Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Which Thread Title shall we name this new thread?
This poll is closed.
Independence Day 2: Resturgeonce 44 21.36%
ScotPol - Unclustering this gently caress 19 9.22%
Trainspotting 2: Independence is my heroin 9 4.37%
Indyref II: Boris hosed a Dead Country 14 6.80%
ScotPol: Wings over Bullshit 8 3.88%
Independence 2: Cameron Lied, UK Died 24 11.65%
Scotpol IV: I Vow To Flee My Country 14 6.80%
ScotPol - A twice in a generation thread 17 8.25%
ScotPol - Where Everything's hosed Up and the Referendums Don't Matter 15 7.28%
ScotPol Thread: Dependence Referendum Incoming 2 0.97%
Indyref II: The Scottish Insturgeoncy 10 4.85%
ScotPol Thread: Act of European Union 5 2.43%
ScotPol - Like Game of Thrones only we wish we would all die 25 12.14%
Total: 206 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
JFairfax
Oct 23, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
I hate to be pedantic but a human being and fascio are basically the same thing, so it's rather inaccurate to have a sign proclaiming that faggots hate fascists

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Juliet Whisky
Jan 14, 2017

JFairfax posted:

I hate to be pedantic but a human being and fascio are basically the same thing, so it's rather inaccurate to have a sign proclaiming that faggots hate fascists

Today's teenagers are well-educated enough to have deployed this irony in their choice of slogan. See also the bundles of sticks piled outside Glasgow Sheriff Court earlier.

jre
Sep 2, 2011

To the cloud ?



Juliet Whisky posted:

To the second point -- you're confusing people who undoubtedly anticipated the possibility of arrest with a kid on their first Pride Parade who thought they were safe to express themselves in Glasgow. The 16-year-old was holding a placard well away from the protest at the commencement of the march.
Oh right, so we're suddenly not talking about the people lying in front of the march now because your realise how stupid that made you look.

So to be clear, your complaint is that police are anti lgbt because they arrested someone who had a banner with "faggots" on it ? at pride ?

quote:

direct action
No you see it's not breaking the law if we call it direct action and we should be able to what we want with no consequences, this of course only applies to us and not to people with views we disagree with.

Coohoolin
Aug 5, 2012

Oor Coohoolie.
hurrrrr the word "human being" is ALWAYS homophobic, even when being used positively in a reclamatory sense by an lgbt person themselves beep boop what is intent?

JFairfax
Oct 23, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
do we know if the police were acting on complaints?

Extreme0
Feb 28, 2013

I dance to the sweet tune of your failure so I'm never gonna stop fucking with you.

Continue to get confused and frustrated with me as I dance to your anger.

As I expect nothing more from ya you stupid runt!


I wonder what the online harassment was. I'm hoping it's stalkish behavior and not him being an rear end in a top hat/dumbass online considering the last time Police Scotland arrested someone for something stupid online was over the nazi pug video.

Pissflaps posted:

I'm not sure if that young man is ready to fight fascism if this encounter left him in tears.

I don't think people who are afraid or react being upset from confrontation should be out there fighting fascism to begin with. At least not physcially anyways.

JFairfax posted:

do we know if the police were acting on complaints?

That's what I'm wondering too. I'm also wondering what the first responce was to the anti-police signs and poo poo were and how long it took before the police/security decied to get physical.

Juliet Whisky
Jan 14, 2017

jre posted:

Oh right, so we're suddenly not talking about the people lying in front of the march now because your realise how stupid that made you look.

So to be clear, your complaint is that police are anti lgbt because they arrested someone who had a banner with "faggots" on it ? at pride ?

No you see it's not breaking the law if we call it direct action and we should be able to what we want with no consequences, this of course only applies to us and not to people with views we disagree with.

I've been checked by police for the content or positioning of banners several times and always been offered the opportunity to take correcive action (on threat of arrest).

On direct action, let's compare and contrast the Bairns not Bombs mass action at Faslane a couple of years ago: four hundred demonstrators, about half of whom took arrestable action. Thirty-odd arrests, everyone was released very quickly with none held overnight, three prosecutions followed, and I think two guilty pleas out of expediency and one case thrown out of court. That's for two hundred people doing much the same thing. I don't know that anyone was cuffed at all even though many of those arrested were using passive resistance, and the only complaints I remember against police stemmed from the Ministry of Defence refusing Police Scotland the use of their facilities.

That's the same force dealing with people doing much the same thing and more-or-less everyone was happy with the proceedings overall. I am going to be all controversial and suggest that the difference is that the anti-nuclear campaign is supported by all of civic society as well as the wider population in Scotland (and generally presents as middle-class), and that different rules apply for more marginalised groups with explicitly radical politics.

JFairfax posted:

do we know if the police were acting on complaints?

Yes, from the Pride organisers. For sure anyone offended could have gone over to register their concern -- one of my friends might have done so if we'd arrived a little earlier -- but instead it went straight to the police who weighed in with no notice or negotiation.

Juliet Whisky
Jan 14, 2017
Bathman speaks: according to him, "The alleged events relate entirely to some tweets from our Twitter account, none of which have been deleted and all of which are still publicly visible."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-41009988

Whether you hate him with patriotic zeal, faithfully repost his entire output with patriotic zeal, or just think he's the worst contributor to his own website, there is a possibility that someone who didn't gain satisfaction from Twitter's anti-harassment policy has tried their luck with the police instead as they slowly shrank etc. Of course, he could also be misrepresenting the allegations against him, and Twitter's anti-harassment policy is notoriously weak as gently caress.

I'm curious about the guy's history here; what was his handle? Sorry for scratching the thread's old wounds.

e: actually, maybe the vile cybernat horde is in at least some extent a real thing and WoS is being blamed for picking its targets. Wouldn't that be on the individuals who misbehaved though?

Juliet Whisky fucked around with this message at 17:25 on Aug 22, 2017

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames
He's never posted on SA AFAIK.

As you've mentioned it's not just what he's said personally, it's also the targeted harassment of a person by somebody using their large number of followers.

Not sure if that has any mileage legally of course but it is his MO.

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

jre posted:

:qq: pride is too mainstream say angsty teenagers :qq:

I see you're still a oval office.

Hoops
Aug 19, 2005


A Black Mark For Retarded Posting

jre posted:

So to be clear, your complaint is that police are anti lgbt because they arrested someone who had a banner with "faggots" on it ? at pride ?
Can you expand on what you mean here? Because as it reads on the face of it you've got this 100% wrong in an insane way.

jre
Sep 2, 2011

To the cloud ?



Hoops posted:

Can you expand on what you mean here? Because as it reads on the face of it you've got this 100% wrong in an insane way.

The police arrested the "antifa" 16 year old and charged him with homophobic breach of the peace because they (wrongly) thought his banner with "these faggots" on it was a protest against gay rights.

Juliet Whisky posted:

Both were thrown in the cells and charged with homophobically-aggravated breach of the peace;

So the police saw someone they they thought was a bigot with hate speech on a banner and arrested them.

3 other people tried to disrupt the march by running in front of it refusing to move, the police quite reasonably removed them.

Juliet Whisky is saying that this proves the police's burning hated of all lgbt people because .....

JFairfax
Oct 23, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
sounds like the idiot 16 year old should have had a sign saying 'This human being' not 'These Faggots' imho

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
gently caress the police imo.

Juliet Whisky
Jan 14, 2017

jre posted:

Juliet Whisky is saying that this proves the police's burning hated of all lgbt people because .....

I never said that. I suspect the police realised pretty quickly that they had hosed up in a heavy-duty way, and chose to deal with it by confounding possible civil consequences via giving a youngster an experience they'd rather forget and putting someone else on the defensive by charging him with resisting his own arrest, and obstructing the teenager's arrest, for an offence which they now concede didn't happen.

e: snatching kids from Pride, imprisoning them, and taking them to court is never going to be cool for anyone who cares about LGBT rights. Also the way the picket at the start of the parade was handled contrasts with my experience at other events, as described above.

Juliet Whisky fucked around with this message at 21:29 on Aug 22, 2017

jre
Sep 2, 2011

To the cloud ?



Juliet Whisky posted:

I never said that. .

Juliet Whisky posted:

(Pride began as a protest against police brutality), three persons from the Free Pride movement were arrested for peacefully being in the road as the Parade moved off. In return, the police showed that they too would like to go back to the good old days, tackling the protestors to the ground and locking them up for breach of the peace.

Juliet Whisky posted:

. I am going to be all controversial and suggest that the difference is that the anti-nuclear campaign is supported by all of civic society as well as the wider population in Scotland (and generally presents as middle-class), and that different rules apply for more marginalised groups with explicitly radical politics.

Juliet Whisky
Jan 14, 2017

jre posted:

things I said


I don't see why you think this is a contradiction. It's nice and all that you want to defend power against truth but your boss probably doesn't read these forums. If they do: this one will definitely work overtime, for nothing, for you!

Meanwhile I have nothing more on this for the moment, though other folk are running now the ball's been kicked.

The Hausu Usher
Feb 9, 2010

:spooky:
Screaming is the only useful thing that we can do.

I'm going to ask the polis to arrest the next Celtic fan who calls himself a fenian, then cheer on the po-po as they wade in and do my bidding in the name of anti-sectarianism. Looking forward to jre's support on this matter.

jre
Sep 2, 2011

To the cloud ?



BisonDollah posted:

I'm going to ask the polis to arrest the next Celtic fan who calls himself a fenian, then cheer on the po-po as they wade in and do my bidding in the name of anti-sectarianism. Looking forward to jre's support on this matter.

So to be clear, you also support accusing the police who were protecting the pride march of queer bashing ?
Because that's exactly what he did before he had go because it's after his bed time.

The Hausu Usher
Feb 9, 2010

:spooky:
Screaming is the only useful thing that we can do.

jre posted:

So to be clear, you also support accusing the police who were protecting the pride march of queer bashing ?
Because that's exactly what he did before he had go because it's after his bed time.

Sorry, not been really interested in the ins and outs of this particular argument in the SOMETHINGAWFUL FORUMS but saw you saying some stupid poo poo and thought I'd throw my oar in. Hope you take some time to have a wee rethink, if not, gently caress ye.

Juliet Whisky
Jan 14, 2017

jre posted:

queer bashing

Assuming you're posting from Scotland, you've just committed a similar offence to the one alleged against the young person you seemingly hate so much.

Anyway: what else is happening this week?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-41011648

Centrist government continues to demonstrate competence, apparently.

e: spelling

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames
Nationalists are furious about it.

jre
Sep 2, 2011

To the cloud ?



Juliet Whisky posted:

Assuming you're posting from Scotland, you've just committed a similar offence

I'd be interested to hear how you commit a breach of the peace by posting on a forum. To head off your inevitable stupid follow up, it really obviously doesn't breach the offensive communication act either.

quote:

to the one alleged against the young person you seemingly hate so much.

I don't have any animosity towards him, and he'll have learned a good lesson that
1. It's not a great idea to have a banner calling other people "these faggots"
2. If you are going to do that, the intent should be unambiguous enough for anyone to grasp

My problem is with idiots like yourself trivialising what people went through to get equality by comparing what the police did at the weekend to "the bad old days"

Pissflaps posted:

Nationalists are furious about it.

Quote this every day.

mehall
Aug 27, 2010


jre posted:

I'd be interested to hear how you commit a breach of the peace by posting on a forum. To head off your inevitable stupid follow up, it really obviously doesn't breach the offensive communication act either.


I don't have any animosity towards him, and he'll have learned a good lesson that
1. It's not a great idea to have a banner calling other people "these faggots"
2. If you are going to do that, the intent should be unambiguous enough for anyone to grasp

My problem is with idiots like yourself trivialising what people went through to get equality by comparing what the police did at the weekend to "the bad old days"


Quote this every day.

Oh goody.

I hadnt noticed you'd started posting in here as well as flaps.

Aramoro
Jun 1, 2012




mehall posted:

Oh goody.

I hadnt noticed you'd started posting in here as well as flaps.

Hes posted in this thread for years in its various guises. You're not very attentive if you've just noticed.

mehall
Aug 27, 2010


Aramoro posted:

Hes posted in this thread for years in its various guises. You're not very attentive if you've just noticed.

That's entirely fair tbh.

Coohoolin
Aug 5, 2012

Oor Coohoolie.
So does Corbyn not realise that Scots Law is a thing or does he just want to do away with it so that labour laws can be controlled from Westminster, in direct contradiction to the STUC's wishes?

Niric
Jul 23, 2008

Coohoolin posted:

So does Corbyn not realise that Scots Law is a thing or does he just want to do away with it so that labour laws can be controlled from Westminster, in direct contradiction to the STUC's wishes?

I take it you're referring to this article? Because you're leaving out a whole bunch of context:

quote:

In the question and answer session with members of the audience Mr Corbyn was asked whether the party would consider fine tuning its policies further in a federalist way to reflect the nations that voted remain in the EU referendum.

He replied: “We are thinking very hard about what forms devolution would take in the future. Devolution in Scotland has gone a long way.

“We are looking at the way we bring about genuine devolution and particularly economic devolution. Could you have a separate economic and legal system in different parts of the UK?

“I think that becomes difficult and very problematic. I want a Labour government that is going to legislate better working conditions for everybody across the UK.”

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


I think the Cybernat outrage is predictably tedious but it's a pretty poorly worded statement nonetheless.

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

Coohoolin posted:

So does Corbyn not realise that Scots Law is a thing or does he just want to do away with it so that labour laws can be controlled from Westminster, in direct contradiction to the STUC's wishes?

Pick one: full Communism imposed on Scotland from Westminster or eternal neo-liberal government in Holyrood.

Niric
Jul 23, 2008

Possibly of interest to some people here: “Identifying Dietary Differences Between Scotland and England: a Rapid Review of the Literature.” Surprisingly the words "deep fried mar bar" and "square sausage" don't appear. Less surprising are the conclusions, which, with qualifications, tend to back up certain long-held stereotypes and assumptions which I imagine everyone here would have probably guessed if asked, but valuable nonetheless. Essentially, Scotland has a poorer diet, on average, than England, and poor diet is linked to deprivation "In general, there were lower intakes of fruit and vegetables, vitamins and fibre in Scotland compared with England..... It is recognised that dietary quality is poorer in populations experiencing higher levels of deprivation. In addition, dietary differences exist with regard to age and gender"

Alertrelic
Apr 18, 2008

forkboy84 posted:

I think the Cybernat outrage is predictably tedious but it's a pretty poorly worded statement nonetheless.

Yeah, it's true that we have an entirely separate legal system with major differences in terms of its underlying logic and history, but it's not true that this actually presents a barrier to economic integration and growth in the way that regulatory barriers or divergence in immigration policy would. All of the big, important stuff is dealt with at the UK or EU level (which is kind of the point of independence).

Corbyn on Scotland always sounds either clumsy, or like he is repeating Scottish Labour line verbatim. Welsh Labour's tepid, centrist management of it's corner of the country is also unfortunate. The SNP are using it as a tool to attack him and it pretty much confirms that Dugdale et al would be governing us in the same way.

Leggsy
Apr 30, 2008

We'll take our chances...
Dugdale no more

https://twitter.com/jamesmatthewsky/status/902643940863696896

EDIT: Beeb has it now

https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/902646519156940800

Coohoolin
Aug 5, 2012

Oor Coohoolie.
Time for Skeletor's big return.

jre
Sep 2, 2011

To the cloud ?




How long was she leader for ? 2 years ?

TheHoodedClaw
Jul 26, 2008

jre posted:

How long was she leader for ? 2 years ?

Yeah, and a couple of weeks.

No great surprise she's stepping down, for a whole host of reasons. I wish her luck - her heart's in the right place.

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь
Take direct control Jeremy. We'll want a Scottish autonomous republic in the inevitable future Union of British Socialist Republics.

Angepain
Jul 13, 2012

what keeps happening to my clothes
well I wasn't expecting that now of all times, seems a bit out of nowhere

then again I guess there's not any elections coming up (that we know of, hurry up and collapse your govt plz theresa) so it kinda makes sense i guess

still i hope there's some idea in the party of who's willing/able to replace her and we're not up for another game of Depose The Current Leader Without Particularly Thinking It Through, I'd like to think there's someone somewhere in this countrylet with a plan that's at least half-baked

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



Welp, this is going to be fun!
Bets gentlemen?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


jre posted:

How long was she leader for ? 2 years ?

Yup, she was elected a few of weeks before Jeremy Corbyn was, the Scottish leadership election happened before the Corbyn campaign really had most of its momentum behind it so the result wasn't impacted by the surge in membership.

Wonder how much her resignation had to do with The Absolute Boy's recent trip up this way. Also wonder who is going to stand. Will Findlay run again? Alex Rowley? hosed if I know any other Labour MSPs. Well, The Graun's Scottish editor seems to think that "Corbynite" support will coalesce behind Anas Sarwar which is bewildering to me, but I'm not really plugged into Scottish Corbynite circles. And there's the simple reality that there's just a lower proportion of them in ScotLab compared to the rUK. Someone else has mentioned Richard Leonard who I'd honestly not heard of before. Maybe Scottish labour could merge with the Greens & just appoint Patrick Harvie as leader.

Also have to say, as much as I've disagreed with Kez's direction as leader, she really got shafted by Jim Murphy. What an absolute loving disaster for Scottish Labour he was. A one man hubris mountain.

https://twitter.com/St_Anderson38/status/902677814234808320

forkboy84 fucked around with this message at 00:53 on Aug 30, 2017

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply