Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Tom Perez B/K/M?
This poll is closed.
B 77 25.50%
K 160 52.98%
M 65 21.52%
Total: 229 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Call Me Charlie posted:

So...what's this thread's thoughts on Bannon trying to push Trump into introducing a 44% tax bracket for anybody making over 5 million a year? (which, as far as I can figure from a google search, would be the top 1/10th of the 1%)

I imagine that's also going to come with heavy tax cuts for everybody underneath that bracket, 20-25% corporate tax, a one time 10% repatriation tax and the repeal of the estate tax but will the current dems take the bait? Normally I'd say they'd be falling all over themselves to take that deal from a GOPe president but I don't think they'll do anything to help Trump
(which Trump will use against them in 2018/2020 :smugdon:: "I wanted to raise taxes on the rich and they still wouldn't work with me. SAD!")

https://theintercept.com/2017/07/26/steve-bannon-pushing-for-44-percent-marginal-tax-rate-on-the-very-rich/

_________

Or if that's too heavy of a subject, you can just laugh at Hillary some more.


https://apnews.com/2966d534b7034f64ab37dc9b81179040/Hillary-Clinton-calling-new-book-

(do you think they'll be stupid enough to try to do some type of 'draft hillary' bullshit for 2020? it couldn't possibly work but it's another page she can rip out of the goldwater playbook)

If Trump pushes for it it will go little better then the skinny Obamacare repeal.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


itt, whiskey juvenile pretends that one of the people behind the grand bargain to slash social security was being honest when she said the social safety net is good and we need to protect it

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Actually slashing the safety net is good, because it's not full communism so it's worthless, and anyway all the electable Democratic candidates like Ossoff want to do it

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Condiv posted:

that's not an answer. why do you not realize this? the kid asked what she was going to do and instead she says we're capitalist and lists some ways that's failed

and then never says what's she's gonna actually do about it. sorry our socks weren't knocked off by nancy pelosi's explanation of stockholder vs shareholder capitalism, and her total silence on any plans to move us out of stockholder capitalism


i guess for a 6-figure making socialist, the definition of socialism remaining totally pure is much more important than it not being a slur.



Check out this liberal complaining about purity tests

WhiskeyJuvenile fucked around with this message at 23:50 on Jul 27, 2017

Call Me Charlie
Dec 3, 2005

by Smythe

twodot posted:

If the Democrats can't beat blatant lies then their problem is not at all restricted to this issue. Like if this strategy works, Republicans can also just say lies like "I wanted to lower the cost of your healthcare and let you keep your doctor and also give you a pony, but the Democrats still wouldn't work with me." I realize the Republicans are going to lie, so coming up with strategies to counter lies is important, but if we're afraid of lies, if we don't have a counter, then just give up, democracy has failed.

The difference is that it's technically not a lie. It's true when comes to income tax but it doesn't cover the scope of his tax overhaul. Good luck trying to explain to people, who's taxes are going down and who think the estate tax is actually a death tax, why a 5% tax raise on the top 1/10th of 1% is not a progressive measure. I don't know if you've ever tried arguing with somebody why a flat tax is bad thing but it's not something people accept on the first try of trying to get through to them.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy
Checkout WJ's hot take.

Call Me Charlie posted:

The difference is that it's technically not a lie. It's true when comes to income tax but it doesn't cover the scope of his tax overhaul. Good luck trying to explain to people, who's taxes are going down and who think the estate tax is actually a death tax, why a 5% tax raise on the top 1/10th of 1% is not a progressive measure. I don't know if you've ever tried arguing with somebody why a flat tax is bad thing but it's not something people accept on the first try of trying to get through to them.

I don't see it passing the house because too many of the GOP's top donars make their money through income not capital gains.

The Kingfish
Oct 21, 2015


WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Check out this liberal complaining about purity tests

Turn your monitor on.

twodot
Aug 7, 2005

You are objectively correct that this person is dumb and has said dumb things

Call Me Charlie posted:

The difference is that it's technically not a lie. It's true when comes to income tax but it doesn't cover the scope of his tax overhaul. Good luck trying to explain to people, who's taxes are going down and who think the estate tax is actually a death tax, why a 5% tax raise on the top 1/10th of 1% is not a progressive measure. I don't know if you've ever tried arguing with somebody why a flat tax is bad thing but it's not something people accept on the first try of trying to get through to them.
No, "I wanted to lower your taxes and raise mine* but they still wouldn't work with me." is a lie, if the measure includes an estate tax repeal. Donald Trump claims a net worth of 10 billion, an estate tax repeal is a 5 billion dollar tax cut, thus not raising his taxes. That sentence is just untrue. Explaining why the sentence is false may not be easy, but if Republicans can just say false things and own Democrats, then give up now. Personally I'm not going to be held hostage on policies by concerns of "What if we pass a good policy or don't pass a bad policy, but then Republicans lie about whether it was actually good or not?"

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Call Me Charlie posted:

I'm more afraid of the consequences of a no-win situation.

If they go along with it, it's basically confirming the narrative Trump's trying to construct and will be championed as his main achievement heading into 2020.
If they don't go along with it, it's basically an anchor around the neck of every Democrat in 2018 and 2020. You can try to explain why that's actually a bad deal but no amount of explanation will be able to beat the quick soundbyte of "I wanted to lower your taxes and raise mine* but they still wouldn't work with me."

In that situation they should probably pass it and then run on raising corporate taxes back up, any Republican who criticizes them can be tarred as going back on the GOP's promise to tax the rich.

Yeah it's not ideal, turns out voting a literal caricature of a greedy corrupt avaricious worker-hating New York fat cat real estate mogul and oligarch to run the country was a bad idea that would inevitably lead to a bunch of no-win scenarios, who knew?

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Check out this liberal complaining about purity tests

so you completely gave up on pretending nancy pelosi gave an appropriate answer? glad to hear, cause that was some ridiculous poo poo

next we just have to work on you not freaking out cause hillary and co called bernie socialist and he didn't deny it

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Whiskey Juvenile in 2020 posted:

As a true socialist, bernie sanders and donald trump are both so right wing as to be indistinguishable to me! so of course i voted trump!!

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Condiv posted:

so you completely gave up on pretending nancy pelosi gave an appropriate answer? glad to hear, cause that was some ridiculous poo poo

next we just have to work on you not freaking out cause hillary and co called bernie socialist and he didn't deny it

she gave a bad answer that's bad on substance in the same way that bernie's campaign was bad, but worse than bernie on tenor with respect to a portion of the electorate

so like I don't much give a poo poo


:thunk:

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Again, I voted Hillary because I didn't see much daylight between the two vis-a-vis anticapitalism

lmao, and also shut the gently caress up.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

she gave a bad answer that's bad on substance in the same way that bernie's campaign was bad, but worse than bernie on tenor with respect to a portion of the electorate

so like I don't much give a poo poo

you sure gave enough of a poo poo to try to pretend there was any substance in her answer. and you give enough of a poo poo now to try to draw a false equivalence between sanders' message and pelosi's

here's the difference, since you seem to be unable to parse political weasel speak at all. pelosi was asked what she would do, and refused to actually commit to anything and instead giving a short history of capitalism

meanwhile, bernie actually pushes policies such as singlepayer (which pelosi is against), 15$/hr minimum wage, and free college. these policies aren't fully fleshed out, but they address people's needs. pelosi on the other hand refuses to acknowledge people's needs (see her schtick about home ownership to that student, something that feels hopelessly unachievable to most millennials)

quote:

:thunk:

i know it sounds ridiculous, but so does "Again, I voted Hillary because I didn't see much daylight between the two vis-a-vis anticapitalism" when talking about a guy who spoke out against too big to fail banks vs a woman who took millions in handouts from them.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

tekz posted:

lmao, and also shut the gently caress up.

it is with a heavy heart that i must announce that bernie sanders is a capitalist

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

it is with a heavy heart that i must announce that bernie sanders is a capitalist

so is trump, so you must've had a hard time not voting for him in the general

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Whiskey Juvenille posted:

How am i supposed to tell the difference between these two capitalists!? They're just too similar! *furrows brow as he contemplates trump vs hillary*

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo
but if you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for evil

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

but if you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for evil

that's only an excuse you get to make if you can tell the difference. and you can't! they're all capitalists!! :derp:

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


if you can tell the difference, you voted the greater of two evils by voting hillary in the primary, so you still don't get to make that excuse :lol:

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Hillary and Bernie are exactly the same you guys, there's no reason to support him over her, all their policies are the same.

Oh also Hillary is the pragmatic electable choice because Sanders is a far out loony leftist and we need Hillary's moderate bipartisan centrist policies not his out there pie-in-the-sky impractical policies, you'll understand the importance of moderate politics when you're older.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

These are the same dishonest arguments from the DNC chair thread.

"Perez and Ellison are exactly the same, don't worry about who gets elected, oh by the way it has to be Perez because Ellison is a scary far-left blacky black black Muslim"

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


VitalSigns posted:

These are the same dishonest arguments from the DNC chair thread.

"Perez and Ellison are exactly the same, don't worry about who gets elected, oh by the way it has to be Perez because Ellison is a scary far-left blacky black black Muslim"

i loved centrists' instistence that perez wasn't an empty suit and he'd do a good job

not much time has passed since that and wow. perez is a trainwreck of a DNC chair who'dve guessed that one

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo
Don't blame me I supported Ellison

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

I both hate Bernie for being to much of a socialist. Also he is too much of a capitalist.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Look there's no difference between single payer and the heritage foundation health care plan, and no difference between breaking up the too-big-to-fail banking cartels and letting the banks write their own regulations, no difference at all.

Oh also did you know Bernie's Wall Street plan will hurt corporate profits and that's the worst thing possible, we can't vote for his loony policies that are totally the same as Hillary's sensible policies anyway and anyone who says they're different is being a baby about it.

The Kingfish
Oct 21, 2015


I'm a well off New York lawyer who voted for Hillary Clinton. But it's not like you think!

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

The Kingfish posted:

I'm a well off New York lawyer who voted for Hillary Clinton. But it's not like you think!

:chloe:

Kokoro Wish
Jul 23, 2007

Post? What post? Oh wow.
I had nothing to do with THAT.

call to action posted:

Like, I'm trying to envision a physical caricature of who Hillary supporters are to make an ironic comparison, but I can't do it because I'm just not that much of a stupid dick

Why do you need caricatures when you can have some real ones?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1hg6VrXcjg

Sneakster
Jul 13, 2017

by R. Guyovich

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

it is with a heavy heart that i must announce that bernie sanders is a capitalist

(til 32:51 in video)
Not so sure about that

:getin:

The Ol Spicy Keychain
Jan 17, 2013

I MEPHISTO MY OWN ASSHOLE
test

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/07/what-socialism-means

quote:

Viewed through this lens, what in the platform of Bernie Sanders is properly socialist? Take single payer health insurance, where the government serves the role typically held by insurance companies, and where progressive taxes help alleviate the burden of paying for care faced by the poor. I support this policy wholeheartedly. But it is not a socialist alternative to health care. “The government pays money for what the people need” is not socialist in general, but rather simply welfare liberalism, as it preserves the role of currency exchange and profit in the first place. A real socialist alternative would be to socialize the health care industry entirely, and have doctors and hospitals provide services based on human need rather than the dictates of the profit model. I don’t think socialized health care is plausible in the short term, and I will take a single-payer system over our current one in a heartbeat. But we should not confuse a single-payer system for a true socialist alternative, just as we should not confuse government-funded college education for a socialized system where education is provided based on need and not on a market mechanism.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

This is all fine and good until you take it and start making invalid inferences to draw erroneous conclusions like "if single-payer is not socialism, then it is indistinguishable from https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/health-care/"

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

VitalSigns posted:

This is all fine and good until you take it and start making invalid inferences to draw erroneous conclusions like "if single-payer is not socialism, then it is indistinguishable from https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/health-care/"

at the end of the day, single payer and a public option are a lot closer together than either is to a NHS

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

at the end of the day, single payer and a public option are a lot closer together than either is to a NHS

Jizz Festival
Oct 30, 2012
Lipstick Apathy

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

at the end of the day, single payer and a public option are a lot closer together than either is to a NHS

Maybe if you're some six-figure gently caress these differences don't matter. You consistently choose to compromise in the worst way possible. You're a bad supposed socialist. You suck.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Jizz Festival posted:

Maybe if you're some six-figure gently caress these differences don't matter. You consistently choose to compromise in the worst way possible. You're a bad supposed socialist. You suck.

:thunk:

Jizz Festival
Oct 30, 2012
Lipstick Apathy
Also lol at "I voted for Hillary because black people wanted her." Like you used the magic of polling to peer into the black soul and nodded in agreement.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Jizz Festival posted:

Also lol at "I voted for Hillary because black people wanted her." Like you used the magic of polling to peer into the black soul and nodded in agreement.

did they not?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Mitt Romney and Bernie Sanders are closer to each other than either is to the dictatorship of the proletariat.

Pinochet and Bernie Sanders are closer to each other then either is to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

  • Locked thread