Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Tercio
Jan 30, 2003

yoober posted:

can you show me the official acab statements

https://twitter.com/aaronpmarks/status/894266235210403840

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Loving Life Partner
Apr 17, 2003
No i didn't, but whatever.

R. Mute
Jul 27, 2011

Loving Life Partner posted:

There's been law enforcement since there was property to protect and systems of exploitation to enforce. Once you dispense with these, the scope of and function of any type of justice system will shrink and wither to near non-existence. If you wanna make some gently caress poo poo assed "human nature" argument you better have a hell of a deep education on sociology of the pre-history and be prepared for me to yell "bullshit!" a lot when you regurgitate liberal programming.
are you an anarcho-primitivist by chance?

Loving Life Partner
Apr 17, 2003
No, anprims are ridiculous.

R. Mute
Jul 27, 2011

Loving Life Partner posted:

No, anprims are ridiculous.
hence the confusion

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015
"Acknowledging that there might be a small amount of leftover criminality far beneath what actually exists right now is like saying you can't abolish"

Like, gently caress's sake, the CNT-FAI had prisons (with optional labor to shorten your time) for fascist sympathizers.

yoober
Nov 21, 2010


that isn't in response to the danny fetonte incident, the thing we're talking about

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





Agnosticnixie posted:

Yes, this is very clever and hasn't been discussed for the past 10 pages even from an libcom perspective.

The vast majority of crime is either victimless or against property; "there will still be some sort of enforcement or mediation therefore checkmate abolitionist" is an uninteresting response that is built on trying to pretend the postrevolutionary world should look like capitalism except nicer, including in its structures.


You didn't own anyone.

No one's talking about owning anyone. It'd just be nice if there could be actual discussion instead of a bunch of leftist wanna-be alpha nerds slamming their dicks on the table and declaring themselves the arbiter of all things socialist. I'm not sure if you guys know this or not, but DSA is Democratic Socialists. If y'all want to be all PURGE THE NON-BELIEVERS I think there's a couple of Stalinist organizations you could join.

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them
i cant believe debby washerman shutz was voted into the DSA's inner circle

Loving Life Partner
Apr 17, 2003
Everyone is getting a horrible perm in Solidarity

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



bump_fn posted:

i cant believe debby washerman shutz was voted into the DSA's inner circle

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015

Internet Explorer posted:

No one's talking about owning anyone. It'd just be nice if there could be actual discussion instead of a bunch of leftist wanna-be alpha nerds slamming their dicks on the table and declaring themselves the arbiter of all things socialist. I'm not sure if you guys know this or not, but DSA is Democratic Socialists. If y'all want to be all PURGE THE NON-BELIEVERS I think there's a couple of Stalinist organizations you could join.

As stated before, I'm an ancom.

Democratic socialism includes libleft and leftcom tendencies. It's also not just a club for edgy democrats, that's exactly what the last congress demonstrated.

I don't even care if he stays in the Austin branch although it makes me uneasy, him being on the NPC is going to gently caress with the DSA's ability to work in solidarity with a ton of groups that it needs to be able to work with if it wants credibility as a united radical left entity.

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Agnosticnixie posted:

united radical left entity.

The DSA is not a (and should not be) a radical left entity.

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them

Venom Snake posted:

The DSA is not a (and should not be) a radical left entity.

how else can i jack off on my marx texts

platzapS
Aug 4, 2007

platzapS posted:

Hot takes incoming:

1) Police and prisons will probably be necessary under socialism for a long while, because the abolition of private property doesn't mean sociopaths no longer exist or that there won't be violent reaction against a socialist state.

2) We can probably get rid of 90+% of prisons though.

3) Cops in their current incarnation are our opponents. This isn't because every one of them has a depraved heart, but because the function of police under capitalism is to defend the rich and control the poor. Every movement for revolution or even reform (like the civil rights movement in the US) was opposed by cops because cops serve at the pleasure of the ruling class. If the poo poo hits the fan, a cop who sides with us will quickly find themselves no longer a cop.

4) This doesn't apply to all soldiers; reading about October 1917 actually softened my previous edgelord gently caress-the-troops stance. But cops are always against revolution. Again, this is because of their function and not their evil cop essence or whatever.

5) Cops should not be allowed in our org because it will scare away much more valuable constituencies, like poor black people and undocumented immigrants.

6) R.L. Stephens owns (collectively).

7) None of these points is directly relevant to Fetonte, because the main complaint against him is that he omitted relevant history, not that he was irrevocably tainted by sin.

(Although I personally hope he resigns)

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them
i hope literally everyone but fontane resigns

R. Mute
Jul 27, 2011

Loving Life Partner posted:

There's been law enforcement since there was property to protect and systems of exploitation to enforce. Once you dispense with these, the scope of and function of any type of justice system will shrink and wither to near non-existence. If you wanna make some gently caress poo poo assed "human nature" argument you better have a hell of a deep education on sociology of the pre-history and be prepared for me to yell "bullshit!" a lot when you regurgitate liberal programming.
im really trying to wrap my head around this post. really really trying. can you elaborate

on all of it

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015

Venom Snake posted:

The DSA is not a (and should not be) a radical left entity.

Except the positions it adopted are more or less in line (except on the question of electoralism and that's not a universal thing), part of the effort to grow its membership has been tapping into solidarity from that kind of people.

R. Mute
Jul 27, 2011

maybe tell me what you are if you're not an anprim so i can switch gears

ThndrShk2k
Nov 3, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Bread Liar

bump_fn posted:

how else can i jack off on my marx texts
How is that radical?

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
Like it's nothing against ancoms libcoms or any flavor of Unironic Communist but the entire point of the DSA is to semi-unite the disparate left under one general banner. It's not supposed to be a radical left organizing group because alienating socdems/demsocs is inherently counter-productive. That doesn't mean radical leftists can't come along for the ride however or have their own sister orgs.

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015

R. Mute posted:

maybe tell me what you are if you're not an anprim so i can switch gears

You know absolutely nothing if you think pointing our how shallowly modernist your human nature argument is was a primitivist position.

Minty
May 3, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

Impermanent posted:

c: I have the same information that everyone else does, which is that he deliberately glossed over his time in the CWA while otherwise being very specific on his other jobs.
e: I think him hiding his past association with CWA/CLEAT is proof of malicious action, and I think that his attempt to hide it is the number one issue.
f: Every single PoC I've spoken to in DSA has talked about leaving if he stays, including my family.

People feel he might have deliberately glossed over his time. They literally don't know whether he did. Just like I literally don't know he didn't.

Whether he did it intentionally or not, enough people think that's a problem that it should be addressed or he should step down. Which is a reasonable stand to take. Throw out the cop is not a reasonable stand.

I would be surprised if he stays at this point. A lot of locals / caucuses are calling for his resignation.

Venom Snake posted:

Like it's nothing against ancoms libcoms or any flavor of Unironic Communist but the entire point of the DSA is to semi-unite the disparate left under one general banner. It's not supposed to be a radical left organizing group because alienating socdems/demsocs is inherently counter-productive. That doesn't mean radical leftists can't come along for the ride however or have their own sister orgs.

socdems and demsocs are radical positions in america

Internet Explorer posted:

No one's talking about owning anyone. It'd just be nice if there could be actual discussion instead of a bunch of leftist wanna-be alpha nerds slamming their dicks on the table and declaring themselves the arbiter of all things socialist. I'm not sure if you guys know this or not, but DSA is Democratic Socialists. If y'all want to be all PURGE THE NON-BELIEVERS I think there's a couple of Stalinist organizations you could join.

I wish there was actual discussion, but unfortunately it was initially "prison abolition would scare normies, therefore the DSA shouldn't even discuss it" outright dismissal, and now it's "prison abolition is an utopian pipedream and police will always happen because crime" outright dismissal, with no discussion on what was suggested or adopted

Minty has issued a correction as of 03:35 on Aug 10, 2017

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Agnosticnixie posted:

Except the positions it adopted are more or less in line (except on the question of electoralism and that's not a universal thing), part of the effort to grow its membership has been tapping into solidarity from that kind of people.

Those positions aren't exactly things it will be able to act on at all in the near future. For right now democratic socialist reform is the name of the game and the reality of the situation on the ground. Idk maybe I'm just to much of a softie demsoc who just wants free healthcare and free college

Minty posted:

socdems and demsocs are radical positions in america

Becoming less and less radical by the second. Free college and healthcare by and large are popular with the electorate

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them
did the tea party have this dumb poo poo infighting

R. Mute
Jul 27, 2011

Agnosticnixie posted:

You know absolutely nothing if you think pointing our how shallowly modernist your human nature argument is was a primitivist position.
i didn't mention human nature. i mentioned primitivism because he didn't seem to distinguish between private and personal property, mentioned pre-history and seemingly seems to think socialism will cure crime or whatever? it's a position ive heard before but im not sure if that's what he's going for

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them
like seriously if you want to be an insurgent mass (without the money influx) thinking about how you can gently caress poo poo up short term is legit important

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015

bump_fn posted:

did the tea party have this dumb poo poo infighting

Less so but the tea party was well funded astroturfing and not a mashup of groups with 4-5 slightly competing variants of the same ideological family and a bunch of newcomers to the whole thing.

R. Mute
Jul 27, 2011

Venom Snake posted:

Idk maybe I'm just to much of a softie demsoc who just wants free healthcare and free college
that's a socdem, ya goof

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them

Agnosticnixie posted:

Less so but the tea party was well funded astroturfing and not a mashup of groups with 4-5 slightly competing variants of the same ideological family and a bunch of newcomers to the whole thing.

i know money isn't there but people need to understand the concept of timescales. like years v decades v centuries

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

R. Mute posted:

that's a socdem, ya goof

I mean I'm okay with massive restructuring of stuff like police and such it's just in the short term thats what I care about the most.

platzapS
Aug 4, 2007

Orlando DSA Statement on the issue

quote:

We, the undersigned, call on Danny Fetonte to resign from the National Political Committee for omitting his past work with the police union CLEAT from his candidate platform. As the police under capitalism exist to protect the rich, control the poor, and maintain white supremacy, many delegates would have voted differently had this information been disclosed.

If Danny Fetonte does not resign, we believe the NPC is within its rights to expel him for malfeasance as explained in Article VI, Section 5 of the national constitution. Orlando also urges that this issue not divide our organization by region, and we extend our sympathy and camaraderie to our friends in Austin.

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
Is there a school of socialism thats fine going for democratic reform but wouldn't be upset if the revolution happened tomorrow as well cause it would mean I wouldn't need to go to work

R. Mute
Jul 27, 2011

Venom Snake posted:

I mean I'm okay with massive restructuring of stuff like police and such it's just in the short term thats what I care about the most.
weren't you the most democrat democrat just like a year ago?

Minty
May 3, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

Venom Snake posted:

I mean I'm okay with massive restructuring of stuff like police and such it's just in the short term thats what I care about the most.

big goals (such as police / prison abolishment or end of capitalism) inform the small goals (police / prison reform and worker rights), and prevent a group from giving up after only obtaining those small goals

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

R. Mute posted:

weren't you the most democrat democrat just like a year ago?

I mean iv always been sympathetic to leftist stuff but I'm also 21 and what I knew about socialism was "the USSR had cool military stuff oh and economic reform is cool to I guess" up until a few months ago when my life got a very rude awakening

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them
remember that socialist "pragmatism" isn't centrist pragmatism by any stretch. socialists have an arc that isn't " get rich and die jerkin it"

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



R. Mute posted:

weren't you the most democrat democrat just like a year ago?

tbh looking at the uptick in membership i imagine that's like 90% of the org

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

quote:

Article VI. Officers and Staff
Section 5. Any officer may be recalled for nonfeasance or malfeasance by a two-thirds vote of all members of the NPC voting in person or by proxy.

I'm calling shenanigans.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Impermanent
Apr 1, 2010
let's not poo poo on newcomers to socialist theory and active socialism. it's good to come here from the dnc. I know I only started thinking about this stuff seriously when obama bailed out the banks.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply