Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Concerned Citizen posted:

the legislature passed same sex marriage multiple times, and it was veto'ed by schwarzenegger. the other 10 were legislative without court action.

the dems were capable of passing resolutions while they knew a republican would veto them, but the second they regained power somehow couldn't find the votes?

~hmmmmm~

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Ol Spicy Keychain
Jan 17, 2013

I MEPHISTO MY OWN ASSHOLE
https://twitter.com/peterdaou/status/892133418653417474

looks like peter found his new queen.

Tired: Hillary Rodham Clinton
Wired: Senator Kamala of the House Harris, First of Her Name, the Unburnt, Queen of the Congresional Hearings :swoon: :swoon:

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Concerned Citizen posted:

the legislature passed same sex marriage multiple times, and it was veto'ed by schwarzenegger. the other 10 were legislative without court action.

they did that with singlepayer too. now they have a supermajority and the governorship, they're blocking it!

FuriousxGeorge
Aug 8, 2007

We've been the best team all year.

They're just finding out.

Concerned Citizen posted:

the legislature passed same sex marriage multiple times, and it was veto'ed by schwarzenegger. the other 10 were legislative without court action.

Ahh, so legislative action in the sense of Republicans voting to repeal Obamacare 100 times, got it.

This site claims there were only eight that legalized with legislative action. 26 that legalized through courts. And 3 by popular vote.

http://gaymarriage.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=004857

navyjack
Jul 15, 2006



Lastgirl posted:

You have been stung by the Bee Man's Purity



Say "thank you bee man" if you want to be cleansed of the centrists and CC's eyebleed D&D posts

Thank you Easter Bee Man! Bawk bawk!

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

Condiv posted:

how much grassroots movement since apparently public support for gay marriage was enough to reach the supreme court's old man justices, but not enough to get dems to lift a finger? seems like literally the entire nation needs to show up in D.C. to convince dems they need to do something about a popular issue

i mean, again, dems did get it passed in 10 states and more were on the way. dc dems took action on dadt and tried multiple times to pass the respect for marriage act, but they did not have the votes to pass it. the closest might have been 2009 but there wasn't enough support to get it to the house floor even with 120 cosponsors, and it did not have obama's support until 2011. so i think the idea that grassroots support didn't materialize into congressional support just isn't true.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Concerned Citizen posted:

i mean, again, dems did get it passed in 10 states and more were on the way. dc dems took action on dadt and tried multiple times to pass the respect for marriage act, but they did not have the votes to pass it. the closest might have been 2009 but there wasn't enough support to get it to the house floor even with 120 cosponsors, and it did not have obama's support until 2011. so i think the idea that grassroots support didn't materialize into congressional support just isn't true.

thank god the supreme court got us gay marriage cause every time the dems try to do something it's like a 3 stooges comedy routine

anime was right
Jun 27, 2008

death is certain
keep yr cool

Concerned Citizen posted:

of course dems chase voters that don't already exist. this is actually the most popular thing among democratic parties - get more students to vote, expand voting rights, help felons vote, register more people to vote, etc. countering voter suppression has been a big dem thing for years. i mean, remember terry mcauliffe auto-penning all those felon rights restorations in virginia because the courts told him he couldn't blanket restore them?

dems have been overly-focused on chasing non-voters since obama in 2008. it contributed to losses in 2010 and 2014, as those surge voters in 2008 weren't interested in midterm elections and didn't bother showing up again. the lack of focus on winning people who actually vote has hamstrung our campaigns - you look at places like florida, where turnout was like over 70% (very high by international standards) and it's like, you just don't have much room to go before you start hitting people who just have absolutely no interest in politics and don't want to vote. and the ashes of history are littered with populist campaigns going down in flames when the promised legions never show up. if you want to grow the party, an easy place to start is actually focusing on people who don't need to be convinced to vote but aren't really civically engaged.

dont quote me or my posts ever again

anime was right
Jun 27, 2008

death is certain
keep yr cool

Scent of Worf posted:

https://twitter.com/peterdaou/status/892133418653417474

looks like peter found his new queen.

Tired: Hillary Rodham Clinton
Wired: Senator Kamala of the House Harris, First of Her Name, the Unburnt, Queen of the Congresional Hearings :swoon: :swoon:

ok so shes the vetted establishment pick got it

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

anime was right posted:

dont quote me or my posts ever again

hm

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

FuriousxGeorge
Aug 8, 2007

We've been the best team all year.

They're just finding out.

Scent of Worf posted:

https://twitter.com/peterdaou/status/892133418653417474

looks like peter found his new queen.

Tired: Hillary Rodham Clinton
Wired: Senator Kamala of the House Harris, First of Her Name, the Unburnt, Queen of the Congresional Hearings :swoon: :swoon:

"don't damage the rising stars, only damage the guy who is already our only actual star."

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:

Condiv posted:

they did that with singlepayer too. now they have a supermajority and the governorship, they're blocking it!

they can't pass an unfunded mandate silly, they might have to find some way to fund it if they did

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod



i don't think he likes you

maybe because you spend every waking second in the thread trolling?

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Concerned Citizen posted:

well there's short term and long term strategy. in the short term it's just imperative that we take back the majority. a gop congress and a gop president are going to kill a lot of people, but if winning 3 seats in orange county with centrists is necessary in 2018 to take back the house, i'm all for it. in the longer term, there needs to be a sustained focus on moving these districts left by organizing more effectively. like we do a lot of work to promote candidates but virtually no work to promote policies. that really needs to change!


but the support is weak. single-payer support isn't really as strong as people itt think it is. like in the last pew poll, only 52% of democrats backed single-payer. 33% of people overall regardless of party. so there's still a lot of work to do to actually build consensus on this. i think obviously campaign donations and whatnot do move politicians to an extent, but it's not what is killing single-payer's chances. and that's the thing - there's so much assumption that everyone is for it among progressives, that the democrats/wealthy lobbyists are the only thing holding us back, when in reality the main thing is there is a lot more electoral pressure against it than for it right now. there isn't electoral cover for people to come out for this except in safe districts.

i kind of contrast this to same sex marriage - there was an organized outreach program nationwide by lgbt groups to increase support for same sex marriage. door-to-door visits by actual gay people talking about their experiences and asking for support. these didn't just focus on democratic areas, but broadly targeted voters all over the place. the growth in support for same sex marriage happened rapidly and lead to a big political breakthrough. there is a lot of potential for similar types of campaigns by proponents of single-payer, but it is not happening. it needs to, though.

if your short-term strategy and your long-term strategy are contradictory, then one will fail. recruiting conservatives in the short term while fostering leftism in the long term works about as well as having what a certain major Dem personality might call a public position and a private position

the important part of that survey is that single-payer support is up five points in six months, and nine points among Dems. it's almost as if a policy gets more popular when the politicians aren't dismissing it as impossible nonsense. but sure, maybe it's not quite there yet. in the meantime, maybe the Dems could pursue some sort of public option, which has 60% support among voters and 85% among Dems, according to that poll. too bad conservative Dems torpedoed it at the insistence of the insurance industry

as for same sex marriage, the "breakthrough" there was that the courts thought banning it was unconstitutional and ruled that way over and over and over again until Obergefell finally settled it once and for all for the few states that still continued to hold out in the face of a clear judicial trend

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!

Weeping Wound posted:

what a terrible way to go, stung by bees :/

rip CC as the hallucinogenic properties of the dead bees' stingers course through his veins as he continues to make longer and double downy contradicting posts

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

anime was right posted:

ok so shes the vetted establishment pick got it

Also just like Dread Abuela a coastal canidate and also finds free prison slave labor to be a very useful concept.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Concerned Citizen posted:

i mean, again, dems did get it passed in 10 states and more were on the way. dc dems took action on dadt and tried multiple times to pass the respect for marriage act, but they did not have the votes to pass it. the closest might have been 2009 but there wasn't enough support to get it to the house floor even with 120 cosponsors, and it did not have obama's support until 2011. so i think the idea that grassroots support didn't materialize into congressional support just isn't true.

if there weren't enough votes to pass it even with clear Dem majorities, then Congressional support clearly didn't materialize

the fact that Obama and Dem leadership did fuckall gay rights for two years of completely controlling Congress, and then suddenly discovered a deep commitment to LGBT equality right after losing the House, was one of the first major things to really get me cynical about the Dems as a whole

docbeard
Jul 19, 2011

Got your boy turning every knob to the right
Every button with an arrow up crushed
'Til my vision is bright white
Mute the dialogue, watch the lips move
Change the script around, make that bullshit tight

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

Condiv posted:

thank god the supreme court got us gay marriage cause every time the dems try to do something it's like a 3 stooges comedy routine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFkV73aluB4

FuriousxGeorge posted:

Ahh, so legislative action in the sense of Republicans voting to repeal Obamacare 100 times, got it.

This site claims there were only eight that legalized with legislative action. 26 that legalized through courts. And 3 by popular vote.

http://gaymarriage.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=004857


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGRlmO5uf9o

anime was right
Jun 27, 2008

death is certain
keep yr cool

Condiv posted:

i don't think he likes you

maybe because you spend every waking second in the thread trolling?

i was joking, i just dont read any of CCs posts. it works p well imo.

Subjunctivitis
Oct 12, 2007
Causation or Correlation?

Scent of Worf posted:

https://twitter.com/peterdaou/status/892133418653417474

looks like peter found his new queen.

Tired: Hillary Rodham Clinton
Wired: Senator Kamala of the House Harris, First of Her Name, the Unburnt, Queen of the Congresional Hearings :swoon: :swoon:

I wanna rip into Daou with a snarky quip about femdom, but then I'd be kink-shaming myself.

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!

:agreed:

Gene Hackman Fan
Dec 27, 2002

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
htank oyu uprity ebe

edit: i mean, thank you purity bee

Squizzle
Apr 24, 2008




Gene Hackman Fan posted:

htank oyu uprity ebe

edit: i mean, thank you purity bee

h.o.u.e :pray:

Gene Hackman Fan
Dec 27, 2002

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
back to the future had the superior saturday morning cartoon.

don't fukkin @ me on this

Thug Lessons
Dec 14, 2006


I lust in my heart for as many dead refugees as possible.

radical meme posted:

So the portion of that 60% that's going to vote GOP in every election until the day they die doesn't matter to you?

I don't know what you mean but if you're saying we should somehow appeal to right-wing Republicans my answer is no, we should not do that. We should have our own policies rather than trying to pander to voters. At the end of the day elections exist to elect national leaders and that's what politicians are, and I don't see any reason a nation's leaders should placate its conservative population "to be fair" or whatever.

Gene Hackman Fan
Dec 27, 2002

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
but even bttf could not compare to freakazoid

hardly anything could

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

Martha Stewart Undying posted:

but what makes the maid happy? does she also get a maid and takeout???

You're each others maids and order takeout all the time. That's a little thing they call love folks.

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!
hey guys

it doesnt take a lot of :words: for me to say

" we get more youth turnout with socialist messaging and actively curb voter suppression, as well as target social/wealth inequality to increase yer chances of winning but actually follow through on those platforms, because thats where the independents voters went to Trump because they wanted the money back in their pockets even though some of them are dumb insecure racist bigots, thats the whole concept of equality."
:goonsay:

no amount of :words: will alter that reality whatsoever


Thug Lessons posted:

I don't know what you mean but if you're saying we should somehow appeal to right-wing Republicans my answer is no, we should not do that. We should have our own policies rather than trying to pander to voters. At the end of the day elections exist to elect national leaders and that's what politicians are, and I don't see any reason a nation's leaders should placate its conservative population "to be fair" or whatever.

agreed, trying to convert republican party loyalists is like inserting medicine into a dead corpse. yer better off setting their party on fire and eradicating it with stronger social policies like never seen before

Thug Lessons
Dec 14, 2006


I lust in my heart for as many dead refugees as possible.
One thing that liberals don't seem to realize is that Trump doesn't have to be liked. He can just accomplish things and make an enormous historical impact. Thankfully he seems to be unable to, but it's not at all guaranteed he won't be able to, say, appoint another Supreme Court Justice and swing it to the Republican side. And they'll have allowed that because their policy was appeasement towards conservatives, a policy greased with corporate money and ideological weakness. Liberals have more or less failed to deliver even on the very modest promise they offered, and the only way you're going to avoid right-wing catastrophe is to abandon liberalism for leftism ASAP.

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler
How does a purity bee work, is the only word I have to spell purity or is it something else

got any sevens
Feb 9, 2013

by Cyrano4747
than-q b-man

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!
bipartisanship is a mealy mouth excused to collaborate with the devil

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

Thug Lessons posted:

One thing that liberals don't seem to realize is that Trump doesn't have to be liked. He can just accomplish things and make an enormous historical impact. Thankfully he seems to be unable to, but it's not at all guaranteed he won't be able to, say, appoint another Supreme Court Justice and swing it to the Republican side. And they'll have allowed that because their policy was appeasement towards conservatives, a policy greased with corporate money and ideological weakness. Liberals have more or less failed to deliver even on the very modest promise they offered, and the only way you're going to avoid right-wing catastrophe is to abandon liberalism for leftism ASAP.

Bad dems may have laughed over stuff like his Obamacare repeal failure but he's already passed hundreds of insane executive laws in the short time he was in office.

Stuff like getting rid of Obama's coal waste regulations or directly gutting the EPA's resources.

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
jerry seinfeld is the purity bee , that we all know and love, from bee movie

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


logikv9 posted:

How does a purity bee work, is the only word I have to spell purity or is it something else

if ur impure, you get stung to death

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler
impurity is a cornerstone of being human

Anime Schoolgirl
Nov 28, 2002

Lastgirl posted:

hey guys

it doesnt take a lot of :words: for me to say

" we get more youth turnout with socialist messaging and actively curb voter suppression, as well as target social/wealth inequality to increase yer chances of winning but actually follow through on those platforms, because thats where the independents voters went to Trump because they wanted the money back in their pockets even though some of them are dumb insecure racist bigots, thats the whole concept of equality."
:goonsay:

no amount of :words: will alter that reality whatsoever
but that's racsexism

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!

logikv9 posted:

impurity is a cornerstone of being human

thats why bees aren't human :angel:

to be b*~l~*e~*s~*s'd by the purity bee is no normal task

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!

Anime Schoolgirl posted:

but that's racsexism

ya thast why you target social inequality as it was said

you just laugh at their stupid ideas and promote welfare and goodness for humanity instead

if you have to stop and listen to them, then thats definitely a problem yer enabling

  • Locked thread