|
Toaster Beef posted:You wouldn't get rid of Pence, though, and suddenly you've got Competent Evil for 3.5 years Dude accidentally started an AIDs epidemic because he thought that banning condoms would stop teenagers from having sex. Define "competent."
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 18:19 |
|
|
Hellblazer187 posted:Who do Trumpists looking at this pick? My obvious picks are 2 and 4. But, assuming you like Trump, who's the other pick? I'm guessing #5 and #7? Everyone else seems like a pretty common "liberals/celebrities destroying America" name.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:19
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:lol Trump?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
 I hope they repost this cover with updates.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Mustached Demon posted:Oh gently caress yes Russia's back on foreground. Yes. A lot of people are saying Scaramucci was hired to distract the media from talking about Bill Browder's testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
Hellblazer187 posted:Who do Trumpists looking at this pick? My obvious picks are 2 and 4. But, assuming you like Trump, who's the other pick? Obviously Condi Rice because they are obviously not racist, who are you calling racist? So much for the tolerant left.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
Ague Proof posted:To defeat Kid Rock, you get someone to change their name to Robert James Ritchie (R) as a false flag Republican concern trolling about how Kid Rock will disgrace the Party with his vulgar ways and redneck hick base and that Respectable Respectables should vote for him instead. Then you raise "Ritchie's" profile. Run Eminem against him. Have all of his campaign ads be 30 second music video diss tracks.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:22
|
|
|
Hellblazer187 posted:Who do Trumpists looking at this pick? My obvious picks are 2 and 4. But, assuming you like Trump, who's the other pick? Sorry I didn't post with the answer key, the answer is Trump twice
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
Bhaal posted:poo poo I just remembered there's a part in The Thick of It where a new cabinet member makes some goof and is worried she's going to get fired. Malcom Tucker reassures her that it won't happen because if the PM fires a cabinet member 2 weeks after he appointed her, it will look like his gently caress up, not hers. Yeah, I've been rewatching The Thick of It lately in part to briefly visit a world where politics makes some kind of sense.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:Sorry I didn't post with the answer key, the answer is Trump twice He probably weighs twice as much as anyone else on there.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:24
|
|
|
I don't know who 3, 6, 9, and maybe 8 are. So 2. And 9 maybe cus I dig dude's hair. Unless he's some rear end of some sort.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
Covok posted:Dude accidentally started an AIDs epidemic because he thought that banning condoms would stop teenagers from having sex. I dunno, that sounds like pretty well done evil if you ask me (He's an idiot and a black hole of charisma, but all he has to do is sit there and sign bills and not cause a new national incident every fuckoff day. The GOP could get a lot of terrible poo poo done with a steady hand in the Executive.) Toaster Beef fucked around with this message at 01:29 on Aug 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
Fat Twitter Man posted:The Economist is extremely biased but still a top notch news source. Good reporting doesn't have to be neutral. Not to mention that the Economist owns up to its own bias at every opportunity. This, to me, makes it trustworthy. Some sort of quantitative rating of the concept of "trustworthy" seems sorta ridiculous to me. Yes, I know that graph is basically just a popular opinion graph.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:27
|
|
|
Hellblazer187 posted:Who do Trumpists looking at this pick? My obvious picks are 2 and 4. But, assuming you like Trump, who's the other pick? Melania? (8)
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:27
|
|
|
Lightning Lord posted:Is this necessarily true? Dude is an unlikable dullard who Indiana was ready to run out on a rail. Yes, meaning he wouldn't be impeached and would let the Repubs run 3.5 years of a legislative push without constant scandal. At this point Trump is almost an ally to the progressive cause in a weird way.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
Covok posted:Dude accidentally started an AIDs epidemic because he thought that banning condoms would stop teenagers from having sex. While I doubt it was intentional, I wouldn't exactly call it an accident. Spreading AIDS isn't necessarily a bad thing in fundamentalist circles and Pence would probably support such a policy as long as it was politically viable. See right wing opposition to the HPV vaccine http://www.npr.org/2011/09/19/140543977/hpv-vaccine-the-science-behind-the-controversy Overwined posted:Not to mention that the Economist owns up to its own bias at every opportunity. This, to me, makes it trustworthy. Some sort of quantitative rating of the concept of "trustworthy" seems sorta ridiculous to me. Yes, I know that graph is basically just a popular opinion graph. The graph is essentially name recognition combined with inoffensiveness. These factors can interplay of course, and I suspect that the reason the Post does a bit better than the Times is because fewer conservatives know that they would hate the Post (or maybe they're mistaking it for that one moonie tabloid) Joe-Bob fucked around with this message at 01:30 on Aug 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
9 is Colin Kaepernick I think. So 2 and 9 for me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:I don't know who 3, 6, 9, and maybe 8 are. He's a football player that dared to suggest maybe cops should stop murdering black people. So he's got a rep as a "troublemaker".
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
9 is Colin Kaepernick. Edit: this is what I get for spell checking his name.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
Wilhelm posted:Yes, meaning he wouldn't be impeached and would let the Repubs run 3.5 years of a legislative push without constant scandal. At this point Trump is almost an ally to the progressive cause in a weird way. Exactly. Pence would be exactly who the GOP needed him to be, and that's very much not what they're getting right now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:I don't know who 3, 6, 9, and maybe 8 are. Colin Kaepernick, NFL QB who quietly protested and people were MAD and him being so... so... well LOOK AT HIM! /s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Kaepernick#U.S._national_anthem_protest Burning_Monk fucked around with this message at 01:32 on Aug 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:I don't know who 3, 6, 9, and maybe 8 are. Kim Kardashian Cash me ousside howboudat girl Caitlyn Jenner Colin Kaepernick (nfl player who quietly kneels during the national anthem as a protest and to raise awareness for BLM or cops shooting black kids aka Domestic Terrorist)
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:I don't know who 3, 6, 9, and maybe 8 are. Nine is Colin Kaepernick, who got blacklisted from the NFL for not standing up for the national anthem. Edit: beaten so hard I have CTE.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
Yeah I'd grab colin immediately and then Barry'O on the way out if time permits
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
Is 8 Melania or Caitlyn Jenner?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
I only save 2. It's right there in the instructions, but also the right choice. Edit: I would have a hard time picking between 9 and 4. Kaepernick would at least carry his own weight, but hilldawg would likely faint getting all parties involved burned alive. Heck Yes! Loam! fucked around with this message at 01:36 on Aug 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
Who is 6?Wilhelm posted:Yes, meaning he wouldn't be impeached and would let the Repubs run 3.5 years of a legislative push without constant scandal. At this point Trump is almost an ally to the progressive cause in a weird way. I dunno, I keep thinking that Pence would be a big distracting idiot, just in a Bible Camp way
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
birds posted:Is 8 Melania or Caitlyn Jenner? Definitely Jenner.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
It doesn't seem like a very likely situation if I'm being 100% honest
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/892170812651864065 No puppet, etc
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
The Glumslinger posted:Oh yeah, thats the good stuff Who knew mounting a defense of the highest office in the land against years of offenses rising to the levels of treason and impeachment could be so complicated.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/natashabertrand/status/892175906248290308
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
I don't know who 1 is, but, if they're over the age of consent and single, definitely on the list. Also, President Obama because he was a good president.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
I very much look forward to tomorrows tweetstorm.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
Cool I'll stick with 2 and 9 then. birds posted:Is 8 Melania or Caitlyn Jenner? Jenner I guess. But I think anyone could be forgiven for not knowing because a) who cares and b) all old people with bad plastic surgery end up looking the same
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
why is condoleeza rice on there like she's not a nobody but she's been out of the public eye for years
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
Condoleezza and Kim. Brains and beauty. Comedy answer there's just Trump and Bieber in the room so you can save them both. Dead prostitute or a live boy. Same difference politically.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:35
|
|
|
Man that Scaramucci bombshell on Monday afternoon. Now this. We barely get 24-48 hours before the next scandal breaks.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:35
|
|
|
Lightning Lord posted:I dunno, I keep thinking that Pence would be a big distracting idiot, just in a Bible Camp way Pence makes normal GOP rear end in a top hat gently caress ups. Considering he'd be following the flaming horror circus of Trump he'd look very normal and would have any run of the mill "this could end a presidency" poo poo slide. He's also low key and not an attention craving attention golem like Trump, so he could actually go dark and hope things blow over if need be.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 18:19 |
|
|
Lightning Lord posted:The problem is KIIIIIIIIID ROCK will campaign as a populist that stands for working class values and the opposite of Washington hijinks, but will most likely govern as an empty suit GOP rubberstamp. I do wonder how the party would react if one of these populists every tried to actually govern as a populist instead of turning heel immediately. It's unlikely to ever come up, but it's so outside their experience I wonder how they would process it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:36
|
|