an incel, because even an inflatable fuckdoll refuses to gently caress him.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 05:49
|
|