|
https://twitter.com/TeslaMotors/status/891159650816491520
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 06:14 |
|
|
Tesla has been learning from the best! (OUYA)
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2017 17:46
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:Tesla has been learning from the best! Optimism.jpg
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Optimism.jpg 
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2017 19:36
|
|
|
ahahahah oh. my. God. this is loving amazing
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2017 19:44
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Optimism.jpg 
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2017 20:13
|
|
|
2017 looks promising.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:2017 looks promising. everythings coming up milhouse *ffwd to one of the time travel eps where milhouse is still a loser*
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 00:09
|
|
|
holy gently caress though. "as time passes we produce more cars."
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 00:10
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:holy gently caress though. "as time passes we produce more cars." It can actually be read as a self-own, because they have it filled up until close to diminishing returns and saturation.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:holy gently caress though. "as time passes we produce more cars." Eventually they'll produce like, 15 cars 
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 00:17
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:It can actually be read as a self-own, because they have it filled up until close to diminishing returns and saturation. lmao yea curve is flattening out. sorry folks, 15 cars per year maxes out our capacity
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:lmao yea curve is flattening out. sorry folks, 15 cars per year maxes out our capacity Well the alternative would be continued accelerated production of Teslas, leading up to the Tesla singularity where the entire mass of our planet is comprised solely of Teslas.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
Strom Cuzewon posted:I hate this loving cult of genius that's grown up around Musk. Just layer after layer of obsequious loving bullshit. Silicone Valley Libertarians are the nadir of modern society
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 00:42
|
|
|
Stex T posted:Well the alternative would be continued accelerated production of Teslas, leading up to the Tesla singularity where the entire mass of our planet is comprised solely of Teslas. this is true, and scary. perhaps that is how ol musky intends to terraform mars? replacing a thin atmosphere with layers of cars could be a thing, however weird yet profitable
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 00:48
|
|
|
Dreddout posted:Silicone Valley Libertarians are the nadir of modern society there are tech nerds in the san fernando valley?!
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
stone cold posted:there are tech nerds in the san fernando valley?! Would you like to pay for your boob job... With Bitcoin?!!?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 02:16
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:everythings coming up milhouse *ffwd to one of the time travel eps where milhouse is still a loser*
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
I uh, this seems like a not great chart to me but what do I know. It's from wikipedia and the previous 5 revisions don't seem much better.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 03:43
|
|
|
Crust First posted:I uh, this seems like a not great chart to me but what do I know. "Mom! Excel barfed on the table again!"
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 03:44
|
|
|
Crust First posted:I uh, this seems like a not great chart to me but what do I know.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 06:06
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:lmao yea curve is flattening out. sorry folks, 15 cars per year maxes out our capacity You are reading it wrong. The y axis isn't yearly production, it's total production. Tesla will produce 15 Model S cars total, then shut down forever. That's their ambition, at least.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 06:34
|
|
|
Crust First posted:I uh, this seems like a not great chart to me but what do I know. Fractured bar graph: you can't tell me what to do Dad
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 07:17
|
|
|
Crust First posted:I uh, this seems like a not great chart to me but what do I know. Serious question: When you have that much data to show, wouldn't it be easier, and better, and more comprehensible to the reader, to just put it in several graphs/charts instead of one overcomplicated mishmash of confusing colour? What is the reason people insist on doing it that way?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 08:01
|
|
|
Some better formatting and that chart would be fine. It's just messy with that colour scheme and the area layout. A series of stacked columns would look 'fine'. The order of the legend is an annoying quirk of PowerPoint/excel. The chart will be plotted bottom up by default (i.e. The first row will be at the bottom of the graph) whilst the legend is goes top-down (so the first row of data is used for the first legend entry).
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 09:57
|
|
|
BrigadierSensible posted:Serious question: You could just use a barchart. Make a 3D one in Excel and then somehow modify the front and back relief of bars according to data.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 09:57
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:lmao yea curve is flattening out. sorry folks, 15 cars per year maxes out our capacity I think those are cumulative numbers, and they account for the fact that they will eventually phase model 3 out of production, so it makes sense.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 10:49
|
|
|
Crust First posted:I uh, this seems like a not great chart to me but what do I know. I like that it's a graph about supercomputers, and whoever made it couldn't push his computer to render more than like six colors.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 10:51
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:I like that it's a graph about supercomputers, and whoever made it couldn't push his computer to render more than like six colors. You can't even tell what spike is which year because the scale's so huge
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 12:33
|
|
|
The patterns guiding your eye downwards diagonally isn't helping that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 12:54
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:I think those are cumulative numbers, and they account for the fact that they will eventually phase model 3 out of production, so it makes sense. It's actually rate of production, so they'll be ramping it up quickly and then leveling off at a stable rate. Not that this is at all clear from the chart of course.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 15:34
|
|
|
A fourth dimensional pie chart would be better. Simulate the fourth dimension by turning successive charts on each page into a flip book.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 18:50
|
|
|
this is actually a really rad data visualization except for maybe the part where they just call 13+ languages, "Chinese" but maybe I just don't know what a Macrolanguage is??? e: I guess it would cut off their 'at least 50M native speakers' requirement for a lot of them and make things screwy but still it stood out to me
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 10:45
|
|
|
I'm irrationally irritated that they put South Korea at the top and North at the bottom.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 10:56
|
|
|
My Lovely Horse posted:I'm irrationally irritated that they put South Korea at the top and North at the bottom.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 11:13
|
|
|
But did he get laid?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 11:20
|
|
|
NoNotTheMindProbe posted:But did he get laid? HERE LIES ELON MUSK HE NEVER SCORED
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 11:30
|
|
|
What does a languages location in the circle mean? Why are related languages nowhere near each other?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:I like that it's a graph about supercomputers, and whoever made it couldn't push his computer to render more than like six colors. I think it's done that way so that a black and white version would still be readable.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 19:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 06:14 |
|
|
Dragonwagon posted:I think it's done that way so that a black and white version would still be readable. Still?!
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 21:24
|
|
