Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
IRQ
Sep 9, 2001

SUCK A DICK, DUMBSHITS!

But without football so maybe I'll watch it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

DrVenkman posted:

Lol at the idea that Jason Segel fell off the radar was because he badmouthed HIMYM. I think at this point it's only NPH who hasn't.

By cultural-phenomenon-sitcom legacy standards Segel has been doing really loving good actually.

Mu Zeta
Oct 17, 2002

Me crush ass to dust

IRQ posted:

But without football so maybe I'll watch it.

One of the main characters is a football coach

less laughter
May 7, 2012

Accelerock & Roll

MiddleOne posted:

By cultural-phenomenon-sitcom legacy standards Segel has been doing really loving good actually.

Well, he's not exactly Woody Harrelson.

Escobarbarian
Jun 18, 2004


Grimey Drawer

Gay Horney posted:

The first episode of the Ozarks on Netflix is really good.

Ozark. We just say Ozark.

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

less laughter posted:

Well, he's not exactly Woody Harrelson.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0265668/?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm

:negative:

Eezee
Apr 3, 2011

My double chin turned out to be a huge cyst

Snak posted:

I'm 6 eps in. It's really good.

Somehow critics really hated it. Personally I can't remember anything better that was actually made by Netflix, certainly not any of the Marvel shows.

X-O
Apr 28, 2002

Long Live The King!

Wheat Loaf posted:

Space Jam may not be a particularly good movie but I don't think Back In Action is a great deal better.

Both are bad, Back in Action is less bad only because it has actual actors in it. I wouldn't watch either again.

less laughter
May 7, 2012

Accelerock & Roll

Eezee posted:

Somehow critics really hated it.

Not really, two thirds of all reviews on both Metacritic and RT are positive.

GreenNight
Feb 19, 2006
Turning the light on the darkest places, you and I know we got to face this now. We got to face this now.

Well this sounds loving terrible:

quote:

“Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan” writer/director Nicholas Meyer is rumored to be moving forward on a limited series that would focus on the life of that film’s villain Khan Noonien Singh, played by the late Ricardo Montalbahn reprising his role from the original 1960s series.

Geek Exchange (via Bleeding Cool) broke the report, citing multiple sources. They indicate events in the series would take place between the original series episode “Space Seed” and the legendary film, a time when Khan and the crew of the Botany Bay (survivors from the Eugenics wars) were exiled to Ceti Alpha V to start a colony.

Meyer, who also directed “Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country,” is involved in the upcoming “Star Trek: Discovery” series and indications are CBS is potentially looking into other projects set within the rich history of Trek mythology.

WeedlordGoku69
Feb 12, 2015

by Cyrano4747

GreenNight posted:

Well this sounds loving terrible:

I dunno, Nick Meyer has an insanely loving good track record with Trek. It might be dope.

Josh Lyman
May 24, 2009


Rhyno posted:

She's also loving hilarious. LoLing at bad actress.
Anyone can look hilarious on a multicam sitcom with a laugh track

See: Ted Mosby in the first few seasons before his character became deplorable

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Is there going to be another season of Last Kingdom?

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames

less laughter posted:

Not really, two thirds of all reviews on both Metacritic and RT are positive.

Patriot and Ozark are both sitting at 68% which just baffles me. Ozark I can understand maybe a bit better but both shows were fantastic.

Mu Zeta
Oct 17, 2002

Me crush ass to dust

Just ignore the riff raff reviews

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/patriot/s01/reviews/?type=top_critics

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames
Patriot's Cool Rick was one of the best parts of the new Spiderman

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer

Big Bad Voodoo Lou posted:

I've always thought this. Natalie did her best acting in The Professional, and had been more wooden and disengaged ever since. Meanwhile, I find Kat gorgeous and sexy as hell, with great comic timing, and she's game for anything. It's a shame her show is offensively, unwatchably bad.

Was offensively, unwatchably bad. Now that it's finally over I have some faint hope she'll find something better. Same goes for most of the cast, really- Beth Behrs, Garrett Morris, and Jennifer Coolidge did not deserve that.

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames
Natalie Portman's best acting is definitely in Closer. Jesus that whole cast nails it so hard it's probably the hardest movie in the world for me to watch (it hits way too close to home, eerily so)

esperterra
Mar 24, 2010

SHINee's back




precision posted:

Natalie Portman's best acting is definitely in Closer. Jesus that whole cast nails it so hard it's probably the hardest movie in the world for me to watch (it hits way too close to home, eerily so)

Closer is an amazing movie and even more amazing play. Portman was great in it, though imho she was nowhere near as good as Julia Roberts, Jude Law or mothafuckin' Clive Owen. So loving good.

But yeah, she really holds her own in Closer and I highly recommend it to anyone who loves plays about hosed up people's hosed up romances, how people change, but more importantly how terrible people are at letting poo poo go.

gently caress, I love Closer.

asecondduck
Feb 18, 2011

by Nyc_Tattoo

IRQ posted:

So unbeknownst to me, the oft-maligned Top Gear USA, which I thought had really found its own identity after a shaky start, was canceled last year, and the BBC is taking another stab at an american Top Gear spinoff and it starts tonight. Kind of bummed to hear the history channel version got killed off, but I'll give the new one a shot I guess.

Thanks for the reminder, watching it on demand now.

[Edit: It's certainly closer in spirit and style to the UK version than the previous version. I just recently watched an episode of Top Gear USA where they map the Rubicon and... ugh.

The first segment of the new show (driving up to the Mexico/US border in buggys) isn't very strong (too many host reactions, not enough of the "driving porn" shots I watch TG for), but the rest of the episode could be dropped into the UK version and it'd feel right at home.

At the end of the day, it's hard to watch any version of Top Gear without Clarkson/May/Hammond without wishing they were hosting instead, but the Top Gear America cast isn't bad, and I can see them growing on me.]

asecondduck fucked around with this message at 16:09 on Aug 1, 2017

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Amazon is going in a different direction with their Civil War alt history.

quote:

Another alternate history drama series, which has been in the works at Amazon for over a year, also paints a reality where southern states have left the Union but takes a very different approach. Titled Black America, the drama hails from top feature producer Will Packer (Ride Along, Think Like A Man franchises, Straight Outta Compton) and Peabody-winning The Boondocks creator and Black Jesus co-creator Aaron McGruder. It envisions an alternate history where newly freed African Americans have secured the Southern states of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama post-Reconstruction as reparations for slavery, and with that land, the freedom to shape their own destiny. The sovereign nation they formed, New Colonia, has had a tumultuous and sometimes violent relationship with its looming “Big Neighbor,” both ally and foe, the United States. The past 150 years have been witness to military incursions, assassinations, regime change, coups, etc. Today, after two decades of peace with the U.S. and unprecedented growth, an ascendant New Colonia joins the ranks of major industrialized nations on the world stage as America slides into rapid decline. Inexorably tied together, the fate of two nations, indivisible, hangs in the balance.

asecondduck
Feb 18, 2011

by Nyc_Tattoo
Looking forward to the hot takes on that show.

IRQ
Sep 9, 2001

SUCK A DICK, DUMBSHITS!

lelandjs posted:

Looking forward to the hot takes on that show.

My hot take is I'd actually watch that one. But being an Amazon show the time between us hearing about it and it coming out we won't see it until 2023.

Calaveron
Aug 7, 2006
:negative:
Man himym just becomes a mess during the whole Kevin Nora part with Robin and Barney wanting to get back together and then everyone breaks up and Ted immediately goes for the I Love You but it's fine because Barney's dating that stripper

Timby
Dec 23, 2006

Your mother!

Calaveron posted:

Man himym just becomes a mess during the whole Kevin Nora part with Robin and Barney wanting to get back together and then everyone breaks up and Ted immediately goes for the I Love You but it's fine because Barney's dating that stripper

And then when Barney's dating the stripper, Ted pulls a Stella and convinces Victoria to leave her fiancé at the altar. Christ, the last half of that show was just filled with completely wretched assholes.

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
The Amazon one sounds more interesting, because it's a concept that hasn't really been done before.

What's the point of doing alternate history if you're just going to go with the same two things that always get done? (i.e. the Nazis winning and the Confederates winning)

Why are there no "Napoleon wins the Battle of Waterloo" ones? That might be interesting.

GreenNight
Feb 19, 2006
Turning the light on the darkest places, you and I know we got to face this now. We got to face this now.

Just do this one:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldwar_series

I want to see Hitler and Stalin gently caress up some aliens.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Wheat Loaf posted:

The Amazon one sounds more interesting, because it's a concept that hasn't really been done before.

What's the point of doing alternate history if you're just going to go with the same two things that always get done? (i.e. the Nazis winning and the Confederates winning)

Why are there no "Napoleon wins the Battle of Waterloo" ones? That might be interesting.

I think because those two wars have the most clearly identifiable bad guys, and "what if the bad guys win" is a compelling premise.

Also, twitter is applauding the utter wokeness of the premise but I think they are forgetting that Boondocks wasn't exactly perfectly non-problematic. I can't remember exactly, but didn't he spark a lot of controversy from time to time?

Snak
Oct 10, 2005

I myself will carry you to the Gates of Valhalla...
You will ride eternal,
shiny and chrome.
Grimey Drawer
Boondocks has the alternate history episode where MLK was actually just in a coma since he was shot, and when he sees what African American culture has become he calls them a bunch of n-words.

It's actually pretty great episode, but obviously really going for some shock factor there and definitely contraversial.

Calaveron
Aug 7, 2006
:negative:
Man but do they love the imagery of Robin's odd red room in Ted's apartment completely empty, sad little blue horn leaning in the corner

IRQ
Sep 9, 2001

SUCK A DICK, DUMBSHITS!

Wheat Loaf posted:

The Amazon one sounds more interesting, because it's a concept that hasn't really been done before.

What's the point of doing alternate history if you're just going to go with the same two things that always get done? (i.e. the Nazis winning and the Confederates winning)

Why are there no "Napoleon wins the Battle of Waterloo" ones? That might be interesting.

What if Einstein built a time machine and used it to kill young Hitler, but then WWII just got started by Stalin instead?

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

zoux posted:

Also, twitter is applauding the utter wokeness of the premise but I think they are forgetting that Boondocks wasn't exactly perfectly non-problematic. I can't remember exactly, but didn't he spark a lot of controversy from time to time?

Isn't he a 9/11 truther? I remember hearing that.

Calaveron
Aug 7, 2006
:negative:
Lilly and Marshall get three homes, goddamn

asecondduck
Feb 18, 2011

by Nyc_Tattoo

Snak posted:

Boondocks has the alternate history episode where MLK was actually just in a coma since he was shot, and when he sees what African American culture has become he calls them a bunch of n-words.

It's actually pretty great episode, but obviously really going for some shock factor there and definitely contraversial.

The first time I saw it I loved it, but after watching it again years later, when I was better educated about intraracial views, it kind of left a bad taste in my mouth.

Aaron McGruder has a lot of important things to say about race and culture, but he's coming from a relative place of privilege compared to he people he complains about in the Boondocks (and specifically that episode). I don't look down on white trailer trash and mock them for making poor financial decisions, I do what I can to help them (which admittedly isn't much, but I voted for Bernie for a reason).


[Edit: Holy poo poo I should have thought this post through before submitting it, never-loving-mind]

asecondduck fucked around with this message at 20:20 on Aug 1, 2017

muscles like this!
Jan 17, 2005


Wheat Loaf posted:

Isn't he a 9/11 truther? I remember hearing that.

If he is it never came up in the show. So I kind of doubt it seeing as he had his W stand in from the very beginning of the show.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

Calaveron posted:

Lilly and Marshall get three homes, goddamn

Well, he did take the evil corporate lawyer job.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

muscles like this! posted:

If he is it never came up in the show. So I kind of doubt it seeing as he had his W stand in from the very beginning of the show.

The only thing I could find about it is he called Condoleeza Rice a murderer to her face before Iraq because he thought she was in on it and also this unsourced quote:

"Outside of the world of whackos and conspiracy theorists and all of that, very few people in the mainstream have been willing to say what I'm about to say, which is, I really and truthfully believe that George W. Bush is somehow involved, either directly or indirectly, in the attacks on New York City on September 11."

Not terribly strong scholarship, I know

asecondduck
Feb 18, 2011

by Nyc_Tattoo
Talking about misunderstanding of socioeconomic differences/privilege, has anyone done a thinkpeice on how great My Name Is Earl is at explaining what life is like for poor people and why they stay poor? I don't think there's another show that does that better outside of, well, The Wire, but The Wire is so much better at EVERYTHING so it doesn't really count.

DivisionPost
Jun 28, 2006

Nobody likes you.
Everybody hates you.
You're gonna lose.

Smile, you fuck.

zoux posted:

I think because those two wars have the most clearly identifiable bad guys, and "what if the bad guys win" is a compelling premise.

Also, twitter is applauding the utter wokeness of the premise but I think they are forgetting that Boondocks wasn't exactly perfectly non-problematic. I can't remember exactly, but didn't he spark a lot of controversy from time to time?

I can't remember exactly, but I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people felt that way about the MLK episode. But that's the thing: aiming to not be "problematic" can be a good thing, especially if it leads you to do your research, talk to people who aren't you, get their feelings, etcetera. But with certain subjects, no matter who you are, you can't avoid it. The only way you can really advance those conversations is through trial and error. That's why when I raise an objection to art on PC grounds, I try to remain civil about it, because there's always the possibility that fans of the work or even the artist just don't know any better. And they'll be more open to learning if you don't, you know, imply that you're writing them off as loving assholes.

That said, "civil" is kind of a dirty word if you're a member of an aggrieved party, since it's often code for "tell me quietly so it's easier for me to ignore you, <racial/sexual expletive of choice>." And there's always the matter of it being increasingly hard to be polite when you've been talking about the same drat thing for x amount of years and nobody seems to be listening. So I try not to hold anger against aggrieved parties. (People with no cultural dog in the fight, though? gently caress 'em.)

Anyway, point is, it doesn't matter much to me if MacGruder's problematic or not, because I've come to realize that being the most woke is a sucker's game. There are always complications, but if you treat people right, recognize and reject those who act maliciously, and seem to be coming from an overall good place, that's usually enough for me. I think that's the case for MacGruder, and I think that's also the case for Benioff and Weiss. The key difference between them is that I think MacGruder's project is way, way, WAY more interesting.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Snak
Oct 10, 2005

I myself will carry you to the Gates of Valhalla...
You will ride eternal,
shiny and chrome.
Grimey Drawer

lelandjs posted:

The first time I saw it I loved it, but after watching it again years later, when I was better educated about intraracial views, it kind of left a bad taste in my mouth.

Aaron McGruder has a lot of important things to say about race and culture, but he's coming from a relative place of privilege compared to he people he complains about in the Boondocks (and specifically that episode). I don't look down on white trailer trash and mock them for making poor financial decisions, I do what I can to help them (which admittedly isn't much, but I voted for Bernie for a reason).

Boondocks, in general, is edgy that way. It's angry and judgemental. Sometimes that's good for complacent or disillusioned people to hear, but of course it's also just kind of unproductive and uncouth. I think it gets a pass because it's also a comedy. It if was somehow 100% serious all the time, it would be bad.

You're probably right about that episode, I haven't seen it in years.

But, in general, what I think is a saving grace about Boondocks is that it's critical of Huey. Despite his often seeming to be the ideological mouthpiece of the show, the show also calls out his holier than thou attitude and simplification of complex issues. I always felt like the show was more about "this is where all these people are coming from" and less "this guy is right and all these other people are completely wrong". That it's less that "MLK is right in 'Return of the King'", and more "MLK would be upset with by his legacy". And I feel like that's a defensible claim. Being upset about the reality of things and acting out emotionally and pointing figures is a big theme in the show, it's rarely portrayed as the correct action.

  • Locked thread