throw to first drat IT posted:

http://i.imgur.com/qR3IH6n.jpg

throw to first drat IT posted:

http://i.imgur.com/qR3IH6n.jpg

KomodoWagon posted:

pussy queefs loudly during sex due to small girth

Pick posted:

For some reason it is OK when it is about women, but just try this about black people. Turns out, society still completely hates women

KomodoWagon posted:

Lol forever at people who think an insanity plea means you get to walk

KomodoWagon posted:

Lol forever at people who think an insanity plea means you get to walk

green chicken feet posted:

My question was over the origin of the comic

hackbunny posted:

"the virgin walk" is the only genuine one. mind blown yet?

Pie Colony posted:

the "virgin walk" was the original meme (it didn't come with a chad counterpart). it was a joke as well -- by describing very common characteristics in how nerds walk, it trolled them into believing everyone could tell they were virgins simply by how they walked (knowing a nerd's virgin status is a common nerd insecurity)

Palpek posted:

green chicken feet posted:

Thank you. I understood this at one point, and then I guess I misinterpreted something. But yes. This makes sense.

I didn't know the original Virgin Walk was created as a joke, though... and that it worked...!

lazorexplosion posted:

Where do I get a red shirt that says 'yowza!'

incel posted:

Going to any other sub with /r/incels in your post history

Say Nothing posted:

Every 90s cartoon had a Chad.

Palpek posted:

Shanghaied posted:

I don't recall the part about how the jews bitched and moaned 24/7/365 about how they are an inferior race, then built and moved into concentration camps, and then tattooed the numbers on their own wrists.

Shanghaied posted:

I don't recall the part about how the jews bitched and moaned 24/7/365 about how they are an inferior race, then built and moved into concentration camps, and then tattooed the numbers on their own wrists.

Shanghaied posted:

I don't recall the part about how the jews bitched and moaned 24/7/365 about how they are an inferior race, then built and moved into concentration camps, and then tattooed the numbers on their own wrists.

throw to first drat IT posted:

Wrong



I don't know if these were posted, please be patient.





http://i.imgur.com/qR3IH6n.jpg

fruit on the bottom posted:

I don't think any of those are from the 90s

Hollismason posted:

I laughed at "Constantly Screaming John Madden Style football plays"

throw to first drat IT posted:

http://i.imgur.com/qR3IH6n.jpg

El Padrino posted:

He's just a man that knows exactly what he wants and he figured that pumping into Stacy while trying to keep the sock from falling from his toes gives him a rush like no other.

Apollodorus posted:

God loving dammit I swear someone needs to teach these people that "hypergamy" does NOT mean the same thing as "polygamy".

Learn loving Greek already.

quote:

The cervix and rape
tl;dr: Legalize rape. Ban fornication. Old Testament got it right.

It is often said, and it is largely true, that women cannot get pregnant by rape. Of course they can get pregnant as a result of someone having sex with them while holding a knife to their throat while they scream and weep and struggle and protest, but unlikely to get pregnant unless they rather enjoyed the knife and the screaming and the weeping and the struggling and the protest.

To get a woman pregnant, the sperm has to swim from the vagina to the womb, which is a mighty marathon race for something the size of a sperm. And between the vagina and the womb, there is the cervix, which is a pair of lips.

What are lips for?

Lips are for opening and closing entrance to an orifice. They are to keep out some things, and allow entrance to other things.

So that sperm is not going anywhere unless those lips open.

If you touch a woman’s cervix and it is not her fertile period, the lips feel hard closed, like the lips of a woman’s mouth when you go for the kiss too soon, and do not permit her to turn her head away, so she purses her lips against the kiss.

If you touch a woman’s cervix in her fertile period, it is like touching the lips of a woman’s mouth when she is ready to be kissed. They feel like they are about to open, and if you keep on diddling her pussy, they do indeed open.

It seems likely that if a nice guy were to touch those lips, he would feel them hard, as if the girl was not in her fertile period, but being an rear end in a top hat, I have not been able to do that experiment.

So from the point of view of natural selection rape is not a problem for women. Women have control of who can impregnate them. She has lips where it counts.

Rape is however a huge problem for husbands, who get cucked, and moderate problem for fathers, who find that they, rather than their son in law, is supporting their grandchild.

Observing female behavior, many of them do not seem to be trying very hard to avoid rape. One does not see businessmen wandering in dark and sketchy places with two bulging wallets half falling out of their top pockets.

If you see a woman in a laundromat late at night, and there is no one around, it is always a single woman. A husband will usually put his foot down and forbid the risky behavior that women so easily engage in.

Emancipating women means treating female consent as more meaningful than it actually is. Women want what they do not want, and do not want what they do want. Their sexual choices are erratic, incompetent, inconsistent, incoherent, and frequently self harming. They lack agency.

“Rape” is not in itself a bad thing, and it is difficult to say what is rape and what is not rape. Rape is a bad thing to the extent that, like female adultery, it undermines the family. Rape is not in itself harmful to women. It is harmful to husbands as a particular case of cuckoldry. We are very severe against rape because we wish we could be severe against cuckoldry, but forbidding cuckoldry is a thought crime, so we displace our rage against cuckoldry to rage against rape.

Similarly, college girls get chewed up and spat out by the cock carousel, so we fetishize ever higher standards of consent for college, when the problem is not lack of consent, but a superabundance of foolish and self destructive consent. The problem is not lecherous college males, but lecherous college females.

Women are of course more precious than men, for women can create life while men can only to destroy life. So harming a woman, or threatening a woman with harm, should be more severely punished than harming a man or threatening to harm a man. Men are the expendable sex. Women are the precious sex.

However, safe forms of corporal punishment, such as whipping a woman on the buttocks or the upper back, should not be considered harm when done by proper authority, such as husband or father, for proper reason.

Nor should sex without the consent of the woman be considered harm of the woman in itself, since female consent is erratic and mysterious even to the woman herself, because but rather, sex with a married or betrothed women should be considered harm against the husband or fiance, and sex without the permission of the father should be considered harm against the father – illicit sex should be a crime against the man who has proper authority over the woman.

And whether the woman herself consented to that illicit sex should be a matter for the man that has proper authority over that woman, and should be not a matter of interest for the law or the courts.

Ludicro posted:

Apologies if this has already been posted, found this through r/badwomensanatomy, but you'll agree its relevant.

http://blog.jim.com/science/the-cervix-and-rape/

Stroop There It Is posted:

lmao if could somehow clamp our cervixes shut voluntarily that would be awesome, we wouldn't need birth control

quote:

between the vagina and the womb, there is the cervix, which is a pair of lips

r/badwomensanatomy posted:

Any substance you find on the gusset of your wife's dirty underwear is definitely semen and proof she's cheating