|
The first hitmen seemed to call it a day after they found the house empty and put a bomb on the car but I guess Evil Cooper didn't want to give too much information about Dougie's workplace/location so they wouldn't gently caress up and kill him before the electric socket body switch. I think Cooper's way of thwarting enemies is becoming more humane and sophisticated: blind chance, physical defense, cherry pie gift
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 04:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 10:11 |
|
|
If BadCoop put Dougie's ring in Briggs' corpse, and is communicating with Diane about whether or not Gordon and Albert have caught on, what is his endgame with that? Is he trying to get Gordon and Albert back together with Dougie and at the same time trying to have him assassinated? Or is someone else behind that whole bit? I think that points to Diane texting with somebody else. I remember that the first text that Diane received that appeared to be from BadCoop was different case from the sent message (one was all caps, the other not) and that makes me think that Diane making her latest text all caps is a clue to the audience that the first text she got wasn't from BadCoop, but resent to her from someone else as a message to her about some secret task they're in on. I'll guess Jefferies, just because he seems to be involved with all of this off-screen but with very nebulous motives.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 05:04
|
|
|
Can someone post that really good edit of The Nine Inch Nails singing James' song, tia
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
Grizzled Patriarch posted:Can someone post that really good edit of The Nine Inch Nails singing James' song, tia What!? Yes please seconded!
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
Grizzled Patriarch posted:Can someone post that really good edit of The Nine Inch Nails singing James' song, tia https://www.facebook.com/groups/1528224180819917/permalink/1703576089951391/ Trent was always cool.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 05:33
|
|
|
el oso posted:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1528224180819917/permalink/1703576089951391/ I was hoping it would be much longer than that, but it was still amazing and very well done.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 05:41
|
|
|
JazzFlight posted:Yeah, combine that with the only clue we have about the fleshy alien/creature: "mother." Robertson... son of Robert (Oppenheimer)
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 05:46
|
|
|
DevCore posted:What is the time code for this scene? Ita during the warden getting shot scene, its above his house. Dunno the exact time code tho.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 08:10
|
|
|
Vikar Jerome posted:oh poo poo, the ending for part 18 got leaked! watch at your own risk! Pages ago but how can they not slip "Hugh Manturd" into the credits?
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 08:57
|
|
|
Vikar Jerome posted:Ita during the warden getting shot scene, its above his house. Dunno the exact time code tho. It's like 32 minutes in? I doubt they shot him at 2:53 since his kid's still up. Those lights look weird, but it could just be nothing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 09:06
|
|
|
Not sure why the Audrey scene was such a big issue for so many people. It seemed to fit in with the rest of the series. The point of the scene wasn't to give you information about Billy, Tina and whoever else but to show you Audrey's character. It told us she's married, unhappy and unfulfilled and stuck due to some sort of contract. Things haven't worked out well for her. If you have a problem with Lynch's style 12 episodes in to season 3 I really don't know what to tell you. Another thing: Sarah Palmer is definitely being inhabited by something (I'm hoping Wyndham Earl). Also the jerky thing was her starting to fear being transported to another reality where things are very similar but not quite the same (see Annie and winning/not winning miss Twin Peaks). Lastly, JBP, you're completely right, the situation is abysmal. I am dumping Stan as soon as Twin Peaks is finished.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 10:02
|
|
|
You could have imparted that information in many other ways that would have been equally effective without being so long and insufferable, though? People are acting like this was the only possible way to show that Audrey is unhappy. And the Lynch's style thing is pretty disingenuous seeing how this is the only scene like this in the show so far, if not his entire career.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 10:19
|
|
|
Escobarbarian posted:You could have imparted that information in many other ways that would have been equally effective without being so long and insufferable, though? People are acting like this was the only possible way to show that Audrey is unhappy. There are plenty of scenes like that even on that same episode Its ok to not like it (I kinda liked it but felt it was way too long), but it was indeed very Lynch
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 12:58
|
|
|
The scene is playing with you, it keeps going on and on to draw you deeper into Audrey's frustration and impotence. It's agonizingly drawn out, inglorious, petty, and dull, everything about it is quite ridiculous, and it keeps getting more ridiculous as it goes, and there is no payoff except Audrey getting madder and madder. It's longer than you'd want because longer than she'd want. However when it takes up like ten minutes of an episode where very little else happens and the plot seems to stagnate, it's frustrating in a whole different way that I doubt was intended and certainly doesn't work very well with its context.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 13:13
|
|
|
Audrey was an audience surrogate for the entire season during that scene. Seemed pretty intentional imo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 13:57
|
|
|
I really think Audrey's acting just didn't click with me for whatever reason. Aside from the length, the scene wasn't that different from Truman's wife yelling at him, but I thought that one was perfect.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 14:26
|
|
|
Sherilynn Fenn has consistently been the worst ex-TP actor and it was sad to find out that even Lynch can't get a great performance out of her now (not that I thought it was BAD, definitely the best thing she's done in years, just not great)
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
Head's up, tails up, run you scallywags. Night falls, morning calls, I'll catch you with my death bag. You may think Lynch has gone insane, but I promise, the Audrey scene will make more sense in hindsight!
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 15:34
|
|
|
Escobarbarian posted:Sherilynn Fenn has consistently been the worst ex-TP actor and it was sad to find out that even Lynch can't get a great performance out of her now (not that I thought it was BAD, definitely the best thing she's done in years, just not great) I thought she was good in Gilmore Girls, but that was 10 years ago. The whole beginning of that scene just made me think of a bad play.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 15:53
|
|
|
I honestly thought it was intentionally frustrating. It worked well and I love it. This show makes me feel things and that's pretty cool with shows.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 15:56
|
|
|
The Audrey scene is polarizing as it is, but it's funny that the acting has been polarizing too. I've seen people say "I hated the scene, but it was acted really really well." which is absurd to me, since I thought both Fenn and the other actor were dreadful. It was just so wooden, I actually wondered if her husband was even an actor, or just some strange-looking guy David Lynch saw and invited on set (as he did with the limping trailer park woman in FWWM - he saw her walking down the street and made his driver pull over).
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 16:16
|
|
|
Cromulent posted:The Audrey scene is polarizing as it is, but it's funny that the acting has been polarizing too. I've seen people say "I hated the scene, but it was acted really really well." which is absurd to me, since I thought both Fenn and the other actor were dreadful. It was just so wooden, I actually wondered if her husband was even an actor, or just some strange-looking guy David Lynch saw and invited on set (as he did with the limping trailer park woman in FWWM - he saw her walking down the street and made his driver pull over). Her husband as OK imo, she was indeed bad
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 16:35
|
|
|
He was so sleepy!
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 16:42
|
|
|
I've never related more to a character on tv than that ugly sleepy man whose wife detests him.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 16:46
|
|
|
I actually did like the husband even if I didn't like the scene.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 16:50
|
|
|
Skanker posted:I honestly thought it was intentionally frustrating. It worked well and I love it. This show makes me feel things and that's pretty cool with shows. This is really the best reason to watch Twin Peaks. Even if you don't care about 90% of the show, there's still scenes that make you feel a specific way and thats what Lynch does really well. Trying to "understand" why Lynch is doing something is insane to me. He creates scenes to make people feel certain ways, and if that means an entire episode to convey anticipation and frustration, then so be it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
Elias_Maluco posted:Her husband as OK imo, she was indeed bad Same, I thought he did a better job than Sherilynn Fenn And More posted:It's like 32 minutes in? I doubt they shot him at 2:53 since his kid's still up. My guess is that the lights (star?/moon) are getting ready to align. It's probably late, but not 2:53 just yet. As the time gets closer, they'll probably get more and more red/defined. DevCore fucked around with this message at 16:59 on Aug 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
A True Jar Jar Fan posted:I actually did like the husband even if I didn't like the scene. Yeah I agree with this. His delivery of "Unbelievable, what you're telling me!" is so good.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
I choose to delude myself and believe that Fenn was acting badly because her character was trying too hard to still be the manipulative hot young thing she once was.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 17:12
|
|
|
Breadallelogram posted:I choose to delude myself and believe that Fenn was acting badly because her character was trying too hard to still be the manipulative hot young thing she once was. Hell, who says it's an act?
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 17:17
|
|
|
Right. I'm deluding myself that it's intentional and self aware.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
The whole "it's intentionally frustrating and slow! Lynch is playing with you" thing would be awesome if we were only going to be able to watch these episodes once and then they disappeared. But once the series ends its broadcast, you're going to have 18 episodes full of slow, annoying scenes and it's not going to be very rewatchable.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 17:30
|
|
|
I disagree.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 17:54
|
|
|
zelah posted:I've never related more to a character on tv than that ugly sleepy man whose wife detests him. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:09
|
|
|
Pedro De Heredia posted:it's not going to be very rewatchable. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
truth. i've rewatched the new season twice so far and im about to go and rewatch part 12 right now!
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
People rewatching will just fast forward over certain scenes they hate the way they do with James in season 2. It's part of the Authentic Twin Peaks Experience.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:32
|
|
|
Once it's over I'm watching everything in the series again.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 10:11 |
|
|
^^ SamePedro De Heredia posted:The whole "it's intentionally frustrating and slow! Lynch is playing with you" thing would be awesome if we were only going to be able to watch these episodes once and then they disappeared. But once the series ends its broadcast, you're going to have 18 episodes full of slow, annoying scenes and it's not going to be very rewatchable. Actually, it flows well when watched in sequence to a surprising degree.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:34
|
|
