|
ashnjack posted:
I dunno, that 150 seems p okay too. Other than that this is a spectacular failing and the fact that it works to their disadvantage makes me think it isn't even on purpose
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 08:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 17:08 |
|
|
Tetracube posted:Typical INTJ posting I've taken the Mayers-Brigg thing a half dozen times. I've gotten four different results.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 17:17
|
|
|
lancemantis posted:i was looking back into pishevar because for some reason i remember him as being kind of scummy, the i noticed the mention of the "Hyperloop Alpha" thing musky wrote up and had the balls to call a "whitepaper", so I had to look a that again, and...
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 18:34
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Comedy answer: “my girlfriend” I'm pretty sure HRT for transwomen does shrink the penis. This is something most of them don't have a problem with.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
Zemyla posted:I'm pretty sure HRT for transwomen does shrink the penis. This is something most of them don't have a problem with.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 20:32
|
|
|
Tumblr of scotch posted:It shrinks the balls a lot of the time, but dick shrinkage is very much YMMV and can range from moderate shrinkage to none at all. Depends on if the hormones are kept in the fridge or not.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 05:12
|
|
|
Yeah, for the most part the shrinkage comes from atrophy to do with both a disinclination towards using it and ED from the hormones, it doesn't directly cause shrinkage.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 05:15
|
|
|
new friend from school posted:time management can only slow you down. Yep, this is how I live my life now. Thanks, New Friend.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 08:48
|
|
|
Car - more efficient than a train? Wut?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 09:18
|
|
|
Tumblr of scotch posted:It shrinks the balls a lot of the time, but dick shrinkage is very much YMMV and can range from moderate shrinkage to none at all. PYF awful/funny graphs: dick shrinkage is very much YMMV
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 10:37
|
|
|
Your millimeters vary?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 10:54
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:Car - more efficient than a train? Wut? thread consensus seems to be that ol musky pulled the numbers out of his rear end
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 11:48
|
|
|
Possibly but not absolutely necessary, if the typical load factor for trains is very low. Which it seems to be, 50% is pretty lovely for public transport. https://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/publications/multimodal_transportation_indicators/2015_12/passenger/amtrak_miles
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 12:42
|
|
|
I bet he's counting on a full load for the hyperloop numbers (probably one among many fudged numbers).
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 12:48
|
|
|
This isn't comically bad but it's a lot of bizarre unforced errors -the numbers should be in /on the circles or in the text labels, not switching. Putting $100m for one of them just because it's an American thing is dumb. -tagging the circles with lines-connected-to circles is confusing, just lines to touch the "real" circles would do it -layout of the circles is dumb / inconsistent / makes them hard to compare -could argue this is kind of a perceptually flawed approach (people aren't great with circle surface area etc.) but I'm not a purist on stuff like that -in summary this is a bad way to portray what is basically 5 numbers
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 17:12
|
|
|
I've got some fresh content from a newsletter my employer sent out, presented here as it was to me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
Geez, what happened in October?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 18:49
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:I bet he's counting on a full load for the hyperloop numbers (probably one among many fudged numbers). Oh, he's delivering a full load alright.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
I bet the Hyperloop numbers don't count the energy expended on reviving victims of explosive decompression.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
pangstrom posted:
Like most of these, it appears that it's scaled to diameter instead of surface area, which makes it pretty visually useless. Edit. Hahaha, it is scaled to area, i just saw the 100 in the centre of the middle circle and my brain assumed that the central figure in the diagram would be in the base units. Of course that's the value in alternate units and the base unit is visually offset! T.C. has a new favorite as of 19:52 on Aug 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2017 19:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 16:27
|
|
|
comic sans making a comeback
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 16:37
|
|
|
Finally, a Zelda game that deals with real-world issues. #maturegaming Seriously though what the hell would "conservative liberals" be? Other than just a fancy way of saying centrist.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 16:42
|
|
|
Sir Lemming posted:Finally, a Zelda game that deals with real-world issues. #maturegaming Conservative Liberal would be your Libertarian, fiscally conservative and socially liberal. The 'Don't care what you do as long as you pay' type.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 16:55
|
|
|
I like this new left/right/muslim
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 17:34
|
|
|
I'm the Anti-Fascist Fascists.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 18:01
|
|
|
Sir Lemming posted:Finally, a Zelda game that deals with real-world issues. #maturegaming
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
Count Roland posted:I'm the Anti-Fascist Fascists. Didn't you know that the people telling you that you can't be a fascist are the real fascists?
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
I've always loved the double think involved in "regressive left." Like... regressing to what exactly? That and "antifa fascists" are fantastic examples of the "I know you are but what am I" school of discourse.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 18:34
|
|
|
Ensign Expendable posted:Didn't you know that the people telling you that you can't be a fascist are the real fascists? I get that people dislike antifas tactics; indeed I think it normal that people don't like masked hooligans doing much of anything. But the only similarities they share with fascists (using violence for political means) is shared by pretty well every other ideology as well, certainly the more radical/reactionary ones.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 18:45
|
|
|
Chitin posted:I've always loved the double think involved in "regressive left." There are definitely some groups on the left I'd classify as "regressive" who use aspects of leftist or progressive ideology to justify racism/sexism/homophobia/etc. Like TERFs or Hoteps or leftists who are against immigration from a "the capitalist class uses immigration to drive down the price of labor" perspective. But those groups are never who conservatives are talking about when they say "regressive left" so
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
Count Roland posted:I get that people dislike antifas tactics; indeed I think it normal that people don't like masked hooligans doing much of anything. But the only similarities they share with fascists (using violence for political means) is shared by pretty well every other ideology as well, certainly the more radical/reactionary ones.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 18:53
|
|
|
Pakled posted:There are definitely some groups on the left I'd classify as "regressive" who use aspects of leftist or progressive ideology to justify racism/sexism/homophobia/etc. Like TERFs or Hoteps or leftists who are against immigration from a "the capitalist class uses immigration to drive down the price of labor" perspective.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
Fathis Munk posted:I like this new left/right/muslim I'm sad that Jews don't rank anymore. Like what do we have to do to get back in the game?
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
lifg posted:I'm sad that Jews don't rank anymore. Like what do we have to do to get back in the game? Nukes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 01:58
|
|
|
Man, Abe Maslow's later work got *weird*.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 02:27
|
|
|
Welcome home, TobleroneTriangular
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
lifg posted:I'm sad that Jews don't rank anymore. Like what do we have to do to get back in the game? They could fit us in real nice if they just added another triangle, upside down.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 02:45
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Nukes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 08:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 17:08 |
|
|
Tumblr of scotch posted:I'm not even sure I'd call TERFs as a whole eftists at all given how many of them are also virulently racist, anti-choice, etc. Anti-choice? Are you still taking about TERFs? Because there's no way someone qualifying for 'Radical Feminist' would be anything but pro-choice.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 09:39
|
|
