Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

i wasn't a fan of "oscars so white" because it was a superficial campaign that ignored the deeper problem of racist (and sexist) hollywood casting practices while allowing people to feel good about tweeting a hashtag. but, at least public consciousness allowed one of the minor awards ceremonies to require diversity in casting in order to be considered. the oscars will be completely whitewashed next year because they did the same thing after "12 Years A Slave" swept, though

but i don't see "No Confederacy" as anything other than puritanical whining

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

get that OUT of my face posted:

i wasn't a fan of "oscars so white" because it was a superficial campaign that ignored the deeper problem of racist (and sexist) hollywood casting practices while allowing people to feel good about tweeting a hashtag. but, at least public consciousness allowed one of the minor awards ceremonies to require diversity in casting in order to be considered. the oscars will be completely whitewashed next year because they did the same thing after "12 Years A Slave" swept, though

but i don't see "No Confederacy" as anything other than puritanical whining

I keep recalling a good criticism of this sort of thing was about how the movie "Glory" focused too much on Matthew Broderick's character instead of Denzel Washington's or Morgan Freeman's. It was ebert that made note of that, and I think he was very much right. Not only was that wrong because it shifted away from the true heroes of the movie, but it also perhaps made the movie a little worse as a result .

I think that's a legitimate criticism. I also watched a "Looney tunes" cartoon that got banned because it was animated/directed in an insanely racist way. The sad thing about it was...the voice actors seemed to be very accomplished african americans, and the soundtrack was quite good. Yet, they told them to pretty much put on a "minstrel" show and it made it beyond disgusting to sit through.

These are things I like seeing addressed because they really need to be addressed. I imagine these sort of things STILL take place today.

e: Bob shitman is back btw

https://twitter.com/historyinflicks/status/892093262374240260

Baku
Aug 20, 2005

by Fluffdaddy

FuzzySkinner posted:

I wonder if being "woke" like this is just one giant con to get money out of rich, guilty bourgeious /aristocracy types at this point.

This is how crowdfunding works, which is basically the most capitalist thing of all

Every famous person under 50 on the right is doing it too

Arcteryx Anarchist
Sep 15, 2007

Fun Shoe
i dont think political punditry is anything new; same poo poo new models

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

I'm the guy who thinks going "Psssst" on Twitter when talking about abortion rights is like, a thing, that isn't condescending and embarrassing as gently caress

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

FuzzySkinner posted:

I keep recalling a good criticism of this sort of thing was about how the movie "Glory" focused too much on Matthew Broderick's character instead of Denzel Washington's or Morgan Freeman's. It was ebert that made note of that, and I think he was very much right. Not only was that wrong because it shifted away from the true heroes of the movie, but it also perhaps made the movie a little worse as a result .

I think that's a legitimate criticism. I also watched a "Looney tunes" cartoon that got banned because it was animated/directed in an insanely racist way. The sad thing about it was...the voice actors seemed to be very accomplished african americans, and the soundtrack was quite good. Yet, they told them to pretty much put on a "minstrel" show and it made it beyond disgusting to sit through.

These are things I like seeing addressed because they really need to be addressed. I imagine these sort of things STILL take place today.

e: Bob shitman is back btw

https://twitter.com/historyinflicks/status/892093262374240260

Bob's a liberal identerian technocrat who shits on anyone that isnt "smart and "tech savy" and "intellectual" like him, while loving worshiping nintendo like a God that can do no wrong and legit compares the Sega/Nintendo "war" as his "personal vietnam" and any game thats a FPS is a evil jock conservative simulator.

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

how can your head not explode from this much cognitive dissonance :psyduck:

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

comedyblissoption posted:

how can your head not explode from this much cognitive dissonance :psyduck:

because he is an idiot who desperetly thinks he is some galactic brain WOKE art critic so he can save gaming from the jocks and the GOP.

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012


I still don't understand this logic.

I've seen it use by the wokes, and it confuses me.

I would dance a loving jig if someone like Chuck Schumer got replaced by someone like Nina Turner. On the flipside? Would Bob, others support Sarah Palin over Joe Biden because one has female private parts and the other doesn't?

call to action
Jun 10, 2016

by FactsAreUseless

Do these folks not know that Obama deported more people than any other president, or do they just not care?

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

https://twitter.com/barrier_trio/status/891960809361776641

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

doesnt surprise me but the PSUV is terrible now and maduro is loving idiot monster.

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

Dapper_Swindler posted:

doesnt surprise me but the PSUV is terrible now and maduro is loving idiot monster.
he's more of a peronist than a socialist, but if you say the right words and shibboleths every so often, those speak louder than actions. that's plenty of tankies are condemning riots over in venezuela when they'd be cheering them if it were, say, an action against police brutality in the US

also lol at listing "fandoms" first

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

get that OUT of my face posted:

he's more of a peronist than a socialist, but if you say the right words and shibboleths every so often, those speak louder than actions. that's plenty of tankies are condemning riots over in venezuela when they'd be cheering them if it were, say, an action against police brutality in the US

also lol at listing "fandoms" first

sorry, i took you the wrong way. i am just sick of tankies.

got any sevens
Feb 9, 2013

by Cyrano4747

get that OUT of my face posted:

he's more of a peronist than a socialist, but if you say the right words and shibboleths every so often, those speak louder than actions. that's plenty of tankies are condemning riots over in venezuela when they'd be cheering them if it were, say, an action against police brutality in the US

also lol at listing "fandoms" first

riots against a democratically elected socialist = riots against police brutality?
:thunk:

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

got any sevens posted:

riots against a democratically elected socialist = riots against police brutality?
:thunk:
maduro and chavez aren't socialists

edit: and i'm pretty sure maduro was chavez's handpicked successor

get that OUT of my face has issued a correction as of 03:26 on Aug 1, 2017

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747
I'm the guy who thinks handing out weapons to crime gangs to act as extralegal security forces for a regime is totes cool and good.

some plague rats
Jun 5, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Byolante posted:

I'm the guy who thinks handing out weapons to crime gangs to act as extralegal security forces for a regime is totes cool and good.

Yeah yeah we all know how you feel about Honduras

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Byolante posted:

I'm the guy who thinks handing out weapons to crime gangs to act as extralegal security forces for a regime is totes cool and good.

but they wear red shirts so they must be good

some plague rats
Jun 5, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Badger of Basra posted:

but they wear red shirts so they must be good

Yeah and rather than de-baathify we can just wait for them all to fall in a volcano

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747

Badger of Basra posted:

but they wear red shirts so they must be good

I have it on good authority from a man who is totally not an insane sex pest that red is the best color and violently silencing any opposition is the only way to deal with counter revolutionaries

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

got any sevens posted:

riots against a democratically elected socialist

you know jack poo poo about Venezuela

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

call to action posted:

Do these folks not know that Obama deported more people than any other president, or do they just not care?
speaking pretty and pumping your decorum stat counts more than what you actually do for a lot of people

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

got any sevens posted:

riots against a democratically elected socialist = riots against police brutality?
:thunk:

lol

if u can't riot against a leader, he is not democratic, fuckface

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

steinrokkan posted:

lol

if u can't riot against a leader, he is not democratic, fuckface

don't sign your posts

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747

steinrokkan posted:

lol

if u can't riot against a leader, he is not democratic, fuckface

Could I just append this to say its ok at your riot to throw a chair through the front window of a bank, but not the chippy where I get my dinner

ugh its Troika
May 2, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
lol at jill stein white knighting North Korea on a major news network

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

ugh its Troika posted:

lol at jill stein white knighting North Korea on a major news network

seriously. doesnt surprise me much. she is tankie dipshit.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

ugh its Troika posted:

lol at jill stein white knighting North Korea on a major news network

I find myself frustrated with people who I am (idealogically speaking) aligned with, but disagree with them on things related to that manner.

Matt Christman for example, was talking about how the collapse of the Soviet Union was a bad thing for the people there (Lower life expectancy, lower quality of living), and I just really couldn't disagree more. While perhaps statistically that may be true? The Soviet Union was a very flawed state, and the people their deserved greater freedoms. (The flip side? We deserve a higher life expectancy, higher quality of living)

R.L. Stephens and others in the DSA are discussing the elimination of the police, jails. While I understand their perspective, again? Couldn't disagree more. (If the discussion is related to eliminating and then replacing them with a better run system? I think I'd be on board with that).

I don't know if that makes me a bad lefty though. I feel on board with a great percentage of what they're about, but it feels like there's some rivers I just cannot cross.

edit: It's not that I find these people "bad". Quite the opposite, I actually admire them, but there's just these bumps in the road I'm noticing.

FuzzySkinner has issued a correction as of 21:35 on Aug 1, 2017

Guy Goodbody
Aug 31, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
When people* say the collapse of the Soviet Union was bad for Russian people, they don't mean the Soviet Union was good. They mean the wholesale dismantling of the country by gangsters and capitalists and con-men was bad. The collapse of the Soviet Union turned Russia into a hosed up oligarchy with one of the highest rates of inequality in the world.

It's like, the Iraq War was bad for the Iraqi people. That doesn't mean that Saddam was good.


*not counting tankies

FuriousxGeorge
Aug 8, 2007

We've been the best team all year.

They're just finding out.

FuzzySkinner posted:

I find myself frustrated with people who I am (idealogically speaking) aligned with, but disagree with them on things related to that manner.

Matt Christman for example, was talking about how the collapse of the Soviet Union was a bad thing for the people there (Lower life expectancy, lower quality of living), and I just really couldn't disagree more. While perhaps statistically that may be true? The Soviet Union was a very flawed state, and the people their deserved greater freedoms. (The flip side? We deserve a higher life expectancy, higher quality of living)

R.L. Stephens and others in the DSA are discussing the elimination of the police, jails. While I understand their perspective, again? Couldn't disagree more. (If the discussion is related to eliminating and then replacing them with a better run system? I think I'd be on board with that).

I don't know if that makes me a bad lefty though. I feel on board with a great percentage of what they're about, but it feels like there's some rivers I just cannot cross.

edit: It's not that I find these people "bad". Quite the opposite, I actually admire them, but there's just these bumps in the road I'm noticing.



Some portions of the extreme left often run into the Ron Paul problem. You can listen to them for five minutes and agree with everything they say but after that you are in total crazytown.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Guy Goodbody posted:

When people* say the collapse of the Soviet Union was bad for Russian people, they don't mean the Soviet Union was good. They mean the wholesale dismantling of the country by gangsters and capitalists and con-men was bad. The collapse of the Soviet Union turned Russia into a hosed up oligarchy with one of the highest rates of inequality in the world.

It's like, the Iraq War was bad for the Iraqi people. That doesn't mean that Saddam was good.


*not counting tankies

If the argument is that? I'm on loving board. Absolutely. That's something I'm opposed to here in the states and abroad.

FuriousxGeorge posted:

Some portions of the extreme left often run into the Ron Paul problem. You can listen to them for five minutes and agree with everything they say but after that you are in total crazytown.

Well and I don't ever want to consider myself a "centrist" because that's not exactly the best thing in the current political climate.

In theory? Perhaps I would be. But the political spectrum has been shifted to far right that the only options are Rockefeller Republican/Reagan Republican. So by default? I'm actually to the "far left" of most people with political power.

I think for example protecting people's civil liberties, ensuring private property and having a bill of rights are cool/good things. But these types of things would likely put me at odds with people who I agree on quite a few economic matters on. So it's..kinda confusing in a lot of ways.

FuriousxGeorge
Aug 8, 2007

We've been the best team all year.

They're just finding out.
Yeah, I'm in the same boat. At least with the left you get the sense they care about somebody other than themselves most of the time, that is the central redeeming quality to me.

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

FuriousxGeorge posted:

Yeah, I'm in the same boat. At least with the left you get the sense they care about somebody other than themselves most of the time, that is the central redeeming quality to me.

Who's "the left" in this sentence? Because with Democrats, I don't' get that feeling at all.

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747
My main concern with the currently direction of most of the left is the absolute belief that taking away personal freedoms from people who don't think right is a virtuous thing. Just yesterday a #resistance woke on twitter stepped up to tell Chelsea Manning if she didn't start supporting Kamala Harris for 2020 she should be sent back to jail for standing in the way of racial and sexual justice. It feels like I have fallen into the videoclip for take me to church with the sort of people leading the idpol left.

HIJK
Nov 25, 2012
in the room where you sleep

Byolante posted:

My main concern with the currently direction of most of the left is the absolute belief that taking away personal freedoms from people who don't think right is a virtuous thing. Just yesterday a #resistance woke on twitter stepped up to tell Chelsea Manning if she didn't start supporting Kamala Harris for 2020 she should be sent back to jail for standing in the way of racial and sexual justice. It feels like I have fallen into the videoclip for take me to church with the sort of people leading the idpol left.

The new Inquisition is raring to go.

sword_man.gif
Apr 12, 2007

Fun Shoe

Byolante posted:

My main concern with the currently direction of most of the left is the absolute belief that taking away personal freedoms from people who don't think right is a virtuous thing. Just yesterday a #resistance woke on twitter stepped up to tell Chelsea Manning if she didn't start supporting Kamala Harris for 2020 she should be sent back to jail for standing in the way of racial and sexual justice. It feels like I have fallen into the videoclip for take me to church with the sort of people leading the idpol left.

it's that kind of poo poo that's left me tired of the whole loving thing. and you can't say a goddamn word because then suddenly you love trump and want to melt transsexuals in acid.

i'm sick of both goddamn sides of this poo poo. everybody's lost their goddamn minds and it feels like you can't listen to a single person because they demand you either dedicate yourself full maga or dedicate yourself full whatever the gently caress the democrats want.

Arcteryx Anarchist
Sep 15, 2007

Fun Shoe
I don't think the #resistance is "left"

I'm pretty sure it's the the millennial demographic campaign of the democratic party

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sword_man.gif
Apr 12, 2007

Fun Shoe
the only people i want to melt in acid are the dipshits - on both sides - waging an idiotic twitter war

  • Locked thread