|
I never suggested women should not be under the authority of fathers husbands, Im objecting to JIM arguing for giving FRIEND OF THE FAMILY rapists the right to rape my daughter by saying she has the right of consent. If you are arguing for consent you are arguing for womens autonomy. Only FRIEND OF THE FAMILYs sell their daughters cheap white invest more time and money in their higher quality children and expect a better quality sire of their grandchildren. Not once did one of younon parent beta fags chomos dying to get into the pants of a 10 year old mention the point of raising children grandchildren. As a father I am the only person that can grant consent. If a man has sex with my daughter I decide whether to execute him as a rapist or offer him the terms to marry her. Jim wants the rapist to decide his own fate. If my horse or my slave or my daughter runs away and I find a man has used them i will execute him, it matters not that the man found them without the owner, he knew they were not his,he knew they could not own themselves, so he knew he was a thief to use them.so if I find my daughter in a commune or crack den and a FRIEND OF THE FAMILY has hosed her I will execute him.(all rapists are FRIEND OF THE FAMILYs) I alone am the legal consentor to sex with my women Since rapists make poor sons in laws i will probably decide to execute. since rapists like thieves are a menace to the society I am building I will probably decide to execute. since sexual assault of my householders is as egregious a personal affront as possible I will probably choose to torture before executing. since raising a slut is a shame on a man I will probably choose to execute the man who has caused me to be seen as such a failure. since I have invested much time and treasure in the raising of my child in the expectation of a high return and this man has destroyed that I will probably choose to execute. since raising a daughter to maturity is one of the greatest pleasures a man has in life and i love my daughter i will probably decide to torture and execute the rapist. Since not executing rapists will only encourage men who want other mens women to simply take them i will probably choose to execute. allowing a man who would rape another mans woman to have legal authority over my daughter and grandchildren is unwise i would probably decide to execute. to allow a man to live that has hosed a daughter without her fathers permission will encourage daughters to lay with men they think they love more readily, i will probably decide to execute after torture. There’s really not to many scenarios where i allow the rapist to live. If you dont get this is the difference between a white civilization and FRIEND OF THE FAMILY anarchy you should stop calling yourself a reactionary. Its like youre saying well property rights expire upon theft and since w cant control the thieves gently caress civilization we will be pirates. Theres a lot of reasons whites decided to delay fertility and all of them are more valid today than then. At what age I can authorize marriage is another question. I think a sensible discussion begins with forgetting about these pre marriage betrothals we are no longer an agrarian society. Lets stipulate that we also understand capital must be subordinated to culture and state so property rights are not absolute, therefor its not a given that there might be limits put on your property rights but that children are an especial property where the already judicious use of state/cultural force on property right ought be even more restrained. On the other hand we are discussing future citizens of the state / culture, while in the case of women such citizenship might have different rights than men they are no less important citizens, they are not second class citizens they are not property in the sense of chattel or slavery the rights over women are more of a trust and guardianship of our most precious resource by those assumed to most have their interests aligned with those women. -AND SO IT SEEMS I MUST ANSWER FOR YOU IDIOTS THE QUESTION I HAVE POSED REPEATEDLY “HOW DOES REACTIONARY PATRIARCHY DIFFER FROM SAY MUSLIM OR OTHER HISTORICAL PATRIARCHY’S”?
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 16:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 22:55 |
|
|
divabot posted:I have a shitload of friends at Google who are deeply upset about this and, I'm pleased to say, making a loving lot of public noise about it. That said, I'm still waiting for more in public than the present non-response from the higher echelons so far. Modified: gently caress google leadership.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 16:15
|
|
|
http://inferentialdistance.tumblr.com/post/163875136282/can-you-please-elaborate-on-how-the-police-follow
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 16:31
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:http://inferentialdistance.tumblr.com/post/163875136282/can-you-please-elaborate-on-how-the-police-follow It's Derrida, not Derida!
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
 'i can already tell the sentence “doesn’t the pope call non-catholics ‘normies’?” is going to haunt me till my dying days' (leviathan-supersystem)
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 17:19
|
|
|
Today I learned there are people who can read that Sea Lion cartoon and think it's about polite disagreement. And I thought MY social skills were bad.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 17:19
|
|
|
divabot posted:
Okay but are you going to worry or post sad frogs huh
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
https://slatestarscratchpad.tumblr.com/post/163863396251/you-famously-criticized-people-who-called-trump-a jesus christ scott
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
THAT'S OUR SCOTT *laugh track*
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2017 23:32
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:THAT'S OUR SCOTT *laugh track* lmao, right? e:i'm really looking forward to seeing how far scott can go in being apologetic for the far-right. Fututor Magnus has a new favorite as of 01:11 on Aug 8, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 01:04
|
|
|
pookel posted:Today I learned there are people who can read that Sea Lion cartoon and think it's about polite disagreement. And I thought MY social skills were bad. I think you'll find that it's really a cartoon about the importance of vigilantly calling out racists and therefore the sea lion is the hero because THE OPPOSITE READING IS TRUE.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 01:25
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/St_Rev/status/890815242602598400
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 01:40
|
|
|
Well sometimes I feel that way too, though I suspect for different reasons
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:I think you'll find that it's really a cartoon about the importance of vigilantly calling out racists and therefore the sea lion is the hero because THE OPPOSITE READING IS TRUE. Uh... wanna explain that one?
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 02:28
|
|
|
Somfin posted:Uh... wanna explain that one? I'm guessing it comes from "Imagine if the lady in the cartoon had said she didn't like people of color", so the sealion is now the hero relentlessly hounding the woman for her bigotry.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 02:47
|
|
|
Somfin posted:Uh... wanna explain that one? http://wondermark.com/2014-errata/ David Malki posted:It has been suggested that the couple in this comic, and the woman in particular, are bigots for making a pejorative statement about a species of animal, and then refusing to justify their statements. It has been further suggested that they be read as overly privileged, because they are dressed fancily, have a house, a motor-car, etc. This is, I suppose, a valid read of the comic, if taken as written.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 02:55
|
|
|
Fututor Magnus posted:lmao, right? There's no bottom. He'll be one of the leashed scholars they keep around as entertainment. It's basically his ambition.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 03:14
|
|
|
and imagine who's back on tumblr.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 03:26
|
|
|
Relevant Tangent posted:There's no bottom. He'll be one of the leashed scholars they keep around as entertainment. It's basically his ambition. i suppose you're right.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
All the cool kids have moved on from ironic Hoxhaism to ironic Posadism anyways.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 03:51
|
|
|
darthbob88 posted:I'm guessing it comes from "Imagine if the lady in the cartoon had said she didn't like people of color", so the sealion is now the hero relentlessly hounding the woman for her bigotry. Yeah, and imagine if she'd said that we should legalise cannibalism, that'd make her even more wrong Imagine if she'd said that the earth was flat woah lady what are you smoking haha
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 04:16
|
|
|
The opposite reading is true! The opposite reading is true! I've been to college!
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 08:27
|
|
|
Fututor Magnus posted:https://slatestarscratchpad.tumblr.com/post/163863396251/you-famously-criticized-people-who-called-trump-a For a nice rebuttal, check out these tumblr posts. Essentially hes grabbing from sources that are all repeating that gender gaps are primarily due to cultural socialisation, cherry picking some random things, then placing them next to paragraphs on innate gender differences and winking suggestively. Basically, if the gender gap is due to innate gender differences, the innate gender differences sure have been changing a lot over the last couple of decades. He even includes figures showing wildly different gender gaps in different countries, but somehow concludes the ones in the west must be due to innate factors because sexism is over! He proves sexism is over by citing a survey asking women if women are inferior at computing, which they disagreed with! Checkmate feminists. The fact that this idiot is being held up as the arbiter of science and reason is deeply saddening.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 12:11
|
|
|
How is it that the same people who are so insistent that being gay or trans is a lifestyle choice and/or result of childhood experiences are also convinced that any differences between men and women are innate and inborn? Like, you believe it's possible to become gay as a result of social conditioning, but not that it's possible to prefer humanities to math as a result of social conditioning? Maybe I'm wrong and the DE folks also tend to think sexuality/gender identity are inborn, but I haven't gotten that impression from them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 14:46
|
|
|
You can turn yourself gay through sheer force of will, but developing an appreciation for math is just crazy talk
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
A combination of personal choice, environment, and biology influences most aspects of human nature. This remains a contentious point because DE types are contrarian, not just to present academia, but all of Western thought to this day
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 15:22
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:You can turn yourself gay through sheer force of will, but developing an appreciation for math is just crazy talk It just dawned on me how ridiculously stupid it is to both not believe in biological determinism for the gay yet fervently believe in it for things like "blacks are inherently violent" Like that just clicked in my head, all at once.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 15:23
|
|
|
pookel posted:How is it that the same people who are so insistent that being gay or trans is a lifestyle choice and/or result of childhood experiences are also convinced that any differences between men and women are innate and inborn? Like, you believe it's possible to become gay as a result of social conditioning, but not that it's possible to prefer humanities to math as a result of social conditioning? Depends on who you're talking to, if it's one of the edgy /pol/ types who likes jerkin' it to trap porn they're surprisingly progressive and not-terrible (most of the time) about gender identity. If it's just a rebranded nazi trying to look cool like Cernovich then it's the more traditionally expected response. Also I can't find it now but a little while ago in this thread someone posted a bunch of stuff from an /lgbt/ "post your politics" thread that was legitimately fascinating in how, i don't know, weird 4chan makes your brain. It was full of stuff like "I think I'm gay but I don't act on it because it's the cancer that is poisoning western civilization" or "I'm trans but I don't talk about it out loud because I'm an ancap and my ancap friends would hate me"
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 15:26
|
|
|
quote:Hyde found moderate or large gender differences in (and here I’m paraphrasing very scientific-sounding constructs into more understandable terms) aggressiveness, horniness, language abilities, mechanical abilities, visuospatial skills, mechanical ability, tendermindness, assertiveness, comfort with body, various physical abilities, and computer skills. The fact that this is taken completely uncritically when dude links the drat paper for everyone to read says a lot about these guys. The paper itself- in the easy-to-read parts, even!- says that the significant differences are "some motor behaviors (e.g., throwing distance) and some aspects of sexuality, which show large gender differences," with a moderate difference in aggression that's specifically pointed out to disappear when subjects think they're not being observed. I'm guessing he just looked at Table 1 and called it a day, ignoring all the words around it about "the Interpretation of Effect Sizes" and "Developmental Trends" and "the Importance of Context." Must be that male problem with language abilities, presumably the same one that caused him to list "mechanical ability/ies" twice.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 15:49
|
|
|
ikanreed posted:A combination of personal choice, environment, and biology influences most aspects of human nature. They're going down the Nazi "scientist" route of "conventional science is a jewish trick" and will soon be claiming that homosexuality is caused by your humors being out of balance and that phlogiston is responsible for combustion.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 16:23
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:Depends on who you're talking to, if it's one of the edgy /pol/ types who likes jerkin' it to trap porn they're surprisingly progressive and not-terrible (most of the time) about gender identity. If it's just a rebranded nazi trying to look cool like Cernovich then it's the more traditionally expected response. Every time I hear about LGBT poo poo on 4chan, it gives me more insight into what made my friend's abusive transwoman ex-girlfriend such a self-loathing basket case.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 16:31
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Every time I hear about LGBT poo poo on 4chan, it gives me more insight into what made my friend's abusive transwoman ex-girlfriend such a self-loathing basket case. My wife hangs out in a Discord that's from /k/ and full of transpeople (effectively transwomen) and crossdressers (because 4chan) that like guns too much and booooy are there some, uh, interesting people there. Also i've come to the conclusion that my wife is probably the only transperson gun nerd in existence who isn't a horrible human being. I even made her agree that when Nancy Pelosi's FEMA death camps finally come around we're going to be first in line to turn in our guns to the new world order.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 17:10
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Every time I hear about LGBT poo poo on 4chan, it gives me more insight into what made my friend's abusive transwoman ex-girlfriend such a self-loathing basket case. I hang around on a trans discord a lot that has had a couple of those types come and go. a lot of them are honestly fine as long as you don't get them talking about whatever subject they're broke-brained about, but then there's the occasional total psycho that's super into /pol/ and brags about lawsuits constantly and married a 16-year-old. idk how that community exists. like, the trans threads on /lgbt/ are nothing but catty trans women picking fights with eachother and making GBS threads on non-passing folk. it's so unapologetically toxic you'd think people would jump ship once they caught on, but instead they've just formed this weird completely isolated community dedicated to making themselves and eachother miserable, and then have extreme difficulty interacting with the larger trans population because they don't want to filter themselves. it's bizarre.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2017 23:45
|
|
|
lmao, the dweeb fired for distributing the manifesto at Google has been offered a job by Julian Assange.The article posted:On Tuesday Damore revealed he had been dismissed by Google for “perpetuating gender stereotypes” and said he was considering legal action against the company. Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks who is holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, offered him a job and accused Google of censorship. It has me wondering just how offensive can your ideas be and still be defensible in the eyes of some of these people as long as you don't start cursing and spitting slurs? I mean on one hand I know we're in part talking about out and out nazis here. But is there actually a line?
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2017 02:20
|
|
|
Great Metal Jesus posted:lmao, the dweeb fired for distributing the manifesto at Google has been offered a job by Julian Assange. I guarantee it if he had cursed and threw slurs Wikileaks would have still hired him (assuming the story got as big).
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2017 02:21
|
|
|
Great Metal Jesus posted:It has me wondering just how offensive can your ideas be and still be defensible in the eyes of some of these people as long as you don't start cursing and spitting slurs? I mean on one hand I know we're in part talking about out and out nazis here. But is there actually a line? There is no line because no matter who they were before it happened and no matter who actually says it, the moment ~The Regressive Left~ says something bad about a person they become a hero in the eyes of these dipshits. Ideology doesn't matter, all that matters is the possibility of living in a world where actions don't have consequences.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2017 02:54
|
|
|
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/08/the-most-common-error-in-coverage-of-the-google-memo/536181/ what do you think about this guys take?
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2017 03:21
|
|
|
anchorpunch posted:https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/08/the-most-common-error-in-coverage-of-the-google-memo/536181/ I think it's exactly the article I'd expect Conor Friedersdorf to write about it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2017 03:47
|
|
|
anchorpunch posted:https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/08/the-most-common-error-in-coverage-of-the-google-memo/536181/ This is the equivalent of saying "I'm not racist, but..." Memoboy starts his manifesto with "I'm not a bigot, but..." and then proceeds to be one for the next ten pages. Dongsturm has a new favorite as of 04:03 on Aug 9, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2017 03:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 22:55 |
|
|
anchorpunch posted:https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/08/the-most-common-error-in-coverage-of-the-google-memo/536181/ Exactly what I would expect from a guy who has repeatedly cited Scott
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2017 04:47
|
|
