Trump's twitter history is the Nostradamus of our time.
|
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 08:52 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:42 |
|
Jippa posted:I need some context. Sorry about your
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 09:09 |
|
After refusing to take any form of action for years the conservative Australian PM recently announced a 'voluntary non-binding postal plebiscite' on gay marriage, basically asking gay australians to beg from everyone else for the right to marry each other rather than putting it up for a parliamentary vote (where it would almost certainly win). Today Bill Shorten, the Australian opposition party leader finally stood up and gave a speech in parliament tearing apart the PM for his cowardice and saying the poo poo i've been screaming at my TV set since the gay marriage plebiscite was first announced last year. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-10/same-sex-marriage-labor-to-hold-pm-responsible-for-filth/8794580 It's bittersweet since the Labor party was in power for six years recently and flatly refused to hold a vote either - only growing some balls and standing up for marriage equality once they were in opposition.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 09:36 |
|
Slugnoid posted:After refusing to take any form of action for years the conservative Australian PM recently announced a 'voluntary non-binding postal plebiscite' on gay marriage, basically asking gay australians to beg from everyone else for the right to marry each other rather than putting it up for a parliamentary vote (where it would almost certainly win). What was Labor's excuse for those six years? I don't follow Aus. politics that closely.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 10:02 |
|
Volcott posted:What was Labor's excuse for those six years? I don't follow Aus. politics that closely. "We want to get votes from shitheads" I imagine the excuse was. Sadly, the Shithead demographic is fairly large in Australia.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 10:05 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:https://twitter.com/i/moments/895379101585883136 FYI, you can have one of your own shipped from Gina right now for just $350: https://www.aliexpress.com/wholesale?catId=0&initiative_id=SB_20170810011119&SearchText=trump+chicken mobby_6kl has a new favorite as of 10:25 on Aug 10, 2017 |
# ? Aug 10, 2017 10:14 |
|
mobby_6kl posted:FYI, you can have one of your shipped from Gina right now for just $350: poo poo..... I really want one of them.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 10:22 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:https://twitter.com/i/moments/895379101585883136 The last couple years would make a lot more sense if it turned out the president was just Chick Boo in disguise.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 10:31 |
|
Can't be true, wasn't Chicken Boo actually competent?
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 10:59 |
|
Oh poo poo, you're right. He was always the best at whatever job until he got found out. Okay, new plan, can we find a giant chicken and elect it president instead?
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 11:00 |
|
Skippy McPants posted:The last couple years would make a lot more sense if it turned out the president was just Chick Boo in disguise. It's been seven months.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 12:06 |
|
Duodecimal posted:It's been seven months. Trump [typing]: "And since I'd achieved all my goals as President in one year, there was no need for the rest of the term."
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 12:31 |
|
http://i.imgur.com/kMvE5OX.gifv
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 12:41 |
|
MariusLecter posted:Luckily only the police can do those things to you here in the US. No they can't. In the US, copyright bullshit is a civil matter.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 12:49 |
|
ugh its Troika posted:No they can't. In the US, copyright bullshit is a civil matter. The companies still can't come search your house
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 12:52 |
|
ugh its Troika posted:No they can't. In the US, copyright bullshit is a civil matter. Private search warrants have nothing to do with whether a matter is a criminal offense or not, but rather whether the private party can convince a judge that the individual is at risk of destroying evidence should they be served a standard warrant.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 12:59 |
|
That's some purestrain el classico schadenfreude, friend.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 15:23 |
|
ugh its Troika posted:No they can't. In the US, copyright bullshit is a civil matter. Nobody in the US can serve a search warrant except the cops. If a company sues you for civil copyright infringement, they can get a subpoena demanding you produce certain things. They can't just invade your property and search for those things themselves. A subpoena isn't a search warrant, and only officers of the government can serve search warrants. A company could send agents to break into your house and take your poo poo, just like a burglar can break into your house and take your poo poo, and it'd be just as illegal.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 15:43 |
|
Man Leaks New 'Power' Episodes Online, Records His Own Facequote:Smash-hit TV series Power is well into season four but impatient fans won't have to wait for the next three episodes. All have leaked onto the Internet having been obtained via a STARZ press portal. In a world first, the episodes were 'cammed' using a phone, while being played back on a phone, with the 'cammer' recording his own face for good measure. The 'camming', using a phone to record another phone, which has a broken screen: quote:If the whole situation isn’t bizarre enough so far, the episodes contain quite a bit of complaining from the ‘cammer’, mainly due to his arm aching from holding up the recording phone for such a long time. Someone is working hard to take the next step on the scene-ladder.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 16:22 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Just tell us the context then, I am sure you know it. How's this for context: Aerdan posted:
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 16:54 |
|
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 16:56 |
|
Pull up thread abort, abort
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 16:59 |
pulling up http://i.imgur.com/kxeRLZW.mp4
|
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:09 |
|
Sometimes I think things would be better if making GBS threads into someone's open mouth wasn't considered assault.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:09 |
http://i.imgur.com/xJunIVT.mp4
|
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:14 |
|
Phanatic posted:Nobody in the US can serve a search warrant except the cops. If a company sues you for civil copyright infringement, they can get a subpoena demanding you produce certain things. They can't just invade your property and search for those things themselves. A subpoena isn't a search warrant, and only officers of the government can serve search warrants.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:14 |
|
Toast Museum posted:I think what they were saying is that, not only can a company not obtain a warrant to search your property, the police aren't going to do it either for a copyright case. Uhhh, in the United States there is such a thing as Criminal Copyright Infringement and authorities do apply for and serve search warrants all the time for it.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:24 |
|
Volcott posted:What was Labor's excuse for those six years? I don't follow Aus. politics that closely.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:24 |
|
Glazier posted:Uhhh, in the United States there is such a thing as Criminal Copyright Infringement and authorities do apply for and serve search warrants all the time for it. I was only trying to clarify the other post's point as I understood it, since more than one person interpreted it differently than I think it was intended. I wasn't endorsing its content.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:40 |
|
Gunfreude
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:43 |
|
Toast Museum posted:I was only trying to clarify the other post's point as I understood it, since more than one person interpreted it differently than I think it was intended. I wasn't endorsing its content. Ah, gotcha
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:49 |
|
Pandas: too cute to die, too stupid to live.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 17:59 |
|
Donnie's been criticising McConnell for not working on a repeal for Obamacare while on vacation. There is some schadenfreude I can get behind.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 18:05 |
|
Phanatic posted:Nobody in the US can serve a search warrant except the cops. If a company sues you for civil copyright infringement, they can get a subpoena demanding you produce certain things. They can't just invade your property and search for those things themselves. A subpoena isn't a search warrant, and only officers of the government can serve search warrants. http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/09/02/iphone.5.prototype/index.html
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 18:11 |
|
If you consent to a search than anyone can search your stuff for any reason at all, anywhere in the world. That's what consent means.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 18:31 |
|
Phanatic posted:If you consent to a search than anyone can search your stuff for any reason at all, anywhere in the world. That's what consent means. To be fair it never said whether the first guy consented or not. Just that the second guy in the article did.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 18:53 |
|
http://i.imgur.com/R2l5idC.gifv
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 19:34 |
|
https://twitter.com/myARDOT/status/895357793007534080 That's a lot of frozen pizzas.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 20:08 |
|
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/893302579735691264
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 20:14 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:42 |
I'm really confused by how she's positioned in there.
|
|
# ? Aug 10, 2017 20:23 |