|
Whatever happened to CIGs regular twitter posts showing poorly cut cakes and icing slathered all over repurposed aircraft metal desks and the unpaid barista in the back or the team playing a game of Civ 5 while waiting for the game to compile for the 8th time in a day?
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:26 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 19:54 |
|
TheAgent posted:yup, the cyclone is one of the worst concepts they have ever put out Well, it's still selling pretty well compared to stuff like the Defender. It's actually impressive that it's tracking so closely to the Dragonfly despite the Cyclone's vastly inferior utility as an LTI token (due to not being able to be CCU'ed to actual ships ).
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:26 |
|
buttery
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:29 |
|
boviscopophobic posted:Well, it's still selling pretty well compared to stuff like the Defender. It's actually impressive that it's tracking so closely to the Dragonfly despite the Cyclone's vastly inferior utility as an LTI token (due to not being able to be CCU'ed to actual ships ).
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:32 |
|
boviscopophobic posted:Well, it's still selling pretty well compared to stuff like the Defender. It's actually impressive that it's tracking so closely to the Dragonfly despite the Cyclone's vastly inferior utility as an LTI token (due to not being able to be CCU'ed to actual ships ). I think its amazing that all 4 vehicles, despite vastly different qualities, weight-punching techniques, and prices all fall relatively within the same sale curve. The dragonfly and nox are basically the same thing, although the dragonfly costs $5 less. Who's buying this?
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:32 |
|
the cliffords and the weshas and that leather fedora guy, it's the same people sinking further and further. There aren't any new people buying this poo poo.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:36 |
|
doingitwrong posted:The one thing we should have learned by now is that time and Star Citizen makes fools of us all. The SC faithful have been so sure that total success is just around the corner for so long. And the SC skeptics have been so sure that total collapse has been just around the corner for so long. And everyone has been wrong.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:42 |
|
AlbieQuirky posted:3.0 coming to avocados in Wait a minute, back right after new year's Toast said "very very soon"! ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." MedicineHut fucked around with this message at 16:46 on Jul 27, 2017 |
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:43 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:45 |
|
In One Ear posted:90 days tops No, I think Bootcha really meant "very very soon"
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:45 |
|
MedicineHut posted:"very very soon"
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:46 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." I can get on board with this
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:48 |
|
I just want everyone to recognize that i called today being thursday back in july of 2017
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:54 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:56 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." quoting the poo poo out of this also loling
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:58 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 16:59 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:00 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." I honestly can't wait.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:01 |
|
It's almost Q4 so a Dec release date still on the cards as Chris quite rightly said
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:03 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." The best part about this post isn't that it is absolutely dead wrong on all three guesses (SQ42 ain't coming this year, bet your belt on it), but that this was considered a very conservative position back in December.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:03 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:03 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:05 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:08 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." Oh hey are we pickin' on MoMA
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:09 |
|
Foo Diddley posted:Oh hey are we pickin' on MoMA It's what he would have wanted
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:14 |
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." I like MoMa.His posts have been good consistently.
|
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:15 |
|
https://twitter.com/RobertsSpaceInd/status/890587705696022529
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:16 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." this was about 2018 and he was right
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:18 |
|
TheAgent posted:notice how he didn't specify a year Gonna quote the poo poo out of this in 2019
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:20 |
|
Mne nravitsya posted:That guy absolutely rubs me the wrong way. I could/world not follow a lead like that in a high pressure production environment. He comes across like a smug rear end kisser, who will throw you under the bus to save his own hide if anything goes sideways. Which, being this is CIG, probably happens about once or twice a day depending on what game or movie crobbler watched that night and is now using as a guide for entire vision. It's ok. Most of us have probably had to work with people like that at some point.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:26 |
|
I'm sure all the yellow quotes boxes will make him feel very popular
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:28 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." MoMA Snipe / Tax
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:29 |
|
Daztek posted:MoMA Snipe / Tax That quote should be the new page snipe tax
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:30 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." Don't forget June 21st 2016 https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3748466&userid=217568&perpage=40&pagenumber=14#post461288606 ManofManyAliases posted:I know I said it a number of times: I really expect at least a mission or two out of SQ42 this year as a teaser, with release of SQ42 next year (summer maybe)? And I'm thinking we'll enter beta by the end of next year with full release in 2018. That said, my 'oh-poo poo' moment will likely be observation of progress by end of Q2 next year: if procedural tech, netcode and and other gameplay mechanics aren't more refined at that point, it's probably too far past a salvage point. Then again, I fully expect the grey-market to still be a viable alternative to offload most of my assets, even by Summer of next year. Space Crabs fucked around with this message at 17:50 on Jul 27, 2017 |
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:36 |
|
I'm glad MoMA's prediction is dead
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:42 |
|
Ayn Marx posted:I'm glad MoMA's prediction is dead There, saved Derek a post
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:47 |
|
Redditors hate trolls but Chris is the biggest troll of them all
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:50 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:51 |
|
MoMa posted:That said, my 'oh-poo poo' moment will likely be observation of progress by end of Q2 next year: if procedural tech, netcode and and other gameplay mechanics aren't more refined at that point, it's probably too far past a salvage point. September 22nd will be the last day you can really offload your stuff in Summer 2017, are you considering getting in before the rush? xXAdmiralBekHarXx posted:just absolutely rock solid You can actually bank it.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:52 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 19:54 |
|
Hav posted:September 22nd will be the last day you can really offload your stuff in Summer 2017, are you considering getting in before the rush? "assets" Also, procedural tech is nowhere near ready, netcode doesn't look like it'll improve greatly. It certainly isn't approaching MMO-levels of fidelity and, uh, 'other game mechanics' is not only vague but sets a neat line in the sand that one can easily backpedal from immediately.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2017 17:54 |