|
Shaggar posted:anyone who doesn't lock their comp @ work leaves themselves open to being hosed w/ that's how we started the "James buys everyone a coffee" club
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 11:56 |
|
|
Your computer should be impossible for a lay person to use regardless if it's locked or not. If someone can walk up to it and accomplish any task it's a sure sign that you need to get a weirder window manager or keyboard layout.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:05
|
|
|
syscall girl posted:i don't have anyone who cares enough about me to try to read my correspondence Cheer up, there's always someone!  
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:Your computer should be impossible for a lay person to use regardless if it's locked or not. If someone can walk up to it and accomplish any task it's a sure sign that you need to get a weirder window manager or keyboard layout. I always use an external keyboard, so I've considered disabling the built in board on my laptops. the keyboard I ferry around to work/coffee shops/etc only has the colemak layout on it, so the population that can use it is fairly small. I don't do this specifically so that no one else can use my computer, but it's a nice side benefit.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:19
|
|
|
I use the rarely seen "double" dvorak in which you both set dvorak on the OS and use a keyboard that outputs dvorak to give you: -wvlfuijpn ar.gcedybo s'htqxm,k;
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:what's the possibility of the robot's batteries discharging into the water and shocking/electrocuting whoever went in to try and haul it out Individual cells are going to be in the 6-14v range and I doubt they would be doing anything more than 100vdc in one of those. It'll discharge to itself more than anything. Bigger risk would be the batteries exploding from the rapid discharge
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
plus wouldn't it have discharged immediately upon falling in and be fully drained and safe by the time a human got there
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:30
|
|
|
Super neat. https://www.sc0tfree.com/sc0tfree-blog/optimizing-rubber-ducky-attacks-with-empire-stagers
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:31
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:Your computer should be impossible for a lay person to use regardless if it's locked or not. If someone can walk up to it and accomplish any task it's a sure sign that you need to get a weirder window manager or keyboard layout. I use OS X
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
haveblue posted:plus wouldn't it have discharged immediately upon falling in and be fully drained and safe by the time a human got there Depends on where the water hit first. Batteries are all going to be in one place down low-ish, if they're all tied in series you could have a lot of voltage and assuming it goes in head first the whole power bus could short out instead of individual cells. Hard to really know without seeing the insides of one but I doubt there's enough Ah in whatever batteries it uses to be on full short discharge for more than a minute
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:Your computer should be impossible for a lay person to use regardless if it's locked or not. If someone can walk up to it and accomplish any task it's a sure sign that you need to get a weirder window manager or keyboard layout.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2017 22:44
|
|
|
I was migrating some of our clients to o365 from this other hosted exchange service I've never had to personally log in to until today and I noticed this very quickly: Sadly I do not own butt.com
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
hunter2 posted:I was migrating some of our clients to o365 from this other hosted exchange service I've never had to personally log in to until today and I noticed this very quickly: Noticed what? ❔❓  ❓❔
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 03:38
|
|
|
Grace Baiting posted:Noticed what? ❔❓ When you fail login it prints the password in the error message. That's my guess what's happening. Either that or the person writing error messages is really bored.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 03:51
|
|
|
Grace Baiting posted:Noticed what? ❔❓ mrmcd posted:whoooooooosh
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 03:52
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:also does anyone else hear that whooshing sound Oh well no fair editing the quoted image. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 03:53
|
|
|
Grace Baiting posted:Noticed what? ❔❓ 
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 03:53
|
|
|
someone at my office is so bad at locking his screens that it's now a written rule that you can't gently caress with his desktop, because it literally will not matter normal people get one free unlocked desktop with a warning, then it's fair game 
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 04:03
|
|
|
mrmcd posted:Oh well no fair editing the quoted image.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:Your computer should be impossible for a lay person to use regardless if it's locked or not. If someone can walk up to it and accomplish any task it's a sure sign that you need to get a weirder window manager or keyboard layout. I spread a highly toxic venom on all of my belongings that I have built up a resistance to via microdosing over the past decade. Additionally, anyone who approaches my desk from a highly probabilistic angle while walking with rhythm activates a series of strobe lights and livestream feeds.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 04:40
|
|
|
RISCy Business posted:someone at my office is so bad at locking his screens that it's now a written rule that you can't gently caress with his desktop, because it literally will not matter Ideally if you gently caress with someone's unlocked desktop you are immediately fired and blacklisted for being a terminal security gently caress up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 05:38
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Ideally if you gently caress with someone's unlocked desktop you are immediately fired and blacklisted for being a terminal security gently caress up. that's what they did at my previous job
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 05:39
|
|
|
at my previous job just about everybody had direct access to customers live systems containing millions of patient records with phi yet id constantly see unlocked computers in empty offices with the door open. shameful. at some point you have to just fuckin enforce a screensaver+lock timing with gpo.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 06:20
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Ideally if you gently caress with someone's unlocked desktop you are immediately fired and blacklisted for being a terminal security gently caress up. my old boss/director got real grumpy sometimes about the cultural practice of “jello”-ing people’s facebooks. his general thrust was that if you can’t trust your team to protect your unlocked computer while you grab a coffee, you shouldn’t want to be on that team.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 07:25
|
|
|
i’m trying to conjure a direct quote but basically “if you’re going to stand by and let your coworkers openly futz with someone’s laptop, i’m within my rights to fire all of you”
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 07:27
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:Depends on where the water hit first. Batteries are all going to be in one place down low-ish, if they're all tied in series you could have a lot of voltage and assuming it goes in head first the whole power bus could short out instead of individual cells. Hard to really know without seeing the insides of one but I doubt there's enough Ah in whatever batteries it uses to be on full short discharge for more than a minute if it's designed to go outside wouldn't it have to be waterproofed to an extent? maybe not enough to survive total immersion though, now i think about it
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 07:53
|
|
|
question: we use openssl in our product, as a dependency of a dependency that would be hugely expensive to replace. is the switch to libressl worth it, and is it painless?
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 10:30
|
|
|
ultramiraculous posted:i’m trying to conjure a direct quote but basically “if you’re going to stand by and let your coworkers openly futz with someone’s laptop, i’m within my rights to fire all of you” I didn't notice because I was working sir
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 13:00
|
|
|
hackbunny posted:question: we use openssl in our product, as a dependency of a dependency that would be hugely expensive to replace. is the switch to libressl worth it, and is it painless? use polarssl op
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 13:08
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:use polarssl op but is it source compatible with openssl? otherwise it's just more work for me which I'd rather expend on something else e.g. rewriting the openssl-dependent code to use native os ssl support
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 13:17
|
|
|
hackbunny posted:but is it source compatible with openssl? otherwise it's just more work for me which I'd rather expend on something else e.g. rewriting the openssl-dependent code to use native os ssl support no it isn't, I misread your post sorry
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 13:22
|
|
|
i think ratbert recently switched to libressl in their codebase
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 13:23
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:here we just get hosed because from any of workstations in my dept you can access full records of every customer [of a company subject to strict regulatory compliance of bunch of countries including us of a] ha, try working in small accounting shops; all of the regulatory burden, none of the money to hire people who know what the gently caress a computer is we had an archival box that was setup by the friend of a friend of one of the kids of someone who left 5 years ago or something and no one had the admin credentials, and only one account's credential escaped the sands of time so pretty much everyone was using that it was accessible remotely from inside and outside the network, so the second you checked the external ip there was nothing preventing you from remoting in from a starbucks and doing whatever i did an internship there so i was gone after 12 weeks, but man, that whole thing scared the bejesus out of me
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 13:35
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:i think ratbert recently switched to libressl in their codebase Yep. It works just fine. A small patch to NTP was needed, but nothing too huge. Edit* LibreSSL is API compatible with OpenSSL 1.0.x, but not OpenSSL 1.1.x... Almost (See below) At least not yet. Looks like v2.6 is starting to work on that, so that's good. 99% of the applications that fail to compile against libressl I have found fall into two categories: 1) Packages that are compatible with both OpenSSL 1.0 and 1.1. Usually, they have macro checks like: code:code:Solution: Switch to PKS and stop using CMS. FlapYoJacks fucked around with this message at 16:39 on Jul 19, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 13:48
|
|
|
one guy I used to work with would install a version of the office paperclip on any unlocked pc he found he stored it on an open network share specifically for this purpose
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 14:04
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Ideally if you gently caress with someone's unlocked desktop you are immediately fired and blacklisted for being a terminal security gently caress up. the terminal security gently caress up is the person leaving their screen unlocked that said, don't screw with people's computers in ways that makes it unusable for them, its straight up rear end in a top hat hazing behavior and its poo poo like that that makes tech culture as bad as it is I work on a product security team, if someone leaves their laptop unlocked and someone else notices, we nicely lock it for them with no dumb pranks and the rule is the person who forgot gets to buy the team donuts the next day, themselves included its helpful and we get to eat donuts together as a team the next day! (except for me cause I work remotely  )Ed: also cause I'm sure someones gonna bring it up, the donuts are expensible pr0zac fucked around with this message at 14:53 on Jul 19, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 14:42
|
|
|
pr0zac posted:the terminal security gently caress up is the person leaving their screen unlocked uh do you work in the same office as me?
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:uh you both have 0s in nicknames, so
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
if the doughnuts are expensible, why not just do it daily and get free donuts all the time??? bet they didnt think of that one
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 15:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 11:56 |
|
|
Mr SuperAwesome posted:if the doughnuts are expensible, why not just do it daily and get free donuts all the time??? bet they didnt think of that one because then they wouldn't have a ritual to use for punishment in a professional setting
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 15:19
|
|
