|
bewbies posted:really thought that was roger federer That made me look and...wow. No kidding.
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 16:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 10:07 |
|
|
AsInHowe posted:It's not just that, every team has at least four jerseys, that are all just used whenever. NBA teams also now have four logos, with no true primary logo any more. This is cool and the NHL should do it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 16:46
|
|
|
DJExile posted:lol if you think ads on jerseys aren't coming to every league sooner than later They aren't. There's no money in it. The stadium naming rights market has cratered and the jersey ads market has exploded on the runway. Manchester United is going to get more money from Chevrolet this year than the entire NBA is going to get from the various companies they signed with.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 16:48
|
|
|
Not too long ago someone (Daly I think?) said that jersey ads would only bring in like $60 million total.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 16:58
|
|
|
Replace the players' names with brands. "Gazprom has really rebounded this year after taking reduced minutes in 2016-17 and is on track for at least 40 goals once again!"
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 17:02
|
|
|
Jersey and ice ads are terrible and I hate them, but I'll live with it if the extra money means it costs less for me to buy a ticket.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 17:08
|
|
|
hyper from Pixie Sticks posted:Jersey and ice ads are terrible and I hate them, but I'll live with it if the extra money means it costs less for me to buy a ticket. Haha, nope!
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 17:11
|
|
|
hyper from Pixie Sticks posted:I'll live with it if the extra money means it costs less for me to buy a ticket. that's adorable
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 17:16
|
|
|
hyper from Pixie Sticks posted:Jersey and ice ads are terrible and I hate them, but I'll live with it if the extra money means it costs less for me to buy a ticket. If you think the owners are going to do anything but pocket the extra money I don't know what to tell ya.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 17:16
|
|
|
Ticket prices will never ever go down for popular teams until they reach the point where the tickets aren't being sold and even at that point the owners will probably blame it on something else and do whatever they can to not lower prices.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
hyper from Pixie Sticks posted:Jersey and ice ads are terrible and I hate them, but I'll live with it if the extra money means it costs less for me to buy a ticket. lol
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 17:19
|
|
|
Even if they did lower prices with the ads, at just $2mil per team that's less than $4 a game. But also they would never do that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 17:21
|
|
|
hyper from Pixie Sticks posted:Jersey and ice ads are terrible and I hate them, but I'll live with it if the extra money means it costs less for me to buy a ticket. hahahah ha ... haha
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 17:56
|
|
|
I really don't get North America's fear of ads on jerseys. Soccer shirts do it and people buy millions of them and love them just fine. We'll put racist caricatures on our shirts but god help you if you put a Jiffy Lube logo on there, that's crossing a line.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 18:01
|
|
|
i don't visually mind ads on jerseys but i don't support the continued encroachment of advertising into things that don't already contain it and i think it's perfectly understandable when people have come to live with it where it's already been for however long, but don't want it to expand. also i think that you're probably for the most part talking to people who don't like the racist caricatures and think that they should go away
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
If team owners are worried about their income, then maybe they should run their business like a business instead of a giant circlejerk with all their best buds, randomly flailing around and hoping it results in positive income. Then begging for handouts when it doesn't happen. It shouldn't be THAT hard, they've got a captive audience that most businesses would kill for.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 18:23
|
|
|
One of the few things the NFL does right from an ownership perspective is profit sharing among the teams*. I don't know why the NHL doesn't do that apart from the Leafs lording over they're the only profitable one. *Cowboys not withstanding, they opted out, which means they keep all their related profits but get nothing from the pool.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
While not as robust as the NFL, the NHL has had revenue sharing since 2005.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
 Yeah lets do this
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
ThinkTank posted:While not as robust as the NFL, the NHL has had revenue sharing since 2005. Fair enough.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
I think it was one of the New York/Metro teams that did it but some team's broadcast sublimated ads onto the glass on the and it was terrible. I don't want ads on jerseys but at least they wouldn't distract from the game since it's just another moving piece on something you're already watching.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
Just because there's poo poo smeared almost everywhere already doesn't mean that it's okay to smear some more in places that have been kept clean it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
Schremp Howard posted:I think it was one of the New York/Metro teams that did it but some team's broadcast sublimated ads onto the glass on the and it was terrible. I don't want ads on jerseys but at least they wouldn't distract from the game since it's just another moving piece on something you're already watching. Yeah it was all MSG broadcasts so the Rags/Devils/Isles all had it. Wouldn't be surprised if the Sabres did too.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
i didn't find the fake glass ads that distracting but again, just because you eventually get used to something doesn't mean it isn't bad in the first place
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
ThinkTank posted:While not as robust as the NFL, the NHL has had revenue sharing since 2005. If I recall the revenue sharing is really lovely probably because only a handful of teams make a lot of money and they weren't happy about it. I think the PA really wanted more revenue sharing but the owners shot it down
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 19:20
|
|
|
iospace posted:One of the few things the NFL does right from an ownership perspective is profit sharing among the teams*. I don't know why the NHL doesn't do that apart from the Leafs lording over they're the only profitable one. The Cowboys only opted out of the merchandise sharing agreement. They happily share the far more enormous TV money pie with the other 31 teams.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 19:39
|
|
|
Schremp Howard posted:I think it was one of the New York/Metro teams that did it but some team's broadcast sublimated ads onto the glass on the and it was terrible. I don't want ads on jerseys but at least they wouldn't distract from the game since it's just another moving piece on something you're already watching. Some other local US stations do that too, and yeah it looks pretty dumb but I can live with it. The superimposed board ads in the World Cup, though; now those were bad and I want none of that in the NHL.  
Zat fucked around with this message at 19:50 on Jul 19, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 19:48
|
|
|
Schremp Howard posted:I think it was one of the New York/Metro teams that did it but some team's broadcast sublimated ads onto the glass on the and it was terrible. I don't want ads on jerseys but at least they wouldn't distract from the game since it's just another moving piece on something you're already watching. This is something that makes me nervous now that Root is AT&T Sportsnet. They already don't understand proper placement of the score in baseball, so I'm expecting them to gently caress up the hockey broadcast as well.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 19:56
|
|
|
hifi posted:
wow those are the worst things ever
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
Mage_Boy posted:This is something that makes me nervous now that Root is AT&T Sportsnet. They already don't understand proper placement of the score in baseball, so I'm expecting them to gently caress up the hockey broadcast as well. yeah but at least steigerwald's gone now so there's a lot of leeway for loving up before it outweighs that
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 20:30
|
|
|
You can put as many soccer style ads on the jerseys as you want if you broadcast the entire game without commercials. Until then, get lost with how it's "just the same"
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 20:30
|
|
|
ElwoodCuse posted:You can put as many soccer style ads on the jerseys as you want if you broadcast the entire game without commercials. Until then, get lost with how it's "just the same" Problem is, hockey, admittedly, is a game that needs commercial breaks. Unless you want 20 minutes of increasingly lovely ice without them scraping off the snow.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 20:44
|
|
|
iospace posted:Problem is, hockey, admittedly, is a game that needs commercial breaks. Unless you want 20 minutes of increasingly lovely ice without them scraping off the snow. When the play is in the other end of the ice, they should have the ice crew sprint out and scrape the ice on their side and then sprint off real quick. It would add a new dimension to the game.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
iospace posted:Problem is, hockey, admittedly, is a game that needs commercial breaks. Unless you want 20 minutes of increasingly lovely ice without them scraping off the snow. They could probably get away with doing it every 10 minutes instead of every 5 but ad revenue and all that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
Ginette Reno posted:They could probably get away with doing it every 10 minutes instead of every 5 but ad revenue and all that. Eh, true. Three tv breaks a period isn't bad though, compared to the NFL anyway.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Ginette Reno posted:They could probably get away with doing it every 10 minutes instead of every 5 but ad revenue and all that. Or 2 times a period like IIHF and the Euro leagues I watch do. The breaks are also But yeah, there's never going to be fewer ads and this is bearable (and miles better than other NA sports anyway) Zat fucked around with this message at 21:32 on Jul 19, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
I'm sure the number of commercial breaks are baked into the various national and local TV deals so I wouldn't expect anything to change there until at least 2021.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
NHL teams are businesses, not public services. They aren't going to make changes that give up money.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:NHL teams are businesses, not public services. They aren't going to make changes that give up money. ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyuuuuuup
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 21:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 10:07 |
|
|
I don't expect them to give up money, but it would be nice if they could have a little bit of foresight and come up with a plan to improve the league in the long term. Like how about they push for 10 years with no lockouts?
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2017 22:00
|
|