|
Byolante posted:Tulsi Gabbard, who never met a muslim she didn't think would be better off dead, somehow has a better foreign policy position than most politicians
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 14:17 |
|
|
https://www.nohatespeechmovement.org/hate-speech-watch/report/submit The EU is funding a youth led mob justice campaign against whatever you want to denounce right now
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 05:29
|
|
|
For some reason the text fields are in all caps, I guess that's fitting.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 05:31
|
|
|
Byolante posted:https://www.nohatespeechmovement.org/hate-speech-watch/report/submit i fuckin love hate speech post some of your fave hate speaches
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 05:51
|
|
|
passionate dongs posted:i fuckin love hate speech 
Byolante has issued a correction as of 06:02 on Aug 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
?? man are sjws attackin cartoons now? what a world
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 06:06
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:I've just dealt with this guy before. Heh look at this snowflake
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 06:10
|
|
|
passionate dongs posted:?? man are sjws attackin cartoons now? https://www.adl.org/education/references/hate-symbols/pepe-the-frog
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 06:23
|
|
|
quote:However, because so many Pepe the Frog memes are not bigoted in nature, it is important to examine use of the meme only in context. The mere fact of posting a Pepe meme does not mean that someone is racist or white supremacist. However, if the meme itself is racist or anti-Semitic in nature, or if it appears in a context containing bigoted or offensive language or symbols, then it may have been used for hateful purposes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
passionate dongs posted:byolante not read own links?? i am shocked I should have noticed you were a trump thread poster and just not responded.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 06:43
|
|
|
So is this thread some kind of GBS gitmo
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 06:50
|
|
|
zegermans posted:So is this thread some kind of GBS gitmo I doubt it because this thread is pro Chelsea Manning
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 06:57
|
|
|
passionate dongs posted:i fuckin love hate speech "Capitalism bad"
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 07:17
|
|
|
passionate dongs posted:i fuckin love hate speech "I disagree with you."
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 07:43
|
|
|
"your opinion of this media has no bearing on my enjoyment of the media"
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 07:48
|
|
|
Maybe we should have universal healthcare
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 08:34
|
|
|
The best thing about this election cycle was watching many people slowly go crazy while thousands of frog memes got tweeted at them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 10:41
|
|
|
It's funny how emotionally invested many journalists and pundits get in twitter, to the point where they feel compelled to get into spats with some anonymous 150 follower account tweeting them pepes. I get why twitter is useful for journalists but they seem to be collectively both very invested in it and also very easy to troll and get strong reactions from, inviting even more trolling.
MaxxBot has issued a correction as of 10:52 on Aug 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 10:50
|
|
|
I once had a self-described SJW argue with me about whether or not a person's twitter feed is a public or private space. Tear down Twitter imo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 17:31
|
|
|
the trump tutelage posted:I once had a self-described SJW argue with me about whether or not a person's twitter feed is a public or private space. There is actually this giant blocklist bot that someone on twitter made so people like this can block as many people with different opinions as possible.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
http://freebeacon.com/politics/former-clinton-adviser-sanders-detrimental-democratic-party/ God I wish the DSA and The Greens (Sans anti-vaxxers...) would become viable alternatives at this point. I would love nothing more then for the Democratic party to die a lonely death as everyone goes towards other options.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:I find myself frustrated with people who I am (idealogically speaking) aligned with, but disagree with them on things related to that manner. Yeah how the hell would you eliminate police and jails. What does that even mean.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 18:50
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:Yeah how the hell would you eliminate police and jails. What does that even mean. Okay I looked up the DSA statement on abolishing police and prisons and they really are just stupid as gently caress. Go to about halfway through the article to see what I mean.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:Okay I looked up the DSA statement on abolishing police and prisons and they really are just stupid as gently caress. Go to about halfway through the article to see what I mean. I understand the perspective, and I'd rather have conversations with people who wrote that article than I ever would someone like Kamela Harris. But...it's not a practical one if you want a functioning society. I sure as poo poo would not like to live in a world where Jeffrey Dahmer, Dylan Roof and John Wayne Gacy were still allowed to walk the streets in spite of both committing horrible crimes. You have to "protect" the public, and that's an important job that a government has in place. My theory is that they're starting from the far left perspective in order to gain some sort of "ground" in regards to solving those problems.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
who kills more americans per year? dahmer/gacy types or the police?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:who kills more americans per year? dahmer/gacy types or the police? the police of course.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:16
|
|
|
Wouldn't simply disarming the police dramatically reduce the numbers of deaths without the same number of negative consequences? In the absence of police the number of people who would go full Dahmer would be low but you'd bet that petty theft and assault and such would be absolutely rampant.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:16
|
|
|
MaxxBot posted:Wouldn't simply disarming the police dramatically reduce the numbers of deaths without the same number of negative consequences? That doesn't work in a country where gun ownership is not only legal but a protected right. You'd probably have the same number of deaths but it'd be police instead of civilians.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:25
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:That doesn't work in a country where gun ownership is not only legal but a protected right. You'd probably have the same number of deaths but it'd be police instead of civilians. seems like the problem is solved then imo
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:28
|
|
|
really queer Christmas posted:seems like the problem is solved then imo No, because it's not fair or practical to ask our public servants to just throw themselves to the wolves, and it'd lead to increased use of a separate military police like in Brazil. Who'd be even less accountable than our police forces now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:31
|
|
|
But again, this is a far more productive conversation than what we see out of Democrats and Republicans. It's why while I disagree with it completely? I'd rather have this conversation than with someone who wants to buddy up with the far right on these types of issues.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:32
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:No, because it's not fair or practical to ask our public servants to just throw themselves to the wolves, and it'd lead to increased use of a separate military police like in Brazil. Who'd be even less accountable than our police forces now. I was obviously joking and do agree it's bad. But I would at least rather simple patrol dudes to not have a handgun and only have a long arm in the car to at least make sure only veterans having 24/7 access to a gun. This may not be feasible everywhere and every city, but it would at least drop some civilian casualties and force an officer to think about pulling the weapon out.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:36
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:But again, this is a far more productive conversation than what we see out of Democrats and Republicans. I kind of know what you mean. Even though I think anarchists and tankies are ridiculous I still feel like they're more courageous and have their hearts in a place closer to right than centrists do. really queer Christmas posted:I was obviously joking and do agree it's bad. But I would at least rather simple patrol dudes to not have a handgun and only have a long arm in the car to at least make sure only veterans having 24/7 access to a gun. This may not be feasible everywhere and every city, but it would at least drop some civilian casualties and force an officer to think about pulling the weapon out. Mm, maybe.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
It looks like they still want some law enforcement entity and enforcement of punishments for serious crimes, this doesn't look totally unworkable but you'd run into a lot of the same problems with #4 as you do with the current police. quote:Additionally, we must connect to anti-racist groups both internally and beyond DSA to explore nationally-backed local campaigns for:
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:42
|
|
|
community patrols are a great idea, those good ol boys down in the south gotta keep watch
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 22:01
|
|
|
really queer Christmas posted:I was obviously joking and do agree it's bad. But I would at least rather simple patrol dudes to not have a handgun and only have a long arm in the car to at least make sure only veterans having 24/7 access to a gun. This may not be feasible everywhere and every city, but it would at least drop some civilian casualties and force an officer to think about pulling the weapon out. Wait am I misunderstanding or is your solution that we take the handguns away from amateurs so only the professional killers have them
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 00:44
|
|
|
Australian police have guns and tasers but people aren't getting shot Willy nilly over here. Maybe there is more to the problem than just cops being murderous lunatics because plenty of Australian cops are just as bad as American ones apart from the shooting everyone thing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 00:54
|
|
|
Crane Fist posted:Wait am I misunderstanding or is your solution that we take the handguns away from amateurs so only the professional killers have them I mean, in a better world the experienced cops would be more trained and aware of situations of when their guns would be needed and when to keep them holstered or unused. That may not be true in this world though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
really queer Christmas posted:I mean, in a better world the experienced cops would be more trained and aware of situations of when their guns would be needed and when to keep them holstered or unused. That may not be true in this world though. Oh you meant veteran cops as in they've been cops for a long time, not as in cops who were in the forces That's def less insane, my bad
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 01:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 14:17 |
|
|
i read that nicaragua has a way of vetting local police that's supposed to make them more accountable and easily punished, but i can't find it anywhere. when i did read it, i thought that could be something that could be effective in curbing their worst impulses over here it also doesn't help that there's a class aspect to being a cop, and not just in the sense of protecting private property that overwhelmingly favors the better-off. it's a middle class job in most parts of the country, and that's reflected in the places that cops usually live. just under half of NYPD officers actually live in the five boroughs (it's gotten lower in recent years), and those guys usually live in westchester county and long island. that doesn't count the ones that live in staten island, which is one of the boroughs but is closer in character to those suburban areas. there's a racist aspect to policing high-crime areas, but there's also a classist aspect- you can go home to your house in scarsdale and feel glad that you don't live in brownsville or hunts point any way of transforming policing has to deal with that too
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 02:04
|
|