|
iajanus posted:How could they tell? Whether there were burnouts over or under it
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 02:56 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 05:27 |
|
one nation under garbage
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 02:56 |
|
The idea of Ipswich dissapearing into a burning pile of garbage is quite appealing.
I would blow Dane Cook fucked around with this message at 03:04 on Aug 8, 2017 |
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:00 |
|
https://twitter.com/SydneyLive2GB/status/894485451704225792 Lololol
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:09 |
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:I lol'd when it was revealed that the place all the waste was going was Ipswich. How appropriate.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:11 |
|
In Laura Tingles opinion, Dutton and Corman, the Potato and the Corbot, have decided to keep Trumble because the alternative is horrific, there will be no spill.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:14 |
|
Who would roll trumbull at this point? Talk about a poison chalice. Not to mention the tonesnipes.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:16 |
|
Oh no, the cartoonists? I mean agreed that it's ridiculous but who acts like people pay attention to political cartoons anyway
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:18 |
|
Guys my plebiscite ballot has not arrived, I checked online and Australia post says it's been stuck in Chullora NSW for three weeks.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:21 |
|
CBA execs are having their bonuses zeroed this FY. sauce: ASX announcement this morning
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:21 |
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:Guys my plebiscite ballot has not arrived, I checked online and Australia post says it's been stuck in Chullora NSW for three weeks. Govt to skip parliament and ask ABS to run same-sex marriage vote what the gently caress quote:12:24pm
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:43 |
|
WHAT THE loving FUCKHOLES
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:44 |
|
[ ] no one should get married [ ] everyone should get gay married [X] smash the coalition
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:46 |
|
Look if they don't care about burning $122 million just deposit it in my bank account, I'll find a use for it.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:47 |
|
Are the government still going to fund anti-equality campaigns?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:47 |
|
Lmao the ABS. A good and reliable department that is not underfunded to the point of being beaten into a state of weltschmerz.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:50 |
|
hooman posted:Who would roll trumbull at this point? Talk about a poison chalice. There's one person who Abbott wouldn't try and undermine. Well, not intentionally anyway.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:50 |
|
"Strong leaders carry out their promises, weak leaders break them," Mr Turnbull says. "I am a strong leader." LOL
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:51 |
|
Someone save the audio of that "The Australian people don't get it wrong" quote to beat Turnbull with when he's trounced at the next election.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:54 |
|
Is it OK to boycott this, or would that mean forfeiting the right to complain about the result?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:58 |
|
open24hours posted:Is it OK to boycott this, or would that mean forfeiting the right to complain about the result? I'm waiting to see what the gay community settles on as a consensus, go with that.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 03:58 |
|
Its still non binding. If the population votes yes, they'll still drag their feet.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:00 |
|
Much as it's a terrible option I can't see any reason boycotting it will lead to a good outcome. e: not to say that it getting a resounding Yes vote will mean anything, but you know that a resounding No vote will be a massive piece of artillery for the muppets who want to keep this stopped.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:04 |
|
What's more important? Standing up to the principle that the relationships of others should not be under public scrutiny and boycotting, or denying the bigots validation.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:07 |
|
Amoeba102 posted:What's more important? Standing up to the principle that the relationships of others should not be under public scrutiny and boycotting, or denying the bigots validation. Seems like boycotting it would achieve both of these things though.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:10 |
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:Guys my plebiscite ballot has not arrived, I checked online and Australia post says it's been stuck in Chullora NSW for three weeks. Got sent straight to Ipswich
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:15 |
|
open24hours posted:Seems like boycotting it would achieve both of these things though. If there is a boycott, a NO result is more likely. That's where the validation comes from.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:15 |
|
I can't believe such a trivial issue has come to this. Just legalise SSM like mostly everyone else has and get on with it, jfc
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:16 |
|
So what, is that it? People won't get the chance to cross the floor and pass the drat vote and save $120 million for something that these idiots are just going to ignore?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:17 |
|
Teddybear posted:So what, is that it? People won't get the chance to cross the floor and pass the drat vote and save $120 million for something that these idiots are just going to ignore? Not until after the money gets flushed down the shitter, no.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:21 |
|
I'll be voting in the plebiscite despite vehemently opposing it. I want to witness the awkwardness if it comes back with a 'yes' result.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:23 |
|
Amoeba102 posted:If there is a boycott, a NO result is more likely. That's where the validation comes from. No matter what the result is those people are going to argue that it has vindicated their position. Even if it's a landslide in favour of SSM they'll still argue that it has 'exposed significant differences of opinion in the community and highlighted the need for a cautious approach' or whatever.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:24 |
|
open24hours posted:No matter what the result is those people are going to argue that it has vindicated their position. Even if it's a landslide in favour of SSM they'll still argue that it has 'exposed significant differences of opinion in the community and highlighted the need for a cautious approach' or whatever. Are you talking about the bigots in parliament, or the bigots in the wider community. I was talking about the latter.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:25 |
|
Parliament, but I think it's applicable to both.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:26 |
|
open24hours posted:No matter what the result is those people are going to argue that it has vindicated their position. Even if it's a landslide in favour of SSM they'll still argue that it has 'exposed significant differences of opinion in the community and highlighted the need for a cautious approach' or whatever. Yes, but it'll be a fuckload easier to laugh in their faces when they do if it's a resounding Yes, and the Labor party and anyone else chasing votes might grow some balls and realise that there's a lot of people who really care about this. Might even convince some muppets on the fence in the LNP that it'd be wise to get it done.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:31 |
|
If 80% of the community voted to introduce slavery would that be OK?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:32 |
|
Endman posted:I'll be voting in the plebiscite despite vehemently opposing it. The Plebiscite is a dumb terrible idea and shouldn't be held. If they do hold it, I will vote the poo poo out of yes because if you're going to be a dumbfuck and ask for my opinion then by poo poo you're going to get it.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:32 |
|
hooman posted:The Plebiscite is a dumb terrible idea and shouldn't be held. Yep, this.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 04:33 |
|
I dont understand why we need to spend money on this when basic polling has shown its like 70% yes vote but then again I dont understand why the government makes any of the choices they do when they have the data to show what the people want.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 05:01 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 05:27 |
|
Laserface posted:I dont understand why we need to spend money on this when basic polling has shown its like 70% yes vote but then again I dont understand why the government makes any of the choices they do when they have the data to show what the people want. There is no point in being elitist if you can't tell people what's good for them.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2017 05:03 |