Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
AstraSage
May 13, 2013

qkkl posted:

Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world. If I were Maduro I would ask the Russians or Chinese for help in building more oil wells. Then I'd make the country better by just pumping all that oil money into the economy, and skim a bit off the top for me and my friends. Now I have tons of money and my people love me and ask me to kiss their babies.

The Government has tried to get Russia and China to renew all the extraction points in the past, but those nations have found importing Venezuelan Oil costs too much for almost no profit (Especially when Russia has better Oil sources in its own territory), hence why China is no longer lending money.

And like Labradoodle said, the Government loves to take the Lion's Share out of everything without actually working for it, hence why all their seized companies has been driven to near bankrupt so far...

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ryde
Sep 9, 2011

God I love young girls

Bob le Moche posted:

This is such a bad faith thing to complain about when I was responding to someone WHO WAS LITERALLY COMPLAINING THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAD DONE STUFF IN ORDER TO BOOST THEIR POPULARITY AFTER BEING ELECTED.

You're simplifying my argument here by leaving out the point that I was criticizing expropriation for short-term benefits. Thats a far cry of complaining about "doing stuff to boost their popularity." That's a pretty dishonest framing of what I said.

Bob le Moche posted:

I didn't expect it to be that contentious to point out that in theory that is kind of the entire point of democracy?

Its not the entire point of democracy. Popularity has to be balanced with other concerns. Some of the other concerns includes human rights and ensuring the long-term viability of the state. Democracy is to serve the interests of the public in general, which may not align with whats popular. I shouldn't expect that to be contentious.

qkkl
Jul 1, 2013

by FactsAreUseless
If Maduro actually wants to make Venezuela better, then I understand why he's stifling the opposition. The problem in Venezuela is the economy is too dependent on oil. The goal of any Venezuelan government, regardless of party, would be to diversify the economy, if it had Venezuelan's best interests in mind. Therefore since the actions of any government would be the same, then having elections is pointless and just slows things down. Elections would become useful once the situation improves and there is no longer one big issue that needs to be addressed.

This same reasoning is why Stalin's policies are regarded to overall be good for the USSR, even though he killed a lot of people.

JailTrump
Jul 14, 2017

by FactsAreUseless

qkkl posted:

If Maduro actually wants to make Venezuela better, then I understand why he's stifling the opposition. The problem in Venezuela is the economy is too dependent on oil. The goal of any Venezuelan government, regardless of party, would be to diversify the economy, if it had Venezuelan's best interests in mind. Therefore since the actions of any government would be the same, then having elections is pointless and just slows things down. Elections would become useful once the situation improves and there is no longer one big issue that needs to be addressed.

This same reasoning is why Stalin's policies are regarded to overall be good for the USSR, even though he killed a lot of people.

Lol is this a loving joke?

Ghost of Mussolini
Jun 26, 2011

JailTrump posted:

Lol is this a loving joke?

He's right though, even if literal stalinists were in charge, the administration of the Venezuelan state would not be an incompetent shitshow on the level it is now.

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong

Ghost of Mussolini posted:

He's right though, even if literal stalinists were in charge, the administration of the Venezuelan state would not be an incompetent shitshow on the level it is now.

The Soviets at least knew how to keep their oil industry afloat, that's for sure. Soviet oil tankers weren't getting blocked from ports across the world because they spilled a huge chunk of their oil while being loaded due to rusty pipes, unlike modern Venezuelan tankers.

MullardEL34
Sep 30, 2008

Basking in the cathode glow

fishmech posted:

The Soviets at least knew how to keep their oil industry afloat, that's for sure. Soviet oil tankers weren't getting blocked from ports across the world because they spilled a huge chunk of their oil while being loaded due to rusty pipes, unlike modern Venezuelan tankers.
PDVSA is the Groverhaus of oil companies.

DoctorStrangelove
Jun 7, 2012

IT WOULD NOT BE DIFFICULT MEIN FUHRER!

MullardEL34 posted:

PDVSA is the Groverhaus of oil companies.

Venezuela's economy is being held up by load-bearing drywall.

Chuck Boone
Feb 12, 2009

El Turpial
A couple of news from the day:

  • Leopoldo Lopez's family released a video that he recorded on July 17 in the event that he were to be dragged out of his home in the middle of the night by the political police and put back in prison. In the video, Lopez calls on Venezuelans to not lose hope, and argues that Venezuelans should continue to strive for the goals set out in the July 16 plebiscite (a rejection of the Constituent Assembly, a renewal of public institutions, and immediate general elections). Here is the video, and my translation is below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJejFGjOTAY

    quote:

    Leopoldo Lopez: On February 12, 2014, I had to record a message like this because there was an arrest warrant against me only because I had spoken out against this corrupt, inefficient, anti-democratic, torturous and repressive regime. After that day, I spent six days in hiding and then decided to hand myself over to the unjust justice. From that day–February 18, 2014–until July 8 of 2017, I was a prisoner in the Ramo Verde prison. I spent a lot of time in isolation.

    More than half the time that I spent there I spent under unjustified punishments. I was the victim of cruel treatment and abuses of power. They tried to humiliate me and to break me down. However, due to my determination to [continue] this struggle, both in terms of being part of the political vanguard but also in terms of simply wanting a better country, I understand that I have to [make sacrifices]. I remained firm, always accompanied by Lilian. I would hear her yelling in the distance [outside of the prison] when they would not let her in. I always knew that she was there, [along with] my children, my immediate family, my mother, my team, and millions of Venezuelans.

    Today, three and a half years after that day, I am in my home. I am still a prisoner. Here is the electronic anklet that they put on me [raises foot to show electronic monitoring anklet]. However, the fact that I am a prisoner in my home makes me think that those who imprisoned me in 2014 and brought me back to my home could take me prisoner again. That is why, the day that I came home, I asked (VP director) Freddy Guevara to tell Venezuelans on my behalf that if my struggle for convictions, for a free and democratic society, placed me back in prison, then I would take that risk.

    If you’re watching this video right now, it is precisely because that is what happened. They came back, and put me in prison again illegally. I am a prisoner of conscience. I am in prison for my thoughts and for wanting a better Venezuela. That is the state of Venezuela today. That is how our country is today. We are millions of Venezuelans who are imprisoned today.

    I want to tell you all that this struggle is worth it. I am recording this message alongside Lilian, because we are in this together as a family. At the time that this video comes out, we may have already revealed that we have another reason here to fight for Venezuela [rubs Lilian’s belly, suggesting that she is pregnant]. This has been one of the best piece of news that I have received–no! The best piece of news that I have received over these past three and a half years. Despite this bond that we have as a family, I am willing to move forward and continue to tell Venezuelans about what I consider to be a way forward towards freedom and democracy.

    I am recording this message today, July 17, a few days before a project to annihilate the republic takes shape: the National Constituent Assembly. I am convinced that this project should not take place. On July 16, yesterday, we got a clear message, a mandate that was very clear: to reject the Constituent Assembly and to move ahead towards a democratic republic through the renewal of public institutions and free elections for all Venezuelans. This way, which was put forward by Venezuelans on July 16, is the one that we should follow and the one that I invite all of you to follow.

    However, beyond the talking about the way forward, I want to talk to all of you from my heart. I want to talk to every Venezuelan, here and around the world, who wants to fight for a better Venezuela. Fighting for a better Venezuela is worthwhile.

    Let us not give up our struggle. We must never surrender. We must never tire of wanting a better Venezuela. We must never stop dreaming, or stop being idealists. Let us never stop imaging that Venezuela which I’m sure all of you watching have imagined in your own way. You’ve imagined better hospitals, schools, highway, markets. You’ve imagined a prosperous life, and the ability to have social mobility. You have visualized graduating from university, and seeing your children graduate from university. You have visualized Venezuela’s fields full of the fruits of our labour, a Venezuela full of opportunities and jobs. Each of you [has done this] in your own way, depending on your expectations. But we all share that idea that we can be a better country.

    Whenever you feel sad, defrauded, and frustrated by what is happening, I invite you to stick to that idea: that we can have a better Venezuela. I am sending you a message of optimism, strength and faith, so that we may make sure to stay on the right side of this history that we are writing, which is the history of a people who are fighting for a free and democratic Venezuela where all rights belong to all people.

    Be strong, brothers and sisters. Be strong, and have faith. Long live the people of Venezuela. Gloria al bravo pueblo que el yugo lanzo [a line from the national anthem; it means, “Glory to the brake people who shook off the yoke”].

    God bless our country, Venezuela.

  • Three PSUV deputies have defected from the regime block in parliament (which is called the Gran Polo Patriotico) and have formed their own block, which they are calling the Socialist Parliamentary Bloc. The deputies are splitting because they don't agree with Maduro's drive towards authoritarianism as manifested through the Constituent Assembly vote. The three deputies are German Ferrer (who is also the attorney general's husband), Ivonne Tellez and Eustoquio Contreras. At the National Assembly today, Contreras gave his reasons for leaving the regime bloc:

    quote:

    We are socialists, and we are defending Chavez’s ideals. We share the strategic goals of every chavista, but we have differences [with the PSUV] about how to administrate [matters] day-to-day in the dynamic climate in which Venezuela lives.

    (...)

    [On the Constituent Assembly]: We [PSUV deputies] were never consulted about this, and neither were the Venezuelan people who have the original sovereign power.

    As you can imagine, this is big news because we now have three deputies on record saying that as socialists, they cannot stand by the Maduro regime. The regime bloc in parliament was 55 deputies, and it is now 52. The opposition bloc is now 115 deputies.

  • As someone in the thread mentioned earlier (sorry, I wasn't able to find the post--thank you, whoever you are!), one of the five heads of the Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE), rector Rondon, gave a press conference today in which he explained the fact that the CNE violated and ignored its own internal anti-voter fraud regulations during the Constituent Assembly vote. For this reason, Rondon says that we can't be sure that fraud did not occur.

    Rondon explained that the CNE conducted 10 fewer audits for the Constituent Assembly than it did for the 2015 parliamentary elections. He said that anti-fraud measures and checks "were for the most part bent and in some cases even eliminated" for Sunday's vote. He decried the fact that the CNE did not use indelible ink, and that it allowed voters to vote at any voting centre in their municipalities instead of the ones in which they were registered (the point of voting only in the centre in which you are registered being that you can't vote in any other centre--you get one vote, and you can only cast it in one place).

    Rondon also said that in previous elections, the CNE would post the results of the election (including audit sheets with the total number of votes from each voting table in the country, as well as the total number of votes earned by each candidate). The point of this is to have a transparent electoral system open to public scrutiny. For this election, Rondon pointed out, the CNE did not post this information on its website. Instead, it presented it directly to Maduro.

A couple of takeaways from today's news: there are critical voices inside the regime itself telling us that what Maduro is doing is not O.K. The PSUV deputies who defected have clearly stated that they do not believe that Maduro represents the best interests of the socialist or the chavista project in Venezuela. One of the people in charge of electoral processes in the country is telling us that safety checks to ensure voter fraud does not take place were "bent" and "eliminated" for the Constituent Assembly election. What these people are showing is something that has been obvious for a long time: it is possible to be a leftist and not be a Maduro supporter. Those two things can be true simultaneously.

Shnooks posted:

Do you think the US will ever welcome Venezuelans as refugees?
This is an interesting question and I want to try to attempt to provide somewhat of an answer with the caveat that I'm a little rusty on human rights law (but I did TA a course on it last year!).

We have to be careful with terms. The term "refugee" is a legal category that is set out in a 1951 UN convention. Anyone can claim refugee status in any country signatory to the convention (I think most countries have signed and ratified the document). The 1951 convention defines a refugee as someone who:

quote:

... owing to well founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.
A Venezuelan person can claim refugee status in the US, but all that means is that a refugee board has to make a determination regarding whether or not that person fits the definition above. That refugee board may accept the person's claim and grant them refugee status, or deny the claim and send them back to Venezuela. These determinations are, again, made by a refugee board on a case-by-case basis.

All of this is a really convoluted way of saying that I think the answer to your question is "maybe". I know that one of Leopoldo Lopez's co-accused, Marco Coello, has applied for asylum in the United States (meaning, he claims to be a refugee because he claims to have a "well founded fear of being persecuted..."). If Coello can prove to the U.S. government that he is being persecuted for his "political opinion" and he is fearful of returning to Venezuela, then he could be granted refugee status. Of course, now that Trump is in office, who knows where any of this (or anything else, for that matter) could end up.

qkkl posted:

If Maduro actually wants to make Venezuela better,
He doesn't. Maduro is not interested in governing for the benefit of Venezuelans. He is only interested in maintaining power for his own benefit and that of the elites around him.

To give you just one example, the Maduro regime has refused on numerous occassions to admit that there are food and medicine shortages in Venezuela amounting to a humanitarian crisis. Maduro has even turned humanitarian aid offers away for no other reason than admitting that there is a crisis would be an admission of his failure as president.

Chuck Boone fucked around with this message at 03:58 on Aug 2, 2017

qkkl
Jul 1, 2013

by FactsAreUseless

Chuck Boone posted:

He doesn't. Maduro is not interested in governing for the benefit of Venezuelans. He is only interested in maintaining power for his own benefit and that of the elites around him.

To give you just one example, the Maduro regime has refused on numerous occassions to admit that there are food and medicine shortages in Venezuela amounting to a humanitarian crisis. Maduro has even turned humanitarian aid offers away for no other reason than admitting that there is a crisis would be an admission of his failure as president.

I've read up on Maduro refusing free food and medicine, and I think the issue is deeper than just Maduro being evil. Giving Venezuelans free food and medicine is like giving ducks bread; they will get used to getting free food, and will become dependent on foreign aid. Maduro clearly does not want Venezuela to be dependent on Western nations. So he is refusing aid in order to force Venezuela to become self-sufficient for food and medicine.

The problem is it seems that Maduro's plan to solve the food crisis is for the people to grow their own food, essentially the socialist utopian "farmer society" fantasy. We all know how those experiments turn out. Unfortunately I think it's too late for Venezuelans to do anything about it since they've been starved for over a year and thus won't be able to put up much of a fight against Maduro.

If I were Trump I would continue to show that I'm against Maduro in the media, but secretly hope that a humanitarian crisis does unfold in Venezuela that would justify US intervention and the installment of a puppet government sympathetic to US interests.

Amused to Death
Aug 10, 2009

google "The Night Witches", and prepare for :stare:
Lopez's video gives me the biggest mix of sorrowful and optimistic emotions

Chuck Boone
Feb 12, 2009

El Turpial

qkkl posted:

I've read up on Maduro refusing free food and medicine, and I think the issue is deeper than just Maduro being evil. Giving Venezuelans free food and medicine is like giving ducks bread; they will get used to getting free food, and will become dependent on foreign aid. Maduro clearly does not want Venezuela to be dependent on Western nations. So he is refusing aid in order to force Venezuela to become self-sufficient for food and medicine.
You are ascribing to Maduro a whole range of motivations and intentions that are counter-factual.

Maduro isn't "evil". He doesn't do the things that he is doing because he is "evil". He does them because he is interested in remaining in power, no matter what the cost. If it means killing protesters, jailing opposition leaders and rigging elections, then so be it: power no matter what the cost. To suggest that Maduro does what he does because he is "evil" completely obscures the complexity of the situation. More to the point, Maduro's excuse for not receiving humanitarian aid is that according to him, there isn't a humanitarian crisis in Venezuela (check the links that I posted earlier with regime officials stating this).

I don't mean to offend you, but the rest of your post reads like the opinion of someone who is not at all informed about Venezuelan political history or the Bolivarian movement. I'm not coming down on you for not being informed, but I would encourage you to do some reading on these topics before giving your opinion on them. Not knowing about a topic is fine, because no one can possibly know about everything. But trying to have a conversation about a topic that you don't know about as if you did know about it is not productive.

One of the fundamental pillars of chavismo is direct subsidized food, medicine and housing for Venezuelans. The government spends most of its budget running massive social programs that, at least on paper, are designed precisely to "keep giving ducks bread" by providing them with free housing and healthcare, as well as food at very low, subsidized prices. So, again, your claim is simply counter-factual.

EDIT: Not to beat keep beating a dead horse, but on "Maduro clearly does not want Venezuela to be dependent on Western nations": Venezuela gets 97%+ of its income from oil sales to Western nations, mostly the United States. Chavismo has been in power for nearly 20 years, and despite this it never cared to invest its astronomical oil earnings into diversifying the economy to avoid relying on others for income. Maduro and Chavez before him never really cared about where their money was coming from, as long as it kept coming.

Chuck Boone fucked around with this message at 05:07 on Aug 2, 2017

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

qkkl posted:

he is refusing aid in order to force Venezuela to become self-sufficient for food and medicine.

LOL I think you've probably put way more thought into this than Maduro has.

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

Imagine if Donald Trump was a pretend socialist instead of a pretend conservative and there were no legislative checks on his power.

You need to import raw materials, farm equipment, factory machinery, seeds, fertilizer, etc. to have a viable agricultural industry and the Maduro government has essentially destroyed most of those possibilities with hyperinflation of the currency and confiscating businesses that are handed to his cronies which rarely reopen. It's basically one big "going out of business" sale for the entire country and they're picking it clean before it collapses.

fnox
May 19, 2013



qkkl posted:

I've read up on Maduro refusing free food and medicine, and I think the issue is deeper than just Maduro being evil. Giving Venezuelans free food and medicine is like giving ducks bread; they will get used to getting free food, and will become dependent on foreign aid. Maduro clearly does not want Venezuela to be dependent on Western nations. So he is refusing aid in order to force Venezuela to become self-sufficient for food and medicine.

The problem is it seems that Maduro's plan to solve the food crisis is for the people to grow their own food, essentially the socialist utopian "farmer society" fantasy. We all know how those experiments turn out. Unfortunately I think it's too late for Venezuelans to do anything about it since they've been starved for over a year and thus won't be able to put up much of a fight against Maduro.

If I were Trump I would continue to show that I'm against Maduro in the media, but secretly hope that a humanitarian crisis does unfold in Venezuela that would justify US intervention and the installment of a puppet government sympathetic to US interests.

No you moron. He's giving them "free" food, because he made finding food extremely hard. He uses hunger as a way to control the masses, "support me or you're not eating". Venezuela IS dependent on Western nations because all this "free" food actually comes from Mexico, Argentina and the US, he destroyed all local production of food, which used to be sufficient to cover the country's demands.

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

Since Venezuela is a petro-state which discovered oil in the 1940s, most of its economic growth has centered around petroleum production and industry. It has always been a net importer of food, mostly from Colombia and the US. In 2004 agriculture was about 5% of the GDP and 10% of the labor force. As of 2005, 3% of proprietors owned about 70% of the agricultural land, which is one of the heaviest land concentration in Latin America. The Venezuelan government has responded to this by confiscating huge tracts of it and handing it over to urban poor families. The problem is that they need to import tractors, harvesters, tools, seeds, cement for silos, etc. and they can't do that because Venezuela's currency isn't worth dog poo poo and the government isn't concerned with helping them either at this point. There are many parallels to Robert Mugabe in the sense that he caused massive famine and hyperinflation due to a poor understanding of economics and agricultural policy.

qkkl
Jul 1, 2013

by FactsAreUseless

Chuck Boone posted:

You are ascribing to Maduro a whole range of motivations and intentions that are counter-factual.

Maduro isn't "evil". He doesn't do the things that he is doing because he is "evil". He does them because he is interested in remaining in power, no matter what the cost. If it means killing protesters, jailing opposition leaders and rigging elections, then so be it: power no matter what the cost. To suggest that Maduro does what he does because he is "evil" completely obscures the complexity of the situation. More to the point, Maduro's excuse for not receiving humanitarian aid is that according to him, there isn't a humanitarian crisis in Venezuela (check the links that I posted earlier with regime officials stating this).

I don't mean to offend you, but the rest of your post reads like the opinion of someone who is not at all informed about Venezuelan political history or the Bolivarian movement. I'm not coming down on you for not being informed, but I would encourage you to do some reading on these topics before giving your opinion on them. Not knowing about a topic is fine, because no one can possibly know about everything. But trying to have a conversation about a topic that you don't know about as if you did know about it is not productive.

One of the fundamental pillars of chavismo is direct subsidized food, medicine and housing for Venezuelans. The government spends most of its budget running massive social programs that, at least on paper, are designed precisely to "keep giving ducks bread" by providing them with free housing and healthcare, as well as food at very low, subsidized prices. So, again, your claim is simply counter-factual.

EDIT: Not to beat keep beating a dead horse, but on "Maduro clearly does not want Venezuela to be dependent on Western nations": Venezuela gets 97%+ of its income from oil sales to Western nations, mostly the United States. Chavismo has been in power for nearly 20 years, and despite this it never cared to invest its astronomical oil earnings into diversifying the economy to avoid relying on others for income. Maduro and Chavez before him never really cared about where their money was coming from, as long as it kept coming.

I think I see now. Maduro is part of the party that promised cheap food, medicine, and housing for all. However recently it has become impossible for the Venezuelan government to give everyone cheap essentials because it didn't make enough money from oil. So obviously the populace is going to vote out the party that failed to keep its promises, but Maduro doesn't want to leave.

fnox posted:

No you moron. He's giving them "free" food, because he made finding food extremely hard. He uses hunger as a way to control the masses, "support me or you're not eating". Venezuela IS dependent on Western nations because all this "free" food actually comes from Mexico, Argentina and the US, he destroyed all local production of food, which used to be sufficient to cover the country's demands.

Ah, this confirms by belief. Maduro thought he could remain popular by giving everyone free essentials, which was possible at the time because of favorable oil prices. When oil prices dropped, his plan fell apart. Another potential socialist utopia ruined by reality.

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

A few months ago the Venezuelans in this thread were talking about the illegal mining operations that are being set up around the country now that the rule of law has totally collapsed. It's basically like a company town with organized gangs or mafias running the show. Very similar to the situation we saw in the Congo/Liberia/Sierra Leon. About 90% of Venezuela's gold is now produced by these illegal mines, and it's causing a lot of deforestation and environmental problems.

I cannot stress just how badly the rule of law has collapsed in Venezuela. A lot of the national police will stop protesters to rob them before driving them off. They will break into apartment blocks and rob the inhabitants while in uniform. Many Venezuelans have turned to lynching robbers because the police don't care. People are absolutely desperate and they are never more desperate when they are starving and their families are starving.

fnox
May 19, 2013



Sergg posted:

Since Venezuela is a petro-state which discovered oil in the 1940s, most of its economic growth has centered around petroleum production and industry. It has always been a net importer of food, mostly from Colombia and the US. In 2004 agriculture was about 5% of the GDP and 10% of the labor force. As of 2005, 3% of proprietors owned about 70% of the agricultural land, which is one of the heaviest land concentration in Latin America. The Venezuelan government has responded to this by confiscating huge tracts of it and handing it over to urban poor families. The problem is that they need to import tractors, harvesters, tools, seeds, cement for silos, etc. and they can't do that because Venezuela's currency isn't worth dog poo poo and the government isn't concerned with helping them either at this point. There are many parallels to Robert Mugabe in the sense that he caused massive famine and hyperinflation due to a poor understanding of economics and agricultural policy.

Yes we've always been a net importer, but not of everything. Coffee production used to more than satisfy the country's needs, most meat and poultry consumed in the country was locally sourced, milk and milk derivates used to be readily available. Seriously, I remember what was like going to the supermarket in 1999, you could find anything, and you could for the most part afford anything, I would go to visit my family in Margarita (Which is an island that is tax exempt) to buy imported candy at local prices. Comparably, the last time I saw a Venezuelan supermarket in 2016, it was on one side flanked with imported products (And I'm talking poo poo products like Spam, Campbell soup, Mountain Dew) at prices so insane nobody could possibly buy them, and on the other side, whatever remained of what was regulated; an entirely empty aisle where milk, eggs, and other foodstuffs used to be. I would have to literally stop working to queue up in a neighbouring supermarket if toilet paper arrived there.

qkkl posted:

Ah, this confirms by belief. Maduro thought he could remain popular by giving everyone free essentials, which was possible at the time because of favorable oil prices. When oil prices dropped, his plan fell apart. Another potential socialist utopia ruined by reality.

His plan didn't fall apart, he didn't do it because he thought it was good policy, he did it (and does it still) because he can much readily control people through hunger. The crisis has been intentionally made worse by them.

Chuck Boone
Feb 12, 2009

El Turpial

qkkl posted:

I think I see now. Maduro is part of the party that promised cheap food, medicine, and housing for all. However recently it has become impossible for the Venezuelan government to give everyone cheap essentials because it didn't make enough money from oil. So obviously the populace is going to vote out the party that failed to keep its promises, but Maduro doesn't want to leave.

Yes, this is much closer to the point.

Venezuela enjoyed oil prices at historic highs for the first ten years of Chavez's tenure. A barrel of crude cost about $17 in December 1998 when Chavez was voted in. The price of oil in July 2008 was about $138 per barrel. For that first decade, Venezuela brought in more and more oil money each year. Chavez used this money to build a huge state that, as I said, provided much-needed relief for Venezuela's poor in the form of free housing and other subsidies. When oil prices began to tank at the end of 2008 and then in 2014, the government suddenly found itself struggling to provide these services. Worse than that, though, is the fact that the government had mismanaged the economy to the point that Venezuela barely produces any food today and relies almost exclusively on imports. When the money ran out for social programs, it also ran out for food and medicine imports.

For Maduro, admitting that there is a humanitarian crisis (i.e., that the country needs help feeding itself and providing medical assistance to its citizens) would mean having to admit that it screwed up. For Maduro, the choice is simple: there is no humanitarian crisis.

Poll after poll after poll since 2014 have shown that Venezuelans overwhelmingly reject Maduro's tenure as president and his PSUV party. One of the reasons why Venezuelans have been protesting and dying since April 1 of this year is that we want to go to the polls to elect a new government, but Maduro won't let that happen. The regime held an election on Sunday that it rigged from the start. It forced the election on Venezuelans illegally (by not holding a referendum prior to the election), and as I said in my earlier posts, the state institution in charge of the election has come out and said that it can't even be sure that the vote wasn't rigged because it ignored so many of its own internal checks and regulations.

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

Sergg posted:

You guys realize that either Maduro is going to falsify the results or just ignore the results and continue to rule as a dictator, right?

^^I wrote this last month^^

I think every Venezuelan in here knew it was true on some level.

fnox
May 19, 2013



Sergg posted:

^^I wrote this last month^^

I think every Venezuelan in here knew it was true on some level.

I don't believe the constituent assembly benefits Maduro in any way. It's by far the most brazen display of autocracy from his government, and it has single-handedly destroyed any plausible deniability he had, as demonstrated by the escalation in international outrage. Besides, it gives him powers he already had, so it serves no benefit strategically either.

I think the constituent assembly did nothing but seal his fate. He is a dictator in the eyes of the world now, undeniably so, and he will go down.

Der Waffle Mous
Nov 27, 2009

In the grim future, there is only commerce.
As someone who's been kinda bad about keeping up with this thread before big parts of leftist Twitter started suddenly caring about democracy in Venezuela is there a good summary of what's been happening since the OP?

Like I have a grasp on what's going on but I feel like I need some things explained to me simply. Like what were the elections that were cancelled and whether or not my read of the 2015 election wiki was that Maduro basically created a new branch of government to neuter parliament was correct.

Edit: and also exactly what the constituent assembly is beyond the probable electoral fraud.

ugh its Troika
May 2, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Der Waffle Mous posted:

As someone who's been kinda bad about keeping up with this thread before big parts of leftist Twitter started suddenly caring about democracy in Venezuela is there a good summary of what's been happening since the OP?

Like I have a grasp on what's going on but I feel like I need some things explained to me simply. Like what were the elections that were cancelled and whether or not my read of the 2015 election wiki was that Maduro basically created a new branch of government to neuter parliament was correct.

Edit: and also exactly what the constituent assembly is beyond the probable electoral fraud.

The constituent assembly exists to write a new constitution, presumably to make Maduro dictator for life.

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

The elections were a recall referendum against Maduro that followed Constitutional procedures which he cancelled and regional elections.

In 2015 he packed the Supreme Court with his own judges and simply ruled by decree. Anything the Legislature passed was simply struck down by his cronies on the court, and all of Maduro's decrees were ruled constitutional. This new Constituent Assembly is supposed to replace the Constitution that Chavez wrote. It allegedly has governing authority over every branch of government but it was held illegally without a plebiscite. Just weeks prior, the Venezuelan opposition held their own non-binding plebiscite in which 7 million people voted overwhelmingly to say they didn't want a new Constitution, but Maduro went ahead with this anyways. It's basically a way to continue ruling as a dictator with a thin veneer of legal legitimacy.

sudo rm -rf
Aug 2, 2011


$ mv fullcommunism.sh
/america
$ cd /america
$ ./fullcommunism.sh


Bob le Moche posted:

The only reason I became a "tankie" (which I guess is what anti-imperialists are called in this thread?) is because, as a North American, I've always made an effort to try to keep myself informed about my country's foreign policy and participation in wars, and to be able to understand the international conflicts it was involved in. Over the years, again and again, I noticed a pattern where at the beginning of any conflict, literally everyone, whether it was conservatives or liberals or social democrats, bought into the justification for wars and foreign intervention and repeated any propaganda that could sell the war as a humanitarian operation to save freedom and democracy or go after terrorits and WMDs or whatever. Only for the outcome of such operations to always lead to more suffering disaster and ruin, for the narratives that justified them to be exposed as pure fabrications, and for everyone who cheered about the war to go silent about the outcomes and move on to the next jingoistic venture.

As part of this pattern I also noticed that any dissenting voice, or anyone who raised doubts about the justifications for intervention, was systematically discredited, silenced and shamed, and automatically painted as a supporter of the evil brown/oriental dictator we just had to do something about. But because over the years it was becoming clear that these few anti-imperialists were in fact the people who were correct, over and over again, every time, and that everyone else was content to keep doing the same thing but expecting different results, I actually started looking into what those people believed and what their perspective was, how they analyzed politics and international affairs.

I am very pessimistic about the situation in Venezuela now. It seems Trump will impose sanctions without any popular opposition in the US, and the situation in Venezuela is going to get much worse. I have no reason to believe that, if imperialist interests get what they're after, whatever government this one gets replaced with won't be a brutal and reactionary regime that will impose IMF-style austerity on the Venezuelan people by any means necessary (and I sincerely hope I am wrong about this). But part of why I'm posting in this thread is because if, when that happens, it can lead some people to ask themselves why they couldn't see that coming in advance, and to try to look into why my attempts to warn about that were dismissed with such hostility; then hopefully the next time we're being told to back the US in a regime change operation, more people might be willing to take a stand against that.

oh my god shut the gently caress up. you are not a mission to save the poor venezuelans from themselves, you're just bloviating about us imperialism because it is the closet thing to sucking your own cock you're capable of doing. shut the gently caress up you god drat idiot.

Der Waffle Mous
Nov 27, 2009

In the grim future, there is only commerce.
Thanks.

The amount of uncritical "BUT DEMOCRACY" I've been seeing about the international reaction to the constituent assembly has been driving me insane.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

qkkl posted:

Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world. If I were Maduro I would ask the Russians or Chinese for help in building more oil wells. Then I'd make the country better by just pumping all that oil money into the economy, and skim a bit off the top for me and my friends. Now I have tons of money and my people love me and ask me to kiss their babies.

Look into Dutch disease and resource curse - countries built on profit from natural resource extraction tend to be deeply dysfunctional, heavily indebted and constantly on the verge of conflict. Countries like Venezuela need to wean themselves off petroleum to survive in the long term.

Bro Dad
Mar 26, 2010


Der Waffle Mous posted:

Thanks.

The amount of uncritical "BUT DEMOCRACY" I've been seeing about the international reaction to the constituent assembly has been driving me insane.

A lot of internet tankies (because these lily-white gringos aren't brave enough to talk to actual Venezuelans) basically gave up defending Maduro and are now parroting the jacobin line about how any possible future Venezuela will be worse than this one, as well as that dumbass cowardly "b-b-but all the facts aren't in yet, let's reserve judgement on this issue (except for all my broke-brain CIA conspiracy theories)"

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

I don't know of any other petro-states that are facing 1000% inflation and lack basic foodstuffs, toilet paper, toothpaste, and basic medical supplies. Even countries actually under heavy US sanctions like Iran and Russia are faring OK. The problem in Venezuela seems to be a mixture of gross economic and policy negligence, PSUV elites looting the country blind, and a violent transition from a Democracy to an Oligarchy. The food distribution patronage networks are based on what political party you support. Rule of law has completely broken down because the ruling class prioritized lining their pockets rather than governing.

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

.

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010
Huh, Nicholas Casey (the NYTimes reporter, probably the best / one of the only English-language reporters in Venezuela) was banned from Venezuela last November. No wonder he hadn't been publishing much lately, and always in collaboration with someone else.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/07/24/world/americas/venezuela-comic-banned.html?rref=collection%2Fbyline%2Fnicholas-casey

And

https://www.nytimes.com/by/nicholas-casey for anyone interested generally. He usually covers different aspects of Venezuela than the average garbage you see on BBC (or wherever)'s front page.


PS: Nicholas Casey is a black guy, and somehow he survived 8 months in Venezuela, at many dozens of opposition rallies, without getting lynched. How incredible!! (If you're an idiot that imposes your American views of racial politics on everywhere else in the world.)

fnox
May 19, 2013



How could that be?! It is known that everyone who doesn't like Maduro is white and everyone who likes Maduro is black.




I mean those guys (I don't know their names, are they Leopoldo Lopez?) they're white, right? So they must be against Maduro. gently caress those CIA bastards!

Chuck Boone
Feb 12, 2009

El Turpial

Der Waffle Mous posted:

As someone who's been kinda bad about keeping up with this thread before big parts of leftist Twitter started suddenly caring about democracy in Venezuela is there a good summary of what's been happening since the OP?

Like I have a grasp on what's going on but I feel like I need some things explained to me simply. Like what were the elections that were cancelled and whether or not my read of the 2015 election wiki was that Maduro basically created a new branch of government to neuter parliament was correct.

Edit: and also exactly what the constituent assembly is beyond the probable electoral fraud.

You've encouraged me to write a mega-update to the second post on the first page that will have answer to all of these questions (with links, etc.), so thank you! I'll link it in a post when I finish it, which should be either today or tomorrow.

Rotacixe
Oct 21, 2008

qkkl posted:

This same reasoning is why Stalin's policies are regarded to overall be good for the USSR, even though he killed a lot of people.

I'm sure that enslaving people who are unable to find employment and working them to death on labor camps would make economic sense too. But what kind of a monster would make such a case?

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
Hey look it's evidence of the exact thing every person who isn't a tankie retard knew was going on:

https://twitter.com/bbcworld/status/892728034121351169

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

fnox
May 19, 2013



https://twitter.com/puzkas/status/892723089708023808

It's confirmed by the firm that makes the drat voting machines that there was fraud.

Bob le Moche
Jul 10, 2011

I AM A HORRIBLE TANKIE MORON
WHO LONGS TO SUCK CHAVISTA COCK !

I SUGGEST YOU IGNORE ANY POSTS MADE BY THIS PERSON ABOUT VENEZUELA, POLITICS, OR ANYTHING ACTUALLY !


(This title paid for by money stolen from PDVSA)

sudo rm -rf posted:

oh my god shut the gently caress up. you are not a mission to save the poor venezuelans from themselves
I am literally arguing for the exact opposite thing to "saving the venezuelans from themselves"

JailTrump
Jul 14, 2017

by FactsAreUseless

PT6A posted:

Hey look it's evidence of the exact thing every person who isn't a tankie retard knew was going on:

https://twitter.com/bbcworld/status/892728034121351169

There was an article last night from the BBC that at 5:30 there had been 3 million votes cast then somehow magically we got 8 million by the time voting ended.

Hahaha. How the gently caress do you cast 5 million votes in less than 3 hours?

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1AI0AL

Meanwhile Colombia has extended legal entry rights for Venezuelans who enter and provided them access to the subsidized healthcare system and employment rights.

http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/nacional/canciller-anuncio-que-colombia-seguira-apoyando-los-venezolanos-que-migren-articulo-706090

JailTrump fucked around with this message at 14:18 on Aug 2, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BeigeJacket
Jul 21, 2005

fnox posted:

https://twitter.com/puzkas/status/892723089708023808

It's confirmed by the firm that makes the drat voting machines that there was fraud.

I'm assuming the PSUV either ignores this completely, or calls them yanqui devils or whatever?

Someone please explain to me what happens next after this vote. When will this Constitutional Assembly meet? Is parliament sitting as normal till then?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply